Re: svn commit: r479498 - in /maven/continuum/trunk: ./ continuum-cc/ continuum-distributed/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-cc/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-distributed/ continuum-sandbox/continuum-update
On 27 Nov 06, at 3:48 AM 27 Nov 06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: It's isn't an old module but a not used module, so it should be in sandbox. That's not true, but as I told Brett I will work sync my stuff back into the sandbox and integrate it later. Jason. Emmanuel Jason van Zyl a écrit : continuum-distributed is not an old module, please put that one back. Jason. On 26 Nov 06, at 9:54 PM 26 Nov 06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: brett Date: Sun Nov 26 18:54:54 2006 New Revision: 479498 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=479498 Log: move old modules to the sandbox Added: maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-sandbox/continuum-cc/ - copied from r479496, maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-cc/ maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-sandbox/continuum-distributed/ - copied from r479496, maven/continuum/trunk/continuum- distributed/ maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-sandbox/continuum-updater/ - copied from r479496, maven/continuum/trunk/continuum- updater/ maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-sandbox/continuum-xfire/ - copied from r479496, maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-xfire/ Removed: maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-cc/ maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-distributed/ maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-updater/ maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-xfire/ Modified: maven/continuum/trunk/pom.xml Modified: maven/continuum/trunk/pom.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/continuum/trunk/pom.xml? view=diffrev=479498r1=479497r2=479498 == --- maven/continuum/trunk/pom.xml (original) +++ maven/continuum/trunk/pom.xml Sun Nov 26 18:54:54 2006 @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ modules modulecontinuum-api/module modulecontinuum-security/module -modulecontinuum-cc/module !-- modulecontinuum-core-it/module --!-- TODO RE- ADD it when continuum-plexus-application will be back -- modulecontinuum-core/module modulecontinuum-model/module @@ -92,7 +91,6 @@ modulecontinuum-rpc-client/module modulecontinuum-store/module modulecontinuum-test/module -!-- modulecontinuum-web/module -- !--Remove this when webapp will be ready and packaged as a plexus-application -- modulecontinuum-webapp/module modulecontinuum-xmlrpc/module modulecontinuum-release/module
Re: distributed continuum
On 25 Sep 06, at 1:44 AM 25 Sep 06, Brett Porter wrote: Cool bananas. Welcome David! Yah, I know from David that's it's been working for quite a while so I figured let David and Kevan work on it in the trunk where it will get some visibility and help. I'm sure that lots of people are going to be interested in this feature. Coupled with build parallelization and some staged commit capabilities this will be quite an amazing new feature. On 25/09/2006, at 7:37 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Howdy, As we discussed some time ago, I was going to check in the distributed continuum once it built and it does with trunk. So I checked it in so that David Blevins can help me with some tests. David now has access as we agreed some time ago. Jason. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: distributed continuum
yeah, finally we can get one continuum box to build windows native, other build unix native, and a central one package them together with Java main build. -D On 9/24/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 25 Sep 06, at 1:44 AM 25 Sep 06, Brett Porter wrote: Cool bananas. Welcome David! Yah, I know from David that's it's been working for quite a while so I figured let David and Kevan work on it in the trunk where it will get some visibility and help. I'm sure that lots of people are going to be interested in this feature. Coupled with build parallelization and some staged commit capabilities this will be quite an amazing new feature. On 25/09/2006, at 7:37 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Howdy, As we discussed some time ago, I was going to check in the distributed continuum once it built and it does with trunk. So I checked it in so that David Blevins can help me with some tests. David now has access as we agreed some time ago. Jason. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: distributed continuum
On Sep 24, 2006, at 11:41 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 25 Sep 06, at 1:44 AM 25 Sep 06, Brett Porter wrote: Cool bananas. Welcome David! Yah, I know from David that's it's been working for quite a while so I figured let David and Kevan work on it in the trunk where it will get some visibility and help. I'm sure that lots of people are going to be interested in this feature. Coupled with build parallelization and some staged commit capabilities this will be quite an amazing new feature. Thanks for the welcome guys. Going to try and get myself familiar with trunk again. Last time I looked at it heavily was Oct, Nov, Dec. Just off the top of my head, I know there's been tons of work in security and the webwork stuff. Do you guys think it's unreasonable to try and put up an install of Continuum trunk to run a few projects? Is trunk basically functional at this point? -David On 25/09/2006, at 7:37 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Howdy, As we discussed some time ago, I was going to check in the distributed continuum once it built and it does with trunk. So I checked it in so that David Blevins can help me with some tests. David now has access as we agreed some time ago. Jason. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: distributed continuum
On 26/09/2006, at 11:05 AM, David Blevins wrote: Do you guys think it's unreasonable to try and put up an install of Continuum trunk to run a few projects? Is trunk basically functional at this point? +1 to doing this on the zone. - Brett
RE: Distributed Continuum (GBuild)
Big +1 too. I've also been waiting for it, see http://tinyurl.com/42zc7 :-) Thanks -Vincent -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mercredi 22 mars 2006 22:13 To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Distributed Continuum (GBuild) +1. I've been really looking forward to it. Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, I have been talking with David Blevins about moving the GBuild code from Geronimo over to Continuum proper. GBuild is a version of Continuum that works in a distributed fashion. GBuild was created to test the Geronimo TCK across many different platforms with many different configurations and have the results all aggregated back on a master machine. So what I would like to propose is to move the code from GBuild over into Continuum proper and give David Blevins and Kevan Miller commit access. They are both committers on the Geronimo project and are familiar with this distributed code and will continue to work on the code once in Continuum. This is very exciting! Here's my +1 Jason van Zyl
Re: Distributed Continuum (GBuild)
Nice diagram! Minus javaspaces and JMS in it's place, that's pretty much what we've got. -David On Mar 24, 2006, at 8:49 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: Big +1 too. I've also been waiting for it, see http://tinyurl.com/ 42zc7 :-) Thanks -Vincent -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mercredi 22 mars 2006 22:13 To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Distributed Continuum (GBuild) +1. I've been really looking forward to it. Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, I have been talking with David Blevins about moving the GBuild code from Geronimo over to Continuum proper. GBuild is a version of Continuum that works in a distributed fashion. GBuild was created to test the Geronimo TCK across many different platforms with many different configurations and have the results all aggregated back on a master machine. So what I would like to propose is to move the code from GBuild over into Continuum proper and give David Blevins and Kevan Miller commit access. They are both committers on the Geronimo project and are familiar with this distributed code and will continue to work on the code once in Continuum. This is very exciting! Here's my +1 Jason van Zyl
Re: Distributed Continuum (GBuild)
+1 This is an important feature for Continuum. I can't wait to see it! -john Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, I have been talking with David Blevins about moving the GBuild code from Geronimo over to Continuum proper. GBuild is a version of Continuum that works in a distributed fashion. GBuild was created to test the Geronimo TCK across many different platforms with many different configurations and have the results all aggregated back on a master machine. So what I would like to propose is to move the code from GBuild over into Continuum proper and give David Blevins and Kevan Miller commit access. They are both committers on the Geronimo project and are familiar with this distributed code and will continue to work on the code once in Continuum. This is very exciting! Here's my +1 Jason van Zyl
Re: Distributed Continuum (GBuild)
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 14:01 -0800, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, I have been talking with David Blevins about moving the GBuild code from Geronimo over to Continuum proper. GBuild is a version of Continuum that works in a distributed fashion. GBuild was created to test the Geronimo TCK across many different platforms with many different configurations and have the results all aggregated back on a master machine. I've also talked a bit to David and read a fair bit of the code and think this is a very valuable addition to Continuum. So what I would like to propose is to move the code from GBuild over into Continuum proper and give David Blevins and Kevan Miller commit access. They are both committers on the Geronimo project and are familiar with this distributed code and will continue to work on the code once in Continuum. This is very exciting! Here's my And there's mine! +1 -- Trygve
