RE: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000?
Thanks you Emmanuel, I know enough. I will propose our team to migrate to Linux! -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 November 2007 08:35 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000? I don't have a windows 2000 to test. I have an instance there with more than 100 projects on win XP and it works fine and at ASF (http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/) an instance on Linux that works fine too. Emmanuel VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) a écrit : > We are very enthousiastic about Continuum. But Continuum on Windows > 2000 is in our configuration not stable. More or less every week an > instability occurs. Our configuration is plain and very > straightforward. We build 4 projects which takes about 10 minutes (3 > java projects and 1 web project). The schedule is every hour. There > are threads or processes remaining which are breaking the build of the > next hour. And thereofore we consider Continuum on Windows 2000 as not > stable. We did play with memory settings. It might be very well stable > on other platforms. In fact we are considering moving to Linux. The > question is, will that solve our problems? > > Erik van Ingen > > > > -Original Message- > From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 November 2007 14:18 > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Re: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000? > > > Continuum is stable, but the stability can depends on lot of things > (nb projects, schedule interval, build time average by project, > memory, > processor) > > Emmanuel > > VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) a écrit : >> Hi continuum, >> >> We are working fine with continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. The >> only annoying thing is that instability things keep happening like >> described below. The reason is that some java processes or threads of >> Continuum are remaining and locking resources. >> >> We don't want to upgrade to continuum 1.1-beta-4, unless it is >> resolving stability issues like below. Am I right to say that beta-4 >> in not improving the stability of Continuum? >> >> Kind Regards, >> Erik >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) >> Sent: 05 November 2007 09:24 >> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org >> Subject: Build Error: svn: Working copy '.' locked >> >> >> Hi continuum, >> >> We are using continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. It is working fine >> but today all of the sudden there is this message: >> >> * >> * >> ** >> Build Error: >> > ** > ** >> Provider message: The svn command failed. >> Command output: >> > -- > --- >> -- >> svn: Working copy '.' locked >> svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for > details) >> Type 'svn help' for usage. >> > -- > --- >> -- >> >> Does anyone have any idea how to solve this? >> >> Kind Regards, >> Erik van Ingen >> >> >
Re: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000?
I don't have a windows 2000 to test. I have an instance there with more than 100 projects on win XP and it works fine and at ASF (http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/) an instance on Linux that works fine too. Emmanuel VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) a écrit : We are very enthousiastic about Continuum. But Continuum on Windows 2000 is in our configuration not stable. More or less every week an instability occurs. Our configuration is plain and very straightforward. We build 4 projects which takes about 10 minutes (3 java projects and 1 web project). The schedule is every hour. There are threads or processes remaining which are breaking the build of the next hour. And thereofore we consider Continuum on Windows 2000 as not stable. We did play with memory settings. It might be very well stable on other platforms. In fact we are considering moving to Linux. The question is, will that solve our problems? Erik van Ingen -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 November 2007 14:18 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000? Continuum is stable, but the stability can depends on lot of things (nb projects, schedule interval, build time average by project, memory, processor) Emmanuel VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) a écrit : Hi continuum, We are working fine with continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. The only annoying thing is that instability things keep happening like described below. The reason is that some java processes or threads of Continuum are remaining and locking resources. We don't want to upgrade to continuum 1.1-beta-4, unless it is resolving stability issues like below. Am I right to say that beta-4 in not improving the stability of Continuum? Kind Regards, Erik -Original Message- From: VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) Sent: 05 November 2007 09:24 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Build Error: svn: Working copy '.' locked Hi continuum, We are using continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. It is working fine but today all of the sudden there is this message: ** ** Build Error: Provider message: The svn command failed. Command output: - -- svn: Working copy '.' locked svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for details) Type 'svn help' for usage. - -- Does anyone have any idea how to solve this? Kind Regards, Erik van Ingen
RE: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000?
We are very enthousiastic about Continuum. But Continuum on Windows 2000 is in our configuration not stable. More or less every week an instability occurs. Our configuration is plain and very straightforward. We build 4 projects which takes about 10 minutes (3 java projects and 1 web project). The schedule is every hour. There are threads or processes remaining which are breaking the build of the next hour. And thereofore we consider Continuum on Windows 2000 as not stable. We did play with memory settings. It might be very well stable on other platforms. In fact we are considering moving to Linux. The question is, will that solve our problems? Erik van Ingen -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 November 2007 14:18 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000? Continuum is stable, but the stability can depends on lot of things (nb projects, schedule interval, build time average by project, memory, processor) Emmanuel VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) a écrit : > Hi continuum, > > We are working fine with continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. The > only annoying thing is that instability things keep happening like > described below. The reason is that some java processes or threads of > Continuum are remaining and locking resources. > > We don't want to upgrade to continuum 1.1-beta-4, unless it is > resolving stability issues like below. Am I right to say that beta-4 > in not improving the stability of Continuum? > > Kind Regards, > Erik > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) > Sent: 05 November 2007 09:24 > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Build Error: svn: Working copy '.' locked > > > Hi continuum, > > We are using continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. It is working fine > but today all of the sudden there is this message: > > ** > ** > Build Error: > > Provider message: The svn command failed. > Command output: > - > -- > svn: Working copy '.' locked > svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for details) > Type 'svn help' for usage. > - > -- > > Does anyone have any idea how to solve this? > > Kind Regards, > Erik van Ingen > >
Re: continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000?
Continuum is stable, but the stability can depends on lot of things (nb projects, schedule interval, build time average by project, memory, processor) Emmanuel VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) a écrit : Hi continuum, We are working fine with continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. The only annoying thing is that instability things keep happening like described below. The reason is that some java processes or threads of Continuum are remaining and locking resources. We don't want to upgrade to continuum 1.1-beta-4, unless it is resolving stability issues like below. Am I right to say that beta-4 in not improving the stability of Continuum? Kind Regards, Erik -Original Message- From: VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) Sent: 05 November 2007 09:24 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Build Error: svn: Working copy '.' locked Hi continuum, We are using continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. It is working fine but today all of the sudden there is this message: Build Error: Provider message: The svn command failed. Command output: - -- svn: Working copy '.' locked svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for details) Type 'svn help' for usage. - -- Does anyone have any idea how to solve this? Kind Regards, Erik van Ingen
continuum 1.1-beta-4 on Windows 2000?
Hi continuum, We are working fine with continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. The only annoying thing is that instability things keep happening like described below. The reason is that some java processes or threads of Continuum are remaining and locking resources. We don't want to upgrade to continuum 1.1-beta-4, unless it is resolving stability issues like below. Am I right to say that beta-4 in not improving the stability of Continuum? Kind Regards, Erik -Original Message- From: VanIngen, Erik (ESTG) Sent: 05 November 2007 09:24 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Build Error: svn: Working copy '.' locked Hi continuum, We are using continuum 1.1-beta-3 on Windows 2000. It is working fine but today all of the sudden there is this message: Build Error: Provider message: The svn command failed. Command output: - -- svn: Working copy '.' locked svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for details) Type 'svn help' for usage. - -- Does anyone have any idea how to solve this? Kind Regards, Erik van Ingen
