RE: [Cooker] glibc pre4

2000-02-22 Thread geoffrey lee


hi,

oh...so you're the maintainer. ok, i'll make a mental note of that. ;-)


are you sure that 2.1.3-0.1mdk is pre4? i was able to get a (pretty) big
diff file ...

fyi, i got my pre4 from sourceware.cygnus.com , ftp protocol.

geoffrey lee (snail talk)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: Chmouel Boudjnah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 4:20 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Cooker] glibc pre4


 "geoffrey lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  hi,
 
  this si the new glibc spec and glibc pre4 patch that i made against
  glibc-2.1.3 0.1mdk.
 
  sorry, but i dunno who is the maintainer for glibc...

 humm sound like the version cvs was already a pre4.

 --
 MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] still no go on hd.img (another recent rsync)

2000-02-22 Thread Roger

on pqmagic5.0  dosutils  ptedit  menu= FAT32 Boot Record at sector 626598

1.  Jump EB5890

...what else?



On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, you wrote:
 On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Roger wrote:
 
  lol, i've got roughly 20 gb of data on it. ..unless i can borrow an extra 20gb
  drive from somebody??? lol
  
  no i did not have to use that s/w.  matter of fact all newer hdd's do not
  require that (or cannot even use it).  most of the hdd's or already preformat
 
 It isn't the drive but the bios that has the problems, that would require
 translation software. And _all_ maxtors come unformated and unpartitioned,
 btw. 
 
  anyways.  when partitioning, i just use partition magic.   never had this
 
 Thats the answer to your problem partition magic is hideing the partition
 most likely :)
 
  problem before.  i'm guessing (sigh, again) that it's probabely just because
  it's with the hd.imgprobabely something missing between it and the cdrom
  install iso.  (missing driver.not able to find the proper module settings
  etc...).  
  
  *remember!  this is a newer model hdd!
  
  all of my older hdd's are able to use the hd.img diskette.  go figure.
 
 try finding the "cylinder limit" jumper and enableing it also
-- 



Sent from:

Lattitude (deg):32.7130
Longitude (deg):-117.1530
Altitude (ft):  410.0
GMT to Local (hrs): -8.0 (daylight savings enabled)



Created with Linux-Mandrake 7.0!

http://www.linux-mandrake.com/

Currently Beta Testing Mandrake Ver 7.0



Re: [Cooker] still no go on hd.img (another recent rsync)

2000-02-22 Thread Roger

it just "sounds like" the hd.img is "itself" hiding the partition.

if, when installing from the iso cdrom (like now) it will infact pop up an
error stating something "cannot see hdd partition table" but i've found out
this has to do with an error someplace in one of the partitions for which i
solve by resizing each on to find the error thru pm5 (or ver. 4). pain in the
but process, but i don't feel like deleting 20 gb of data just to install
linux (no offense).

once this process is complete or i know there are now errors because the iso
cdrom (install process by using the cdrom install) can see the partition
tablehd.img will still fail to "see" the partitions.  

augghh...it would be s much faster to install via hdd instead of  burning
the cdrom...athough i should have a copy just incase

On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, you wrote:
 On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Roger wrote:
 
  lol, i've got roughly 20 gb of data on it. ..unless i can borrow an extra 20gb
  drive from somebody??? lol
  
  no i did not have to use that s/w.  matter of fact all newer hdd's do not
  require that (or cannot even use it).  most of the hdd's or already preformat
 
 It isn't the drive but the bios that has the problems, that would require
 translation software. And _all_ maxtors come unformated and unpartitioned,
 btw. 
 
  anyways.  when partitioning, i just use partition magic.   never had this
 
 Thats the answer to your problem partition magic is hideing the partition
 most likely :)
 
  problem before.  i'm guessing (sigh, again) that it's probabely just because
  it's with the hd.imgprobabely something missing between it and the cdrom
  install iso.  (missing driver.not able to find the proper module settings
  etc...).  
  
  *remember!  this is a newer model hdd!
  
  all of my older hdd's are able to use the hd.img diskette.  go figure.
 
 try finding the "cylinder limit" jumper and enableing it also
-- 



Sent from:

Lattitude (deg):32.7130
Longitude (deg):-117.1530
Altitude (ft):  410.0
GMT to Local (hrs): -8.0 (daylight savings enabled)



Created with Linux-Mandrake 7.0!

http://www.linux-mandrake.com/

Currently Beta Testing Mandrake Ver 7.0



Re: [Cooker] File not found:/var/tmp/a2ps-root/usr/share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/

2000-02-22 Thread Pablo Saratxaga

Kaixo!

On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 04:47:32PM +0100, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:

 I've also noticed that my alpha sys does:
 checking for catalogs to be installed...  ru_RU
 
 while my intel sys does:
 checking for catalogs to be installed...
 
 How do I get my intel sys to install catalogs?

unset LINGUAS

(and remove the line from /etc/sysconfig/i18n)

The problem is that rpm used that variable to know which language catalogs
to install (for rpm packages using %lang macros); but then it conflicts
with building trought ./configure ... :-\

In the future, rpm will be patched to use a variable of its own, 
called RPM_INSTALL_LANG, and LINGUAS won't be used anymore.
 
 Stefan

-- 
Ki ça vos våye bén,
Pablo Saratxaga

http://www.ping.be/~pin19314/   PGP Key available, key ID: 0x8F0E4975



[Cooker] Re: spec-helper

2000-02-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell

from the quill of Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Starting  from  rpm-3.0.4-0.2mdk,  the  spec-helper  package  must  be
 installed as a dependency of the rpm-build package.

[ snip ]

 The goal is to have vendor neutral spec files.

Woohoo!  I love it.  At one of my consulting gigs we use RPM on Solaris
exclusively to install aftermarkeet software.  A lot of times I will
start the build process with either a RH but usually a Mandrake
SRPM/spec file.  I always wind up removing the bzipping of man pages
(Solaris' man doesn't know bzip2).

But more than that, at this location, we use a "prefix" of /usr/local
rather that /usr as it is mandated that all "aftermarket" software be
placed in /usr/local.  Along with the "spec-helper" initiative can we
mandate the use of %{_prefix} (or define another macro, if you like, at
the top of all spec files) anywhere /usr is being used?

 Example:
 
 %files
 /usr/man/man1/alias.1*

How about:

%{_prefix}/man/man1/alias.1*

Thots?

b.


--
Brian J. Murrell  InterLinx Support Services, Inc.
North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX
Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD



Re: [Cooker] Re[2]: libgtop-1.1.5-0.1mdk

2000-02-22 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote:

 from the quill of Axalon Bloodstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
  
  well yeah libgtop won't install..
 
 And things that need libgtop won't work because 1.1.3 will not be
 installed either.

Um no, you asked what to remove, i said libgtop assumeing you'd take the
older one from say Air ;)
 
  No. First off I never said to use nodeps.
 
 No you didn't.  Somebody else did though.  Did not mean to infer you
 did, sorry.
 
  You want to install it along
  side of the older version, breaking as little as posible in the mean
  time.
 
 Why even bother though?  Why not wait for the rest (i.e. the dependant)
 of the packages to catch up?

Why do you/we update everyday? because you/we can. 

With the two libgtop and the new libgtop-devel you can run all the old
stuff and anything you build will link with the newer lib. So this way
your s**t works, you can rebuild anything new, and I don't get razzed
every few hours about where the f**k the relinked packages are while i
wait for the rest of the GUAD(uhh something ;) stuff to be released

  If you use nodeps you do not get told about the missing file
  (tracking it down now) in libgtop-1.1.5-0.1mdk
  (libgtop_sysdeps-1.1.so.5),
  it would be pretty much useless
 
 OK, another problem with it.  :-)

Uhmm no only problem with it. and i kinda spaced it out till i read
this, got distracted hacking voodoo_vid :), let me go find the right vt
and get that finished to make the above true =)



Re: [Cooker] Re: spec-helper

2000-02-22 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

"Brian J. Murrell" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 But more than that, at this location, we use a "prefix" of /usr/local
 rather that /usr as it is mandated that all "aftermarket" software be
 placed in /usr/local.  Along with the "spec-helper" initiative can we
 mandate the use of %{_prefix} (or define another macro, if you like, at
 the top of all spec files) anywhere /usr is being used?

Yes, most of our package support the prefix.

 How about:
 %{_prefix}/man/man1/alias.1*

No %{prefix} for a local variable.

%{_prefix} should be specified only on the tag Prefix :

Prefix: %{_prefix}

-- 
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
 --Chmouel



Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.3mdk

2000-02-22 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

"David Odin (aka DindinX)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

You've included /usr/doc/rpm-3.0.4/manual/Makefile,
 /usr/doc/rpm-3.0.4/manual/Makefile.in and
 /usr/doc/rpm-3.0.4/manual/Makefile.am
I don't think these files should be there :)

my mistake, i upload a fix.

-- 
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
 --Chmouel



Re: [Cooker] still no go on hd.img (another recent rsync)

2000-02-22 Thread Roger

also, just burned iso2 of 7.0 and the problem with the install not seeing the
partition table is solved.as previously stated, the reason for iso2 of 7.0
of course.

so this appears, again, specific to the hd.img (diskette) again.


On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, you wrote:
 On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Roger wrote:
 
  lol, i've got roughly 20 gb of data on it. ..unless i can borrow an extra 20gb
  drive from somebody??? lol
  
  no i did not have to use that s/w.  matter of fact all newer hdd's do not
  require that (or cannot even use it).  most of the hdd's or already preformat
 
 It isn't the drive but the bios that has the problems, that would require
 translation software. And _all_ maxtors come unformated and unpartitioned,
 btw. 
 
  anyways.  when partitioning, i just use partition magic.   never had this
 
 Thats the answer to your problem partition magic is hideing the partition
 most likely :)
 
  problem before.  i'm guessing (sigh, again) that it's probabely just because
  it's with the hd.imgprobabely something missing between it and the cdrom
  install iso.  (missing driver.not able to find the proper module settings
  etc...).  
  
  *remember!  this is a newer model hdd!
  
  all of my older hdd's are able to use the hd.img diskette.  go figure.
 
 try finding the "cylinder limit" jumper and enableing it also
-- 



Sent from:

Lattitude (deg):32.7130
Longitude (deg):-117.1530
Altitude (ft):  410.0
GMT to Local (hrs): -8.0 (daylight savings enabled)



Created with Linux-Mandrake 7.0!

http://www.linux-mandrake.com/

Currently Beta Testing Mandrake Ver 7.0



[Cooker] wooo- problem with iso2 7.0????

2000-02-22 Thread Roger

error oping security policy file /ur/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy

during installing packages on install.

think it's as soon as the install installs the 2nd or 3rd package of teh full
install.



Re: [Cooker] wooo- problem with iso2 7.0????

2000-02-22 Thread Pixel

Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 error oping security policy file /ur/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy

it doesn't matter, does it ?



Re: [Cooker] wooo- problem with iso2 7.0????

2000-02-22 Thread kallador

i get that same problem
- Original Message -
From: "Pixel" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] wooo- problem with iso2 7.0


 Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  error oping security policy file
/ur/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy

 it doesn't matter, does it ?



Re: [Cooker] wooo- problem with iso2 7.0???? --please ignore my thread.

2000-02-22 Thread Roger

sorry guysget a mess of p script errors also...think it's a bad d/l of the
iso!  as such am now d/l'ing a new iso.  burned it in win98...figuress 

cdrecord was acting up in linux was using my rsync'd system and that's why
it's acting up i thinkscsi-ide.

just go ahead and ignore this thread.

i'll repost after buring another image if this is still persistanttoo bad i
could use the hd.img diskette eh? eh??  would be easier to install since i've
got the files already on a directory of my /home.  of course it's on a local
net and recently did a net install using it.


On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, you wrote:
 error oping security policy file /ur/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy
 
 during installing packages on install.
 
 think it's as soon as the install installs the 2nd or 3rd package of teh full
 install.
-- 



Sent from:

Lattitude (deg):32.7130
Longitude (deg):-117.1530
Altitude (ft):  410.0
GMT to Local (hrs): -8.0 (daylight savings enabled)



Created with Linux-Mandrake 7.0!

http://www.linux-mandrake.com/

Currently Beta Testing Mandrake Ver 7.0



[Cooker] xfree86 pre 4.0 is out

2000-02-22 Thread Roger

they also stated final release will occur in march 2000.

snapshot is out tho'.
www.xfree86.org



Re: [Cooker] wooo- problem with iso2 7.0????

2000-02-22 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On 23 Feb 2000, Pixel wrote:

 Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  error oping security policy file /ur/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy
 
 it doesn't matter, does it ?

It should use defaults. and i thought that said "warning" in the message 

-- 
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



Re: [Cooker] glibc pre4

2000-02-22 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

"geoffrey lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 are you sure that 2.1.3-0.1mdk is pre4? i was able to get a (pretty) big
 diff file ...
 fyi, i got my pre4 from sourceware.cygnus.com , ftp protocol.

strange i see only a ChangeLog difference between them, anyway the
last glibc don't go we still have problems with some headers and won't
be fix until pre5.

-- 
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
 --Chmouel



[Cooker] Using RPM

2000-02-22 Thread John Cavan

Hi all,

Just a quick question, is there a way to tell RPM to skip over arbitrary
stages beyond that documented in the man pages? The --short-circuit flag
supposedly only works with -bc and -bi and I would like to be able to do
this with -bb and -ba so I don't have to keep rebuilding a tree as I
progress through testing the stages...

John



Re: [Cooker] Using RPM

2000-02-22 Thread Frederic Lepied

John Cavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi all,
 
 Just a quick question, is there a way to tell RPM to skip over arbitrary
 stages beyond that documented in the man pages? The --short-circuit flag
 supposedly only works with -bc and -bi and I would like to be able to do
 this with -bb and -ba so I don't have to keep rebuilding a tree as I
 progress through testing the stages...
 
The version of rpm shipped with Linux-Mandrake is modified to allow it.

Enjoy.
-- 
Fred - May the source be with you



Re: [Cooker] xfree86 pre 4.0 is out

2000-02-22 Thread Frederic Lepied

Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 they also stated final release will occur in march 2000.
 
 snapshot is out tho'.
 www.xfree86.org
 
I'm packaging it.
-- 
Fred - May the source be with you



[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] spec-helper-0.1-3mdk

2000-02-22 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Merde j'ai oublié de te demandé, j'espere que ca te derange pas ?

bad chmouel, forget to remove Cc:, (bad) translation :

Shit i have forget to ask you, it doen't annoy you, right ?

  --Chmouel