[Cooker] samba and startup.bat
Can anyone help here? I want my fileserver to be a login controller for a fleet of win98 machines. All I want is when the users log in in the morning to their machines the fileserver sends the file startup.bat which contains this command: net use x: \\fileserver\group mapping x drive to the group folder on the fileserver. This script lives in /home/netlogon/scripts/ I can run the startup.bat file by hand and it works perfectly. For some reason it does not automatically. Here is my smb.conf any thoughts would be appreciated. #=== Global Settings = [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = LordandMaster printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 security = user password level = 8 username level = 8 encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 local master = yes os level = 66 domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes dns proxy = no map to guest = never null passwords = no add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -s /bin/false -g popusers -c "smb account %u" %u delete user script = /usr/sbin/deluser %u dead time = 0 debug level = 9 logon path = \\fileserver\netlogon logon home = \\fileserver\netlogon logon script = scripts\startup.bat wins support = no preserve case = no case sensitive = no short preserve case = no # Share Definitions == [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes public = no only user = no # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = yes public = yes share modes = yes [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no public = no writable = no printable = yes [Group] comment = Forms, notices software etc path = /home/samba/Group public = yes writable = yes printable = no create mask = 0777 [Production] comment = Production Files path = /home/samba/Production public = yes writable = yes printable = no create mask = 0777 [Devel] comment = Devel Files path = /home/samba/Devel public = yes writable = yes printable = no create mask = 0777 [Content] comment = Content Group Files path = /home/samba/Content public = yes writable = yes printable = no create mask = 0777 [Admin] comment = Admin Group path = /home/samba/Admin public = yes writable = yes printable = no create mask = 0777 [Databases] comment = Databases path = /home/samba/Databases public = yes writable = yes printable = no create mask = 0777 [Finance] comment = Financials - private path = /home/samba/Finance valid users = bmiles mahendrat dominique patrickd public = yes writable = yes printable = no create mask = 0777 [LostandFound] comment = Junk to be removed path = /home/samba/lostandfound public = yes writable = yes printable = no create mask = 0777
[Cooker] OpenGL
I have a Voodoo3 2000 card, and I have it working perfectly with Quake3. Is this setup (latest cooker Mesa + 3Dfx drivers) supposed to transparently accelerate (which is not happening) any X windows OpenGL application like the GL screensavers that come with xscreensaver? Do I need to recompile or does the app. need to be re-writen to use glide instead of OpenGL? I understood that there where sort of a Mesa-Glide libraries that uses Mesa to present a OpenGL interface between OpenGL apps and the native Glide lang. of the board? Is this possible? How do I do it? -- Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE Linux Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] XFree86-3.3.6-8mdk
On Sun, 05 Mar 2000, you wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: XFree86 Distribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 3.3.6 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 8mdk Build Date: Mon Mar 06 00:16:14 2000 > Install date: (not installed) Build Host: kenobi.mandrakesoft.com > Group : System/XFree86Source RPM: (none) > Size: 40608966 > Packager: Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Summary : Part of the XFree86 implementation of the X Window System. > Description : > If you want to install the X Window System (TM) on > your machine, you'll need to install XFree86. > > * Mon Mar 06 2000 Frederic Lepied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3.3.6-8mdk > > - merged patches from Redhat. > - enabled i810 support. > - split libfont on its own package. > - don't hardcode the search path for libraries. spliting the libfont did't make the upgrade too easy, All the XFree packages were complaining about the libfont.so.1, but the XFree86-libfont-3.3.6-8mdk.i586.rpm wouldn't install, it was collaiding with XFree86-lib-3.3.6-7mdk, until I forced it. After that the rpm --freshen XF* worked fine.
Re: [Cooker] How 'bout a directory with just spec files?
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Countless times I would like to look into a spec file to see if the > resulting binary RPM is going to do/be what I want. It just sucks to > have to download a whole source RPM (thinking of the kernel here) just to > see what the spec file is going to do when it's possible that the binary > RPM will be just what I want. > > Can we have the spec files in their own directory for easy retrieval? > You can already access them by the CVS server of cooker. The module is SPECS/ or contrib-SPECS/. Each module contains the spec file and the patches. -- Fred - May the source be with you
RE: [Cooker] Re[2]: More preventable spam (was Re:UNLIMITED Long Distance?)
Nope, it wouldn't. The message would just be filtered, i.e. not sent out to everyone on the planet. As we all know the procedure to leave the list is NOT by sending "unsubscribe" to the list so why not just filter out these inane messages from the lists. Anyhow, this thread is probably stretching the patience of our co-cookers so we should probably drop it until the next flood of deluded unsubscribers. Cheers: Michael Perry. R&D. Dep. Netafim Magal. <<<>>> > -Original Message- > From: Guy T. Rice [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tue 07 March 2000 5:01 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Cooker] Re[2]: More preventable spam (was Re:UNLIMITED > Long Distance?) > > On Mon, 06 Mar 2000, Mike Perry wrote: > > I might also suggest that any message sent to any of the > > mandrake lists that contains the word "unsubscribe" be filtered, > > that would certainly save a hell of a lot of bandwidth! :-) > > Wouldn't that include this message? I'd hate to be unsubscribed > for it...
[Cooker] How 'bout a directory with just spec files?
Countless times I would like to look into a spec file to see if the resulting binary RPM is going to do/be what I want. It just sucks to have to download a whole source RPM (thinking of the kernel here) just to see what the spec file is going to do when it's possible that the binary RPM will be just what I want. Can we have the spec files in their own directory for easy retrieval? b. -- Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc. North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
RE: [Cooker] Re[2]: More preventable spam (was Re:UNLIMITED Long Distance?)
On Mon, 06 Mar 2000, Mike Perry wrote: > I might also suggest that any message sent to any of the > mandrake lists that contains the word "unsubscribe" be filtered, > that would certainly save a hell of a lot of bandwidth! :-) Wouldn't that include this message? I'd hate to be unsubscribed for it...
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kernel-2.2.15-0.11mdk
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --=-=-= > Name: kernel Distribution: Linux-Mandrake > Version : 2.2.15Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 0.11mdk Build Date: Mon Mar 06 16:46:06 2000 This kernel should work perfectly, only the emu10k1.o should not work. -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com Pasadena, CA USA --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] Intel 810 Chipset
Dalton Calford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks, > > Is their any way to just apply the agpgart.c files to the current Mandrake 7 > kernel without using the newer patches? > (on another note, is there a central place to see the differences between the > Mandrake kernels and the linus/ac kernels?) humm get the src.rpm and see how much patch there is. -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com Pasadena, CA USA --Chmouel
[Cooker] Slashdot | Interviews | Question to Jean-loup Gailly
Hi everybody! wanna ask a question to Jean-Loup? Jean-Loup is our CTO (responsible for the Linux-Mandrake distribution) and he has nothing to hide about Mandrake! Do you want a proof? Ask him everything right-now on Slashdot: http://slashdot.org/interviews/00/03/06/0840249.shtml Greets, Gaël.
Re: [Cooker] Intel 810 Chipset
Thanks, Is their any way to just apply the agpgart.c files to the current Mandrake 7 kernel without using the newer patches? (on another note, is there a central place to see the differences between the Mandrake kernels and the linus/ac kernels?) best regards Dalton Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > Dalton Calford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thanks Pixel, > > > > I will download the source to the kernel and compile/install it. > > When you refer to the kernel, do you mean the 2.2.15-.08 or the 2.2.14-3mdk? > > 2.2.15-10mdk not here right now wait tonight. > > -- > MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com > Pasadena, CA USA --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] Intel 810 Chipset
Dalton Calford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks Pixel, > > I will download the source to the kernel and compile/install it. > When you refer to the kernel, do you mean the 2.2.15-.08 or the 2.2.14-3mdk? 2.2.15-10mdk not here right now wait tonight. -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com Pasadena, CA USA --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] Intel 810 Chipset
Dalton Calford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks Pixel, > > I will download the source to the kernel and compile/install it. > When you refer to the kernel, do you mean the 2.2.15-.08 or the 2.2.14-3mdk? i mean kernel-2.2.15-0.9mdk, 0.8mdk is buggy. the 0.9mdk works quite nicely, you *just* have to correct the path from /lib/modules/0.5.3-0.9mdk to /lib/modules/2.2.15-0.9mdk
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nmh-1.0.3-1mdk
Jerome Dumonteil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Tue Jan 18 2000 Jerome Dumonteil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > - fix preun last check Humm the changelog should be : * Mon Mar 6 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.0.3-1mdk - 1.0.3 (security update). -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com Pasadena, CA USA --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] Intel 810 Chipset
Thanks Pixel, I will download the source to the kernel and compile/install it. When you refer to the kernel, do you mean the 2.2.15-.08 or the 2.2.14-3mdk? Thanks in advance Dalton Calford
Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.2.15-0.9mdk modules?
Eugenio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package "kernel-2.2.15-0.9mdk" creates the modules in a weird dir: > > "/lib/modules/0.5.3-0.9mdk/" > > How could that happen? bad chmouel > I just moved it to ".2.15-0.9mdk and it works well. i finish to test the kernel and upload a new one. -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com Pasadena, CA USA --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] Intel 810 Chipset
Dalton Calford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for your response, > > > cooker should work with i810 now. > > What RPM's do I need to upgrade a plain vanillia Mandrake 7.0 install to one that > supports the 810 chipset? > I do not want a complete cooker install due to the fact that I would prefer a stable > configuration vs a development version for the majority of the workstations. kernel and XFree (3.9)
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk
Camille Begnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Shouldn't be hackrpm-3.0.4-5mdk.rpm then? no because the rpm-3.0.4 is the current version and less buggy than rpm-3.0.3, hackWHATEVER is here only when you want to provide two set of rpm one stable and one developement. -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com Pasadena, CA USA --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] Intel 810 Chipset
Thanks for your response, > cooker should work with i810 now. What RPM's do I need to upgrade a plain vanillia Mandrake 7.0 install to one that supports the 810 chipset? I do not want a complete cooker install due to the fact that I would prefer a stable configuration vs a development version for the majority of the workstations. > > have a look in mandrake's contribs, fred has put them What is the ftp address of the contribs? I was looking at the website and I must have missed the section for contributed units. thanks in advance Dalton Calford Pixel wrote: > Dalton Calford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I am installing Mandrake 7 on a new system but it uses the Intel 810 chipset. > > I understand that I must install the agpgart.o module and make some other system > > changes. > > Has anyone done this and got it working? Is there a RPM for this? > > cooker should work with i810 now. > > [...] > > > (I would like to try out XFree86 version 4 but I am having problems with the > > imake - anyone have a set of 3.9.18 rpms that work with Mandrake 7?) > > have a look in mandrake's contribs, fred has put them
Re: [Cooker] Intel 810 Chipset
Dalton Calford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am installing Mandrake 7 on a new system but it uses the Intel 810 chipset. > I understand that I must install the agpgart.o module and make some other system > changes. > Has anyone done this and got it working? Is there a RPM for this? cooker should work with i810 now. [...] > (I would like to try out XFree86 version 4 but I am having problems with the > imake - anyone have a set of 3.9.18 rpms that work with Mandrake 7?) have a look in mandrake's contribs, fred has put them
[Cooker] Intel 810 Chipset
I am installing Mandrake 7 on a new system but it uses the Intel 810 chipset. I understand that I must install the agpgart.o module and make some other system changes. Has anyone done this and got it working? Is there a RPM for this? I downloaded the driver from the Intel site and followed the directions but, the make install fails (although make alone does work) and although I follow the steps manually, the system does not set up X correctly. Any help would be appreciated. (I would like to try out XFree86 version 4 but I am having problems with the imake - anyone have a set of 3.9.18 rpms that work with Mandrake 7?) thanks in advance Dalton Calford
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk
geoffrey lee wrote: > > hi, > > coz rpm 3.0.4 is in alpha/beta. can't remember which. it was like glibc > pre4 a while ago. it had 0.1mdk. Shouldn't be hackrpm-3.0.4-5mdk.rpm then? > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Camille Begnis > > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 9:22 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk > > > > > > Pablo Saratxaga wrote: > > > > > > --=-=-= > > > Name: rpm Distribution: Mandrake > > > Version : 3.0.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > > > Release : 0.5mdkBuild Date: Mon Mar > > 06 05:56:46 2000 > > > > I just noticed, why a decimal release number? > > (To be added in mdk-rpm...) > > > > Thanks, Camille. > >
[Cooker] Does rpmfind.net not mirror "updates" or are they just not there?
I am patiently awaiting some "official" (i.e. non-cooker) updates for 7.0. I usually use rpmfind.net as my mirror but I do not see any updates there. I would expect to see at least the security update for MySQL that came out recently. Does rpmfind.net just not mirror the updates or are they not being issued? I asked this a few days ago but it would seem that the issue was dropped. If there are security updates we need them folks! We also need official releases as installing "cooker" components on a production system just doesn't fly. Thanx, b. -- Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc. North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
Re: [Cooker] Samba / LinuxConf / inetd - Dependency Problem
Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Samba adds the "swat" service to /etc/inetd.conf without checking if the > inetd package (netkit-base) is installed. This gives the user the false > impression that "swat" should be working. > LinuxConf adds the "linuxconf" service to /etc/inetd.conf without checking > if the inetd package (netkit-base) is installed. This gives the user the > false impression that "linuxconf" should be working. > The inetd package (netkit-base) installs without merging changes with the > existing /etc/inetd.conf. If it does not find one, it creates it with the > default services. If it finds one, it creates a inetd.rpmsave. If for some > reason LinuxConf or Samba are installed before netkit-base, the only two > services that will be active are "linuxconf" and "swat", because netkit-base > will see an existing inetd.conf and not overwrite it. This means that > telnet and FTP are not working. > This was noticed in Red Hat 6.1. I am not aware if this is an issue in > Mandrake 7 or not, I thought I'd pass it along just in case it is. > Considering how similiar Red Hat and Mandrake are, I figured the possibility > would be high that it is present in both distributions. Yes we are affected, thanks i'll fix this. > I do not have permission to use the person's name who found this. If she > wants credit, I'm more than happy to give it to her. She did find it, I tell her she did a good job. -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com Pasadena, CA USA --Chmouel
[Cooker] Re: junkbuster-2.0.2-1mdk (fwd)
Did anything get fixed with this? How about a new rpm with the fixes? > Forwarded message from "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from the quill of Lenny Cartier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [Contrib-RPM] > > --=-=-= > Name: junkbuster Distribution: Mandrake > Version : 2.0.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 1mdk Build Date: Thu Mar 02 10:40:41 2000 Broken. Startup script does: su - nobody -c '/usr/sbin/junkbuster /etc/junkbuster/config' & But /var/log/junkbuster is installed with permissions: [root@pc junkbuster]# rpm -qlv junkbuster ... drwxr--r-- root root 4096 Mar 2 08:40 /var/log/junkbuster ... There is no way a process started with "su - nobody" is going to be able to write into that log dir unless it was setuid root which would be silly of course. :-) b. -- Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc. North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD << End forwarded message -- Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc. North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
[Cooker] New kernel rpm coming soon?
Are we going to see (a) new kernel rpm(s) coming soon with the modules directory naming blooper fixed? Chemoul: How did you make out with freeswan? Is it in the master kernel specfile? Did it all work out as expected? Is there anything you need me to do? b. -- Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc. North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
RE: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk
hi, coz rpm 3.0.4 is in alpha/beta. can't remember which. it was like glibc pre4 a while ago. it had 0.1mdk. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Camille Begnis > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 9:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk > > > Pablo Saratxaga wrote: > > > > --=-=-= > > Name: rpm Distribution: Mandrake > > Version : 3.0.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > > Release : 0.5mdkBuild Date: Mon Mar > 06 05:56:46 2000 > > I just noticed, why a decimal release number? > (To be added in mdk-rpm...) > > Thanks, Camille. >
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk
Pablo Saratxaga wrote: > > --=-=-= > Name: rpm Distribution: Mandrake > Version : 3.0.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 0.5mdkBuild Date: Mon Mar 06 05:56:46 2000 I just noticed, why a decimal release number? (To be added in mdk-rpm...) Thanks, Camille.
Re: [Cooker] what happend to advancedextranet.com
> Can you point me to the URL of that package? Check dans les contrib de redhat ex: ftp.valinux.com ou ftp.redhat.com - Original Message - From: "Jean-Michel Dault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hakan Tandogan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2000 9:27 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] what happend to advancedextranet.com > > On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Hakan Tandogan wrote: > > > > My boxes have glibc-2.1.2-8mdk and run the blackdown-JDK 1.2.2-rc4 > > perfectly. They would even run the SUN/Inprise 1.2.2-fcs (or whatever they call > > it now), but I found the blackdown port to be more stable on my particular work > > load. I must admit that I didn't check the 1.1-ports (like the IBM 1.1.8) > > because my software absolutely needs 1.2.2 features. > > Thanks for the reply. I will try the blackdown JDK. > > > > > If you package jserv, could you base your RPMs on the > > ApacheJServ-1.1-2rpm? It contains an important bug fix that was introduced > > after 1.1 was packaged. > > Can you point me to the URL of that package? > > Jean-Michel Dault > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Regards, > > Hakan > > > > -- > > Hakan Tandogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature" > > >
Re: [Cooker] Re: More preventable spam (was Re:UNLIMITED Long Distance?)
On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, frank wrote: > i've gotta hang with brian on this...not that it's that difficult to delete the > spam, but the folks at mandrake ought at least give him the common courtesy of > an answer... I don't know why anyone else didn't see this, but Pixel already mailed saying they had taken measures to prevent more spam from reaching the list. Now, until another spam reaches the list I beleive this thread should end to allow us to concentrte on more productive activity. -dws
RE: [Cooker] Re[2]: More preventable spam (was Re:UNLIMITED Long Distance?)
I might also suggest that any message sent to any of the mandrake lists that contains the word "unsubscribe" be filtered, that would certainly save a hell of a lot of bandwidth! :-) Cheers: Michael Perry. R&D. Dep. Netafim Magal. <<<>>> > Which I (we) have gotten. It would seem that posting to the list has > been closed to subscribers only. It's not the measures I was suggesting > but should do the trick all the same. > > Derek need not thank me for all of my "bitching" now that his mailbox > will be less "spamful", just not having it in *my* mailbox is all the > thanks I need. :-) > > b. > > > -- > Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, > Inc. > North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 > UNIX > Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
[Cooker] Re[2]: More preventable spam (was Re:UNLIMITED Long Distance?)
from the quill of frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <00030521404700.10481@[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > i've gotta hang with brian on this...not that it's that difficult to > delete the > spam, but the folks at mandrake ought at least give him the common > courtesy of > an answer... Which I (we) have gotten. It would seem that posting to the list has been closed to subscribers only. It's not the measures I was suggesting but should do the trick all the same. Derek need not thank me for all of my "bitching" now that his mailbox will be less "spamful", just not having it in *my* mailbox is all the thanks I need. :-) b. -- Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc. North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
Re: [Cooker] new gimp
geoffrey lee wrote: > > hi, > > gimp 1.1.18 (that's the devel version, in the contrib) is now up on hum.. didn't we already put this version in contrib ? > ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming as src rpm. > > changed: > new version > renamed to hackgimp since this is devel version don't do this. I disagree on hack* naming as it make updates not easy. Or at least, put a 'provides: gimp' line. But install of mdk8'll have to know that gimp-1.2.x has to remove hackgimp... > changed the build root... What is the interest? -- www.linux-mandrake.com somewhere between the playstation and the craystation Thierry
