[Cooker] Proposal: rpmdrake/Mandrake Update

2002-08-12 Thread David Grant

To Mandrake Users and Developers,

I propose that the old rpmdrake be salvaged from wherever it is now, and 
it can be called rpmdrake.  The new stuff should be a new piece of 
software, and I think that perhaps it should be combined with whatever 
used to be called "Mandrake Update" to form a new "Mandrake Update2" 
(with enhancements).  "Mandrake Update" was always sort of a rinky-dink 
thing anyways, sort of a copy of Redhat's update utility, great for 
newbie's who want to update a few packages from Mandrake's 
Updates/Errata directory on the mirrors, but sort of limited for 
medium-to-power users.  It could benefit from a few extra features, and 
still remain easy to use for newbie users.  If what I propose is done, 
there will be 2 pieces of software:

1) rpmdrake: a full-featured front-end to urpmi/rpm/whatever, just like 
the rpmdrake that shipped with 8.2

2) Mandrake Update: the same old Mandrake Update PLUS an "Install New 
Software" section which allows newbies to install any software from 
their CDs, and allows them to select a mirror if they are adventurous 
enough (which they can do through the "Add Sources" area).  It will also 
allow them to remove software through the "Remove Software" section.  Of 
course these 4 options will all be accessible with large pretty-looking 
buttons in a single main-frame GUI.  Clicking on one of the 4 buttons 
will open a new panel/dialog.  This is an alternative to have 4 menu 
entries.

If you don't feel like making a formal reply to this, please reply with 
+1 in the first line of the body if you think this is a good idea, or a 
-1 in the first line of the body if you think this is a bad idea for 
whatever reason.  (This is used frequently on OpenOffice mailing lists 
and I find it works quite well in some cases).

Cheers,
David Grant





Re: [Cooker] Ugly and nonergonomic rpmdrake !!!

2002-08-12 Thread David Grant

I know.  I just thought it was funny that you called someone who is 
using Mandrake a "Windows" user.

Scott Rainaldo wrote:

>Referring to my previous "Windoze" comment, I was
>talking about potential Windoze->(Mandrake)Linux 
>converts.
>
>
>---- Begin Original Message 
>
>From: David Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:15:14 -0700
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Cooker] Ugly and nonergonomic
>rpmdrake !!!
>
>
>
>
>Scott Rainaldo wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Windoze users would assume that the 
>>application crashed.
>>
>>
>>
>I didn't know that rpmdrake was ported to Windows?  =)
>  
>





Re: [Cooker] Ugly and nonergonomic rpmdrake !!!

2002-08-12 Thread David Grant



Scott Rainaldo wrote:

>Windoze users would assume that the 
>application crashed.
>
I didn't know that rpmdrake was ported to Windows?  =)

>Not 
>to be antagonistic, but it would be nice to see 
>some kind of explanation for the interface  
>"enhancements" to the new rpmdrake. 
>
I originally assumed that it was an early, early beta to the new 
rpmdrake, and that some other features had actually been re-written, but 
just hadn't been integrated in yet.  It's just a GUI issue, I'm sure 
that all the old functionality is still there underneath.  Or perhaps it 
was a complete re-write, in which case I would assume that they are 
still working to re-write parts of the code, but didn't have time to get 
it all done for 9.0beta2.





Re: [Cooker] Ugly and nonergonomic rpmdrake !!!

2002-08-12 Thread David Grant

I am not sure I understand what you mean here.  Why would you want 
cancel removals if they will cause conflicts?  And if don't mind risking 
a conflict, you should be using rpm, not urpmi.

Tom Whiting wrote:

>There SHOULD be an option to cancel existing removals (ie: your package 
>will involve xxx other packages being removed)
>






Re: [Cooker] Ugly and nonergonomic rpmdrake !!!

2002-08-12 Thread David Grant

I sort of agree, although my criticism of the new version is not so 
harsh.  Simplicity is always better, although not at the sacrifice of 
necessary features.  My main points:

1) The ability to search through titles or descriptions should be 
brought back
2) All the facilities of rpmdrake should be accessible from one GUI, not 
4 (!!!) menu entries!
3) When installing/removing packages, once a certain package is 
selected, it should be shown in a list, so that the user knows which 
packages are currently selected for installation/removal.
4) It should be possible to remove and install packages simultaneously, 
just like in the old rpmdrake.
5) BUG: rpmdrake closes right away after installing a package.  Expected 
behaviour: it should stay open, in case you want to install some more.

Please lets add on to this list, telling developers exactly what we 
liked about the old rpmdrake, and provide developers with some clear and 
precise things to improve upon in the new one.

David Grant


Mircea Ciocan wrote:

>  OK, I could live without the breezecom driver but today I updated 
> cooker fron Saturday and saw what becomed of rpmdrake, and with all 
> due respect for the coders is a steaming pile of sh..t, please explain 
> to a guy who LOVED the the 8.1/8.2 style, why for God sake was 
> necessary to butcher such a nice and functional utility and transform 
> it in such a nonfunctional garbage 
>  I mean those ridicolus dialogs, the imposibility of setting your own 
> mirror, the butt ugly presentation of packages and so on, was anybody 
> complainig that the previous incarnation was to good or what ???
>  I really can explain why was necesary to destroy on of the strongest 
> points of selling of that distribution and endlessly confuse ordinary 
> people converted to Linux that started to undersand to like it.
> Even more, is that the old interface available somewhere, could it 
> be possible to have an old style rpm or what contribution or lobby is 
> necesarry to revert to the old and nice style of rpmdrake, I have a 
> strong feeling that I'm not the only one who wants back the old and 
> nice interface.
>
> Mircea C.
>
> P.S. On a side note cooker insalled flawlessly on my crappy Dell 
> Latitude and it works very well, also the today update made via urpmi 
> --auto-select ( sniff, snifff ;)
>
>
>






[Cooker] upgrade 8.2-9.0

2002-08-12 Thread David Grant

Hi,

I have a general question about upgrading from MDK 8.2 to 9.0.  Is is 
possible to do an upgrade package-by-package manually?  I tried doing 
this from 8.1->8.2 but I had lots of libpng dependancy problems, so I 
did a clean install.  I could just do the upgrade option in the 
installer but I like having control.

I currently have KDE3 installed in /opt/kde3 with the non-cooker 
packages which were meant to be compatible with KDE2.

I'm just wondering if there would be any major roadblocks ahead, similar 
to the libpng problems I had before.  I would be easy to get around 
those dependancy problems by the way...just symlink to the new libpng 
and use the --force option...but I don't like tricking rpm.

Thanks,
David Grant





Re: [Cooker] 9.0 Suggestion: More themes

2002-08-11 Thread David Grant

Texstar makes RPMs, and he made a liquid-mosfet RPM for Mandrake 8.2. 
 At least I think it was him.  He also made a Keramik RPM.  They are 
located at:

ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/contrib/texstar/Mandrake-8.2

His website is:

http://www.pclinuxonline.com

My suggestion is that you beg him to build his RPMs for Mandrake 9.0. 
 It would be a simple change, basically just changing references from 
/opt/kde3 to /usr


David Grant


Jure Repinc wrote:

> Hello all
>
> I know you have more important work to do but I see a lot of users on 
> the internet asking for more themes included for window managers. For 
> example a lot are asking for Mosfet Liquid and Keramik for KDE. And I 
> agree with them as these two are some of the best themes ever. Maybe 
> you can hae someone create special Mandrake theme for WMs. For usuall 
> users it is very important how their desktop looks and i am sure they 
> would appreciate visual eye candy included into the distribution.
>






[Cooker] Bug in CD-Rom Mount Point in Control Centre

2002-08-11 Thread David Grant

To reproduce:
 From fresh 9.0beta2 install,
Go to Mandrake control center
Click on CD Burner moint point
Click on options and then OK
Click on "User", then okay.
It freezes

However, if instead of just clicking on "User", you click on "User" AND 
click on "supermount", it does not freeze.

David Grant





[Cooker] General comments and some bugs

2002-08-10 Thread David Grant

Wow, the install of 9.0beta2 was simpler than it has ever been before. 
 I especially like the new XFree86 setup.  Just a couple coments:

1) My network card is sort of detected twice.  It's probably not 
detected twice, but from the GUI dialogs that pop up, it seems like it 
is.  The message I get is:

"Found National Semi | DP83810 10/100 Ethernet network/main interfaces. 
 Do you have another one?"

When I click "no", the same question comes up again.  I press "no" 
again, and then finally the installer moves on...

BTW, this has been around since 8.1 I think.  Can be very confusing for 
a new user, and makes an experienced user scratch their head a bit too.

2) For the language selection screen, there is something that has come 
to annoy me after installing Mandrake about 20 times since 8.0:
Can we just have one list for users to select the languages, and then 
allow the user to select their default?

3) During the first boot, and every boot thereafter, I get a "FAILED" 
(in red letters) message on the F1 virtual terminal/screen, but when I 
press F4, F12, F11, or whatever, there is no failed there?  All I see is 
"OK" (in green letters).  And on the F1 screen it doesn't even really 
show what caused the FAILED, because there is nothing written directly 
to the left of the FAILED.

4) Can the KDE defaults be made a little nicer?  This has always been 
annoying to me.  For example can we increase the default mouse 
accceleration to 4x?  How about making the icons in the Panel larger? 
 This is changed in KDE Control Center -> LookNFeel -> Panel-> Position 
-> Size.  I think that "small" is so butt-ugly, and medium is much 
better.  Can we also add more default icons to the desktop?  Like how 
about putting rpmdrake on the desktop?

5) Complaints/bugs about rpmdrake:
-About rpmdrake, every time I install a package, it exits after 
installing a package.
-How can I search via description or name?  there is no option to toggle 
this as before
-How do I know which packages I've selected for installing so far?
-Why do we have 4 menu entries for rpmdrake derivatives?
-Why not have one central GUI like before?  I don't see what was so 
wrong with the old rpmdrake that you had to change it.

6) Harddrake bug
-Harddrake fails on boot up.  In /var/log/boot.log it says "harddrake:  
failed "
-When you click on a device in the scrollpane, the scrollpane 
automatically jumps to the top of the list, while leaving the 
just-clicked item selected.  Very annoying.

Thanks for a great install though!  And most things I've tried so far 
work great.  (I like the new Mozilla fonts package!)

David Grant





Re: [Cooker] Ogg vorbis in 9.0 vs. 8.2

2002-08-10 Thread David Grant

Good news, ogg vorbis seems to work in 9.0b2.  Thanks to whoever fixed 
something from 8.2->9.0





[Cooker] Noatun doesn't start in 9.0b2

2002-08-10 Thread David Grant

I am using kdemultimedia-3.0.2-4mdk and noatun crashes when I try to run 
it.  The backtrace is:

0x411615e9 in wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
#0  0x411615e9 in wait4 () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
#1  0x411dd340 in sys_sigabbrev () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
#2  0x40fa0a73 in waitpid () from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
#3  0x40730815 in KCrash::defaultCrashHandler(int) (sig=11) at 
kcrash.cpp:224

I'm not sure if this helps.  I'm using CD1 from MDK-9.0b2, and I 
installed kdemultimedia from the hawaii cooker ftp site.

David Grant





Re: [Cooker] Cooker as of 22/06/2002 pressing F1 more options oninstall CD

2002-08-10 Thread David Grant

I'm also seeing this blue-ish screen, although you could also describe 
it as grey-ish.  I tried blindly typing "linux" and hitting enter, but 
that didn't work.  I may have typed in it wrong though.

David Grant


Max Bernard wrote:

>I've also seen the "blue-screen-after-hitting-F1" problem.  However, blindly
>typing
>"rescue" and hitting  has worked both times I've tried it.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Charlie M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 11:07 AM
>Subject: Re: [Cooker] Cooker as of 22/06/2002 pressing F1 more options on
>install CD
>
>
>  
>
>>On Friday 09 August 2002 05:17 am, John J. Allen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Pressing F1 more options on install CD, just produces a nice blue
>>>  
>>>
>screen.
>  
>
>>For me also. I 've read about 'grey' screens from others. Mine was a very
>>
>>
>pale
>  
>
>>lavender-blue color.
>>
>>
>>






Re: [Cooker] ADSL feature request

2002-08-09 Thread David Grant

I thought there already was this feature in the Networking part of the 
Mandrake control center?  If I am wrong then this would definitely be a 
cool feature.  I usually just do "ifconfig eth0 down, ifconfig eth0 up" 
at the command prompt for my DHCP connection



Florent BERANGER wrote:

>   Hi,
>
>it will be very cool if we'll have an "auto-reconnect"
>option for ADSL (and other ?) connection configuration.
>Thanks to take a look to it,
>
>  Florent
>--
>Pendant tout l'été, le modem ADSL Tiscali est gratuit.
>Profitez en pour passer au Haut Débit !
>Cliquez ici, http://register.tiscali.fr/adsl/
>Offre soumise à conditions.
>
>
>
>
>  
>






Re: [Cooker] Ogg vorbis in 9.0 vs. 8.2

2002-08-09 Thread David Grant

No, I was using all the MDK 8.2 packages, which are all ogg-vorbis 
1.0rc3 for encoding and playback.  Sorry, I think I'll stop posting for 
now, until I actually try 9.0beta2 tonight.  I just wanted to get a feel 
for what success people are having with the ogg packages in 9.0 before I 
try it tonight.  I try it right out of the box and see what happens.

Danny Tholen wrote:

>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I noticed that some old oggs do not play with 1.0. Maybe that is what causing these 
>failures.
>They are probably encoded by an earlier version, which might be slightly 
>incompatible. For people
>who do not hear sound: Try encoding a file with the 1.0 version and try playing that.
>
>  
>






Re: [Cooker] Ogg vorbis in 9.0 vs. 8.2

2002-08-09 Thread David Grant



Jason Wood wrote:

>On Friday 09 Aug 2002 7:35 pm, Brook Humphrey wrote:
>  
>
>>Well I didn'try encodeing but xmms plays mp3 just fine ogg doesn't play. So
>>playback is broke.
>>
>>
>
>When I start xmms from the shell, I get this error message :
>
>/usr/lib/libvorbisfile.so.3: undefined symbol: vorbis_synthesis_trackonly
>
>which I assume is a likely candidate for why ogg support isn't working at the 
>moment.
>
I think you should tell us which version of Mandrake and which xmms and 
vorbis rpms you are using.  







Re: [Cooker] Ogg vorbis in 9.0 vs. 8.2

2002-08-09 Thread David Grant



Brook Humphrey wrote:

>On Friday 09 August 2002 11:16 am, David Grant wrote:
>  
>
>Well I didn'try encodeing but xmms plays mp3 just fine ogg doesn't play. So 
>playback is broke.
>  
>
Yeah, when I was tring to playback ogg files, they would just keep 
repeating about a 1 second clip, kind of a like a broken record.





Re: [Cooker] Ogg vorbis in 9.0 vs. 8.2

2002-08-09 Thread David Grant



Brook Humphrey wrote:

>On Friday 09 August 2002 10:37 am, David Grant wrote:
>  
>
>>Just curious, has anyone tested the ogg vorbis stuff in Mandrake
>>9.0beta1 or 2?  Mine doesn't work in 8.2, and I couldn't upgrade the ogg
>>and vorbis rpms, because there are many other dependancy issues, the
>>most annoying being a kde dependancy, which I didn't feel like breaking.
>> I know the package structure changed a bit from ogg-vorbis 1.0rc3 to
>>1.0.  If no one can confirm that ogg vorbis works well in 9.0beta, then
>>I can test it extensively.  In fact I'm downloading the isos right now,
>>so I'll be able to check myself later tonight.  But I just wanted to
>>find out if anyone and any luck or lack thereof with ogg vorbis in MDK
>>9.0 before I start testing tonight.
>>
>>D. Grant
>>
>>
>Just tried it in beta 1 and it is still broke.
>  
>
Which part of it is broke for you?  For me, it was the playback that was 
broken.  Whether I used xmms or noatun, it never worked, which means it 
must be ogg-vorbis that was causing the problem.  I also thought maybe 
it was just the Mandrake packages there were broken, because I heard 
from some other people with different distros whose ogg-vorbis worked 
fine.  So I think the MDK packages are messed up.  Can anyone confirm or 
deny this?





[Cooker] Ogg vorbis in 9.0 vs. 8.2

2002-08-09 Thread David Grant

Just curious, has anyone tested the ogg vorbis stuff in Mandrake 
9.0beta1 or 2?  Mine doesn't work in 8.2, and I couldn't upgrade the ogg 
and vorbis rpms, because there are many other dependancy issues, the 
most annoying being a kde dependancy, which I didn't feel like breaking. 
 I know the package structure changed a bit from ogg-vorbis 1.0rc3 to 
1.0.  If no one can confirm that ogg vorbis works well in 9.0beta, then 
I can test it extensively.  In fact I'm downloading the isos right now, 
so I'll be able to check myself later tonight.  But I just wanted to 
find out if anyone and any luck or lack thereof with ogg vorbis in MDK 
9.0 before I start testing tonight.

D. Grant





[Cooker] urpmi and webfetch

2002-03-16 Thread David Grant

Why does urpmi require webfetch?  Webfetch is not even available as an 
rpm in the primary Cooker mirror.  And it has no listing whatesoever on 
rpmfind.net?  If this dependancy it wrong, can we have it removed, or if 
webfetch is in fact required, can we add it to the cooker?

Thanks,
David

p.s. Please send replies to e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thanks