[Cooker] problems running ut2003demo2206
I'm not sure if this is a problem with UT or Mandrake so here goes.
I get the following error messages when I attempt to run ut2003demo
[20] ./ut2003-bin(main+0x328c) [0x8058b2c]
[21] /lib/i686/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc7) [0x40ba07f7]
[22] ./ut2003-bin(GetFullName__C7UObjectPw+0x7d) [0x80512d1]
Signal: SIGSEGV [segmentation fault]
Aborting.
The following is output from strace:
munmap(0x46aaf000, 16384) = 0
munmap(0x46ab3000, 16384) = 0
munmap(0x43a55000, 16384) = 0
munmap(0x43a53000, 8192)= 0
munmap(0x448b7000, 33554432)= 0
fstat64(102, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0666, st_rdev=makedev(226, 0), ...}) = 0
fstat64(102, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0666, st_rdev=makedev(226, 0), ...}) = 0
close(102) = 0
write(6, \16\2\0\0\0\300\2+\n\1\0, 12) = 12
read(6, 0xbfffa9e0, 32) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
select(7, [6], NULL, NULL, NULL)= 1 (in [6])
read(6, \1\1\322\0\0\0\0\0\\0 \2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0p-\267..., 32) = 32
shutdown(6, 2 /* send and receive */) = 0
close(6)= 0
time(NULL) = 1048552107
write(3, disabled\nUninitialized: Log fil..., 67) = 67
close(3)= 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
write(5, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]..., 148) =
148
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, NULL, [SEGV RTMIN], 8) = 0
rt_sigsuspend([SEGV] unfinished ...
--- SIGRTMIN (Unknown signal 32) @ 0 (0) ---
... rt_sigsuspend resumed ) = -1 EINTR (Interrupted system call)
sigreturn() = ? (mask now [SEGV RTMIN])
wait4(2429, NULL, __WCLONE, NULL) = 2429
munmap(0x416f, 4096)= 0
exit_group(1) = ?
[Cooker] cooker install failed
rsync'ed cooker on sat 04 nov. Tried to do expert update and got past selecting kernel/security options and then got the following.. deplist.ordered mismatch against hdlist files ask_from_list : empty list /usr/bin/perl-instal/interactive.pm line 114, line 7
[Cooker] Win some Lose some
Finally thought we were getting past the Walmart/Macmillian/Mandrake7.2 debacle and then I had to go and check out slashdot today.
Re: [Cooker] I am puzzled by people's behaviour...
On Wednesday 01 November 2000 05:08, you wrote: Well, nice start for a Wednesday morning, mailbox full of shity emails from *not very nice so called disatisfied* customer and frankly I am disgusted by their behaviour. Ok, the final 7.2 version you bought is missing some updates present in the downloadable version and you think you are screwed... fair enough but why so much anger towards the guys at Mdk? Some Individuals are being nasty about it but not all of us. Some times people read emotions into emails that are not there. If any of the developers feel I was attacking them I heartedly apologize as this was never my intent. What is so difficult in using Mdk-update to get your installation updated with the packages from the Mdk 7.2 download edition? Do you need a university degree to do that? Does it ruin your day because you have to download a few megabytes of data? What is your pbm? 1. Sorry but as a end user I feel that KDE 1.99 was not adequate for release. 2. Did you read the email from the russian MandrakeUser? That clearly explains some of the problems with expecting buyers to update after purchase. I accept Mandrake's reasons for letting Macmillian release RC1 as Mandrake 7.2, but I just wished to express my feelings that I felt it could have been done differently. The guys at Mandrake go out of their way to provide everybody with a great linux distro, they listen to all of us when we bitch about packages missing or when we ask them to package more programs and so on. And you know what, they do it because they're a nice bunch of developers dedicated to linux and its success. As a matter of fact, they also need to bring the bacon back home so to speak and for that very valid reason they also need to make money and sell their stuff. They wish to sell their stuff and I am more than willing to buy it. But I won't purchase what Macmillian packages. Nor will I recommend that others do so. Is it not productive to inform Mandrake of why? I greatly appreciate what they have done in producing such a quality distro, but there is always room for improvement, and I feel that marketing of the distro is one such area. I know that comparing them to M$ was a bit harsh and I have not done this. Here is the feeling though; Mandrakesoft had the option to release 1.99 and meet a marketing deadline or wait for 2.0 and hit a quality assurance target (Ok they felt that 1.99 met this. I will accept that explanation). It still leaves the impression that Mandrake was more interested in a revenue maximising marketing deadline rather than qaulity. This may indeed be unfounded but that is the appeareance. I understand the fact that the developers want to be paid and I will be sending them money. I hope this helps to explain some of the dissatisfaction with Macmillian's Mandrake7.2. As for the blatant trolls with the nasty comments; ignore them.
Re: [Cooker] I am puzzled by people's behaviour...
On Wednesday 01 November 2000 16:39, you wrote: On 1 Nov 2000, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So sprach Pixel am Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 12:48:45PM +0100: - name the updated-7.2 7.2.1, but marketing people don't accept this. Ah! Finally a reason why the download version is also dubbed 7.2. Although I disagree with the reason (I always disagree with marketing people :]), I can understand it! They are right, they say that if we use two different names, people in the shops would require the newest one, which the shop would be unable to provide. Not necessarily; label the box as "7.2RC1" or whatever, and add a little "sticker" on the cover art boasting "Includes free online upgrade to 7.2 Final!". I know everyone wants to let this die including me but... Marketing would never let Mandrake label the box as 7.2RC1 as that would never sell. So lets label it 7.2 with a little card containing the fine print inside the box. Please think about this for a few minutes. Please cut some slack to those of us trying to point this out. We really are trying to help and not just trolling. That's an unsolvable problem, I think. Not entirely. The product they are selling is NOT "7.2", and shouldn't be sold as such. Just print the truth... James.
Re: [Cooker] Sad state of pre-releasing to consumers
On Monday 30 October 2000 14:14, you wrote: Jason Straight [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1. We has to put out this version due to very tight time schedule: WalMart doesn't want any new products on the shelves from 1st of november, until mid january. Is this really that important to MandrakeSoft? Don't get caught up in allowing Walmart to dictate the terms. What is more important stable release or Nov 1st target. If Walmart won't take it past a given date, politely remind them about how well the product is selling at Staples. (Yes lie, make up imaginary sales figures, whatever). As the end buyer of your product, I don't want to see the crap that is being sold as Mandrake. I have installed Mandrake for 4 friends and would like to have them purchase the boxed set and send some money back to MandrakeSoft. I can not do this in good faith knowing what crap comes in that Macmillian box. Fortunately the download version does not have this limitation and holds the updates to 2.0, that are also available in download for retail customers. 2. You had bad experience with it because you apparently purchased the "beginner" version that prices $25. We have removed plenty of "expert" things in it and that's what pissed you off, that's normal. Wasn't there the "PowerPack Deluxe" also available on sales? How about another pricing plan here? Direct sale from MandrakeSoft on new versions. I want to start installing Mandrake on computer's for friends and family but I have no need of the limitations of the "beginners" boxed set, nor the price tag of "deluxe". I would rather make my own ISO and work out a direct payment plan to MandrakeSoft. Yes believe it or not, some of us want to send some money your way, but that Macmillian crap doesn't cut it.
Re: [Cooker] ssh: end of discussion: MS make the right decision ?
O If it's such a problem for you, you know how to turn it off yourself. Or turn it on yourself
Re: [Cooker] unsubscribe
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, you wrote: please remove me from the subscriptiuon list.thank you for all the help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dude I generally try to be resaonable and relaxed but sending yellow fucking pages is a good way to get your email added to every annoying spam list in the known universe. Learn a little netiqette jack ass
[Cooker] KDE2 quicklauncher
Has anyone else found that the quicklauncher applet doesn't remember user added applications between sessions? I logout with restore session but they are still not remembered. I have attempted to trace the pid but this is of course worthless as they die during logout ; ) I can't make any sense of the output anyway.
[Cooker] who is actually working?!!!!
Word to all the Mandrake developers. DELETE THAT STAROFFICE SOURCE CODE AND GET BACK TO WORK ON 7.2 I KNOW WHAT YOUR DOING Just kidding guys, I couldn't resist though so please forgive me.
[Cooker] publishing--kfractal?
why is a fractal generator under publishing in the menu?
[Cooker] netscape/gnome save directory?
Saving files in netscape under a gnome desktop results in files being saved to .gnome-desktop. Isn't saving files to a hidden directroy a bit confusing, particularly for newbies?
Re: [Cooker] MandrakeUpdate/ Not working
MandrakeUpdate has completely quit working for me.. MandrakeUpdate-7.2-13mdk It simply does not launch at all neither from the DrakConf nor from a terminal. There is no error message given. Strace yeilds the following... read(8, "c #ACA9A4\",\n\"n$\tc #C3C2C0\",\n\"o$\t"..., 4096) = 4096 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 _llseek(8, 12327, [12327], SEEK_SET)= 0 shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 9216, IPC_CREAT|0x1ff|0666) = 365568 shmat(365568, 0, 0) = 0x403d8000 write(3, "\201\1\4\0\3\0@\4\0\224\5\0\0\0\0\0+e\1\0", 20) = 20 read(3, "\1\0011\0\0\0\0\0\21\0@\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 32) = 32 shmctl(365568, IPC_RMID, 0) = 0 read(8, "$b$c$d$e$f$g$h$i$j$k$l$m$Z . . ."..., 4096) = 1165 write(3, "5\30\4\0\4\0@\4\0\0\\\0007e\5\0\5\0@\4\4\0@\4"..., 104) = 104 read(3, "\1\0017\0\0\0\0\0\21\0@\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 32) = 32 shmdt(0x403d8000) = 0 close(8)= 0 munmap(0x401ba000, 4096)= 0 write(3, "\201\2\2\0\3\0@\4+\0\1\0", 12) = 12 read(3, "\1\0019\0\0\0\0\0\21\0@\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 32) = 32 write(3, "f\2\3\0\200\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\2\0\0\0@\4+\0\1\0", 24) = 24 read(3, "\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\21\0@\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 32) = 32 shutdown(3, 2 /* send and receive */) = 0 close(3)= 0 _exit(0)= ? This is only the end of the strace. Hope it helps.
Re: [Cooker] ulysses-3 iso's
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, you wrote: salane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: are there any other mirrors of these files? It seems that the two are overloaded. rh7 effect? :) Are people still using their product? I thought Mandrake had put them out of business.
[Cooker] xchat and KDE
I have know Idea why this happens but here goes.. Fresh install of Mandrake 7.2 Start KDE Start xchat for the first time Gives warning about default dcc get directory Promptly segfaults Log out of KDE and log into Gnome Start xchat - works fine Log out of Gnome and back into KDE Start xchat - no more segfault
Re: [Cooker] xchat and KDE
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, you wrote: "Matthew R. Sprague" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have know Idea why this happens but here goes.. Fresh install of Mandrake 7.2 Start KDE Start xchat for the first time Gives warning about default dcc get directory Promptly segfaults can't reproduce it here. someone else? Did as you requested. Strace output is --- If the full output is needed I can email that put sympa won't accept the full file as an attachment . brk(0x81e2000) = 0x81e2000 read(3, "\f\2T\f\354\3\0\4\0\0\24\0\233\0\2\0\0\0\377\0\20\263P"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\f\0T\f\356\3\0\4\0\0\0\0\227\0\22\0\0\0\377\0p\225@\10"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\f\3T\f\351\3\0\4\0\0\0\0\235\0\2\0\3\0\377\277\260\225"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\f\0T\f\351\3\0\4\0\0\2\0\2\0\22\0\2\0\0\0\304\365\377"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\f\366T\f\351\3\0\4\233\0\2\0\2\0\22\0\1\0\0\0004\366\377"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\f\0T\f\351\3\0\4\0\0\24\0\235\0\2\0\0\0\377\0p\225@\10"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\f\0T\f\353\3\0\4\0\0\0\0\231\0\22\0\0\0\377\0\260\225"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\f\2T\f\346\3\0\4\0\0\0\0\235\0\2\0\3\0\377\277P5\\\10"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\f\0T\f\346\3\0\4\0\0\2\0\2\0\22\0\2\0\0\0\304\365\377"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\f\366T\f\346\3\0\4\233\0\2\0\2\0\22\0\1\0\0\0004\366\377"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\f\0T\f\346\3\0\4\0\0\24\0\235\0\2\0\0\0\377\0\260\225"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\f\0T\f\350\3\0\4\0\0\0\0\231\0\22\0\0\0\377\0P5\\\10\0"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\10\3T\f\235\260\300\265\0\0\0\365\2\0\4\0\0\0\0\315\1"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\10\4T\f\235\260\300\265\0\0\0.\0\0\4\357\2\0\4\315\1"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\7\3T\f\235\260\300\265\0\0\0Z\3\0\4\0\0\0\0\315\1[\1"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\n\3T\f.\0\0\4\0\24g\10\300\24g\10\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\20\324"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\t\3T\fZ\3\0\4\0s5\10H\31J\10\350s5\10\0\0\0\0\20\324F"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\241 T\fZ\3\0\4\340\0\0\0\327\0\0\0\203\260\300\265\0\0"..., 32) = 32 read(3, "\1\1\341\f\0\0\0\0Z\3\0\4\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 32) = 32 fork() = 1354 wait4(1354, [WIFEXITED(s) WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0], 0, NULL) = 1354 --- SIGCHLD (Child exited) --- _exit(1)= ?
[Cooker] ld-linux.so.2 corrupt?
I sync'ed cooker from rpmfind yesterday, September 7 and went for a really small install of just basic packages and KDE. All the KDE packages crapped out during installation. I booted into linux and tried to install KDE by hand but kept getting dependency errors for ld-linux.so.2 even though it was in /lib. I tried to rewrite from .../mdkinst/lib but of course it complained that the file was busy. I then got really dumb and decided to rename it too ld-linux.so.2old. Word of wisdom to any other newbies. Don't ever ever ever do this. I learn everything the hard way I re-installed but still keep getting errors with ld-linux.so.2. Am I the only one experiencing this problem and how do I solve this?
[Cooker] rpm's not installing
I updated my cooker files today and decided to update the packages via mandrake update. Packages would not install and on some packages it caused my comp to freeze up. rpm -uvh from the cl gives the following error message. VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd... VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for rpm... VM: killing process rpm Killed
[Cooker] Cooker from a reiserfs partition
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Cooker from a reiserfs partition Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:04:20 -0400 From: root [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I rsync'ed cooker to a reiserfs partiton and tried to install from there. At the prompt for the partition for location of Mandrake files, the install program gives an error that "mount failed device does not exist". I created an ext2 partiton and moved cooker there, and the install went without any problems. Does the hd.img installer not recognize reiserfs partitons? Will this change in the future? --- ---
Re: [Cooker] cooker won't boot on promise ultra66
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: [Cooker] cooker won't boot on promise ultra66 Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:08:43 -0400 From: root [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 04 Sep 2000, you wrote: Have you succeeded in making it run in UDMA4 mode? I remember the parameters for setting this go in a file ending ".everytime" in /etc somewhere. I couldn't make run better than UDMA2. Maybe it is the kernel I am using (2.2.16-9mdk) Stratos Since I'm the original poster of the question I believe your asking me Answer... Yes I downloaded/installed the latest cooker last night (03/09/00), and cooker boots without any problems from the promise ultra66 and without any user intervention. --- ---
[Cooker] cooker won't boot on promise ultra66
howdy folks I just installed cooker on a udma66 hard drive controlled by a promise ultra66 pci controller card. It installs without any hitches but upon booting with lilo it gets to Partition check hda: hda1 hda2 hde: At this point the computer freezes and the keyboard won't respond. I can only hit he reset switch to reboot. I re-installed 7.1 which works without any glitches. What do I need to do here?
[Cooker] can't configure sound
there seems to be a problem with sounds cards in hard drake under drakconf. it detects the correct card, ess solo1, but fails on configure. Says it can't locate module snd-pcm_oss.. Is that a typo? Should it be looking for snd-pcm-oss?
[Cooker] aug 20 kde2 builds
I installed the latest KDE2 builds and when I start KDM I get the following error message. BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: dl-version.c: 210: _dl_check_map_versions: Assertion `needed != ((void *)0)' failed! What did I screw up here?
[Cooker] Crypto kernels?
Is there any plan to include kernel's with the crypto patches apllied? These could be housed on the mandrake-crypto servers?
[Cooker] New KDE2 libs and support RPM's don't work
kdelibs-1.92-12mdk.i586.rpm qt2 = 2.2 is needed by kdelibs-1.92-12mdk Are there Mandrake rpm's for the qt2.2 beta's? They came out on like Tuesday didn't they? The KDE developers were pretty fast in using them. kdesupport-1.92-12mdk.i586.rpm libkde-qt-addon.so.3 is needed by kdelibs-1.92-10mdk libkde-qt-addon.so.3 is needed by kdelibs-sound-1.92-10mdk libkde-qt-addon.so.3 is needed by kdelibs-crypto-1.92-8mdk libkde-qt-addon.so.3 is needed by kdeadmin-1.92-8mdk libkde-qt-addon.so.3 is needed by kdebase-1.92-12mdk Checking the files in this RPM reveals that the qt-addon libs are not in the package at all. Are they moved to another package? These two packages are both experiencing the same problem? These newer KDE2 beta packages were compiled with the newer qt2.2beta? Just out of curiosty, will we now need to install the qt2.2 or will the qt-addon's be brought back to fix the problem (I had been informed by a kde developer that the qt-addons were phased out anyway)?
[Cooker] Fwd: New KDE2 libs and support RPM's don't work
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: New KDE2 libs and support RPM's don't work Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 17:17:48 -0400 From: Matthew R. Sprague [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] kdelibs-1.92-12mdk.i586.rpm qt2 = 2.2 is needed by kdelibs-1.92-12mdk Are there Mandrake rpm's for the qt2.2 beta's? They came out on like Tuesday didn't they? The KDE developers were pretty fast in using them. kdesupport-1.92-12mdk.i586.rpm libkde-qt-addon.so.3 is needed by kdelibs-1.92-10mdk libkde-qt-addon.so.3 is needed by kdelibs-sound-1.92-10mdk libkde-qt-addon.so.3 is needed by kdelibs-crypto-1.92-8mdk libkde-qt-addon.so.3 is needed by kdeadmin-1.92-8mdk libkde-qt-addon.so.3 is needed by kdebase-1.92-12mdk Checking the files in this RPM reveals that the qt-addon libs are not in the package at all. Are they moved to another package? These two packages are both experiencing the same problem? These newer KDE2 beta packages were compiled with the newer qt2.2beta? Just out of curiosty, will we now need to install the qt2.2 or will the qt-addon's be brought back to fix the problem (I had been informed by a kde developer that the qt-addons were phased out anyway)? ---
[Cooker] kdeaddutils-1.92-8mdk.i586.rpm broken
This latest build will not install at all. error: kdeaddutils-1.92-8mdk.i586.rpm cannot be installed I also found that kde2 upgrades will not work with ld.so-1.9.5-13mdk.i586.rpm installed as it lacks ld.so.1 These latest builds didn't work so hot. KDE2 wouldn't work at all after upgrading. One of the packages (base?) hosed the entry for KDE in /etc/X11/wmsessions.d, which had to be remade. It also required a change in /etc/X11/gdm/Sessions where kde had to be changed to KDE. I didn't think that capitalization would matter but the newest packages wouldn't install untill the filename was changed to all caps.
Re: [Cooker] KDE2
On Sat, 05 Aug 2000, you wrote: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Ron Stodden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ron@CO3000655-A ron]$ kpackage kpackage: error in loading shared libraries: libbz2.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Yes we moved to bzip2-1.something right after the 7.1 Are you sure you don't have the old bzip2 (0.9.something) ; installed with --nodeps ?? This problem only occurs when kpackage is attempted by a user. When loaded by root, all works OK. This seems odd to me: [root@CO3000655-A ron]# ls -l /usr/lib/libbz2* -rw-r--r--1 root root53428 May 5 19:02 /usr/lib/libbz2.a lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 Jun 9 12:23 /usr/lib/libbz2.so - libbz2.so.0 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 15 Jun 9 12:23 /usr/lib/libbz2.so.0 - libbz2.so.0.9.0 -rw-r--r--1 root root50100 May 5 19:02 /usr/lib/libbz2.so.0.9.0 [root@CO3000655-A ron]# drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 4096 May 8 22:35 usr/ drwxr-xr-x 86 root root20480 Aug 1 14:43 lib/ So why cannot user kpackage see it? The RPM is from l-m 7.1 = bzip2-0.9.5d-9mdk as installed by DrakX. What is the fix? Install the bzip2 from cooker? Is this a candidate for MandrakeUpdates? I have kpackage working perfectly as user right now. I still stick by my findings that kpackage works every other build. Previously, clicking on an RPM would launch an older version of kpackage but now it is launching kpackage 2.0pre. I have never gotten any messages about bzip2 causing an error. My error was always about either stopen0 or fdopen0 or something. Sorry I can't remember which error it was. rpm - qa | grep kde switchdesk-kde-2.1-2mdk kde-themes-extra-7.1-1mdk kde-themes-7.1-1mdk kdenetwork-1.92-7mdk kdeaddutils-1.92-4mdk kdelibs-sound-1.92-8mdk kdelibs-1.92-8mdk kdepim-1.92-7mdk kde1-compat-1.1.2-3mdk kdemultimedia-1.92-6mdk kdelibs-crypto-1.92-8mdk kdetoys-1.92-7mdk kde-i18n-German-1.92-4mdk kdeadmin-1.92-7mdk kdegames-1.92-7mdk kdesupport-1.92-5mdk kdeutils-1.92-7mdk kdebase-1.92-8mdk kdegraphics-1.92-7mdk rpm -qa | grep bzip bzip2-1.0.1-6mdk
[Cooker] Kpackage and KDE2
Chris you wanted to know what happens when an RPM is clicked on in Konqi. Well it works sort of... every other build... literally everyother build. I have been downloading every build of kde2 from Mandrake cooker and clicking on an RPM will open kpackage in one build and then not open in the next and then work again in the next build. It opens the older kpackage (1.9.3?). The plus side is that it is VERY VERY FAST at opening an RPM in kpackage. Opening kpackage from a konsole opens kpackage pre2.0 which looks very pretty but is not fully functional. Click on open and select an RPM in a user's directory promptly causes kpackage to crash with the folowing QToolBar::QToolBar main window cannot be 0. kpackage: KGlobalSettings::initStatic kdecore (KURL): KURL couldn't parse URL "Root Directory: /" kio (Slave): createSlave for file:/home/EDITEDFORPRIVACY/ kio (Slave): PID of slave = 2800 kio (Slave): slave has connected to application kio (Slave): got answer 10 kio (KIOJob): Finished [this = 0x86abe18] kio (KIOJob): stat file:/home/EDITEDFORPRIVACY/GConf-0.7-1mdk.i586.rpm kio (KIOJob): StatJob::slotStatEntry kio (KIOJob): Finished [this = 0x86abe18] kpackage: error in loading shared libraries: kpackage: undefined symbol: fdOpen This is going out as a bug report to KDE and really doesn't belong here, but you did ask what is happening.
[Cooker] Kernel 2.2.17
If I want to manually upgrade to the 2.2.17 kernel from 2.2.16 and I am using reiserfs will I need to follow the directions on the Mandrake update page? Change the following from 15 - 16 to 16 - 17? Important: If you use ReiserFS, please don't forget to do as following after the upgrade: 1 If you used MandrakeUpdate or rpm -Uvh to upgrade, reinstall kernel 2.2.15 from native Mandrake 7.1 2 Type: cd /lib/modules/2.2.15-4mdk 3 Type: /sbin/depmod -a 4 Type: mkinitrd -f --ifneeded /boot/initrd-2.2.16-9mdk 2.2.16-9mdk 5 You can now remove the older 2.2.15. Type: rpm -e kernel-2.2.15 6 Type: ln -sf /boot/initrd-2.2.16-9mdk /boot/initrd.img 7 Type: ln -sf /boot/System.map-2.2.16-9mdk /boot/System.map 8 Type: ln -sf /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.16-9mdk /boot/vmlinuz 9 In /etc/lilo.conf add: initrd=/boot/initrd-2.2.16-9mdk 10 Type: lilo -v I also would like to know if anyone has had success applying the kernli crypto patch to the Mandrake 2.2.16 or 2.2.17 kernels? I keep on getting malformed patch at line 229:
[Cooker] Kernel 2.2.16 -- 17 with reiserfs
If I want to manually upgrade to the 2.2.17 kernel from 2.2.16 and I am using reiserfs will I need to follow the directions on the Mandrake update page? Change the following from 15 - 16 to 16 - 17? Important: If you use ReiserFS, please don't forget to do as following after the upgrade: 1 If you used MandrakeUpdate or rpm -Uvh to upgrade, reinstall kernel 2.2.15 from native Mandrake 7.1 2 Type: cd /lib/modules/2.2.15-4mdk 3 Type: /sbin/depmod -a 4 Type: mkinitrd -f --ifneeded /boot/initrd-2.2.16-9mdk 2.2.16-9mdk 5 You can now remove the older 2.2.15. Type: rpm -e kernel-2.2.15 6 Type: ln -sf /boot/initrd-2.2.16-9mdk /boot/initrd.img 7 Type: ln -sf /boot/System.map-2.2.16-9mdk /boot/System.map 8 Type: ln -sf /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.16-9mdk /boot/vmlinuz 9 In /etc/lilo.conf add: initrd=/boot/initrd-2.2.16-9mdk 10 Type: lilo -v I also would like to know if anyone has had success applying the kernli crypto patch to the Mandrake 2.2.16 or 2.2.17 kernels? I keep on getting ***malformed patch at line 229:
Re: [Cooker] KDE2
On Tue, 01 Aug 2000, you wrote: On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Ron Stodden wrote: Christopher Molnar wrote: 2. the kde2 kpackage will not accept drag and drop of an RPM from a user Konqueror window. RPMs are most usually installed by drag and drop to kpackage - to lose this capability would be a serious retrograde step and make any claim of upward compatibility kde1 to kde2 an untruth. What happens if you double click on an RPM in the konqi window? Honestly, I haven't tried yet, let me know. If you double click on an RPM in Konqi it opens it normally with Kpackage v.1.3.10. This has only recently started working with the newest builds in cooker (July 31). Up untill now, Kpackage would only crash with a process error.
Re: [Cooker] Re: [kde-alpha] kde2 -20000531
On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, you wrote: On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Matthew R. Sprague wrote: What differences exist between your rpm's on http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~molnarc/index.html and those in Mandrake cooker contributions? Are the rpm's on us.mandrake using /usr/lib/qt2 or /usr/lib/qt2.1.1? This is also an issue that needs to be addressed. Why is Mandrake using qt2 and Redhat qt2.1.1.? This is a classic example of the need for the LSB. This is a real pain in the ass from the end user standpoint. As far as qt goes.. The current version in cooker is qt2.1.1 (qt2-2.1.1). I really am not sure waht you are talking about here. I upgraded cooker to qt2-2.1.1 the day after it was available from the trolls. I don't think anyone can ask much more. I wasn't very clear here in what I was trying to get across. The qt difference that I was talking about was where RH and Mandrake are putting the qt2 files RH ---/usr/lib/qt2.1.1 Mandrake/usr/lib/qt2 Maybe I'm over reacting but from the end user point of veiw this is a pain in the butt. Does this not cause a problem if a someone using Mandrake decides to grab binary RPM's made by bero for RH and install them? This is was I meant by a good example of the pressing need for a linux standard base. Mandrake claims 99.5(?)% compatability with RH but right now as it stands won't this lead to potential conflicts?. This is not KDE's fault directly, but you might want to suggest that Mandrake and RH agree on a common library directory. It is a tiny difference but it is the kind of thing that can leave a sour taste in the mouths of new users. The other option is that there is no problem and I'm pulling my hair out over something that has a solution allready built in to Mandrake. If I'm correct in the directory naming conflict then isn't the following a problem? http://www.kde.org/kde1-and-kde2.html #!/bin/sh export KDEDIR=/opt/kde2 export QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt-2.1.1 (does this need to be changed to /usr/lib/qt2 for a Mandrake distribution?) export PATH=$KDEDIR/bin:$PATH export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$KDEDIR/lib:$QTDIR/lib I am still confused as to why your RPM's won't uninstall. I think this is a Mandrake specific problem as other packages (ie pine)are also not uninstalling. rpm -e foo.rpm = not installed, rpm -qa | grep foo = bingo installed??? Chris, is this a problem with your RPM's or is this a Mandrake problem? I am cross posting this to the Mandrake cooker list and KDE-alpha list as parts of this thread pertain to each team. Is this OK to do or would the developers prefer that I not cross post? On a more upbeat note... I got the 0608 builds installed and I am very impressed with the quality, look and feel of KDE2. You got me hooked as a die hard fan of KDE. Keep up the good work.
[Cooker] digest
how do I get the digest format?
