Re: [Cooker] BM -- some more fixes...
An update: Hi, here's the status on the packages with BM problems... I'm working on fixing them, some of them are done and can be downloaded from my server, some of them need to be done. === Please rebuild the following packages, they should be fine then: dpsftplib-0.1.6-2mdk fribidi-0.1.9-1mdk isicom-3.0-3mdk jpilot-Mail-0.0.3-1mdk tetex-latex-heb-1.0-2mdk ttfonts-1.3-6mdk xcin-2.5.2-1mdk === dhcpxd-1.0.3-4mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/man8/dhcpxd.8.bz2 Fix: http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/dhcpxd-1.0.3-5mdk.src.rpm * Sun Sep 24 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.3-5mdk - BM macro's === gatos-0.0.6-0.2303.5mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man /usr/man/fr /usr/man/fr/man1 /usr/man/fr/man1/atisplit.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/atitogif.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/atitojpg.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/atitoppm.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/atitv.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/gatos-conf.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/gatos.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/gatos.conf.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/scanpci.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/xatitv.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/yuvsum.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1 /usr/man/man1/atisplit.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/atitogif.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/atitojpg.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/atitoppm.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/atitv.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/gatos-conf.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/gatos.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/gatos.conf.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/scanpci.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/xatitv.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/yuvsum.1.bz2 I'm just wondering: shouldn't this package also have a ExcludeArch: for the alpha? RedHat doesn't have this package in rawhide-alpha or redhat-6.2-alpha at the moment, which of you alpha users actually _needs_ this package (the package requires some specific ATI hardware)? For the rest: the .spec file is a mess. It uses a filelist, etc. etc. Not the way it should be. I'm looking into this one now... I screw up on the French manpages... Maybe a pro can have a go at it, I give up ;-) === Glide_V3-2.60.15-5mdk.i586.rpm /usr/doc/Glide2/glide_license.txt /usr/doc/Glide3/glide_license.txt Glide_V3-devel-2.60.15-5mdk.i586.rpm /usr/doc/Glide2/glidepgm.pdf /usr/doc/Glide2/glideref.pdf /usr/doc/Glide3/glide3pgm.pdf /usr/doc/Glide3/glide3ref.pdf /usr/doc/Glide3/glide3relno.pdf Fix: http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/Glide_V3-2.60.15-6mdk.src.rpm * Sun Sep 24 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.60.15-6mdk - macro's + BM Someone take a look at mine (above) or Alexander's at http://dp.ath.cx/rpms. Please fix. Thanks. === joe-2.8-19mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/man1/joe.1.bz2 Fix: http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/joe-2.8-20mdk.src.rpm * Sun Sep 24 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.8-20mdk - BM - some macro's === kterm-6.2.0-13mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/ja/man1/kterm.1.bz2 Fix: http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/kterm-6.2.0-14mdk.src.rpm * Mon Sep 25 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6.2.0-14mdk - BM + macro's == libPropList-0.10.1-3mdk.i586.rpm Size: 123689 License: GPL/LGPL (see files COPYING and COPYING.LIB in /usr/doc/libPropList) libPropList-devel-0.10.1-3mdk.i586.rpm Size: 66550License: GPL/LGPL (see files COPYING and COPYING.LIB in /usr/doc/libPropList) http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/libPropList-0.10.1-4mdk.src.rpm * Mon Sep 25 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.10.1-4mdk - changed path in Copyright header to /usr/share/doc === publib-devel-0.31-1mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/man3/__set_liberror.3pub.bz2 Fix: http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/publib-devel-0.31-2mdk.src.rpm * Mon Sep 25 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.31-2mdk - BM + macro's === The following packages don't build on my alpha or intel system, but they do contain files that are not BM compliant... Can someone at Mandrake try rebuilding these packages on ke no or bi and tell me the result? kdbg-1.0.2-2mdk.i586.rpm kfun21-0.2-1mdk.i586.rpm kmol-0.2.1-4mdk.i586.rpm kover-0.4-7mdk.i586.rpm ksendfax-0.3.2-6mdk.i586.rpm lyx-1.1.4-7mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/man1/lyx.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/reLyX.1.bz2 Lyx doesn't build on my alpha or intel. It requires forms.h. When is a package that contains forms.h going to be included in cooker? The following problems have been detected by configure. Please check the messages below before running 'make'. (see the section 'Problems' in the INSTALL file) ** Cannot find libforms or libxforms. Please check that the xforms library is correctly installed on your system. ** Cannot find forms.h. Please check that the forms library is correctly installed on your system. === Hope it helps... Stefan
Re: [Cooker] BM -- some more fixes...
Yo, I'm stil trying to take care of lesstif. :( When is a package that contains forms.h going to be included in cooker? The following problems have been detected by configure. Please check the messages below before running 'make'. (see the section 'Problems' in the INSTALL file) ** Cannot find libforms or libxforms. Please check that the xforms library is correctly installed on your system. ** Cannot find forms.h. Please check that the forms library is correctly installed on your system. === Instlal fltk-devel? I checked on the buildhosts .. Hope it helps... Stefan -- Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] §õªø· ~/.signature ¤¤¤åbig5 compliant. http://devel.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk
Re: [Cooker] BM -- some more fixes...
When is a package that contains forms.h going to be included in cooker?
The following problems have been detected by configure.
Please check the messages below before running 'make'.
(see the section 'Problems' in the INSTALL file)
** Cannot find libforms or libxforms. Please check that the xforms
library
is correctly installed on your system.
** Cannot find forms.h. Please check that the forms library
is correctly installed on your system.
Instlal fltk-devel? I checked on the buildhosts ..
Yup (now I feel stupid), I guess the includepath needs to be changed in
lyx then...
Stefan
[Cooker] BM -- some more fixes...
Hi, here's the status on the packages with BM problems... I'm working on fixing them, some of them are done and can be downloaded from my server, some of them need to be done. === Please rebuild the following packages, they should be fine then: dpsftplib-0.1.6-2mdk fribidi-0.1.9-1mdk isicom-3.0-3mdk jpilot-Mail-0.0.3-1mdk tetex-latex-heb-1.0-2mdk ttfonts-1.3-6mdk xcin-2.5.2-1mdk === aktion-0.4.1-4mdk.i586.rpm /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/aktion/KXAnim.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/aktion/aktion.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/aktion/aktion.jpg /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/aktion/fullscreen.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/aktion/kxanim-h.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/aktion/q.jpg /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/aktion/screen.jpg /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/aktion/titulo_aktion.jpg /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/aktion/titulo_kxanim.jpg /usr/doc/kde/HTML/es/aktion/KXAnim.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/es/aktion/aktion.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/es/aktion/aktion.jpg /usr/doc/kde/HTML/es/aktion/fullscreen_es.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/es/aktion/kxanim-h.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/es/aktion/q.jpg /usr/doc/kde/HTML/es/aktion/screen.jpg /usr/doc/kde/HTML/es/aktion/titulo_aktion.jpg /usr/doc/kde/HTML/es/aktion/titulo_kxanim.jpg Are we going to remove / fix the package? Time to make a descision? === dhcpxd-1.0.3-4mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/man8/dhcpxd.8.bz2 Fix: http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/dhcpxd-1.0.3-5mdk.src.rpm * Sun Sep 24 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.3-5mdk - BM macro's === gatos-0.0.6-0.2303.5mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man /usr/man/fr /usr/man/fr/man1 /usr/man/fr/man1/atisplit.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/atitogif.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/atitojpg.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/atitoppm.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/atitv.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/gatos-conf.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/gatos.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/gatos.conf.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/scanpci.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/xatitv.1.bz2 /usr/man/fr/man1/yuvsum.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1 /usr/man/man1/atisplit.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/atitogif.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/atitojpg.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/atitoppm.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/atitv.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/gatos-conf.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/gatos.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/gatos.conf.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/scanpci.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/xatitv.1.bz2 /usr/man/man1/yuvsum.1.bz2 I'm just wondering: shouldn't this package also have a ExcludeArch: for the alpha? RedHat doesn't have this package in rawhide-alpha or redhat-6.2-alpha at the moment, which of you alpha users actually _needs_ this package (the package requires some specific ATI hardware)? For the rest: the .spec file is a mess. It uses a filelist, etc. etc. Not the way it should be. I'm looking into this one now... needs to be done === Glide_V3-2.60.15-5mdk.i586.rpm /usr/doc/Glide2/glide_license.txt /usr/doc/Glide3/glide_license.txt Glide_V3-devel-2.60.15-5mdk.i586.rpm /usr/doc/Glide2/glidepgm.pdf /usr/doc/Glide2/glideref.pdf /usr/doc/Glide3/glide3pgm.pdf /usr/doc/Glide3/glide3ref.pdf /usr/doc/Glide3/glide3relno.pdf Fix: http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/Glide_V3-2.60.15-6mdk.src.rpm * Sun Sep 24 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.60.15-6mdk - macro's + BM === joe-2.8-19mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/man1/joe.1.bz2 Fix: http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/joe-2.8-20mdk.src.rpm * Sun Sep 24 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.8-20mdk - BM - some macro's === kterm-6.2.0-13mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/ja/man1/kterm.1.bz2 needs to be done === kvirc-2.0.0-1.94.5mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/man1 /usr/man/man1/kvirc.1.bz2 kwebget-0.5-3mdk.i586.rpm /usr/doc/kde/HTML/de/kwebget/index-1.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/de/kwebget/index-2.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/de/kwebget/index-3.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/de/kwebget/index-4.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/de/kwebget/index-5.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/de/kwebget/index.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/kwebget/index-1.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/kwebget/index-2.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/kwebget/index-3.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/kwebget/index-4.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/kwebget/index-5.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/en/kwebget/index.html /usr/doc/kwebget-0.5 /usr/doc/kwebget-0.5/AUTHORS /usr/doc/kwebget-0.5/COPYING /usr/doc/kwebget-0.5/ChangeLog /usr/doc/kwebget-0.5/README /usr/doc/kwebget-0.5/TODO needs to be done === libPropList-0.10.1-3mdk.i586.rpm Size: 123689 License: GPL/LGPL (see files COPYING and COPYING.LIB in /usr/doc/libPropList) libPropList-devel-0.10.1-3mdk.i586.rpm Size: 66550License: GPL/LGPL (see files COPYING and COPYING.LIB in /usr/doc/libPropList) needs to be done Someone please change those lines in the header of the .spec file. === publib-devel-0.31-1mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/man3/__set_liberror.3pub.bz2 ... .. . needs to be done === The following packages don't build on my alpha or intel system, but they do contain files that are not BM compliant... Can someone at Mandrake try rebuilding these packages on ke no or bi and tell me the result? === kdbg-1.0.2-2mdk.i586.rpm /usr/doc/kde/HTML/de/kdbg/index.html /usr/doc/kde/HTML/de/kdbg/types.html
Re: [Cooker] BM -- some more fixes...
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 04:06:31PM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: jpilot-Mail-0.0.3-1mdk According to Christopher Molnarc this is already fixed in -2mdk which he said is in the dir (no, I'm not talking about my package). ttfonts-1.3-6mdk As soon as someone from Mdk moves my package from /incoming to the right dir it's there. === Glide_V3-2.60.15-5mdk.i586.rpm /usr/doc/Glide2/glide_license.txt /usr/doc/Glide3/glide_license.txt Did that, fix at http://dp.ath.cx/rpms === kover-0.4-7mdk.i586.rpm Yup, don't get that to compile either. === lesstif-0.91.4-2mdk.i586.rpm /usr/doc/lesstif-0.91.4 That's a bitch, ain't it? Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
Re: [Cooker] BM -- some more fixes...
lesstif-0.91.4-2mdk.i586.rpm /usr/doc/lesstif-0.91.4 That's a bitch, ain't it? The lesstif package is difficult... I'll leave it to one of you ;-) Stefan
Re: [Cooker] BM -- some more fixes...
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 10:18:23PM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: The lesstif package is difficult... I'll leave it to one of you ;-) Thanks, but rihgt now I'm fighting with openssl, and next on my wishlist is nessus. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
RE: [Cooker] BM fixed packages
Here are some BM fixed packages... I've uploaded the src.rpm's to /incoming. Please integrate (if possible). thanks!! Stefan i'll see if i have time to do it tonight :-) thx -- Geoff
[Fwd: Re: [Cooker] BM]
What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's mean?? I think is Big Move ... but may also be Big Mess ;-) I'm sorry, but I disagree with you. Yes, not all packages are "done" yet. The packages that have been done work fine, and in the mean time it's a bit dusty (ever seen a clean construction site?). Anyway, this _could_ quickly change. Take on the challenge and make the list of "todo" packages shorter... http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/cooker/alpha/BM/ http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/cooker/i586/BM/ Applying the macro's isn't that difficult. I do the following (I presume you have setup your useraccount for building as described in the Mandrake RPM HOWTO): 1) I install the current src.rpm rpm -i package.version.src.rpm 2) I run my m.sh script on the specfile m.sh package.spec The first vi editor that is started shows the proposed "patch" to the .spec file. I normally leave it the way it is, but make sure the entries in the %changelog section aren't modified. The second vi editor brings up the patched .spec file. I then bump up the mdk number, add a changelog entry (I beleive people at mandrake have a macro for that, can that be put into the rpm-howto too?) and check the rest of the .spec file. It should be compliant to what is stated in the mdk-rpm-howto. After you exit the second vi editor the package is rebuilt. The output is saved into package.spec.out (nice for later viewing). After it finishes building it tails the .out file. If everyhting goes well it should show an exit 0. You can then answer "y" three times and the .spec .spec.orig .spec.diff and .src.rpm files are copied to your "output" directory (better modify the scrip to suit your needs). This is how I do it. Some packages take little time, others can be very tedious... comments / improvements on this script are welcome (I'm not a scripting hero). And thanks to Chmouel for his perl script. Stefan m.sh macro.sh
[Cooker] BM
What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's mean??
[Cooker] BM
What does BM in the updates stand for? Michael
Re: [Cooker] BM
Michael Irving wrote: What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's mean?? Big Move -- Mike Tracy Holt Kirkland, WA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] BM
--- Michael Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's mean?? I think is Big Move ... but may also be Big Mess ;-) = Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE Linux Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] BM
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Michael Irving wrote: What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's mean?? [Uh, this should become a FAQ] Big Move - we turn to FHS compliance and therefore move man, doc and info from /usr to /usr/share. As a side note, this requires the use of a good number of macros for making our RPMs, which is why I also expanded this acronym as "Boring Macros"... you can also read the MDK-RPM-HOWTO, whose unofficial and unwilling maintainter for now is Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). -- Francis Galiegue, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more idiot-proof software, and universe, which produces more and more remarkable idiots. Until now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook
Re: [Cooker] BM
--- Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's mean?? I think is Big Move ... but may also be Big Mess ;-) I'm sorry, but I disagree with you. Yes, not all packages are "done" yet. The packages that have been done work fine, and in the mean time it's a bit dusty (ever seen a clean construction site?). Anyway, this That was a joke! Actually I think the changes have gone pretty smoothly so far, considering the task at hand. = Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE Linux Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/
[Cooker] BM-ed: ypserv
I'll try to upload the src.rpm to ftp://ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming/
but this is what I'm getting:
Connection attempt
timed-out.
Connection attempt
timed-out.
Connection attempt
timed-out.
Connection attempt
timed-out.
Connection attempt
timed-out.
Redialing (try 6)...
and it seems that the mailinglist is having a bad day. Some messages
are arriving a day late, and some are being sent a few times (sometimes
up to 4 copies). Is sympa on the loose?
Stefan
--- ypserv.spec.origSun Jul 23 15:33:27 2000
+++ ypserv.spec Sun Jul 23 16:36:31 2000
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
%define name ypserv
%define version 1.3.9
-%define release 3mdk
+%define release 4mdk
Summary: The NIS (Network Information Service) server.
Summary(de): NIS/YP-Server
@@ -63,18 +63,24 @@
%build
cp etc/README etc/README.etc
-CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ./configure --prefix=/usr \
- --enable-tcp-wrapper --enable-fqdn --enable-yppasswd
+%configure --enable-tcp-wrapper --enable-fqdn --enable-yppasswd
make
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-make install prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr YPMAPDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/var/yp \
- CONFDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc
-mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/rc.d/init.d
-install -m644 etc/ypserv.conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc
-install -m755 $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/ypserv-ypserv.init
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/rc.d/init.d/ypserv
-install -m755 $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/ypserv-yppasswdd.init
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd
+%makeinstall \
+ CONFDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir} \
+ MAKEDBMDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/yp \
+ MAN1DIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1 \
+ MAN5DIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man5 \
+ MAN8DIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man8 \
+ YPBINDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/yp \
+ YPMAPDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/var/yp
+
+mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d
+install -m644 etc/ypserv.conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}
+install -m755 $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/ypserv-ypserv.init
+$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/ypserv
+install -m755 $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/ypserv-yppasswdd.init
+$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd
%clean
@@ -100,17 +106,20 @@
%defattr(-,root,root)
%doc README README.secure INSTALL ChangeLog TODO
%doc etc/ypserv.conf etc/securenets etc/README.etc
-%config /etc/ypserv.conf
+%config %{_sysconfdir}/ypserv.conf
%config /var/yp/*
%dir /var/yp
-%config /etc/rc.d/init.d/*
-/usr/lib/yp
-/usr/sbin/*
-/usr/man/man5/*
-/usr/man/man8/*
-/usr/include/*/*
+%config %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/*
+%{_libdir}/yp
+%{_sbindir}/*
+%{_mandir}/man5/*
+%{_mandir}/man8/*
+%{_includedir}/*/*
%changelog
+* Sun Jul 23 2000 Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.3.9-4mdk
+- macroszifications
+- BM
* Thu Mar 30 2000 Thierry Vignaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.3.9-3mdk
- fix group
Re: [Cooker] BM-ed: ypserv
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'll try to upload the src.rpm to ftp://ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming/ i believe it not necessary anymore since titi has did the changes. -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] BM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just out of curiosity, why the move? I think I missed that one on the list. to comply with FHS.
RE: [Cooker] BM
Just out of curiosity, why the move? I think I missed that one on the list. fhs compliance -- GEoFF
RE: [Cooker] BM
writes: This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the changelogs? Big Move. /usr/man - /usr/share/man /usr/info - /usr/share/info /usr/doc - /usr/share/doc why why why...? because of LSB? no, for FHS compliance, unless you want mandrake tob e the only suck distro that doesn't isn't compliant with FHS ;)
Re: [Cooker] BM
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Alex Boag-Munroe wrote: This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the changelogs? Big Move - or Boring Macros, too -- Francis Galiegue, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more idiot-proof software, and universe, which produces more and more remarkable idiots. Until now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook
Re: [Cooker] BM
Just out of curiosity, why the move? I think I missed that one on the list. Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Alex Boag-Munroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the changelogs? Big Move. /usr/man - /usr/share/man /usr/info - /usr/share/info /usr/doc - /usr/share/doc -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] BM
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just out of curiosity, why the move? I think I missed that one on the list. 1. FHS compliance, 2. RH does it. -- Francis Galiegue, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more idiot-proof software, and universe, which produces more and more remarkable idiots. Until now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook
Re: [Cooker] BM
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, you wrote: Alex Boag-Munroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the changelogs? Big Move. /usr/man - /usr/share/man /usr/info - /usr/share/info /usr/doc - /usr/share/doc why why why...? because of LSB?
Re: [Cooker] BM
Just out of curiosity, why the move? I think I missed that one on IIRC, it's for compliance with FHS Alexander Skwar -- ATTENTION: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS ADDRESS! ONLY REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] My Homepage: http://www.DigitalProjects.com My GPG Key: Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] BM
- Original Message - From: "Alex Boag-Munroe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Cooker (E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:48 AM Subject: [Cooker] BM This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the changelogs? Curiously, in American English, BM stands for bowel movement. 8) Hoyt
RE: [Cooker] BM
by mandrake? -Original Message- From: Hoyt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 July 2000 16:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] BM - Original Message - From: "Alex Boag-Munroe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Cooker (E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:48 AM Subject: [Cooker] BM This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the changelogs? Curiously, in American English, BM stands for bowel movement. 8) Hoyt
RE: [Cooker] BM
I was just waiting for someone to say this.. No, it stands for Big Move, it is moving the docs and the man to /usr/share/man and /usr/share/doc and almost forces a re-packaging of every package. On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Oliver Stieber wrote: by mandrake? -Original Message- From: Hoyt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 July 2000 16:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] BM - Original Message - From: "Alex Boag-Munroe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Cooker (E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:48 AM Subject: [Cooker] BM This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the changelogs? Curiously, in American English, BM stands for bowel movement. 8) Hoyt -- --Chris
Re: [Cooker] BM
I was just waiting for someone to say this.. No, it stands for Big Move, it is moving the docs and the man to /usr/share/man and /usr/share/doc and almost forces a re-packaging of every package. cool... But: I wish my rpm would start building packages with the files in /usr/share/. Which packages do i need to have updated to which version in order to make this happen? Until this weekend i used to be running a quite up2date cooker box, but things have been going _SO_ fast since then... Stefan
RE: [Cooker] BM
Yes and my 28.8 modem is gonna love this :) On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Christopher Molnar wrote: I was just waiting for someone to say this.. No, it stands for Big Move, it is moving the docs and the man to /usr/share/man and /usr/share/doc and almost forces a re-packaging of every package. On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Oliver Stieber wrote: by mandrake? -Original Message- From: Hoyt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 July 2000 16:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] BM - Original Message - From: "Alex Boag-Munroe" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Cooker (E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:48 AM Subject: [Cooker] BM This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the changelogs? Curiously, in American English, BM stands for bowel movement. 8) Hoyt
Re: [Cooker] BM
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was just waiting for someone to say this.. No, it stands for Big Move, it is moving the docs and the man to /usr/share/man and /usr/share/doc and almost forces a re-packaging of every package. cool... But: I wish my rpm would start building packages with the files in /usr/share/. Which packages do i need to have updated to which version in order to make this happen? Until this weekend i used to be running a quite up2date cooker box, but things have been going _SO_ fast since then... i'd say, update rpm-* :)
Re: [Cooker] BM
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was just waiting for someone to say this.. No, it stands for Big Move, it is moving the docs and the man to /usr/share/man and /usr/share/doc and almost forces a re-packaging of every package. cool... But: I wish my rpm would start building packages with the files in /usr/share/. Which packages do i need to have updated to which version in order to make this happen? Until this weekend i used to be running a quite up2date cooker box, but things have been going _SO_ fast since then... i'd say, update rpm-* :) also, man and info is important. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] BM
also, man and info is important. I have a better sugegstion... how about we update the files in /usr/lib/rpm/alpha-mandrake-linux/ (/usr/lib/rpm/alpha-mandrake-linux/macros) to reflect the BM situation? Stefan
Re: [Cooker] BM
also, man and info is important. I have a better sugegstion... how about we update the files in /usr/lib/rpm/alpha-mandrake-linux/ (/usr/lib/rpm/alpha-mandrake-linux/macros) to reflect the BM situation? Well... easier said than done I guess. i've been looking through the buildoutputs and what strikes me is that I can't find the statement which installs these files. It kind of seems that they are made during the %install and installed right away. What I think is weird is that on intel boxen the macros file is OK, on alpha it isn't. In the Makefile I think this part is responsible for installing it into the dir: chmod u+x ./installplatform; DESTDIR="$(DESTDIR)" pkglibdir="$(pkglib dir)" ./installplatform rpmrc macros platform ; \ $(mkinstalldirs) $(DESTDIR)/$(prefix)/src/RPM/RPMS/alpha ;;\ Whatever is going on in there is abracadabra to me, maybe Chmou (or an other Mandrake wizard) can shine his (/her?) magick over it... (I saw chmou's name on a lot of those patches -- he must know how it works ;-) ). Stefan van der Eijk
