Re: [Cooker] Mdk-rpm-howto on the wiki ( was : [CHRPM]dmapi-2.0.5-3mdk )

2003-07-21 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Original document:
 http://www.linux-mandrake.com/howtos/mdk-rpm/mdk-rpm.html
 
 WiKi document:
 http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RpmHowto

nice renew :-)




Re: [Cooker] Mdk-rpm-howto on the wiki ( was : [CHRPM] dmapi-2.0.5-3mdk)

2003-07-21 Thread Stefan van der Eijk

I got started on it, but decided to ask the list first.

The conclusion of the discusion was that it is a good idea, but we (I
think Dams was also involved in the thread) weren't sure how it
should be done.
- One big document, or split up per chapter?
   

IMHO, split up by chapter is better.
One big docuement is not pratical, because of the time evolved to 
transmit it over the net , to read it and so on.

With one big page, we will see that all the document have been updated.
With small chapter, we will see which chapter have changed.
 

- Naming of chapters in WiKi style or not?
   

This would be consistent to name them in a wiki-like fashion, and will 
favorate the linking through the pages.

I do not see why we should not name them in the wiki style, but, i may 
be wrong.

Just put the document on the WiKi. It's one big document (for the 
moment), and I've started applying WiKi to it.

How to go forward:
- First get the document in WiKi, so it's 100% identical as the original 
HTML document.
- Then start splitting it up and doing smart WiKi stuff with it...

I've you've got access to the WiKi and have nothing todo, feel free to 
WiKi it.

Original document:
   http://www.linux-mandrake.com/howtos/mdk-rpm/mdk-rpm.html
WiKi document:
   http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/RpmHowto
regards,

Stefan


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Cooker] Mdk-rpm-howto on the wiki ( was : [CHRPM] dmapi-2.0.5-3mdk )

2003-07-19 Thread Michael Scherer

 I got started on it, but decided to ask the list first.

 The conclusion of the discusion was that it is a good idea, but we (I
 think Dams was also involved in the thread) weren't sure how it
 should be done.
 - One big document, or split up per chapter?

IMHO, split up by chapter is better.
One big docuement is not pratical, because of the time evolved to 
transmit it over the net , to read it and so on.

With one big page, we will see that all the document have been updated.
With small chapter, we will see which chapter have changed.


 - Naming of chapters in WiKi style or not?

This would be consistent to name them in a wiki-like fashion, and will 
favorate the linking through the pages.

I do not see why we should not name them in the wiki style, but, i may 
be wrong.


-- 

Mickaƫl Scherer