Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libgtop-1.0.13-2mdk
R.I.P. Deaddog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Frederic Lepied wrote: Name: libgtop Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 1.0.13Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 2mdk Build Date: Sat Feb 23 05:12:26 2002 --=-=-= * Fri Feb 22 2002 Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.13-2mdk - added BuildRequires guile-devel Sorry, seems this is wrong; guile interface for libgtop is not built at all by default. Even if guile is enabled explicitly, all it does is no more than building one more example executable. It doesn't heart. Leave it out in your build if you want (--nodeps does the trick).
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libgtop-1.0.13-2mdk
On 23 Feb 2002, Daouda LO wrote: Name: libgtop Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 1.0.13Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 2mdk Build Date: Sat Feb 23 05:12:26 2002 --=-=-= * Fri Feb 22 2002 Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.13-2mdk - added BuildRequires guile-devel Sorry, seems this is wrong; guile interface for libgtop is not built at all by default. Even if guile is enabled explicitly, all it does is no more than building one more example executable. It doesn't heart. Leave it out in your build if you want (--nodeps does the trick). However, if it's for me, I'd rather get things corrected, rather than leaving them wrong (unnecessarily) :( Abel
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libgtop-1.0.13-2mdk
R.I.P. Deaddog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 23 Feb 2002, Daouda LO wrote: Name: libgtop Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 1.0.13Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 2mdk Build Date: Sat Feb 23 05:12:26 2002 --=-=-= * Fri Feb 22 2002 Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.13-2mdk - added BuildRequires guile-devel Sorry, seems this is wrong; guile interface for libgtop is not built at all by default. Even if guile is enabled explicitly, all it does is no more than building one more example executable. It doesn't heart. Leave it out in your build if you want (--nodeps does the trick). However, if it's for me, I'd rather get things corrected, rather than leaving them wrong (unnecessarily) :( I agree but for packagers/developers i think that it's better having all libs needed ( even if not mandatory) installed.
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libgtop-1.0.13-2mdk
On 24 Feb 2002, Daouda LO wrote: Name: libgtop Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 1.0.13Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 2mdk Build Date: Sat Feb 23 05:12:26 2002 --=-=-= * Fri Feb 22 2002 Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.13-2mdk - added BuildRequires guile-devel Sorry, seems this is wrong; guile interface for libgtop is not built at all by default. Even if guile is enabled explicitly, all it does is no more than building one more example executable. I agree but for packagers/developers i think that it's better having all libs needed ( even if not mandatory) installed. You're true if there are any visible changes after adding libguile as BuildRequires; however in this case it isn't true. There's no change at all; you still need to give extra configure flags before guile support is activated. And even after guile support is manually added, it does compile one (or 2) more example binaries, which are not bundled with libgtop binary package at all. Hence, adding guile-devel is not much different than adding, say, libusb-devel. Just no effect at all. If there's some unspoken special need to add guile-devel, then I wouldn't object to this; just that I feel it's completely redundant. Abel
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libgtop-1.0.13-2mdk
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Frederic Lepied wrote: Name: libgtop Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 1.0.13Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 2mdk Build Date: Sat Feb 23 05:12:26 2002 --=-=-= * Fri Feb 22 2002 Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.13-2mdk - added BuildRequires guile-devel Sorry, seems this is wrong; guile interface for libgtop is not built at all by default. Even if guile is enabled explicitly, all it does is no more than building one more example executable. Abel
