Re: [Cooker] Re: vi in gnome-term loses arrow keys
>Finally, I am not sure, as I say, that it is a Mandrake bug. I am >even quite sure it is a gnome-terminal problem, so the report has >nothing to do in Mandrake's database. > Here you go: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96364 So just turn num-lock off to get the arrow keys back. That works here. =-= kk1
Re: [Cooker] Re: vi in gnome-term loses arrow keys
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 00:31, Quel Qun wrote: > --- Original Message --- > From: "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Cooker] Re: vi in gnome-term loses arrow keys > > >On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:59:48PM -0500, Quel Qun wrote: > >> Hi, > >> This may not be specific to Mandrake, but after using > >> gnome-terminal for a while, I cannot navigate in vi with the > >> arrow keys anymore. > > > >Do you actually stop and read the bugs that are posted from > >qa.mandrakesoft.com before posting this here? Did you actually use > >qa.mandrakesoft.com to even search for this bug? Try this search > >... > > > >If you did, then why did you not just vote for bug 568 > >(https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D568) rather than > posting > >a duplicate bug report here? If you want this bug fixed you have to > >go vote for it! > > > >People, Mandrake have put a tool in place to help file bugs and help > >us give input as to what is important, and what is not. The > tool will > >not work if we do no use it. > > > Take it easy, buddy. > > First you removed why I wrote this message: my question. I know > some other people reported the problem, but since there is > obviously no change, I was asking what we can do to help find the > real cause. I just find it weird that the keys only stop working > after some time. > > Second, it seems that we can only vote for one bug at a time. If > I try to vote for two different bugs I receive a crappy error > message. Additionally, the pages take far too long to load. When > a problem is confirmed, that should be enough. If the number of > votes creates a hierachy, I will create 100 accounts and vote for > my own reports. > > Finally, I am not sure, as I say, that it is a Mandrake bug. I am > even quite sure it is a gnome-terminal problem, so the report has > nothing to do in Mandrake's database. > > Let's not start a war, ok? btw. what version of gnome-term are u using? because for me: gnome-term-2.0.x ... works fine... afaik it uses libzvt gnome-term-2.1.x ... arrows doesn't work when num-lock is on... afaik it uses vte when i sent a mail about this problem, frederic-crozat replied that it's a known bug with vte. i don't know how could the vte-developers not spot it btw... bye, gabor > =-= > kk1 -- listening to Seat Belts - MUSAWA gpg key at www.keyserver.net
Re: [Cooker] Re: vi in gnome-term loses arrow keys
--- Original Message --- From: "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cooker] Re: vi in gnome-term loses arrow keys >On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:59:48PM -0500, Quel Qun wrote: >> Hi, >> This may not be specific to Mandrake, but after using >> gnome-terminal for a while, I cannot navigate in vi with the >> arrow keys anymore. > >Do you actually stop and read the bugs that are posted from >qa.mandrakesoft.com before posting this here? Did you actually use >qa.mandrakesoft.com to even search for this bug? Try this search >... > >If you did, then why did you not just vote for bug 568 >(https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D568) rather than posting >a duplicate bug report here? If you want this bug fixed you have to >go vote for it! > >People, Mandrake have put a tool in place to help file bugs and help >us give input as to what is important, and what is not. The tool will >not work if we do no use it. > Take it easy, buddy. First you removed why I wrote this message: my question. I know some other people reported the problem, but since there is obviously no change, I was asking what we can do to help find the real cause. I just find it weird that the keys only stop working after some time. Second, it seems that we can only vote for one bug at a time. If I try to vote for two different bugs I receive a crappy error message. Additionally, the pages take far too long to load. When a problem is confirmed, that should be enough. If the number of votes creates a hierachy, I will create 100 accounts and vote for my own reports. Finally, I am not sure, as I say, that it is a Mandrake bug. I am even quite sure it is a gnome-terminal problem, so the report has nothing to do in Mandrake's database. Let's not start a war, ok? =-= kk1
[Cooker] Re: vi in gnome-term loses arrow keys
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:59:48PM -0500, Quel Qun wrote:
> Hi,
> This may not be specific to Mandrake, but after using
> gnome-terminal for a while, I cannot navigate in vi with the
> arrow keys anymore.
Do you actually stop and read the bugs that are posted from
qa.mandrakesoft.com before posting this here? Did you actually use
qa.mandrakesoft.com to even search for this bug? Try this search
("key" in the Summary field for package gnome-terminal):
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=key&product=gnome-terminal&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=key&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
If you did, then why did you not just vote for bug 568
(https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568) rather than posting
a duplicate bug report here? If you want this bug fixed you have to
go vote for it!
People, Mandrake have put a tool in place to help file bugs and help
us give input as to what is important, and what is not. The tool will
not work if we do no use it.
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell
msg83042/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
