Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq v8
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:43:55PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi, 1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint. I have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go online when started. Probably temporary login problems but I see that there was a login packet fix, I might rebuild a new CVS one soon. 2. Authorization Requests hangs licq. Also I never get any notifications that people sends these to me. Let me check that. -- Geoff.
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq v8
On Thursdayen den 29 November 2001 10.26, Geoffrey Lee wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:43:55PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi, 1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint. I have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go online when started. Probably temporary login problems but I see that there was a login packet fix, I might rebuild a new CVS one soon. Ok, cool! 2. Authorization Requests hangs licq. Also I never get any notifications that people sends these to me. Let me check that. I may get notifications if I examine the network window, I didn't check that. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-12mdksmp: 2 days 8 hours 20 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4192 rpm, temp +29¢XC | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4218 rpm, temp +29.5¢XC
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq v8
fix, I might rebuild a new CVS one soon. Ok, cool! 2. Authorization Requests hangs licq. Also I never get any notifications that people sends these to me. Let me check that. I may get notifications if I examine the network window, I didn't check that. Yes. I cannot stress more of the importance of lots of ugly debug output and / or packet dumps. -- Geoff.
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq v8
On Thursdayen den 29 November 2001 11.59, Geoffrey Lee wrote: fix, I might rebuild a new CVS one soon. Ok, cool! 2. Authorization Requests hangs licq. Also I never get any notifications that people sends these to me. Let me check that. I may get notifications if I examine the network window, I didn't check that. Yes. I cannot stress more of the importance of lots of ugly debug output and / or packet dumps. Belive it or not I have worked some in a support (OM) environment tracing MS shit methodically and filing it into CA AHD at a shitty software company... I may have to pick up that some :) -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-12mdksmp: 2 days 8 hours 49 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4192 rpm, temp +30¢XC | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4192 rpm, temp +30.0¢XC
[Cooker] Testing Licq v8
Hi, 1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint. I have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go online when started. 2. Authorization Requests hangs licq. Also I never get any notifications that people sends these to me. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-12mdksmp: 8 hours 20 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4218 rpm, temp +30°C | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4166 rpm, temp +29.0°C
[Cooker] Testing Licq V8
Update user/all users hangs Licq. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-12mdksmp: 8 hours 41 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4166 rpm, temp +30°C | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4166 rpm, temp +29.0°C
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall. I think that there are still some direct connection issues with Licq. Unfortunately. :-( - G.
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 06.12, Geoffrey Lee wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall. I think that there are still some direct connection issues with Licq. Yes perhaps, I need to test this some more. It may work to older ICQ clients?. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-11mdksmp: 12 hours 55 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4166 rpm, temp +33.0¢XC | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4218 rpm, temp +33¢XC
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 06.12, Geoffrey Lee wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall. I think that there are still some direct connection issues with Licq. Yes perhaps, I need to test this some more. It may work to older ICQ clients?. There isn't that much v8-compliance in the code as you may think (but hey server messages work now). For now, I believe that you still need to get them to uncheck that magic box in the security and privacy settings. Depending on how things go, I would very much like to merge this into cooker, but that will mainly depend on people's experiences with using the v8 client and how fast development goes on the Licq side. These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8 one is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that, there are several core issues: - interaction with the server - interaction with other clients - stability on Licq client's part - G.
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
Es schrieb Geoffrey Lee: These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8 one is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that, there are several core issues: - interaction with the server Since I use your RPMs I can communicate again via the server, when behind a firewall. - interaction with other clients From home I am even able to communicate directiy with Winow$ clients. - stability on Licq client's part No crash/hang so far ... -- _ Tschüss und bis demnächst/à bientôt, _|_|_ () * Stefan /v\ / »( )« Penguin Powered! +(m-m)--+
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
On Monday 26 November 2001 04:40, you wrote: These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8 one is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that, there are several core issues: - interaction with the server - interaction with other clients - stability on Licq client's part Only major problem I have had with the v8 version is with console mode, I can't seem to launch it with v8. - Server send messages work - updating user info works (not always, but more often than official did) - URL sending still crashes client, otherwise appears stable (official has this problem also?) -- Live fast, die young, you're sucking up my bandwidth. -- J.P. Pasnak, CD [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.warpedsystems.sk.ca
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 07:59:42AM -0600, J.P. Pasnak wrote: On Monday 26 November 2001 04:40, you wrote: These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8 one is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that, there are several core issues: - interaction with the server - interaction with other clients - stability on Licq client's part Only major problem I have had with the v8 version is with console mode, I can't seem to launch it with v8. Strange. Are you sure? All protocol stuff should be done within the Licq daemon, not the plugins. - Server send messages work If these work, then v8 is there. - updating user info works (not always, but more often than official did) Direct connection update is broke, there is a CVS fix, but I won't build a new one right now. When I do, I'll give everyone a note. - URL sending still crashes client, otherwise appears stable (official has this problem also?) I can't reproduce this in the Cooker version. Can you please (1) verify for the cooker version (2) verify for the v8 version, if it's reproduceable, give me an an exact test case, exactly as you type it (the aliases that you send to you can subsitute something else, those shouldn't be too important.) -- Geoff.
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
On Monday 26 November 2001 05:37, you wrote: Strange. Are you sure? All protocol stuff should be done within the Licq daemon, not the plugins. OK, my bad. Reload V8, and console is working. Don't know what the problem was last night - URL sending still crashes client, otherwise appears stable (official has this problem also?) I can't reproduce this in the Cooker version. Can you please To be exact, it is when I highlight a URL, and double-click on a user that causes LICQ to crash. This use to switch it to URL-send mode, and copy the URL. Now it lauches the send window, and freezes.Tried with both qt-gui and kde-gui. Only way to recover is to kill LICQ. (1) verify for the cooker version licq-1.0.4-0.5mdk.i586.rpm (2) verify for the v8 version, if it's reproduceable, give me an an exact test case, exactly as you type it (the aliases that you send to you can subsitute something else, those shouldn't be too important.) licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk As above, it only happens on a 'copy and click'. At first I though it was a conflict with klipper, as turning off klipper appeared to help, but only for one message, and then the problem came back, just not as quickly (a minute or so would pass before LICQ would freeze up). -- Live fast, die young, you're sucking up my bandwidth. -- J.P. Pasnak, CD [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.warpedsystems.sk.ca
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
(1) verify for the cooker version licq-1.0.4-0.5mdk.i586.rpm (2) verify for the v8 version, if it's reproduceable, give me an an exact test case, exactly as you type it (the aliases that you send to you can subsitute something else, those shouldn't be too important.) licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk As above, it only happens on a 'copy and click'. At first I though it was a conflict with klipper, as turning off klipper appeared to help, but only for one message, and then the problem came back, just not as quickly (a minute or so would pass before LICQ would freeze up). Oh oh, right right, I see, I thought you meant the console UI. I can't reproduce this ... :/ I've only been able to produce a variant of this bug. - G.
[Cooker] Testing Licq V8
Hi, It seems licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk do not propagate itself as v8... 16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq v1.0.4/SSL]. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-12mdksmp: 54 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4272 rpm, temp +29¢XC | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4245 rpm, temp +29.0¢XC
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:29:36PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi, It seems licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk do not propagate itself as v8... 16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq v1.0.4/SSL]. That's probably not such a good idea yet, given the minimal support that we have. - G.
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 23.47, Geoffrey Lee wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:29:36PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi, It seems licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk do not propagate itself as v8... 16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq v1.0.4/SSL]. That's probably not such a good idea yet, given the minimal support that we have. Ok, got it. I have done some small test here against several buddies of mine, and direct messages do not work at all. I guess it's because one, or both parts is behind forewalls. Is there a list somewhere that shows which ICQ version ranges that uses which protocol versions? It feels real stupid to have to _ask_ them what they use... -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-12mdksmp: 11 hours 52 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4166 rpm, temp +30¢XC | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4218 rpm, temp +29.5¢XC
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
That's probably not such a good idea yet, given the minimal support that we have. Ok, got it. I have done some small test here against several buddies of mine, and direct messages do not work at all. I guess it's because one, or both parts is behind forewalls. Is there a list somewhere that shows which ICQ version ranges that uses which protocol versions? It feels real stupid to have to _ask_ them what they use... Unfortuntely not. My understanding is that anything above 2000 will not work unless you uncheck that magic box but even so it doesn't mean that the windows client will speak anything v7 to you. First things first: even some stuff with the server are not complete for v8 so I think that it's good to put that as a priority as what the V8_BRANCH is doing now. I like to receive experiences on what works and doesn't work (similar to the case when the kde2 pre snapshots were provided in the kde1 days). I haven't been receiving too many positive / negative reports apart from you and Stefan, but what happens to the cooker branch of Licq will largely depend on these experiements I am conducting right now. -- Geoff.
[Cooker] Testing Licq V8
Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-11mdksmp: 21 hours 54 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4166 rpm, temp +30.0°C | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4218 rpm, temp +29°C
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
le dim 25-11-2001 à 17:23, Oden Eriksson a écrit : Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall. you open the right port ( 5190 ) ? -- http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html - C'est dans la marine qu'il y a le plus de cocus. Marcel Pagnol.
Re: [Cooker] Testing Licq V8
On Sundayen den 25 November 2001 19.58, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: le dim 25-11-2001 à 17:23, Oden Eriksson a écrit : Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall. you open the right port ( 5190 ) ? Everything is open LAN-EXERNAL, but only one dedicated ICQ udp port (4000) for EXTERNAL-LAN. It is not possible to set this with the Licq version found at: https://kalife.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk/RPM/ -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-11mdksmp: 1 day 49 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4166 rpm, temp +30.0°C | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4245 rpm, temp +30°C
