[Cooker] gmc progress

2000-05-24 Thread Anton Graham

Well, I have tried well over a dozen different builds, all with the
same result.  I *did* get the helix RPM to build properly (stupid
mistake on my part the first time).  It appears, however that the
basic problem is in the generation of the initial ~/.gnome/metadata.db
file.  After removal of the ~/.gnome directory, the file generated has
an md5sum of:

5e9ae0dff8845a586fc7d04e5577c594  metadata.db

Deletion of this file and restart of X generates (consistently) one
with md5sum:

01361424b2a7235d311dc931cfc8543d  metadata.db

This later metadata.db allows the icons to be changed and has a
correct icon for Netscape, but all other icons are default.  I
could not determine why it generates two different versions of the
file, being uncertain as to where to look.

Sorry I couldn't be more help.

-- 
   _
 _|_|_
  ( )   *Anton Graham
  /v\  / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/(   )X
 (m_m)   GPG ID: 18F78541
Penguin Powered!




Re: [Cooker] gmc progress

2000-05-24 Thread Anton Graham

Submitted 24-May-00 by John Grange:
| Anton Graham wrote:
| 
|  Well, I have tried well over a dozen different builds, all with the
|  same result.  I *did* get the helix RPM to build properly (stupid
|  mistake on my part the first time).  It appears, however that the
|  basic problem is in the generation of the initial ~/.gnome/metadata.db
|  file.  After removal of the ~/.gnome directory, the file generated has
|  an md5sum of:
| 
|  5e9ae0dff8845a586fc7d04e5577c594  metadata.db
| 
|  Deletion of this file and restart of X generates (consistently) one
|  with md5sum:
| 
|  01361424b2a7235d311dc931cfc8543d  metadata.db
| 
|  This later metadata.db allows the icons to be changed and has a
|  correct icon for Netscape, but all other icons are default.  I
|  could not determine why it generates two different versions of the
|  file, being uncertain as to where to look.
| 
|  Sorry I couldn't be more help.
| 
| 
| I would like to rederate, i didn't have to remove any files (desktop or
| otherwise) after installing the latest rounds of updates from helix-gnome
| team the problem went away.
| 
| -DarkWlf
|

Yes, the Helix RPM functions correctly without such modifications, but
there are several patches that are part of our RPM and not Helix.  I
was hoping to find the reason why ours had the inconsistent behavior.

-- 
   _
 _|_|_
  ( )   *Anton Graham
  /v\  / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/(   )X
 (m_m)   GPG ID: 18F78541
Penguin Powered!