Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-07 Thread danny
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:
 PS. Danny!
 I haven't checked how your kernel is doing this, but since it's an
 stable 2.4 kernel, the problem isn't that big, OTOH it's a
 contrib kernel, so I think the MDK people would like it better 
 if you to would be doing this ... 
 (I added the same to my kernels beginning with 2.4.22-1.tmb.1mdk),
 Sorry I forgot to mention this to you in my earlier mail...

Dear Thomas,
I had this in my kernel long before you even knew about it:-P








Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-07 Thread Thomas Backlund
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Sunnuntai 7. Syyskuuta 
2003 17:15):
 On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:
  PS. Danny!
  I haven't checked how your kernel is doing this, but since it's an
  stable 2.4 kernel, the problem isn't that big, OTOH it's a
  contrib kernel, so I think the MDK people would like it better
  if you to would be doing this ...
  (I added the same to my kernels beginning with 2.4.22-1.tmb.1mdk),
  Sorry I forgot to mention this to you in my earlier mail...

 Dear Thomas,
 I had this in my kernel long before you even knew about it:-P

Yeah, I thought so... but I had to ask ... ;-)

As it turns out it's a bug in the installer that does this :-(
(seems to go by the highest version number)

I'm adding a bugzilla entry now...

-- 
Regards

Thomas




Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Robert Fox
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 21:37, guran wrote:
 On Friday 05 September 2003 23.05, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
  Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   I can't install and test kernel-2.6 under Cooker because of the
   missing kernel-utils package.
 
  replaced by bootloader-utils
 
 Well I have a new hd.img installation for a couple of hours ago and NVIDIA's 
 new installer can't install without kheader.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] nvidia]$ rpm -qa bootloader-utils
 bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk
 As you can see the bootloader is not enough.
 There are two ways out of this, the rest of the world changes their way and 
 follow in line or a symlink or similar is setup.
 
 guran

Fine with me about the name change, but why when I do a urpmi
kernel-2.6 it says:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] rfox]# urpmi kernel-2.6
One of the following packages is needed:
 1- kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586
 2- kernel-smp-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586
What is your choice? (1-2) 1
Some package requested cannot be installed:
kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied
kernel-utils[*]) (Y/n) y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rfox]#

Thx,
R.Fox




Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 11:48, Robert Fox wrote:
 On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 21:37, guran wrote:
  On Friday 05 September 2003 23.05, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
   Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can't install and test kernel-2.6 under Cooker because of the
missing kernel-utils package.
  
   replaced by bootloader-utils
  
  Well I have a new hd.img installation for a couple of hours ago and NVIDIA's 
  new installer can't install without kheader.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] nvidia]$ rpm -qa bootloader-utils
  bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk
  As you can see the bootloader is not enough.
  There are two ways out of this, the rest of the world changes their way and 
  follow in line or a symlink or similar is setup.
  
  guran
 
 Fine with me about the name change, but why when I do a urpmi
 kernel-2.6 it says:
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] rfox]# urpmi kernel-2.6
 One of the following packages is needed:
  1- kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586
  2- kernel-smp-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586
 What is your choice? (1-2) 1
 Some package requested cannot be installed:
 kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied
 kernel-utils[*]) (Y/n) y
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] rfox]#

It's just because it's not been rebuilt to depend on bootloader-utils
instead, I think...
-- 
adamw




Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Robert Fox
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 10:09, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 11:48, Robert Fox wrote:
  On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 21:37, guran wrote:
   On Friday 05 September 2003 23.05, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 I can't install and test kernel-2.6 under Cooker because of the
 missing kernel-utils package.
   
replaced by bootloader-utils
   
   Well I have a new hd.img installation for a couple of hours ago and NVIDIA's 
   new installer can't install without kheader.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] nvidia]$ rpm -qa bootloader-utils
   bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk
   As you can see the bootloader is not enough.
   There are two ways out of this, the rest of the world changes their way and 
   follow in line or a symlink or similar is setup.
   
   guran
  
  Fine with me about the name change, but why when I do a urpmi
  kernel-2.6 it says:
  
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] rfox]# urpmi kernel-2.6
  One of the following packages is needed:
   1- kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586
   2- kernel-smp-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586
  What is your choice? (1-2) 1
  Some package requested cannot be installed:
  kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied
  kernel-utils[*]) (Y/n) y
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] rfox]#
 
 It's just because it's not been rebuilt to depend on bootloader-utils
 instead, I think...

Nice guess - but I can't even find the bootloader-utils package!  I
maintain an actual copy (rsync) of the main mirror several times daily!

Argh!

R.Fox




Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 13:56, Robert Fox wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 10:09, Adam Williamson wrote:
  On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 11:48, Robert Fox wrote:
   On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 21:37, guran wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2003 23.05, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
 Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I can't install and test kernel-2.6 under Cooker because of the
  missing kernel-utils package.

 replaced by bootloader-utils

Well I have a new hd.img installation for a couple of hours ago and NVIDIA's 
new installer can't install without kheader.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nvidia]$ rpm -qa bootloader-utils
bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk
As you can see the bootloader is not enough.
There are two ways out of this, the rest of the world changes their way and 
follow in line or a symlink or similar is setup.

guran
   
   Fine with me about the name change, but why when I do a urpmi
   kernel-2.6 it says:
   
   
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] rfox]# urpmi kernel-2.6
   One of the following packages is needed:
1- kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586
2- kernel-smp-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586
   What is your choice? (1-2) 1
   Some package requested cannot be installed:
   kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied
   kernel-utils[*]) (Y/n) y
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] rfox]#
  
  It's just because it's not been rebuilt to depend on bootloader-utils
  instead, I think...
 
 Nice guess - but I can't even find the bootloader-utils package!  I
 maintain an actual copy (rsync) of the main mirror several times daily!
 
 Argh!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 280603_glastonbury]$ rpm -qa | grep bootloader
bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 280603_glastonbury]$

I got one. *shrug* Might still be on my mirror, I dunno, I don't rsync.
I'm using lip6.fr at the moment, I think.
-- 
adamw




Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Thomas Backlund
From: Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 10:09, Adam Williamson wrote:
  On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 11:48, Robert Fox wrote:
   On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 21:37, guran wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2003 23.05, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
 Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I can't install and test kernel-2.6 under Cooker because of the
  missing kernel-utils package.

 replaced by bootloader-utils
   
Well I have a new hd.img installation for a couple of hours ago and
NVIDIA's
new installer can't install without kheader.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nvidia]$ rpm -qa bootloader-utils
bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk
As you can see the bootloader is not enough.
There are two ways out of this, the rest of the world changes their
way and
follow in line or a symlink or similar is setup.
   
guran
  
   Fine with me about the name change, but why when I do a urpmi
   kernel-2.6 it says:
  
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] rfox]# urpmi kernel-2.6
   One of the following packages is needed:
1- kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586
2- kernel-smp-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586
   What is your choice? (1-2) 1
   Some package requested cannot be installed:
   kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied
   kernel-utils[*]) (Y/n) y
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] rfox]#
 
  It's just because it's not been rebuilt to depend on bootloader-utils
  instead, I think...

 Nice guess - but I can't even find the bootloader-utils package!  I
 maintain an actual copy (rsync) of the main mirror several times daily!


If so, either your local mirror, or the mirror you are syncing from is
screwed up...

Both main mirrors have it:

$ rsync -av ftp.uninett.no::Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/boot*
-rw-r--r--   18425 2003/09/05 11:17:27
bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk.i586.rpm

$ rsync -av ftp.sunet.se::Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/boot*
-rw-r--r--   18425 2003/09/05 11:17:27
bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk.i586.rpm


Thomas





Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Greg Meyer
On Saturday 06 September 2003 08:27 am, Thomas Backlund wrote:
   It's just because it's not been rebuilt to depend on bootloader-utils
   instead, I think...
 

I think the point is that even with bootloader-utils installed, kernel2.6 
complains of needing kernel-utils.  Since there apparently is no kernel-utils 
anymore, but bootloader-utils instead, the dependencies for Kernel2.6 are 
wrong.
-- 
/g

Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx



Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Olivier Blin
 I think the point is that even with bootloader-utils installed,
 kernel2.6 complains of needing kernel-utils.  Since there apparently
 is no kernel-utils anymore, but bootloader-utils instead, the
 dependencies for Kernel2.6 are wrong.

Right, but does it need a rebuilt for this ?

-- 
Olivier Blin



Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Thomas Backlund
From: Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  I think the point is that even with bootloader-utils installed,
  kernel2.6 complains of needing kernel-utils.  Since there apparently
  is no kernel-utils anymore, but bootloader-utils instead, the
  dependencies for Kernel2.6 are wrong.
 
 Right, but does it need a rebuilt for this ?
 

I think you do, since there is an other thing you need to change
at the same time...

you have to add the -L parameter to every /sbin/installkernel 
%post script, ( it makes the installkernel not add/modify the 
symlinks in /boot), since currently if you install a main 2.4 kernel,
and a 2.6 kernel from contribs, the initrd.img, vmlinuz, and
System.map symlinks will point to the 2.6 kernel,
making the lilo entries linux, linux-nonfb and failsafe all using the 
2.6 kernel, wich will lead to a disaster... 
think of people trying to troubleshoot their system, and they are told
to boot into failsafe - they will be booting into an 2.6 test-kernel...

Regards

Thomas

PS. Danny!
I haven't checked how your kernel is doing this, but since it's an
stable 2.4 kernel, the problem isn't that big, OTOH it's a
contrib kernel, so I think the MDK people would like it better 
if you to would be doing this ... 
(I added the same to my kernels beginning with 2.4.22-1.tmb.1mdk),
Sorry I forgot to mention this to you in my earlier mail...






Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Olivier Blin
 I think you do, since there is an other thing you need to change
 at the same time...

ok, i'll do that :)

 you have to add the -L parameter to every /sbin/installkernel 
 %post script, ( it makes the installkernel not add/modify the 
 symlinks in /boot), since currently if you install a main 2.4 kernel,
 and a 2.6 kernel from contribs, the initrd.img, vmlinuz, and
 System.map symlinks will point to the 2.6 kernel,
 making the lilo entries linux, linux-nonfb and failsafe all using the 
 2.6 kernel, wich will lead to a disaster... 

you're right ...

-- 
Olivier Blin



Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Buchan Milne
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:

 PS. Danny!
 I haven't checked how your kernel is doing this, but since it's an
 stable 2.4 kernel, the problem isn't that big, OTOH it's a
 contrib kernel, so I think the MDK people would like it better 
 if you to would be doing this ... 
 (I added the same to my kernels beginning with 2.4.22-1.tmb.1mdk),
 Sorry I forgot to mention this to you in my earlier mail...


But if a user installs a new kernel, that kernel should be their new 
default? IMHO, there is a problem with installkernel's logic, it should be 
making versioned bootloader entries for the previous default kernel, not 
the new one, which would ensure that on the first kernel installed after 
installation of the distro, the user wouldn't lose access to their 
original kernel (this assuming installkernel hasn't changed that much 
since it was in initscripts).

Regards,
Buchan

-- 
|Registered Linux User #182071-|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
*
Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our
e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy.
*



Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Olivier Blin
  you have to add the -L parameter to every /sbin/installkernel 
  %post script, ( it makes the installkernel not add/modify the 
  symlinks in /boot), since currently if you install a main 2.4
  kernel, and a 2.6 kernel from contribs, the initrd.img, vmlinuz, and
  System.map symlinks will point to the 2.6 kernel,
  making the lilo entries linux, linux-nonfb and failsafe all using
  the 2.6 kernel, wich will lead to a disaster... 
 
 you're right ...

but it was already done in kernel-2.6-2.6.0-0.test4.1mdk ...

-- 
Olivier Blin



Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Olivier Blin
 But if a user installs a new kernel, that kernel should be their new 
 default? IMHO, there is a problem with installkernel's logic, it
 should be making versioned bootloader entries for the previous default
 kernel, not the new one, which would ensure that on the first kernel
 installed after installation of the distro, the user wouldn't lose
 access to their original kernel (this assuming installkernel hasn't
 changed that much since it was in initscripts).

I think the best would be to always make versionned bootloader entries
when a kernel is installed and to update the symlinks.
The only missing versionnned bootloader entry is the one that
comes with the first installed kernel.

-- 
Olivier Blin



Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Thomas Backlund
From: Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   you have to add the -L parameter to every /sbin/installkernel 
   %post script, ( it makes the installkernel not add/modify the 
   symlinks in /boot), since currently if you install a main 2.4
   kernel, and a 2.6 kernel from contribs, the initrd.img, vmlinuz, and
   System.map symlinks will point to the 2.6 kernel,
   making the lilo entries linux, linux-nonfb and failsafe all using
   the 2.6 kernel, wich will lead to a disaster... 
  
  you're right ...
 
 but it was already done in kernel-2.6-2.6.0-0.test4.1mdk ...
 

Ah.
sorry about that... 
I didn't recheck the latest 2.6 kernels...
It was just something I remembered happend to me when I
last did a Cooker Reinstall, and that was with the 2.6-test3 if IRC,
and I don't remember seeing any changes to this in the changelog...

so that leves us with the bootloader/kernel -utils...
I don't think it's an urgent problem as long as it's rebuilt before
9.2 Final... 

Thomas




Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Olivier Blin
 Ah.
 sorry about that... 
 I didn't recheck the latest 2.6 kernels...
 It was just something I remembered happend to me when I
 last did a Cooker Reinstall, and that was with the 2.6-test3 if IRC,
 and I don't remember seeing any changes to this in the changelog...

Strange, it is like this since the first spec revision.
http://cvs.mandrakesoft.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/contrib-SPECS/kernel-2.6/kernel-2.6.spec?rev=1.1content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
Or do you mean -L is missing for some custom kernel ? It looks good

 so that leves us with the bootloader/kernel -utils...
 I don't think it's an urgent problem as long as it's rebuilt before
 9.2 Final... 

I will do that just in case there is no other release of kernel-2.6
until 9.2 final.

-- 
Olivier Blin



Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Thomas Backlund
From: Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Thomas Backlund wrote:

  PS. Danny!
  I haven't checked how your kernel is doing this, but since it's an
  stable 2.4 kernel, the problem isn't that big, OTOH it's a
  contrib kernel, so I think the MDK people would like it better
  if you to would be doing this ...
  (I added the same to my kernels beginning with 2.4.22-1.tmb.1mdk),
  Sorry I forgot to mention this to you in my earlier mail...


 But if a user installs a new kernel, that kernel should be their new
 default? IMHO, there is a problem with installkernel's logic, it should be
 making versioned bootloader entries for the previous default kernel, not
 the new one, which would ensure that on the first kernel installed after
 installation of the distro, the user wouldn't lose access to their
 original kernel (this assuming installkernel hasn't changed that much
 since it was in initscripts).


That's my opinion too, but if IRC there was a discussion earlier on this
same topic, wich pretty much ended up in an
someone at mdk didn't like the idea..., so it got rejected...

Maybe I'll have to provide a alternate bootloader-utils on my homepage,
that does it the other way around so people can try it out...
and if they like it maybe mdk will pick it up...

Thomas





Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Thomas Backlund
From: Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Ah.
  sorry about that...
  I didn't recheck the latest 2.6 kernels...
  It was just something I remembered happend to me when I
  last did a Cooker Reinstall, and that was with the 2.6-test3 if IRC,
  and I don't remember seeing any changes to this in the changelog...

 Strange, it is like this since the first spec revision.

http://cvs.mandrakesoft.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/contrib-SPECS/kernel-2.6/kernel-2.6.spec?rev=1.1content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
 Or do you mean -L is missing for some custom kernel ? It looks good


Now this is weird,
either it's a DrakX installer bug, or I got bitten by a broken
installkernel...
Oh well, I'm syncing my cooker mirror right now,
and will do a couple of testinstalls to chek if my earlier reported bugs
are still there, and I'll check this at the same time...

I'll let you know how it goes

  so that leves us with the bootloader/kernel -utils...
  I don't think it's an urgent problem as long as it's rebuilt before
  9.2 Final...

 I will do that just in case there is no other release of kernel-2.6
 until 9.2 final.


That's good ;-)
it will minimize the some bugreports...

 -- 
 Olivier Blin






Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-06 Thread Olivier Blin
  Some package requested cannot be installed:
  kernel-2.6.0-0.test4.2mdk-1-1mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied
  kernel-utils[*]) (Y/n) y
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] rfox]#
 
 It's just because it's not been rebuilt to depend on bootloader-utils
 instead, I think...

Done, kernel-2.6-2.6.0-0.test4.3mdk has hit mirrors :)

-- 
Olivier Blin



[Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-05 Thread Robert Fox
I can't install and test kernel-2.6 under Cooker because of the missing
kernel-utils package.

Anyone know where they are?

Thx,
R.Fox
-- 
Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fox Consulting Services




Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-05 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I can't install and test kernel-2.6 under Cooker because of the
 missing kernel-utils package.

replaced by bootloader-utils




Re: [Cooker] kernel-utils missing from mirrors

2003-09-05 Thread guran
On Friday 05 September 2003 23.05, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
 Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I can't install and test kernel-2.6 under Cooker because of the
  missing kernel-utils package.

 replaced by bootloader-utils

Well I have a new hd.img installation for a couple of hours ago and NVIDIA's 
new installer can't install without kheader.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nvidia]$ rpm -qa bootloader-utils
bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk
As you can see the bootloader is not enough.
There are two ways out of this, the rest of the world changes their way and 
follow in line or a symlink or similar is setup.

guran
-- 
Mandrake Linux Cooker 9.2, KDE, kernel-i686-up-4GB-2.4.22.5mdk-1-1mdk 
VERSION:200309051823