Re: [Cooker] lm_sensors 2.8.0 is out

2003-07-20 Thread Andrey Borzenkov

[...]
> Does this mean that the Mandrake kernel is patched to already include all 
the 
> modules in the current lm_sensors version, 

Jain. Mandrake kernel includes some (most of the) modules available in version 
integrated in it. It is not always the latest version obviously.

[...]

> Since it looks like the i2c package has been progressively better integrated 
> into the kernel, maybe with kernel 2.6 and lm_sensors 2.8 (some of) these 
> troubles will go away?

lm_sensors project so far is for 2.4 only. 2.6 has in-tree support but the 
number of supported chips is small comparing with 2.4. Also libsensors still 
does not support new sysfs interface and interface itself has problems with 
providing clean chip identification to user level apps (at least, compatible 
with old sensors.conf).




Re: [Cooker] lm_sensors 2.8.0 is out

2003-07-20 Thread Andi Payn
On Sunday 20 July 2003 05:46, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Please upgrade lm_sensors and kernel packages.

I've been looking at the lm_sensors package, and I think I'm missing 
something. When I've used this in the past (built from the tarball), the i2c 
and lm_sensors packages have both built kernel modules that I had to install. 
But in the Mandrake lm_sensors package, no kernel modules seem to be built.

Does this mean that the Mandrake kernel is patched to already include all the 
modules in the current lm_sensors version, or does it mean that whichever 
sensors need extra modules just aren't going to work?

For example, I've got a Dell PowerEdge 2400, which has three ltc1710 sensors 
and an smbus-arp controller, as well as a slew of lm75's and eeproms. When I 
install the RPM (or build the SRPM), everything but the eeproms is useless: 
the lm75's fail to read because they're disabled, and the ltc1710 and arp 
fail to read because the kernel modules don't exist. When I build manually 
from the tarball, everything sort of works ("sort of" because the lm75's 
still don't actually read the temperature; I think the BIOS is doing funky 
things).

Since it looks like the i2c package has been progressively better integrated 
into the kernel, maybe with kernel 2.6 and lm_sensors 2.8 (some of) these 
troubles will go away? If not, I think there's a problem that has to be fixed 
(unless it's acceptable that only some sensors are readable--which it might 
be, because the most common/useful ones usually are).




Re: [Cooker] lm_sensors 2.8.0 is out

2003-07-20 Thread Austin
On 2003.07.20 08:46, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Please upgrade lm_sensors and kernel packages.
(and ALSA!)

Austin

--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
 Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching Assistant
   Department of Chemistry, York University, Toronto
 MandrakeClub Volunteer (www.mandrakeclub.com)
 homepage: www.groundstate.ca


[Cooker] lm_sensors 2.8.0 is out

2003-07-20 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Please upgrade lm_sensors and kernel packages.
-- 
Disks are always full. It is futile to try to get more disk space. Data 
expands to fill any void. 
-- Murphy's Computer Laws n°4