Re: [Cooker] proftpd don't work

2003-01-28 Thread Warly
Varas Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I have proftpd 1.2.7 Stable , it is not working, my file of
 configuration has been always the same. What may I to do ?

It is not working has never be any kind of valid bug report.

-- 
Warly




Re: [Cooker] proftpd don't work

2003-01-28 Thread francesco.melo
Warly wrote:


Varas Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 

I have proftpd 1.2.7 Stable , it is not working, my file of
configuration has been always the same. What may I to do ?
   


It is not working has never be any kind of valid bug report.

 

service proftpd  start
Avvio proftpd:  - Fatal: unknown configuration directive 'ShowDotFiles' 
on line 70 of '/etc/proftpd.conf'.
   [FALLITO ]
[root@vete vete]#

always the same for me too

regard
francesco




Re: [Cooker] proftpd don't work

2003-01-28 Thread Warly
francesco.melo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Warly wrote:

Varas Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


I have proftpd 1.2.7 Stable , it is not working, my file of
configuration has been always the same. What may I to do ?


It is not working has never be any kind of valid bug report.


 service proftpd  start
 Avvio proftpd:  - Fatal: unknown configuration directive
 'ShowDotFiles' on line 70 of '/etc/proftpd.conf'.
 [FALLITO ]
 [root@vete vete]#

 always the same for me too

[root@proca mnt]# grep  ShowDotFiles /usr/share/doc/proftpd-1.2.7/NEWS
- Removed the deprecated AllowChmod and ShowDotFiles configuration directives.


-- 
Warly




Re: [Cooker] proftpd don't work

2003-01-28 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Jan 28, 2003 at 04:53:01PM +0100, francesco.melo wrote:

 I have proftpd 1.2.7 Stable , it is not working, my file of
 configuration has been always the same. What may I to do ?

 
 
 It is not working has never be any kind of valid bug report.
 
  
 
 service proftpd  start
 Avvio proftpd:  - Fatal: unknown configuration directive 'ShowDotFiles' 
 on line 70 of '/etc/proftpd.conf'.
[FALLITO ]
 [root@vete vete]#
 
 always the same for me too

Just a guess, but maybe try commenting out or removing ShowDotFiles
in your config?

So you don't have to go hunting for it, it's on line 70 of
/etc/proftpd.conf.

-- 
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import
{FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}


msg88456/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Cooker] proftpd don't work

2003-01-28 Thread francesco.melo
Vincent Danen wrote:


On Tue Jan 28, 2003 at 04:53:01PM +0100, francesco.melo wrote:

 

I have proftpd 1.2.7 Stable , it is not working, my file of
configuration has been always the same. What may I to do ?
 

   

It is not working has never be any kind of valid bug report.



 

service proftpd  start
Avvio proftpd:  - Fatal: unknown configuration directive 'ShowDotFiles' 
on line 70 of '/etc/proftpd.conf'.
  [FALLITO ]
[root@vete vete]#

always the same for me too
   


Just a guess, but maybe try commenting out or removing ShowDotFiles
in your config?

So you don't have to go hunting for it, it's on line 70 of
/etc/proftpd.conf.

 

i changed to default and now works 
:)
thanks
francesco




[Cooker] proftpd 1.2.7 stable

2003-01-26 Thread Varas Jim
Excuse moi, je ne peux pas faire marcher proftpd, avant ça fonctionnait 
parfait et je ne comprends pas pour quoi il ne veux pas fonctionner 
maintenant avec le même fichier de configuration qui fonctionnaît depuis 
toujours.

--
Je ne voulais qu'essayer de vivre ce qui voulait spontanément surgir
de moi. Pourquoi était-ce si difficile ?(...)


 Hesse.





Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.7 stable

2003-01-26 Thread Olivier Thauvin
This is not a support list.

I agree to help you, but please in private.

Mail moi en privé ton problème...

Le Dimanche 26 Janvier 2003 23:05, Varas Jim a écrit :
 Excuse moi, je ne peux pas faire marcher proftpd, avant ça fonctionnait
 parfait et je ne comprends pas pour quoi il ne veux pas fonctionner
 maintenant avec le même fichier de configuration qui fonctionnaît depuis
 toujours.

-- 
Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer
une pomme en véritable ordinateur. - JL.
Olivier Thauvin - http://nanardon.homelinux.org/




[Cooker] proftpd don't work

2003-01-26 Thread Varas Jim
I have proftpd 1.2.7 Stable , it is not working, my file of 
configuration has been always the same. What may I to do ?

--
Je ne voulais qu'essayer de vivre ce qui voulait spontanément surgir
de moi. Pourquoi était-ce si difficile ?(...)


 Hesse.

ServerName  georgina
ServerType  standalone
DefaultServer   on
ServerIdent off
DeferWelcomeoff
ShowSymlinkson
MultilineRFC2228on
AllowOverwrite  on
AllowStoreRestart   on

Port21

Umask   022

TimeoutNoTransfer   600
TimeoutStalled  600
TimeoutIdle 600

MaxInstances30

DisplayLoginwelcome.msg
DisplayFirstChdir   .message
LsDefaultOptions

DenyFilter  \*.*/

Usernobody
Group   nogroup

Directory /*
Limit ALL
 order deny,allow
 allow from 129.104.0.0/16
 allow from 129.168.1.0/24
 allow from 127.0.0.1
/Limit
Umask   022 022
  AllowOverwriteon
/Directory

PersistentPasswdoff

Anonymous ~ftp
  User  ftp
  Group ftp

  UserAlias anonymous ftp

  MaxClients2 désolé, il y a déjà %m gars conectés, reviens plus 
tard stp

  MaxClientsPerHost 1 reste calme, 1 ça suffit  

  RequireValidShell on
  HideGroup root
  HideNoAccess  on
  AnonRequirePassword   off

  DisplayLogin  welcome.msg
  DisplayFirstChdir .message

  Limit WRITE
DenyAll
  /Limit

  Limit LOGIN
order deny,allow
allow from  129.104.0.0/16
allow from  129.168.1.0/24
allow from  127.0.0.1
  /Limit LOGIN

  Directory uploads
  Limit READ WRITE STOR
  order deny,allow
  allow from ALL
  /Limit
  /Directory
 
/Anonymous



Re: [Cooker] Proftpd init script patch

2002-08-29 Thread Geoffrey Lee

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:06:31PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
 Strange, i was sure to have already reported it...
 


oh ok it must have slipped through the cracks.


 --- /etc/init.d/proftpd~2002-07-11 16:56:28.0 +0200
 +++ /etc/init.d/proftpd 2002-08-28 21:04:39.0 +0200
 @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
start)
 gprintf Starting proftpd: 
 daemon proftpd
 +   RETVAL=$?
 echo
 [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ]  touch /var/lock/subsys/proftpd
 ;;
 
 -- 
 Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
 





[Cooker] Proftpd init script patch

2002-08-28 Thread Guillaume Rousse

Strange, i was sure to have already reported it...

--- /etc/init.d/proftpd~2002-07-11 16:56:28.0 +0200
+++ /etc/init.d/proftpd 2002-08-28 21:04:39.0 +0200
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
   start)
gprintf Starting proftpd: 
daemon proftpd
+   RETVAL=$?
echo
[ $RETVAL -eq 0 ]  touch /var/lock/subsys/proftpd
;;

-- 
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html





[Cooker] proftpd and tcp wrappers

2002-02-24 Thread Mattias Dahlberg

Hi,

Why isn't proftpd tcp wrapped by default? I understand that there has to
be a reason for this, as it's been the case since 8.0 IIRC.

Many have learned to put ALL:ALL in hosts.deny the first thing they do
after installing a Linux system. And then open up service by service in
hosts.allow. Unfortunately this doesn't work with proftpd as it's
installed now. Even if you have ALL:ALL in hosts.deny it's possible to
connect to your ftp server.

Regards,
Mattias





[Cooker] proftpd won't start: missing nobody group

2002-02-05 Thread Claudio

I had to manually

groupadd nobody

in order to allow proftpd starting correctly!
C.

-- 
Claudio Panichi
System/Network Admin at Dept. of Physics
Tor Vergata University and INFN - Sec. Roma II
Remote System is: LINUX Mandrake




Re: [Cooker] proftpd won't start: missing nobody group

2002-02-05 Thread Guillaume Rousse

Ainsi parlait Claudio :
 I had to manually

   groupadd nobody

 in order to allow proftpd starting correctly!
It seems converting nobody to nogroup in proftpd.conf would be a better 
solution...
-- 
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html




Re: [Cooker] proftpd won't start: missing nobody group

2002-02-05 Thread Geoffrey Lee

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 02:38:23PM +0100, Claudio wrote:
 I had to manually
 
   groupadd nobody
 
 in order to allow proftpd starting correctly!


Urgh. I didn't notice that.

I think for most systems it's Ok to have nobody as a group as well, I 
remember that we used to have it before, I'm not sure why it was removed ..

Chmouel can you add it back again?


- G.




Re: [Cooker] proftpd won't start: missing nobody group

2002-02-05 Thread Claudio

On Tuesday 05 February 2002 02:36 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
 Ainsi parlait Claudio :
  I had to manually
 
  groupadd nobody
 
  in order to allow proftpd starting correctly!

 It seems converting nobody to nogroup in proftpd.conf would be a better
 solution...

I agree, but developers should find a common decision!  ;p
C.




Re: [Cooker] proftpd-1.2.5-0.rc1.1mdk proftpd-anonymous-1.2.4-2mdk

2002-01-17 Thread Vincent Danen

On Thu Jan 17, 2002 at 11:12:46AM +1100, Geoffrey Lee wrote:

  Please update proftpd-anonymous.
 
 Yeh vdanen suck coz he rebuilt it from an older src rpm ;p

Yes, I do.  =)  Fixed now tho.

-- 
MandrakeSoft Security, OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
1024D/FE6F2AFD   88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD

Current Linux kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk uptime: 6 days 0 hours 12 minutes.



msg51482/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Cooker] proftpd-1.2.5-0.rc1.1mdk proftpd-anonymous-1.2.4-2mdk

2002-01-16 Thread Yura Gusev


Please update proftpd-anonymous.

-- 
 10:24pm  up 21 days,  9:35,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
  O //
 ==-}  -.--._.-^-(.}
  )'/{   ( \d
 ./\, ) -._.- 
/  /   `\/' GNU  -=LFS*1482=-
I am not 31337. But I can use the Vi editor... ;-0





Re: [Cooker] proftpd-1.2.5-0.rc1.1mdk proftpd-anonymous-1.2.4-2mdk

2002-01-16 Thread Geoffrey Lee

On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 10:25:25PM -0500, Yura Gusev wrote:
 
 Please update proftpd-anonymous.
 

Yeh vdanen suck coz he rebuilt it from an older src rpm ;p

-- Geoff.





[Cooker] proftpd package issues....

2001-10-25 Thread Cain Brian-BCAIN1

Greetings,

I've had a spot of trouble installing a recent proftpd source package.  I
currently have a binary package installed (though I don't see why I couldn't
upgrade to a newer source one).  Attempts listed below:

~~~
[root@x /root]# rpm --upgrade -vh proftpd-1.2.4-1mdk.src.rpm 
proftpd
##
[root@x /root]# rpm -qa | grep proftpd
proftpd-1.2.2-2mdk
[root@x /root]# rpm -ivvh proftpd-1.2.4-1mdk.src.rpm 
D: counting packages to install
D: found 1 packages
D: looking for packages to download
D: retrieved 0 packages
D: New Header signature
D: Signature size: 149
D: Signature pad : 3
D: sigsize : 152
D: Header + Archive: 506915
D: expected size   : 506915
D: found 1 source and 0 binary packages
D: New Header signature
D: Signature size: 149
D: Signature pad : 3
D: sigsize : 152
D: Header + Archive: 506915
D: expected size   : 506915
D: installing a source package
D: sources in: /usr/src/RPM/SOURCES
D: spec file in: /usr/src/RPM/SPECS
D:file: proftpd-1.2.2-conf.patch.bz2 action: unknown
D:file: proftpd-1.2.2-ldap.patch.bz2 action: unknown
D:file: proftpd-1.2.4.tar.bz2 action: unknown
D:file: proftpd.init action: unknown
D:file: proftpd.logrotate action: unknown
D:file: proftpd.spec action: unknown
D:file: proftpd.xinetd action: unknown
proftpd
#GZDIO:  63 reads,
508348 total bytes in 0.162 secs
#
[root@x /root]# rpm -qa | grep proftpd
proftpd-1.2.2-2mdk


Does this mean there's a problem with the package?

I welcome pointers to appropriate documentation, or a more appropriate forum
to ask this question if it doesn't belong here.

-Brian




Re: [Cooker] proftpd package issues....

2001-10-25 Thread Vincent Danen

On Thu Oct 25, 2001 at 01:05:20PM -0500, Cain Brian-BCAIN1 wrote:

 Greetings,
 
 I've had a spot of trouble installing a recent proftpd source package.  I
 currently have a binary package installed (though I don't see why I couldn't
 upgrade to a newer source one).  Attempts listed below:
 
 ~~~
 [root@x /root]# rpm --upgrade -vh proftpd-1.2.4-1mdk.src.rpm 
 proftpd
 ##
 [root@x /root]# rpm -qa | grep proftpd
 proftpd-1.2.2-2mdk

No.  It worked fine.  You installed the *source* package.  The srpm
does not get listed in the rpm database.  If you go into
/usr/src/RPM/SPECS you will see the proftpd.spec in there and can from
there do rpm -ba proftpd.spec to rebuild the package.

If you want to update your proftpd install, you need to install the
i586.rpm not the src.rpm.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
1024D/FE6F2AFD   88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD
 - Danen Consulting Serviceswww.danen.net, www.freezer-burn.org
 - MandrakeSoft, Inc. Security  www.linux-mandrake.com

Current Linux kernel 2.4.8-30.1mdk uptime: 13 hours 21 minutes.

 PGP signature


Re: [Cooker] proftpd package issues....

2001-10-25 Thread Onur Kucuk

CBB Greetings,

CBB I've had a spot of trouble installing a recent proftpd source package.  I
CBB currently have a binary package installed (though I don't see why I couldn't
CBB upgrade to a newer source one).  Attempts listed below:

CBB ~~~
CBB [root@x /root]# rpm --upgrade -vh proftpd-1.2.4-1mdk.src.rpm 
CBB proftpd
CBB ##
CBB [root@x /root]# rpm -qa | grep proftpd
CBB proftpd-1.2.2-2mdk
CBB [root@x /root]# rpm -ivvh proftpd-1.2.4-1mdk.src.rpm 
CBB -Brian

 Guess it would be better to ask it in the newbie list, or may be in
 the expert.

 As you read the file name you see a src right before the rpm. That
 means it is not an rpm file , but it is a source rpm file, so that
 you should compile it.

 If you have bandwith, find one that is not src.

 or.

 run rpm to compile it for you

 rpm --rebuild proftpd-1.2.4-1mdk.src.rpm

 You will find the compiled package in /usr/src/RPM if I remember it
 right. If not, it writes at the end , where it puts the ready rpm
 file.

 
 Onur Kucuk



_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.3 is out

2001-10-21 Thread Warly

Mordechai Ovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Friday 19 October 2001 08:31, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
  Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   Ok, now the *REAL* question: where is the DVD ISO section on mandrake
   mirrors
  
   :-) ?
 
  Well
 
  1- the DVD we wrote is full of commercial applications we can't distribute
  2- we already overruse mirrors :-)
  3- who owns DVD burners except us? (6000 FRF was the cost for a Pioneer)
 
 Most DVDs use UDF, not ISO

At present the UDF filesystem creation is more than premature on linux, or
at least I do not know how to make bootable UDF filesystem and to burn
then on the DVD.

That is why the Mandrake Linux DVD is a 4.5 GB iso file.

But you can generate a DVD iso file with mkcd2, just specifying 4.5
GiB as the disc size instead of 650 MiB.

-- 
Warly




Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.3 is out

2001-10-21 Thread Marcel Pol

On 21 Oct 2001 13:36:29 +0200
Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mordechai Ovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  On Friday 19 October 2001 08:31, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
   Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, now the *REAL* question: where is the DVD ISO section on
mandrake
mirrors
  
   1- the DVD we wrote is full of commercial applications we can't
distribute
   2- we already overruse mirrors :-)
   3- who owns DVD burners except us? (6000 FRF was the cost for a
Pioneer)
  
  Most DVDs use UDF, not ISO
 
 At present the UDF filesystem creation is more than premature on
linux, or
 at least I do not know how to make bootable UDF filesystem and to
burn
 then on the DVD.

According to this review it's not very promising at the moment.
With cdrw's it mostly screwed up the cdrw's.
I guess that won't be fun with more expensive dvd's.

http://machineofthemonth.org/articles/a77/index.html

Greetings,
--
Marcel Pol
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.3 is out

2001-10-19 Thread Geoffrey Lee

[...]

  [gc@bi ~] rpmmon[1] -p proftpd
  snailtalk
 
 
  Ref:
  [1] http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/html/rpmmon-tut.html
 
 Thanks, I'm notorious about forgetting the rpmmon tool...
 


Oh. Very well.

I'll take a look at it right now. :-)

- G.





Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.3 is out

2001-10-19 Thread Fabrice FACORAT

Le Vendredi 19 Octobre 2001 08:58, Geoffrey Lee scribit :
 Oh. Very well.

 I'll take a look at it right now. :-)

pure-ftpd seems to be more secure and have more functionnality to me ( cf contrib, and 
I hope to see it in mainstream )
http://pureftpd.sourceforge.net/

Feature WU-FTPd 2.6.1   ProFTPd 1.2.2   Pure-FTPd 
0.99.9
PAM authentication  *YES*   *YES*   *YES*
Virtual servers *YES*   *YES*   *YES*
Standalone mode *YES*   *YES*   *YES*
MySQL users databaseno  *YES*   *YES*
Customizable SQL requests   no  no  *YES*
On-demand home directories  no  (ldap only) *YES*
LDAP users database no  *YES*   *YES*
Built-in MD5/SHA cryptography   no  no  *YES*
Extended logs for ftpStats  no  no  *YES*
Advanced idle detection no  no  *YES*
IPv6 supportno  no  *YES*
'Fortune' cookies   no  no  *YES*
Internationalisationno  no  *YES*
Partition fill-up preventionno  no  *YES*
Password tapping*YES*   no  *YES*
'ls' depth limiting no  no  *YES*
'ls' results limiting   no  no  *YES*
EPRT/EPSV support   no  no  *YES*
Modern directory listings (MLST)no  no  *YES*
Extensible attributes (MLSD)no  no  *YES*
STOU support*YES*   no  *YES*
SPSV supportno  no  *YES*
Load average check  *YES*   no  *YES*
Bandwidth throttlingno  *YES*   *YES*
Linux capabitilies drop no  *YES*   *YES*
Never switch uids   no  no  *YES*
Chroot() home directories*YES*  *YES*   *YES*
Upload/download ratios  *YES*   *YES*   *YES*
Built-in 'ls'   Experimental*YES*   *YES*
HTML/CGI activity reporting no  no  *YES*
XML activity reporting  no  no  *YES*
Report individual bandwidth usage   no  no  *YES*
Run a script after upload   no  no  *YES*
Auto-rename uploaded files  no  no  *YES*
Fast indexed virtual users  no  no  *YES*
Virtual quotas  no  (yes, but very insecure) *YES*
Languages   english english 
*english, german, romanian, french, polish, spanish, danish, dutch, italian, brazilian 
portuguese*
Apache-like (CLF) log files no  no  *YES*
Large files (2Gb) support  no  no  *YES*
KDE configuration interface *YES*   no  *YES*
Avg minimal executable size 252 Kb  311 Kb  *51 Kb*


-- 
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html 
-
Une femme est comme votre ombre, courrez après, elle vous fuit; 
fuyez-la, elle vous court après. Alfred De Musset




Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.3 is out

2001-10-19 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Fridayen den 19 October 2001 08.58, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
 [...]

   [gc@bi ~] rpmmon[1] -p proftpd
   snailtalk
  
  
   Ref:
   [1] http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/html/rpmmon-tut.html
 
  Thanks, I'm notorious about forgetting the rpmmon tool...

 Oh. Very well.

 I'll take a look at it right now. :-)

   - G.

Ok, he he :)

-- 
Oden Eriksson, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Vitamin) for i586, kernel 2.4.10-6mdksmp. Uptime: 
12:13




Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.3 is out

2001-10-19 Thread Guillaume Rousse

Ainsi parlait Guillaume Cottenceau :
 Argh if I knew that[1]...



 Ref:
 [1] http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/html/proftpd_largefiles.html
Ok, now the *REAL* question: where is the DVD ISO section on mandrake mirrors 
:-) ?
-- 
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html




Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.3 is out

2001-10-19 Thread Mordechai Ovits

On Friday 19 October 2001 08:31, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
 Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Ok, now the *REAL* question: where is the DVD ISO section on mandrake
  mirrors
 
  :-) ?

 Well

 1- the DVD we wrote is full of commercial applications we can't distribute
 2- we already overruse mirrors :-)
 3- who owns DVD burners except us? (6000 FRF was the cost for a Pioneer)

Most DVDs use UDF, not ISO

Mordy
-- 
Mordy OvitsBad Password:
Network Securitynds09813-050
Bloomberg L.P.




Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.3 is out

2001-10-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Fabrice FACORAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


[...]

 Feature   WU-FTPd 2.6.1   ProFTPd 1.2.2   Pure-FTPd 
0.99.9

[...]

 Large files (2Gb) supportno  no  *YES*


Argh if I knew that[1]...



Ref: 
[1] http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/html/proftpd_largefiles.html

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.3 is out

2001-10-19 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Ok, now the *REAL* question: where is the DVD ISO section on mandrake mirrors 
 :-) ?

Well

1- the DVD we wrote is full of commercial applications we can't distribute
2- we already overruse mirrors :-)
3- who owns DVD burners except us? (6000 FRF was the cost for a Pioneer)


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.3 is out

2001-10-18 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Fridayen den 19 October 2001 00.45, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
 Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  ftp://ftp.proftpd.org/distrib/source/proftpd-1.2.3.tar.bz2

 You should CC to proftpd maintainer for faster response:

 [gc@bi ~] rpmmon[1] -p proftpd
 snailtalk


 Ref:
 [1] http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/html/rpmmon-tut.html

Thanks, I'm notorious about forgetting the rpmmon tool...

-- 
Oden Eriksson, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
Mandrake Linux release 8.1 (Vitamin) for i586, kernel 2.4.10-6mdksmp. Uptime: 
37 min




Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.3 is out

2001-10-18 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 ftp://ftp.proftpd.org/distrib/source/proftpd-1.2.3.tar.bz2

You should CC to proftpd maintainer for faster response:

[gc@bi ~] rpmmon[1] -p proftpd 
snailtalk


Ref: 
[1] http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/html/rpmmon-tut.html

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




[Cooker] proftpd-1.2.2-2mdk needs dependancy to xinetd

2001-09-26 Thread Christian Bricart



installing proftpd-1.2.2-2mdk on a system lacking xinetd leads to
a warning/error message stating something like: could not find out
something with xinetd.
I guess a missing:

Requires: xinetd

in proftpd's Spec file.

Christian

-- 
Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have
 everyone else mirror it.- Linus Torvalds




Re: [Cooker] proftpd-1.2.2-2mdk needs dependancy to xinetd

2001-09-26 Thread Vincent Danen

On Wed Sep 26, 2001 at 01:59:51PM +0200, Christian Bricart wrote:

 installing proftpd-1.2.2-2mdk on a system lacking xinetd leads to
 a warning/error message stating something like: could not find out
 something with xinetd.
 I guess a missing:
 
 Requires: xinetd
 
 in proftpd's Spec file.

Nope, what it needs is you to configure it to run standalone.  proftpd
does not require xinetd and putting a requires tag in there for it
will annoy people who prefer to use it standalone and may not use/want
xinetd.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
1024D/FE6F2AFD   88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD
 - Danen Consulting Serviceswww.danen.net, www.freezer-burn.org
 - MandrakeSoft, Inc. Security  www.linux-mandrake.com

Current Linux kernel 2.4.8-26mdk uptime: 2 days 19 hours 15 minutes.

 PGP signature


[Cooker] proftpd 1.2.2 (release and rc2) big files corruption problem

2001-09-08 Thread Ural Khassanov

Hi

Proftpd 1.2.2 release and rc2 packages all have this bug on my 8.0 server: 
downloaded files 1mb in size are corrupted.
I downloaded 1417694b tar.gz file 3 times over modem connection and got 100% 
file corruption. Tested with many ftp clients as well.
All packages were rebuilt from src without any errors.
rc1.3 from 8.0 distribution doesn't have this problem and works very well.

Please test and don't include faulty versions in upcoming 8.1 release.




Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.2 (release and rc2) big files corruption problem

2001-09-08 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Ural Khassanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi
 
 Proftpd 1.2.2 release and rc2 packages all have this bug on my 8.0 server: 
 downloaded files 1mb in size are corrupted.
 I downloaded 1417694b tar.gz file 3 times over modem connection and got 100% 
 file corruption. Tested with many ftp clients as well.
 All packages were rebuilt from src without any errors.
 rc1.3 from 8.0 distribution doesn't have this problem and works very well.
 
 Please test and don't include faulty versions in upcoming 8.1 release.

[gc@bi ~] rpmmon -p proftpd
snailtalk


Geoffrey ?


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




[Cooker] proftpd 1.2.2 (release and rc2) big files corruption problem

2001-09-08 Thread Ural Khassanov

Hi

Ural Khassanov wrote:
Proftpd 1.2.2 release and rc2 packages all have this bug on my 8.0 server: 
downloaded files 1mb in size are corrupted.
I downloaded 1417694b tar.gz file 3 times over modem connection and got 100% 
file corruption. Tested with many ftp clients as well.
All packages were rebuilt from src without any errors.
rc1.3 from 8.0 distribution doesn't have this problem and works very well.
Please test and don't include faulty versions in upcoming 8.1 release.

more:
server in standalone mode,
seems no problems when ftp localhost, but 5 min downloads over 33600 line
are broken :(
[sv@uralhome ftptst]$ ls -l
-rw-r--r--1 sv   sv1423696 Sep  7 10:44 NV_good
-rw-r--r--1 sv   sv1423696 Sep  7 04:44 NV_bad
[sv@uralhome ftptst]$ cmp -l NV_bad NV_good
982001 355  15
982002 253 143
982003 356 202
...^C

second file:
[sv@uralhome ftptst]$ ls -l ks*
-rw-r--r--1 sv   sv3706924 Nov  2  1999 ks_bad
-rw-r--r--1 sv   sv3706924 Nov  2  1999 ks_good
[sv@uralhome ftptst]$ cmp -l ks_bad ks_good
1005001 115 262
1005002 132  34
1005003 220 224
...^C

note that differences come on at 001 boundary.




Re: [Cooker] proftpd 1.2.2 (release and rc2) big files corruption problem

2001-09-08 Thread Geoffrey Lee

/* snip */

  downloaded files 1mb in size are corrupted.
  I downloaded 1417694b tar.gz file 3 times over modem connection and got 100% 
  file corruption. Tested with many ftp clients as well.
  All packages were rebuilt from src without any errors.
  rc1.3 from 8.0 distribution doesn't have this problem and works very well.
  
  Please test and don't include faulty versions in upcoming 8.1 release.
 
 [gc@bi ~] rpmmon -p proftpd
 snailtalk
 
 
 Geoffrey ?
 
 


Strange:

Just tested (over a LAN).

This is a 30+ MB WMV file, on the proftpd machine. Logged in, downloaded the 
file and uploaded it back again, and I got no hisses from diff ...

-- 
Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
李長風

http://www.wychk.org/~glee

$ /usr/games/fortune
Anything that can go wrong will go
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ 





Re: [Cooker] proftpd

2001-05-11 Thread Mattias Dahlberg

 proftpd in mdk 8.0 doesn't have mod_wrap compiled-in

Ok, but I hope that's fixed in Cooker?

Regards,
Mattias




Re: [Cooker] proftpd

2001-05-11 Thread Paul Cox

On Thursday, May 10, 2001, Christian Zoffoli wrote:

 proftpd in mdk 8.0 doesn't have mod_wrap compiled-in ...you can start
 proftpd using xinetd (enabling tcp_wrapper in it)

Any particular reason for that?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ#: 25370820, OpenPGP key at www.keyserver.net
1024D/39F0BBF4 2024 B7CB 10BF 6BE7 2ECE  E0FD 1360 0181 39F0 BBF4

Current Linux uptime: 6 days 5 hours 20 minutes.




Re: [Cooker] proftpd

2001-05-11 Thread Geoffrey Lee

On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 12:16:13AM +0200, Mattias Dahlberg wrote:
  proftpd in mdk 8.0 doesn't have mod_wrap compiled-in
 
 Ok, but I hope that's fixed in Cooker?
 

Not yet but thanks for reminding me, /me will take a look at it and do it ..

-- 
Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
李長風

http://www.wychk.org/~glee

$ /usr/games/fortune
Anything that can go wrong will go
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ 





[Cooker] proftpd

2001-05-10 Thread Mattias Dahlberg

Is it correct that the default install of profptd in 8.0 doesn't start via tcp 
wrappers, hence anything in hosts.deny will be ignored?

Regards,
Mattias




Re: [Cooker] proftpd

2001-05-10 Thread Christian Zoffoli

Mattias Dahlberg wrote:
 
 Is it correct that the default install of profptd in 8.0 doesn't start via tcp
 wrappers, hence anything in hosts.deny will be ignored?
 
 Regards,
 Mattias


proftpd in mdk 8.0 doesn't have mod_wrap compiled-in ...you can start
proftpd using xinetd (enabling tcp_wrapper in it)


Christian

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
1024D/2D3C2E70   6241 A35C DD72 242E 5430  2D01 F732 1EEF 2D3C 2E7

 - Littlepenguin Team  www.littlepenguin.org
 - jPackage Team   jpackage.sourceforge.net
 - Genetix Teamgenetix.sourceforge.net




Re: [Cooker] proftpd

2001-02-20 Thread Geoffrey Lee

On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 10:39:27PM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
 
 Should the proftpd package play with /etc/inetd.conf? Nothing uses the
 file anymore, or?


I guess not. I am going to disable support for it.
 
-- 
Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
李長風

http://devel.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk
ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk

$/usr/games/fortune
Anything that can go wrong will go
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$





[Cooker] proftpd

2001-02-19 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld


Should the proftpd package play with /etc/inetd.conf? Nothing uses the
file anymore, or?

seb






[Cooker] proftpd

2000-12-15 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld


Why is the proftpd-anonymous patch empty?

seb






Re: [Cooker] proftpd

2000-12-15 Thread Geoffrey Lee

Yo,

On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 03:17:38PM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
 
 Why is the proftpd-anonymous patch empty?
 

It was /me who made the patch to add something in the basic.conf file to make
ftp logins work, I have no idea why it is empty ... oh well. Just fixed it.

-- 
Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
§õªø­·

http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk
ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk

$/usr/games/fortune
Anything that can go wrong will go
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
$




Re: [Cooker] proftpd install bug

2000-09-17 Thread Pixel

Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[...]

  That makes sense.  The installer picks the wrong ftp daemon to go with
  anonftp.
 
 Ahh, not my problem then. :)
 
 Pixel...? wu-ftpd should go with anonftp while proftpd is standalone.

if anonftp doesn't like proftpd, change the require of anonftp to wu-ftpd
instead of ftpserver! ;p




Re: [Cooker] proftpd install bug

2000-09-16 Thread Robert Haddon


That makes sense.  The installer picks the wrong ftp daemon to go with
anonftp.

Rob

 On Fri Sep 15, 2000 at 09:15:50AM -0700, Robert Haddon wrote:
 
  Proftpd is a package dependency of anonftpd.  So good idea or not, you
  have no choice.
 
 Then this is really wrong...  proftpd should depend on nothing,
 especially anonftp.  And anonftp should depend on wu-ftpd (that's the
 only thing it's really useful with).
 
 Geoffrey?
 
 





Re: [Cooker] proftpd install bug

2000-09-16 Thread Geoffrey Lee



Yo,



 That makes sense.  The installer picks the wrong ftp daemon to go with
 anonftp.



Ahh, not my problem then. :)

Pixel...? wu-ftpd should go with anonftp while proftpd is standalone.

--
Geoff





Re: [Cooker] proftpd install bug

2000-09-15 Thread Geoffrey Lee

Yo,


 Packages: proftpd  anonftp
 Version: (the one from 7.2 Beta1)



Oh but I really don't think that installing proftpd and anonftp together
is so good an idea ..

 The RPM install configures /etc/proftpd.conf for standalone mode AND
 /etc/inetd.conf super-server mode.  This, of course, is invalid.  It must
 be one or the other, but not both.


Yep. Will fix. :)

Thanks.

--
GEoff





Re: [Cooker] proftpd install bug

2000-09-15 Thread Robert Haddon


Proftpd is a package dependency of anonftpd.  So good idea or not, you
have no choice.

On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Geoffrey Lee wrote:

 Yo,
 
 
  Packages: proftpd  anonftp
  Version: (the one from 7.2 Beta1)
 
 
 
 Oh but I really don't think that installing proftpd and anonftp together
 is so good an idea ..
 
  The RPM install configures /etc/proftpd.conf for standalone mode AND
  /etc/inetd.conf super-server mode.  This, of course, is invalid.  It must
  be one or the other, but not both.
 
 
 Yep. Will fix. :)
 
 Thanks.
 
 --
 GEoff
 
 





Re: [Cooker] proftpd install bug

2000-09-15 Thread andre

don't u mean wu-ftp 
 
 Proftpd is a package dependency of anonftpd.  So good idea or not, you
 have no choice.
 
 On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
 
  Yo,
  
  
   Packages: proftpd  anonftp
   Version: (the one from 7.2 Beta1)
  
  
  
  Oh but I really don't think that installing proftpd and anonftp together
  is so good an idea ..
  
   The RPM install configures /etc/proftpd.conf for standalone mode AND
   /etc/inetd.conf super-server mode.  This, of course, is invalid.  It must
   be one or the other, but not both.
  
  
  Yep. Will fix. :)
  
  Thanks.
  
  --
  GEoff
  
  
 
 
 





Re: [Cooker] proftpd install bug

2000-09-15 Thread Vincent Danen

On Fri Sep 15, 2000 at 09:15:50AM -0700, Robert Haddon wrote:

 Proftpd is a package dependency of anonftpd.  So good idea or not, you
 have no choice.

Then this is really wrong...  proftpd should depend on nothing,
especially anonftp.  And anonftp should depend on wu-ftpd (that's the
only thing it's really useful with).

Geoffrey?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
// Danen Consulting Serviceswww.danen.net, www.freezer-burn.org
// MandrakeSoft, Inc.   www.linux-mandrake.com
1024D/FE6F2AFD   88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD

Current Linux uptime: 13 hours 30 minutes.




Re: [Cooker] proftpd install bug

2000-09-15 Thread Geoffrey Lee



 Proftpd is a package dependency of anonftpd.  So good idea or not, you
 have no choice.



anonftp you mean? proftpd provides its own /var/ftp, and they conflict
actually. Vincent was the first one I believe to propose the use of proftpd,
I was also fooled when I asked him why proftpd does not require anonftp.

--
Geoff





Re: [Cooker] proftpd install bug

2000-09-15 Thread Geoffrey Lee

Yo,


 On Fri Sep 15, 2000 at 09:15:50AM -0700, Robert Haddon wrote:

  Proftpd is a package dependency of anonftpd.  So good idea or not, you
  have no choice.

 Then this is really wrong...  proftpd should depend on nothing,
 especially anonftp.  And anonftp should depend on wu-ftpd (that's the
 only thing it's really useful with).



This has been what I was trying to explain all along, in fact, anonftp 
conflict with proftpd

--
Geoff





Re: [Cooker] proftpd install bug

2000-09-15 Thread Vincent Danen

On Sat Sep 16, 2000 at 01:39:23AM +0800, Geoffrey Lee wrote:

  Proftpd is a package dependency of anonftpd.  So good idea or not, you
  have no choice.
 
 anonftp you mean? proftpd provides its own /var/ftp, and they conflict
 actually. Vincent was the first one I believe to propose the use of proftpd,
 I was also fooled when I asked him why proftpd does not require anonftp.

Yup... you got that right... =)  anonftp is only useful if you use wu-ftpd...

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
// Danen Consulting Serviceswww.danen.net, www.freezer-burn.org
// MandrakeSoft, Inc.   www.linux-mandrake.com
1024D/FE6F2AFD   88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD

Current Linux uptime: 17 hours 41 minutes.




[Cooker] proftpd install bug

2000-09-14 Thread Robert Haddon

Packages: proftpd  anonftp
Version: (the one from 7.2 Beta1)

The RPM install configures /etc/proftpd.conf for standalone mode AND
/etc/inetd.conf super-server mode.  This, of course, is invalid.  It must
be one or the other, but not both.

Good work other than that.  I'm really enjoying 7.2 so far.

Regards,
Robert Haddon





Re: [Cooker] proftpd more secure than wuftpd?

2000-07-06 Thread Xavier Bertou

On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 11:43:36PM +0200, Frank Meurer wrote:
 I've follow the thread about wuftpd and proftpd.
[...]
 On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, lamagra wrote:
  ___
  http://lamagra.seKure.de: advisory #1
  
  Advisory: misc. bugs
  Programname: proftpd
  Versions: 1.2.0 = pre10
  Vendor: proftpd.net
  Severity: high (root shell) and low
  Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]

Read http://www.proftpd.org/proftpd-l-archive/00-07/msg00060.html for an
answer about it. I hope the mandrake rpm will follow soon (will it be in
the update directory for MandrakeUpdate to catch it ?).
-- 
Xavier




[Cooker] proftpd more secure than wuftpd?

2000-07-05 Thread Frank Meurer

I've follow the thread about wuftpd and proftpd.
I remember that there were some postings about proftpd
last year in the bugtraq. But before I did search the
archive there came a fresh posting:

On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, lamagra wrote:

   ___
   http://lamagra.seKure.de: advisory #1
 
   Advisory: misc. bugs
   Programname: proftpd
   Versions: 1.2.0 = pre10
   Vendor: proftpd.net
   Severity: high (root shell) and low
   Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Bug1:
   void set_proc_title(char *fmt,...) in src/main.c
 
   snippet
   memset(statbuf, 0, sizeof(statbuf));
   vsnprintf(statbuf, sizeof(statbuf), fmt, msg);
 
   #ifdef HAVE_SETPROCTITLE
   setproctitle(statbuf);
   #endif /* HAVE_SETPROCTITLE */
   /snippet
 
   setproctitle, defined setproctitle(char *fmt,...);, calls vsnprintf().
   This makes it vulnerable for formatattacks. By carefully outlining the
   attackbuffer it's possible to gain root priviledges.
 
   Fix: use setproctitle("%s",statbuf);
 
 Bug2:
   MODRET pam_auth(cmd_rec *cmd) in modules/mod_pam.c
 
   snippet
   /* Allocate our entries...we don't free this because PAM does this for
 us.
*/
   pam_user = malloc(strlen(cmd-argv[0]) + 1);
   if(pam_user == (char *)0)
 return pam_return_type ? ERROR(cmd) : DECLINED(cmd);
   sstrncpy(pam_user, cmd-argv[0], strlen(cmd-argv[0]) + 1);
 
   pam_pass = malloc(strlen(cmd-argv[1]) + 1);
   if(pam_pass == (char *)0)
 return pam_return_type ? ERROR(cmd) : DECLINED(cmd);
   sstrncpy(pam_pass, cmd-argv[1], strlen(cmd-argv[1]) + 1);
   /snippet
 
   PAM doesn't do it for you though. Which leaves a nice memoryleak.
   But since USER/PASS is limited to 3 tries and user changing isn't
 supported.
   This can't be used as a Denial of service attack against proftpd, unless
   the administartor sets a different (higher) limit.
 
   Fix: pstrdup() or just use cmd-argv[0] and cmd-argv[1].
 
 Bug3:
   void logformat(char *nickname, char *fmts) doesn't check boundaries on
 it's
   local variable 'format'. As a result custom logformats could overflow the
   buffer. Just a really small thingie :) Could cause some problems though.
 
 Bug3:
   int dolist(cmd_rec *cmd, const char *opt, int clearflags) in
 modules/mod_ls.c
   snippet
  char   pbuffer[MAXPATHLEN];
 
  if(*arg == '~') {
 struct passwd *pw;
 int i;
 const char *p;
 
 i = 0;
 p = arg;
 p++;
 
 while(*p  *p != '/')
   pbuffer[i++] = *p++;
 pbuffer[i] = '\0';
/snippet
 
This function gets called by cmd_stat, with 'arg' being the argument of
 STAT.
This looks really bad and ugly. But isn't really exploitable since the
 input
buffer is only 1024 bytes. But it's still insecure programming.
 
 
   Copyright 2000-2001
   lamagra.seKure.de
 


-
Sending unsolicited commercial email to this address may be a violation
of the Washington State Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW.
Das Verschicken unverlangter kommerzieller email an diese Adresse ist
verboten (LG Traunstein, 2 HK O 3755/97 vom 14.10.1997, CR 1998, 171f).

(Frank Meurer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP ID: 0x5E756DA8)




Re: [Cooker] proftpd more secure than wuftpd?

2000-07-05 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Frank Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I've follow the thread about wuftpd and proftpd.
 I remember that there were some postings about proftpd
 last year in the bugtraq. But before I did search the
 archive there came a fresh posting:

yep i just forwarded this in our internal mailing list ;).

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel