Re: [Cooker] reiserfs as root filesystem

2001-10-24 Thread Leon Brooks 

On Wednesday 24 October 2001 13:11, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
 Reiserfs doesn't need to be checked
 normally no, but if you put a /forcefsck is should check it
 [root@cooker root]# ll /sbin/fsck.reiserfs
 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   11 Sep 17 10:49
 /sbin/fsck.reiserfs - ../bin/true*

 It does whatever /bin/true command does.

Not even the enhanced version of true does filesystem checks yet.

Just use ext3. 97k of executable at /sbin/fsck.ext3 means that they don't 
presume on perfect self-repair or build everything but the coffee maker into 
the fs. (-:

[Cooker] reiserfs as root filesystem

2001-10-23 Thread Jorg 

when you do a 
/ filesystem is reiserfs
touch /forcefsck
the reboot, it does a filesystem check on the other filesystems, but does 
nothing on the rootfs. using -22mdk initscripts
never runs a check on / filesystem

Jorg

Re: [Cooker] reiserfs as root filesystem

2001-10-23 Thread Matthew D. Pitts 

Jorg,

Reiserfs doesn't need to be checked unless your computer locks up. I ran it
when I was using 7.2.

Matthew D. Pitts

- Original Message -
From: Jorg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:47 PM
Subject: [Cooker] reiserfs as root filesystem


when you do a
/ filesystem is reiserfs
touch /forcefsck
the reboot, it does a filesystem check on the other filesystems, but does
nothing on the rootfs. using -22mdk initscripts
never runs a check on / filesystem

Jorg

RE: [Cooker] reiserfs as root filesystem

2001-10-23 Thread Borsenkow Andrej 

 
  Reiserfs doesn't need to be checked unless your computer locks up. I
ran
 it
  when I was using 7.2.
 
  Matthew D. Pitts
 
 
 
 normally no, but if you put a /forcefsck is should check it

[root@cooker root]# ll /sbin/fsck.reiserfs 
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   11 Sep 17 10:49
/sbin/fsck.reiserfs - ../bin/true*

It does whatever /bin/true command does.

-andrej