Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake - pkg naming upgrade issue

2002-08-20 Thread Franois Pons 

Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Antony Suter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  If i've compiled a pkg to *.athlon.rpm and installed it, rpmdrake
  still shows that I can upgrade this package from a *.i586.rpm that
  has the same version and build number.
 
 Still, same answer, perl-URPM/urpmi are reporting that...
 Francois?

Yes, I undertstand what the problem may be.

It could be seen as best architecture whereas rpm is not so happy with this
distinction urpmi do.

François.

Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake - pkg naming upgrade issue

2002-08-19 Thread Kenton Groombridge 

Woohoo,

It wasn't just me.

Ken

Antony Suter wrote:

If i've compiled a pkg to *.athlon.rpm and installed it, rpmdrake
still shows that I can upgrade this package from a *.i586.rpm that
has the same version and build number.

  

-- 
Kenton A. Groombridge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.coastalnow.net/~kgroombr/

[Cooker] rpmdrake - pkg naming upgrade issue

2002-08-18 Thread Antony Suter 


If i've compiled a pkg to *.athlon.rpm and installed it, rpmdrake
still shows that I can upgrade this package from a *.i586.rpm that
has the same version and build number.

-- 
- Antony Suter  (sutera internode on net)  Exner
- Tools to make tools.