RE: [Cooker] Problem with Beta3
That is correct, those are two different drivers. Drakx doesn't list the driver modules for those cards supported by the two drivers. The detection software finds the controllers but no modules are available. I will be trying a cooker install that I made today and see if it is any different. On the other Mandrake versions 7.2 and 8.0, the drivers would be listed with the scsi controllers. If you need any other info, let me know. Don Dupuis Enterprise X86/IA64 Linux Development Compaq Computer Corp. -Original Message- From: Pixel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Problem with Beta3 Dupuis, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Beta 3 does not allow installing to Compaq Smart Array controllers. The controllers are recognized but the modules are not there. Please fix. Compaq controllers use 2 drivers, cpqarray and cciss. ?? tell more. AFAIK cciss and cpqarray are two different things.
RE: [Cooker] Problem with Beta3
The Cooker that I built today installed just fine. Issue has been fixed!! -Original Message- From: Dupuis, Don Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Cooker] Problem with Beta3 That is correct, those are two different drivers. Drakx doesn't list the driver modules for those cards supported by the two drivers. The detection software finds the controllers but no modules are available. I will be trying a cooker install that I made today and see if it is any different. On the other Mandrake versions 7.2 and 8.0, the drivers would be listed with the scsi controllers. If you need any other info, let me know. Don Dupuis Enterprise X86/IA64 Linux Development Compaq Computer Corp. -Original Message- From: Pixel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Problem with Beta3 Dupuis, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Beta 3 does not allow installing to Compaq Smart Array controllers. The controllers are recognized but the modules are not there. Please fix. Compaq controllers use 2 drivers, cpqarray and cciss. ?? tell more. AFAIK cciss and cpqarray are two different things.
RE: [Cooker] problem with beta3 iso
On Wed, 31 May 2000, B. K. Barley wrote: I downloaded and installed the iso's off of free.net last week and it seems to be ok. You mean free.fr, right? I tried ftp.free.net and it's some weird site in Moscow. Anyway, try "rpm -qp *" in the RPMS2 directory of the ext iso. I'm betting you get a bunch of "does not appear to be a RPM package" errors. -- David Hart Vincity Design *Proudly sent from Linux Mandrake 6.1*
Re: [Cooker] problem with beta3 iso
Darin Peshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, I had the same problem. It seems that start with gimp...rpm package all other packages are damaged. maybe a problem of the free.fr version :-( did you try also with other mirrors versions? -- Guillaume Cottenceau
Re: [Cooker] problem with beta3 iso
On Tue, 30 May 2000, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: I had the same problem. It seems that start with gimp...rpm package all other packages are damaged. maybe a problem of the free.fr version :-( Nope, as stated earlier, tucows is the same. I haven't seen a list of any other mirrors with the iso's, but I would think that if the two main mirrors have bad iso's, then the original is bad. Warly wrote a short note on this list earlier today, acknowledging the problem, but I haven't seen a fixed iso pop up on the mirrors yet. -- David Hart Vincity Design *Proudly sent from Linux Mandrake 6.1*
RE: [Cooker] problem with beta3 iso
I downloaded and installed the iso's off of free.net last week and it seems to be ok. Bryan -Original Message- From: David Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 4:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] problem with beta3 iso On Tue, 30 May 2000, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: I had the same problem. It seems that start with gimp...rpm package all other packages are damaged. maybe a problem of the free.fr version :-( Nope, as stated earlier, tucows is the same. I haven't seen a list of any other mirrors with the iso's, but I would think that if the two main mirrors have bad iso's, then the original is bad. Warly wrote a short note on this list earlier today, acknowledging the problem, but I haven't seen a fixed iso pop up on the mirrors yet. -- David Hart Vincity Design *Proudly sent from Linux Mandrake 6.1*
Re: [Cooker] problem with beta3 iso
Pascal Grosse wrote: Hi list, I downloaded the 2 isos of mdk 7.1beta3 from ftp.free.fr I got some problems : the install program failed to read my second CD. At first i thought of a burning error, but the second time the same bug did appear. So i took a further look at some files on the ext cd. For example xxgdb-1.12-15mdk.i586.rpm was not found to be a valid rpm archive by rpm. I downloaded the same file from an ftp archive, and it looked correct. The 2 files had exactly the same size, but when i edited the iso version with hexedit, i found that it was completelly filled with null bytes ! I looked at many other files, and found the same problem, but not on all. The same behaviour occured also when i mounted the iso as loopback, so i think it is not a burning problem. I redownloaded the iso a second time, and the md5sum test was correct. Has anybody else met the same problem ? Pascal Grosse Yep, I experienced the same problem. Second cd files bad, wont install. Larry
Re: [Cooker] problem with beta3 iso
Yes, I had the same problem. It seems that start with gimp...rpm package all other packages are damaged. Regards, Darin Pascal Grosse wrote: Hi list, I downloaded the 2 isos of mdk 7.1beta3 from ftp.free.fr I got some problems : the install program failed to read my second CD. At first i thought of a burning error, but the second time the same bug did appear. So i took a further look at some files on the ext cd. For example xxgdb-1.12-15mdk.i586.rpm was not found to be a valid rpm archive by rpm. I downloaded the same file from an ftp archive, and it looked correct. The 2 files had exactly the same size, but when i edited the iso version with hexedit, i found that it was completelly filled with null bytes ! I looked at many other files, and found the same problem, but not on all. The same behaviour occured also when i mounted the iso as loopback, so i think it is not a burning problem. I redownloaded the iso a second time, and the md5sum test was correct. Has anybody else met the same problem ? Pascal Grosse
