Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-14 Thread Grégoire Colbert

Thierry Vignaud wrote:
 SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should I disable writeback mode?

 
 safer but slower on writes :-)
 if  you want, put a hdparm -W 0 /dev/hd[XYZ] in your /etc/rc.d/rc.local

man hdparm says that write-caching is disabled by default.

Grégoire





Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-13 Thread Thierry Vignaud

SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  about reiserfs ate my /var partition, note that
  ext3 writeback mode where
  metadata only are journalized, you can still have
  old date or mix of old and new
  data in your files on remount after crash.
  ext3 ordered mode should be safer.  but :
  
  note also that for eide disks, most of them works in
  writeback mode by default,
  ie the eide controller lye to the OS and say ok, it
  has just been written on
  the disk whereas it's only in the disk cache.
  so eide disks can lead to corruption dispite the
  medata journal.
  scsi disks should be safer here.
  
  there're also other hw problems than can lead to
  metadata corruption like the
  via bugs, the dma engine still writing do disk when
  the power is shoot down
  because it's powered longer than ram (ram needs to
  be refresh thousands times
  per second to keep its data), ...

 does the eide disk problem also affect reiserfs?

eide writeback mode affects all fs : by saying ok it's writing whereas it's
only cached, the eide disk/controller couple waits for mode I/O to do them more
intelligently if they can order them, they can achieve better write performance
but if a power problem or a kernel oops occurs, then you can lost your data
since they're not yet written.
this can break journaled fs since they rely on physically written metadata.
but the odds are high you see data corruption before metadata corruption.

 Should I disable writeback mode?

safer but slower on writes :-)
if  you want, put a hdparm -W 0 /dev/hd[XYZ] in your /etc/rc.d/rc.local





Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-10 Thread SI Reasoning

as far as eide hard drives is there not a bios
setting to control that?

--- Thierry Vignaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Nima S. Panahi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  I have had mixed results. I tried to keep my mouth
 shut during the whole
  thread, but I can't any longer. I experimented
 with Reiser since 7.2. All
  it did was each my paritions and I think the VIA
 bug has something to do
  with it. But this was not a rare occation, it ate
 my /home and /var
  multiple times and on different machines (all
 three had some VIA chipset
  as I only use AMD). Then, the newer Reiser version
 cameout and changing
  the paritions to those helped but I still saw
 problems where it reported a
  directory to have 2 gigs of data in it when I only
 had 400 megs!
  I must have been smoking something, because for my
 server, I went all
  ReiserFS with the latest 8.0. I was doing a switch
 from the old server to
  a new one and in the excitement I forgot about my
 ReiserFS problems. I
  almost switch back as soon as I realized what I
 had done. However, I just
  bited down and did regular backups waiting for
 when it went south. IT
  NEVER DID! I hope I am not talking too soon, but
 for a few months it has
  been running w/o any problems. I would still waite
 for it to mature more
  or use XFS, which I have used in many of my
 desktops. IMHO anyways...
 
 about reiserfs ate my /var partition, note that
 ext3 writeback mode where
 metadata only are journalized, you can still have
 old date or mix of old and new
 data in your files on remount after crash.
 ext3 ordered mode should be safer.  but :
 
 note also that for eide disks, most of them works in
 writeback mode by default,
 ie the eide controller lye to the OS and say ok, it
 has just been written on
 the disk whereas it's only in the disk cache.
 so eide disks can lead to corruption dispite the
 medata journal.
 scsi disks should be safer here.
 
 there're also other hw problems than can lead to
 metadata corruption like the
 via bugs, the dma engine still writing do disk when
 the power is shoot down
 because it's powered longer than ram (ram needs to
 be refresh thousands times
 per second to keep its data), ...
 
 reiserfs 
 
 

=
SI Reasoning
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-10 Thread SI Reasoning

does the eide disk problem also affect reiserfs?
Should I disable writeback mode?

--- Thierry Vignaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 about reiserfs ate my /var partition, note that
 ext3 writeback mode where
 metadata only are journalized, you can still have
 old date or mix of old and new
 data in your files on remount after crash.
 ext3 ordered mode should be safer.  but :
 
 note also that for eide disks, most of them works in
 writeback mode by default,
 ie the eide controller lye to the OS and say ok, it
 has just been written on
 the disk whereas it's only in the disk cache.
 so eide disks can lead to corruption dispite the
 medata journal.
 scsi disks should be safer here.
 
 there're also other hw problems than can lead to
 metadata corruption like the
 via bugs, the dma engine still writing do disk when
 the power is shoot down
 because it's powered longer than ram (ram needs to
 be refresh thousands times
 per second to keep its data), ...
 
 reiserfs 
 
 

=
SI Reasoning
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-09 Thread Nima S. Panahi

I have had mixed results. I tried to keep my mouth shut during the whole
thread, but I can't any longer. I experimented with Reiser since 7.2. All
it did was each my paritions and I think the VIA bug has something to do
with it. But this was not a rare occation, it ate my /home and /var
multiple times and on different machines (all three had some VIA chipset
as I only use AMD). Then, the newer Reiser version cameout and changing
the paritions to those helped but I still saw problems where it reported a
directory to have 2 gigs of data in it when I only had 400 megs!
I must have been smoking something, because for my server, I went all
ReiserFS with the latest 8.0. I was doing a switch from the old server to
a new one and in the excitement I forgot about my ReiserFS problems. I
almost switch back as soon as I realized what I had done. However, I just
bited down and did regular backups waiting for when it went south. IT
NEVER DID! I hope I am not talking too soon, but for a few months it has
been running w/o any problems. I would still waite for it to mature more
or use XFS, which I have used in many of my desktops. IMHO anyways...

On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Harry wrote:

 On 8/6/01 2:04 AM, Stefan Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Since then I don't trust ReiserFS = I wouldn't install it
  currently on a critical system, only on playgounds for data loosing ...

 Depending on the nature of your electrical failure, no data is really safe
 if it is preceded by a spike while the drive writes to the disk. In general,
 I have found Reiserfs to be admirably reliable.

 Harry







Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-08 Thread Harry

On 8/6/01 2:04 AM, Stefan Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Since then I don't trust ReiserFS = I wouldn't install it
 currently on a critical system, only on playgounds for data loosing ...

Depending on the nature of your electrical failure, no data is really safe
if it is preceded by a spike while the drive writes to the disk. In general,
I have found Reiserfs to be admirably reliable.

Harry





Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-07 Thread Jose_Jorge


Oh it can't be possible : yesterday someone had problems with ReiserFS, and
this morning my ReiserFS / said no more space avaliable on device! The df
command says unable the read the partition information ! seems like
someone has putten a not funny virus in ReiserFS...

/\


|  José Jorge [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| TEKLYNX International http://www.teklynx.com |
\/


   
  
Brook Humphrey 
  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
Sent by: cc:   
  
cooker-owner@linux-maSubject: Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS 
killed my /var   
ndrake.com 
  
   
  
   
  
06/08/2001 21:03   
  
Please respond to  
  
cooker 
  
   
  
   
  



On Monday 06 August 2001 10:09 am, you wrote:
 On Mon Aug 06, 2001 at 04:07:18PM +0200, Stefan Siegel wrote:


 This is really odd... I've been using reiserfs almost exclusively
 since 7.2 on all my machines.  The only partition that I don't use it
 for is /var because I run qmail on all my machines and there was an
 issue with qmail and reiserfs in the past (no idea if it's fixed, but
 /var being ext2 is a matter of habit now).

 Anyways, I've had a number of power outtages despite having UPS's with
 the systems all of a sudden going down.  I may have lost the odd file
 occassionally, but certainly never an entire partition.  Considering
 this is on about 5 machines all showing the same thing, I'm a little
 hesitant to think it's reiserfs *alone*.  Maybe there is something
 with the files on /var that causes this problem (again, maybe if I had
 reiserfs /var partitions I would have experienced the same thing, I
 don't know).

 I do know that I have never lost more than a handful of files and I've
 got many reiserfs partitions across various systems.

Same here. I did loose two partitions on completetly different hard drives
but tracked it down to hard drive controler failure. The only thing I can
say
about the failure is that the ext2 partitions survived it but reiser didn't

However I run reiser on almost everything and this is the first time I've
had
a problem.









Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-06 Thread Stefan Siegel

Es schrieb Borsenkow Andrej:
 
 
  On 8/3/01 2:21 PM, Grégoire Colbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   1- Is ReiserFS good enough nowadays for a production machine?
 
  Yes, in fact I use it on production machines with great success.
 
 I use it as well, but my systems are not mission critical :-)
 
 
   2- Will it ever become the default filesystem for Mandrake?
 
  One can hope. I'm sure it will be made default after RedHat does so
 :-)
 
 
 Eh? It is default file system suggested by 8.0 install. What else do you
 mean under default filesystem?

It killed my var partiton. When I did reboot my desktop machine after an 
electricity failure, my /var was gone. So I am currently left alone with 
a 8.0 WITHOUT any RPM support, as all relevant files reside there :-\
(In fact the whole system is relatively unusable without an intact /var, 
but most can be reconstructed, except the RPM-DB)

As this was my first encounter with a power failure (and I was hoping the 
jounal would fix arising problems) I lost all data on the ReiserFS 
partition. Lucky me it was not /home with my (not yet finished) diploma 
thesis on it ... Since then I don't trust ReiserFS = I wouldn't install it 
currently on a critical system, only on playgounds for data loosing ...

-- 
_ 
Tschüss und bis demnächst/à bientôt,  _|_|_   
   ()   *
Stefan /v\  / 
 »(   )«  Penguin Powered!
 +(m-m)--+




RE: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-06 Thread Borsenkow Andrej

 
 It killed my var partiton. When I did reboot my desktop machine after
an
 electricity failure, my /var was gone. So I am currently left alone
with
 a 8.0 WITHOUT any RPM support, as all relevant files reside there :-\
 (In fact the whole system is relatively unusable without an intact
/var,
 but most can be reconstructed, except the RPM-DB)
 

What exactly do you mean?

- it was not possible to mount /var?
- it was possible to mount but /var was empty?
- it was not entirely empty but some files were gone?

Have you tried fsck it?

-andrej




Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-06 Thread Stefan Siegel

Es schrieb Borsenkow Andrej:
 
 
  It killed my var partiton. When I did reboot my desktop machine after
  an electricity failure, my /var was gone. So I am currently left alone
  with  a 8.0 WITHOUT any RPM support, as all relevant files reside there 
  :-\
  (In fact the whole system is relatively unusable without an intact
  /var, but most can be reconstructed, except the RPM-DB)
 
 What exactly do you mean?
 
 - it was not possible to mount /var?

Yes, boot pricess gave ma an error message (don't remember any more) and 
left me with a prompt.

 - it was possible to mount but /var was empty?

It was unwilling to mount it (still don't remember error message).

 - it was not entirely empty but some files were gone?

As it was unwilling to mount, I have no idea.
 
 Have you tried fsck it?

After it was unwillint to mount it, yes.

It repoted a lot of note cecking/fixing line (by the way it warned me 
several times that ReiserFsck is totaly unstable and might destroy 
everything before it was starting to check the partition ...).

After that I was able to mount the partition again, but it was totally 
empty !!! :-(

As a result I ran mke2fs on that partition, remounted it and created some 
directories to get able to start my system again. It was a nightmare 
(I thaught sometines I would be sitting on a Window$ system, as all my 
data went away with no possibility to get it back).

As a result my laptop only runs a stable file system (aka ext2) and I 
never had such problems ...

-- 
_ 
Tschüss und bis demnächst/à bientôt,  _|_|_   
   ()   *
Stefan /v\  / 
 »(   )«  Penguin Powered!
 +(m-m)--+
 | Stefan Siegel | http://www.student.uni-kl.de/~siegel/ |
 | Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 34 / App.144 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
 | D-67663 Kaiserslautern| PGP Public Key:   |
 | Tel.: +49-631-18269   |   finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
 +---+




RE: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-06 Thread Borsenkow Andrej

  What exactly do you mean?
 
  - it was not possible to mount /var?
 
 Yes, boot pricess gave ma an error message (don't remember any more)
and
 left me with a prompt.

...
  Have you tried fsck it?
 
 After it was unwillint to mount it, yes.
 
 It repoted a lot of note cecking/fixing line (by the way it warned me
 several times that ReiserFsck is totaly unstable and might destroy
 everything before it was starting to check the partition ...).
 
 After that I was able to mount the partition again, but it was totally
 empty !!! :-(
 

There is an option rebuild tree (sorry, do not have access to Mandrake
just now, cannot check exactly). I guess you have not tried it?

I ask because I'm really interested in how to recover a broken ReiserFS.
So far, I could not find any real information, looks like reiser
developers assume it never goes wrong.

Any pointers are appreciated.


And of course, I can well understand your feeling about it ...

-andrej




Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-06 Thread Stefan Siegel

Es schrieb Borsenkow Andrej:
 [...]
  After that I was able to mount the partition again, but it was totally
  empty !!! :-(
 
 There is an option rebuild tree (sorry, do not have access to Mandrake
 just now, cannot check exactly). I guess you have not tried it?

I did, as this was IIRC te only part doing anything, the other options all 
reported some errors but did nothing (still unable to mount afterwards).

 I ask because I'm really interested in how to recover a broken ReiserFS.
 So far, I could not find any real information, looks like reiser
 developers assume it never goes wrong.

It seems so ...

 And of course, I can well understand your feeling about it ...

Thx. I am sorry I can't provide you more informations, I've tried to wipe 
it out of my brian, as it is an awfull experiance, loosing relevant parts 
of an OS, specially when it is labeld rocksolid like GNU/Linux is these 
days ...

-- 
_ 
Tschüss und bis demnächst/à bientôt,  _|_|_   
   ()   *
Stefan /v\  / 
 »(   )«  Penguin Powered!
 +(m-m)--+




Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-06 Thread Stefan Siegel

Am 2001-08-06, um 15:41:26 (+0200) schrieb Guillaume Cottenceau:
 Stefan Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 
 [...]
 
  thesis on it ... Since then I don't trust ReiserFS = I wouldn't install it 
  currently on a critical system, only on playgounds for data loosing ...
 
 The question is whether it ameliorates mean crash recovery on critical
 systems. Nornally journaling would go in the right direction, but there
 are still potential problems.
 
 Any filesystem you're using, you'll still want to do periodic saves on
 tape devices, or even replication.

Sure in theory you are right. But ReiserFS don't seem to be stable enough
(atleast for me) as on the _FIRST_ crash (Power failure on the whole 
PC) I had, it shrederd my data. ext2 sometime eats data too, I know - 
but only files - at least on my side it never killed whole partitions.

I am hoping for ext3 as it works on top of ext2 afaik.

-- 
_ 
Tschüss und bis demnächst/à bientôt,  _|_|_   
   ()   *
Stefan /v\  / 
 »(   )«  Penguin Powered!
 +(m-m)--+




Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-06 Thread Vincent Danen

On Mon Aug 06, 2001 at 04:07:18PM +0200, Stefan Siegel wrote:

   thesis on it ... Since then I don't trust ReiserFS = I wouldn't install it 
   currently on a critical system, only on playgounds for data loosing ...
  
  The question is whether it ameliorates mean crash recovery on critical
  systems. Nornally journaling would go in the right direction, but there
  are still potential problems.
  
  Any filesystem you're using, you'll still want to do periodic saves on
  tape devices, or even replication.
 
 Sure in theory you are right. But ReiserFS don't seem to be stable enough
 (atleast for me) as on the _FIRST_ crash (Power failure on the whole 
 PC) I had, it shrederd my data. ext2 sometime eats data too, I know - 
 but only files - at least on my side it never killed whole partitions.
 
 I am hoping for ext3 as it works on top of ext2 afaik.

This is really odd... I've been using reiserfs almost exclusively
since 7.2 on all my machines.  The only partition that I don't use it
for is /var because I run qmail on all my machines and there was an
issue with qmail and reiserfs in the past (no idea if it's fixed, but
/var being ext2 is a matter of habit now).

Anyways, I've had a number of power outtages despite having UPS's with
the systems all of a sudden going down.  I may have lost the odd file
occassionally, but certainly never an entire partition.  Considering
this is on about 5 machines all showing the same thing, I'm a little
hesitant to think it's reiserfs *alone*.  Maybe there is something
with the files on /var that causes this problem (again, maybe if I had
reiserfs /var partitions I would have experienced the same thing, I
don't know).

I do know that I have never lost more than a handful of files and I've
got many reiserfs partitions across various systems.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
1024D/FE6F2AFD   88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD
 - Danen Consulting Serviceswww.danen.net, www.freezer-burn.org
 - MandrakeSoft, Inc. Security  www.linux-mandrake.com

Current Linux kernel 2.4.3-20mdk-win4lin uptime: 10 days 22 hours 51 minutes.

 PGP signature


Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-06 Thread Andre Anneck

[Snip]

I am using reiserfs since 7.2, including /var. And I never had any 
problems with it. And we had more than one powerfailure ;). I am so 
confident with it that
windows-user-method
I sometimes just click on reset if the system seems to be hanging
/windows-user-method

Everytime it came up perfectly clear. From my expirience I would say 
that you loss of /var filesystem was not due to reiserfs but due to 
something else. But thats just IMHO.

Take care,

Andre

P.S.: Even if you use reiserfs, never underestimate the power of Murphy! 
(Do backups)!





RE: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-06 Thread Andrew P. Bielecki

I have 7 raiserfs system including 4 SMP 4 proc boxes and I have never had problem 
with any of them except with one old box
which I'm still using as my firewall. The system would started corrupting volumes if I 
used 2.4 kernel with reiserfs. When installed
with 2.2 kernel and reiserfs or 2.4 kernel with ext2 the box could tick for months. 
The system in question was old 120Mhz Pentium
(no mmx) with 96 Mb memory and Adaptec 2940 Scsi Controller ( no -ide drives)

Andrew Bielecki

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kelley Terry
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var


On Mon, 6 Aug 2001 11:09:45 -0600
Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Mon Aug 06, 2001 at 04:07:18PM +0200, Stefan Siegel wrote:


 This is really odd... I've been using reiserfs almost exclusively
 since 7.2 on all my machines.  The only partition that I don't use it
 for is /var because I run qmail on all my machines and there was an
 issue with qmail and reiserfs in the past (no idea if it's fixed, but
 /var being ext2 is a matter of habit now).


Ditto here.  I've had nothing but reiser since on my machine since 7.2
and a few power outages and no problems.


--
Kelley Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It said use windows 95 or better so I loaded linux!
In a world without walls or fences who needs windows or gates?





Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-06 Thread Brook Humphrey

On Monday 06 August 2001 10:09 am, you wrote:
 On Mon Aug 06, 2001 at 04:07:18PM +0200, Stefan Siegel wrote:


 This is really odd... I've been using reiserfs almost exclusively
 since 7.2 on all my machines.  The only partition that I don't use it
 for is /var because I run qmail on all my machines and there was an
 issue with qmail and reiserfs in the past (no idea if it's fixed, but
 /var being ext2 is a matter of habit now).

 Anyways, I've had a number of power outtages despite having UPS's with
 the systems all of a sudden going down.  I may have lost the odd file
 occassionally, but certainly never an entire partition.  Considering
 this is on about 5 machines all showing the same thing, I'm a little
 hesitant to think it's reiserfs *alone*.  Maybe there is something
 with the files on /var that causes this problem (again, maybe if I had
 reiserfs /var partitions I would have experienced the same thing, I
 don't know).

 I do know that I have never lost more than a handful of files and I've
 got many reiserfs partitions across various systems.

Same here. I did loose two partitions on completetly different hard drives 
but tracked it down to hard drive controler failure. The only thing I can say 
about the failure is that the ext2 partitions survived it but reiser didn't 
However I run reiser on almost everything and this is the first time I've had 
a problem.




Many success stories (was: RE: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var)

2001-08-06 Thread Borsenkow Andrej

Folks, you all miss the point. Nobody argues that ReiserFS has been used
with success by many people. The problem is that if something goes
wrong, Reiser gives very few chances to recover compared with other file
systems (*especially* non-journaling). 

-andrej




Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS killed my /var

2001-08-06 Thread Vox


During the bombing raid on Mon, 6 Aug 2001 11:09:45 -0600, Vincent Danen was
heard mumbling in fear:

 On Mon Aug 06, 2001 at 04:07:18PM +0200, Stefan Siegel wrote:
  
 thesis on it ... Since then I don't trust ReiserFS = I wouldn't install it 
 currently on a critical system, only on playgounds for data loosing 

The question is whether it ameliorates mean crash recovery on critical
systems. Nornally journaling would go in the right direction, but there
are still potential problems.

Any filesystem you're using, you'll still want to do periodic saves on
tape devices, or even replication.
   
   Sure in theory you are right. But ReiserFS don't seem to be stable enough
   (atleast for me) as on the _FIRST_ crash (Power failure on the whole 
   PC) I had, it shrederd my data. ext2 sometime eats data too, I know - 
   but only files - at least on my side it never killed whole partitions.
   
   I am hoping for ext3 as it works on top of ext2 afaik.
  
  This is really odd... I've been using reiserfs almost exclusively
  since 7.2 on all my machines.  The only partition that I don't use it

Count me in as a happy reiserfs user, since somewhere in the 7.1
appearance (hand-patched into 2 7.0 servers and 3 workstations)...only had one
problem, and that actually was due to the infamous VIA bug + the Reiserfs bug
of a while back (chipset optimizations bug, I believe) that we tracked here in
cooker...but no problems at all since nor before. And back then (it was during
the road to 8.0) it was file corruption, never partition corruption...only
thing that insisted on dieing was the rpm database whenever I installed 2 or
more files at a time.

  Anyways, I've had a number of power outtages despite having UPS's with
  the systems all of a sudden going down.  I may have lost the odd file

My workstation has hadwell...enough power outtages...without any
problems.

  occassionally, but certainly never an entire partition.  Considering
  this is on about 5 machines all showing the same thing, I'm a little
  hesitant to think it's reiserfs *alone*.  Maybe there is something
  with the files on /var that causes this problem (again, maybe if I had
  reiserfs /var partitions I would have experienced the same thing, I
  don't know).

Nop, nothing to do with /var...I have everything under reiserfs and no
problems at allso...I don't think it's a reiserfs+/var problem, but
something else...maybe something like the qmail bug you mentioned.

  
  I do know that I have never lost more than a handful of files and I've
  got many reiserfs partitions across various systems.

Counting 32 reiserfs partitions under my hand, most of them under stock
mandrake kernels (have a suse box somewhere)

Vox

-- 
Pain is the gift of the gods, and I'm the one they chose as their messenger
For info on safety in the BDSM lifestyle http://www.the-vox.com

Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs.  Kind
of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_
technology than everyone else.   -- Donald B. Marti Jr.

Vox populi, vox deii