Re: [Cooker] test, ignore...
Also surprised that the mailing list wasn't down
Re: [Cooker] test, ignore...
söndag 20 juli 2003 10:26 em skrev andre: Also surprised that the mailing list wasn't down No, I had to test my spamassassin setup;) -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
Re: [Cooker] test, ignore...
onsdagen den 26 mars 2003 13.33 skrev Oden Eriksson: i hate not being in control of the damn fw i have to pass..., testing..., testing... -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
Re: [Cooker] test, ignore
good, kmail works 4 u :) :) :) (i'm booted in win rite now, bnut kmail werks for me) - Original Message - From: Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:22 AM Subject: [Cooker] test, ignore Sorry, needed to test Kmail. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-8mdksmp: 1 hour 23 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4115 rpm, temp +30.0°C | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4141 rpm, temp +29°C
Re: [Cooker] test - ignore
I did not beleived it either, but a few nights ago I sent quite a few messages (around 5 or 6), and much to my surprise, they never appeared. So after a few days went by, I sent the test, and sure enought it went throught immediately ... What is going on? Pixel replied to some of the emails that never made it; so it is even more puzzling ... Maybe the emails are being received but not forwarded. --- "Guy T. Rice" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are we testing the capital vs. small C in "Cooker" theory, by any chance? I didn't think much of it until today. I posted two messages about 12 hours ago, one to "Cooker" and one to "cooker". The first appeared within a few minutes, the second has yet to appear... Of course, two messages is not a statistically significant sample. It could just be a coincidence. = Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE Linux Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] test - ignore
Are we testing the capital vs. small C in "Cooker" theory, by any chance? I didn't think much of it until today. I posted two messages about 12 hours ago, one to "Cooker" and one to "cooker". The first appeared within a few minutes, the second has yet to appear... Of course, two messages is not a statistically significant sample. It could just be a coincidence.
Re: [Cooker] test - ignore
"Guy T. Rice" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are we testing the capital vs. small C in "Cooker" theory, by any chance? I didn't think much of it until today. I posted two messages about 12 hours ago, one to "Cooker" and one to "cooker". The first appeared within a few minutes, the second has yet to appear... same. Of course, two messages is not a statistically significant sample. It could just be a coincidence. same for me.. and yesterday every messages was with a big C. most probably there is a big problem with the mailing lists but the responsible (denis) are in vacations, and it seems that no one would like to go deep inside his procmail/sympa configuration (actually I think that Jean-Loup tried to have a look yesterday but abandonned after seeing how deep the mess is..) time to code! :-) -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
RE: [Cooker] test - ignore
hours ago, one to "Cooker" and one to "cooker". The first appeared within a few minutes, the second has yet to appear... same. as far as i know the messages with small "c" in the cooker that i posted yesterday all ent to the bit bucket ... :-( Of course, two messages is not a statistically significant sample. It could just be a coincidence. same for me.. and yesterday every messages was with a big C. most probably there is a big problem with the mailing lists but the responsible (denis) are in vacations, and it seems that no one would like to go deep inside his procmail/sympa configuration (actually I think that Jean-Loup tried to have a look yesterday but abandonned after seeing how deep the mess is..)
RE: [Cooker] test - ignore
I'm having the same problem Bryan -Original Message- From: Geoffrey Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Cooker] test - ignore hours ago, one to "Cooker" and one to "cooker". The first appeared within a few minutes, the second has yet to appear... same. as far as i know the messages with small "c" in the cooker that i posted yesterday all ent to the bit bucket ... :-( Of course, two messages is not a statistically significant sample. It could just be a coincidence. same for me.. and yesterday every messages was with a big C. most probably there is a big problem with the mailing lists but the responsible (denis) are in vacations, and it seems that no one would like to go deep inside his procmail/sympa configuration (actually I think that Jean-Loup tried to have a look yesterday but abandonned after seeing how deep the mess is..)
Re: [Cooker] test - ignore
Well I gess every one has now understood that cooker is much slower than Cooker may be it would be nice for the people who can't thread theit incoming mail that we just ask "them" (mailing list manager) to try to do something when possible ... Thomas, p.s. : This message was (also) sent twice so you can see the delay between Cooker cooker. "Guy T. Rice" wrote: Are we testing the capital vs. small C in "Cooker" theory, by any chance? I didn't think much of it until today. I posted two messages about 12 hours ago, one to "Cooker" and one to "cooker". The first appeared within a few minutes, the second has yet to appear... Of course, two messages is not a statistically significant sample. It could just be a coincidence. -- Thomas SMETS Phone : +32 (0)2 742. 05. 94. Av. de la Brabançonne 133 / 3 e-mail : tsmets @altern.org 1030 Bruxelles Quote of the day = Love is an ideal thing, marriage a real thing; a confusion of the real with the ideal never goes unpunished. -- Goethe === End of Quote =
Re: [Cooker] test ignore
Hello Chmouel Boudjnah, On 24 Feb 2000 16:02:17 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Friday, February 25, 2000, 7:02:17 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com (mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com [216.71.84.35]) by ruby.granis.net (Build 98 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA00192 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:03:51 -0600 Received: (from sympa@localhost) by mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA23130 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:49:02 -0600 Received: from natanya.us.mandrakesoft.com (barracuda.mandrakesoft.com [209.77.56.161]) by mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA22535 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:47:25 -0600 Received: (from chmou@localhost) by natanya.us.mandrakesoft.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA05496; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:02:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: natanya.us.mandrakesoft.com: chmou set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f To: Mandrake devel [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 24 Feb 2000 16:02:17 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lines: 4 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0804 (Gnus v5.8.4) Emacs/20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sequence: 1454 Precedence: list Subject: [Cooker] test ignore test --Chmouel hello... I am filtering all known mails to their proper boxes to reduce spam. if the addressee is NOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail like yours and some others end up in my spam box. Is there any reason for the Mandrake devel [EMAIL PROTECTED] address being used to the cooker list? -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] test ignore
tracer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am filtering all known mails to their proper boxes to reduce spam.
if the addressee is NOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail like yours and
some others end up in my spam box.
Is there any reason for the Mandrake devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
address being used to the cooker list?
yes know is the same list, if you want to set a filter set it on the
X-Loop:, for gnus i have someting like this :
'(("Mandrake-Cooker" "X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]")))
--
MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] test ignore
Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: test ok alias work, when you send a mail to devel@ you go on cooker. -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Chmouel
