Re: [Cooker] cooker@ antispam procedures.
Han [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes I found out by sending a message from another account. I saw the light after I send the message. Works great btw. Some people actually use an equivalent method to prevent themselves from spam: they maintain the list of all known persons, and each time an unknown person tries to send them a mail, an autoresponder asks for am answer, insisting on the fact that it's an antispam measure, and that the bothering would occur only once. It's fairly radical but I suppose it works well. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] cooker@ antispam procedures.
On Mon Apr 22, 2002 at 06:05:36PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Yes I found out by sending a message from another account. I saw the light after I send the message. Works great btw. Some people actually use an equivalent method to prevent themselves from spam: they maintain the list of all known persons, and each time an unknown person tries to send them a mail, an autoresponder asks for am answer, insisting on the fact that it's an antispam measure, and that the bothering would occur only once. It's fairly radical but I suppose it works well. This works awesome... I've been using TMDA here for a while, and it does exactly this... it is the best anti-spam investment I have ever made... spam is now 0/day, consistently, when it used to be 25+/day. Very nice. For some info (somewhat dated already due to development on TMDA), you can read http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/spam2.php or else visit the TMDA homepage at http://tmda.sourceforge.net/. TMDA is also in contribs (I just have to update it to the latest version sometime this week). -- MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/ lynx -source http://www.freezer-burn.org/bios/vdanen.gpg | gpg --import 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD Current Linux kernel 2.4.18-6mdk uptime: 7 days 3 hours 39 minutes. msg63088/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] cooker@ antispam procedures.
On Monday 22 April 2002 02:07 pm, Vincent Danen wrote: On Mon Apr 22, 2002 at 06:05:36PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Yes I found out by sending a message from another account. I saw the light after I send the message. Works great btw. Some people actually use an equivalent method to prevent themselves from spam: they maintain the list of all known persons, and each time an unknown person tries to send them a mail, an autoresponder asks for am answer, insisting on the fact that it's an antispam measure, and that the bothering would occur only once. It's fairly radical but I suppose it works well. This works awesome... I've been using TMDA here for a while, and it does exactly this... it is the best anti-spam investment I have ever made... spam is now 0/day, consistently, when it used to be 25+/day. Very nice. For some info (somewhat dated already due to development on TMDA), you can read http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/spam2.php or else visit the TMDA homepage at http://tmda.sourceforge.net/. TMDA is also in contribs (I just have to update it to the latest version sometime this week). I finally got spamassassin to work with maildrop on mandrake. With this combo I'm able to tag spams and decide weather or not I want' to look at them. In my case I have a filter set to send them right ot the trash. -- -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~- Brook Humphrey Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107 http://www.webmedic.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Holiness unto the Lord -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
Re: [Cooker] cooker@ antispam procedures.
Brook Humphrey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Monday 22 April 2002 02:07 pm, Vincent Danen wrote: On Mon Apr 22, 2002 at 06:05:36PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Yes I found out by sending a message from another account. I saw the light after I send the message. Works great btw. Some people actually use an equivalent method to prevent themselves from spam: they maintain the list of all known persons, and each time an unknown person tries to send them a mail, an autoresponder asks for am answer, insisting on the fact that it's an antispam measure, and that the bothering would occur only once. It's fairly radical but I suppose it works well. This works awesome... I've been using TMDA here for a while, and it does exactly this... it is the best anti-spam investment I have ever made... spam is now 0/day, consistently, when it used to be 25+/day. Very nice. For some info (somewhat dated already due to development on TMDA), you can read http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/spam2.php or else visit the TMDA homepage at http://tmda.sourceforge.net/. TMDA is also in contribs (I just have to update it to the latest version sometime this week). I finally got spamassassin to work with maildrop on mandrake. With this combo I'm able to tag spams and decide weather or not I want' to look at them. In my case I have a filter set to send them right ot the trash. Well I use OpenBSD as my firewalling mailserver. But the OpenBSD mailinglist is a fully open list. Yes great fun, 3 spams a day and virusses and antivirus warnings (with trojans included). And they wont make it a subscribe only list :( So: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/ Heh. That was why I informed here to find out how this list does prevent spam. Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
Re: [Cooker] cooker@ antispam procedures.
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 01:17:33 +0200 Han [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was wondering if anybody could tell me how the cooker@ mailinglist manages to avoid nearly all spam. If you're looking to prevent spam, I've started a web page describing my efforts. Currently, I've only gotten one spam message in the past month. The page needs some updating; but my real configs are available. If it helps, see http://pfortin.com/Linux/PostFix Cheers, Pierre
Re: [Cooker] cooker@ antispam procedures.
Pierre Fortin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 01:17:33 +0200 Han [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering if anybody could tell me how the cooker@ mailinglist manages to avoid nearly all spam. If you're looking to prevent spam, I've started a web page describing my efforts. Currently, I've only gotten one spam message in the past month. The page needs some updating; but my real configs are available. If it helps, see http://pfortin.com/Linux/PostFix Thanks for your reply but this was absolutely not what I meant. Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
Re: [Cooker] cooker@ antispam procedures.
easy to post on the list you must be registered to recieve the list. If you're not registered, the mail program responds to the user confirming they want to post, and asking them to register. Try it from a hotmail account you haven't registered to recieve cooker. You'll find it will reject you and ask you to register, or send it anyways. Either way, the auto mailers won't respond to the provided link. To stupid. NB On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 19:17, Han wrote: Hi, I was wondering if anybody could tell me how the cooker mailinglist manages to avoid nearly all spam. Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
Re: [Cooker] cooker@ antispam procedures.
Nelson Bartley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Han Wrote: I was wondering if anybody could tell me how the cooker@ mailinglist manages to avoid nearly all spam. easy to post on the list you must be registered to recieve the list. If you're not registered, the mail program responds to the user confirming they want to post, and asking them to register. Try it from a hotmail account you haven't registered to recieve cooker. You'll find it will reject you and ask you to register, or send it anyways. Either way, the auto mailers won't respond to the provided link. To stupid. Yes I found out by sending a message from another account. I saw the light after I send the message. Works great btw. Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
