Re: why mdk should be renamed mandrake-kdm (was Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mdkkdm-9.1-1mdk)
>drak_xx or x_drak ? drakdm then Gregory K. Meyer ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!
Re: why mdk should be renamed mandrake-kdm (was Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mdkkdm-9.1-1mdk)
Le Lundi 3 Février 2003 16:31, Per Øyvind Karlsen a écrit : > I agree > > *aol'er* ;p to Han > - Original Message - > From: "Yves Duret" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 4:06 PM > Subject: why mdk should be renamed mandrake-kdm (was Re: [Cooker] Re: > [CHRPM] mdkkdm-9.1-1mdk) > > > Buchan Milne wrote: > > >Laurent MONTEL wrote: > > >>--=-=-= > > >>Name: mdkkdm Relocations: (not > > >> relocateable) Version : 9.1 Vendor: > > >> MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: > > >> Mon Feb 3 11:53:49 200 > > >> > > >> > > >>Does this mean we get normal kdm back? If so, thanks! > > >> > > >>Buchan > > > > why have this been renamed as mdkkdm ?? > > Once upon a time, people tried to make mandrake specific RPMs more > > coherent, either by the name or by the numbering scheme... > > For the moment, we have > > drakfoo (or foodrake sometimes) for drakxtools-like tools > > mandrake-foo for others such as mime, desktop, menu and so and so on. > > > > thus why changing this defacto policy ? > > i suggest to rename it mandrake-kdm. I agree too. I remember a long thread about cleaning up the name standard for next release :) drak_xx or x_drak ? -- Pascal Cavy - VMF __ Running 3 days, 22:42, 5 users, load average: 0.41, 0.43, 0.54 (gcc version 3.2.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.1 3.2.1-4mdk)) Kernel Linux version 2.4.21pre4-1mdkenterprise
Re: why mdk should be renamed mandrake-kdm (was Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mdkkdm-9.1-1mdk)
I agree *aol'er* ;p to Han - Original Message - From: "Yves Duret" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 4:06 PM Subject: why mdk should be renamed mandrake-kdm (was Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mdkkdm-9.1-1mdk) > Buchan Milne wrote: > > >Laurent MONTEL wrote: > > > > > >>--=-=-= > >>Name: mdkkdm Relocations: (not relocateable) > >>Version : 9.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > >>Release : 1mdk Build Date: Mon Feb 3 11:53:49 200 > >> > > >>Does this mean we get normal kdm back? If so, thanks! > >> > >>Buchan > >> > >> > >> > why have this been renamed as mdkkdm ?? > Once upon a time, people tried to make mandrake specific RPMs more > coherent, either by the name or by the numbering scheme... > For the moment, we have > drakfoo (or foodrake sometimes) for drakxtools-like tools > mandrake-foo for others such as mime, desktop, menu and so and so on. > > thus why changing this defacto policy ? > i suggest to rename it mandrake-kdm. > >
why mdk should be renamed mandrake-kdm (was Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM]mdkkdm-9.1-1mdk)
Buchan Milne wrote: Laurent MONTEL wrote: --=-=-= Name: mdkkdm Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 9.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Mon Feb 3 11:53:49 200 Does this mean we get normal kdm back? If so, thanks! Buchan why have this been renamed as mdkkdm ?? Once upon a time, people tried to make mandrake specific RPMs more coherent, either by the name or by the numbering scheme... For the moment, we have drakfoo (or foodrake sometimes) for drakxtools-like tools mandrake-foo for others such as mime, desktop, menu and so and so on. thus why changing this defacto policy ? i suggest to rename it mandrake-kdm.
