Re: CD Audio on iMac DV?

2001-07-03 Thread Brice D Ruth



Ian,

Thank you for the quick response.  Unfortunately, xmms doesn't seem to do
the trick either.  I'm not sure what's going on here.  When I run the command
'amixer' to check the levels of the various inputs and outputs - I notice
the following under 'CD':

Group 'CD',0
  Capabilities: capture jointly-capture
  Channels: Front-Left Front-Right 
  Limits: min = 0, max = 0
  Front-Left: 0 [0%] [on] [---]
  Front-Right: 0 [0%] [on] [---]

Notice that the 'Limits' line is interesting ...

Is this what's kickin' my butt?  All other sound seems to work now ... just
not CD!

-Brice

Ian White wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Brice D Ruth wrote:
  I'm at somewhat of a loss ... I appear to have audio working, however I cannot play my CDs.  I'm using the ALSA system - and if I test the audio by going into Look'NFeel in the Control Center - I can play the system sounds just fine.  However, neither kscd nor freeamp seem to be able to play CD audio.  Why is this?

There isn't a standard analog connection from the cdrom to the sound cardon the new macs. If you use xmms there is a plugin for doing cd audiowhich should work.Ian---Ian Whiteemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






CDROM devicefound problem resolved

2001-07-03 Thread Robert Zelnik

Dear friends,

thank you for response. Any of drivers didn't help me until I download the 
new version of the kernel (vmlinux2.2.15pre19). Now it works well.

Sorry for stupid questions, i'm a beginner.

Robert Zelnik


> 
> The other integrated scsi driver is  mac53c94
> 
> Stew Benedict

> 
> > OK.  Maybe it's not the mesh driver (that is the one you tried, right?)
> > There's at least one other Mac scsi driver on that list, but I can't 
> think
> > of the name of it off-hand.  Do you currently have linux installed?  
> Have
> > you ever had it installed?  What was the scsi driver in dmesg?  
> > Use that.  Wish I could be more helpful--anyone else out there know what
> > scsi driver he's supposed to use?
> > 
> > Jeff
> > 
> > On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Robert Zelnik wrote:
> > 
> > > I tried it. It wrote:
> > > Kernel panic: Exception in kernel pc c015ea2c signal 4
> > > Rebooting in 180 seconds

Robert Zelnik
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.domudra.sk/




Re: CD Audio on iMac DV?

2001-07-03 Thread Ian White

On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Brice D Ruth wrote:

> I'm at somewhat of a loss ... I appear to have audio working, however I 
> cannot play my CDs.  I'm using the ALSA system - and if I test the audio 
> by going into Look'NFeel in the Control Center - I can play the system 
> sounds just fine.  However, neither kscd nor freeamp seem to be able to 
> play CD audio.  Why is this?

There isn't a standard analog connection from the cdrom to the sound card
on the new macs. If you use xmms there is a plugin for doing cd audio
which should work.

Ian

---
Ian White
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: Miscellaneous bugs

2001-07-03 Thread Brice D Ruth



>From Stew's previous posts, I don't think we're close to a freeze.  He was
talking about releasing a Beta2 set pretty soon here, though.

-Brice

Ian White wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Right. Although Mandrake/PPC is still using XFree86 4.0.3, so that is anissue too :) (Yes I know that I can compile 4.1 from srpm, but..)Is the PPC tree actually frozen to try and make a 8.0 or 8.1 release? I'venoticed the x86 tree seems to have lots of activity again. We only seem tobe getting security fixes..IanOn Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Brice D Ruth wrote:
  I personally am speaking entirely hypothetically, just so ya know ;)However - I'm pretty sure that you need to have DRI compiled for your kernel (which it may or may not be for Stew's 2.4.4-6.2) before XF-4.1 can access it.  This may be the problem.Regards,Brice RuthIan White wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Stew Benedict wrote:
  I'll check all those out and get back to the list.  We may not have GLXextensions in X, like some of those messages say, but I'll verify.  I'mheaded down to TN, so I won't be back online until tomorrow most likely.

What did you find out about GLX? I've got mine enabled and mostapplications are running.. although slowly.I've enabled it in my config, but glxinfo tells me:direct rendering: No...OpenGL vendor string: VA Linux Systems, Inc.OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX IndirectOpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.4And during the starting of X it says:(II) LoadModule: "glx"(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a(II) Module glx: vendor="The XFree86 Project"   compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0   ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1(II) Loading extension GLX(II) Loading sub module "GLcore"(II) LoadModule: "GLcore"(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a(II) Module GLcore: vendor="The XFree86 Project"   compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0   ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1(II) LoadModule: "dri"!
(WW) Warning, couldn't open module dri(II) UnloadModule: "dri"(EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)The release notes for 4.1.0 claim there is support for DRI under linux/ppcwith that version.Ian---Ian Whiteemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---Ian Whiteemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: Miscellaneous bugs

2001-07-03 Thread Ian White


Right. Although Mandrake/PPC is still using XFree86 4.0.3, so that is an
issue too :) (Yes I know that I can compile 4.1 from srpm, but..)

Is the PPC tree actually frozen to try and make a 8.0 or 8.1 release? I've
noticed the x86 tree seems to have lots of activity again. We only seem to
be getting security fixes..

Ian

On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Brice D Ruth wrote:

> I personally am speaking entirely hypothetically, just so ya know ;)
> 
> However - I'm pretty sure that you need to have DRI compiled for your 
> kernel (which it may or may not be for Stew's 2.4.4-6.2) before XF-4.1 
> can access it.  This may be the problem.
> 
> Regards,
> Brice Ruth
> 
> Ian White wrote:
> 
> >On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Stew Benedict wrote:
> >
> >>I'll check all those out and get back to the list.  We may not have GLX
> >>extensions in X, like some of those messages say, but I'll verify.  I'm
> >>headed down to TN, so I won't be back online until tomorrow most likely.
> >>
> >
> >What did you find out about GLX? I've got mine enabled and most
> >applications are running.. although slowly.
> >
> >I've enabled it in my config, but glxinfo tells me:
> >direct rendering: No
> >...
> >OpenGL vendor string: VA Linux Systems, Inc.
> >OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
> >OpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.4
> >
> >And during the starting of X it says:
> >(II) LoadModule: "glx"
> >(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a
> >(II) Module glx: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
> >compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0
> >ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1
> >(II) Loading extension GLX
> >(II) Loading sub module "GLcore"
> >(II) LoadModule: "GLcore"
> >(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a
> >(II) Module GLcore: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
> >compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0
> >ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1
> >(II) LoadModule: "dri"
> >(WW) Warning, couldn't open module dri
> >(II) UnloadModule: "dri"
> >(EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)
> >
> >The release notes for 4.1.0 claim there is support for DRI under linux/ppc
> >with that version.
> >
> >Ian
> >
> >---
> >Ian White
> >email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 

---
Ian White
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







CD Audio on iMac DV?

2001-07-03 Thread Brice D Ruth

I'm at somewhat of a loss ... I appear to have audio working, however I 
cannot play my CDs.  I'm using the ALSA system - and if I test the audio 
by going into Look'NFeel in the Control Center - I can play the system 
sounds just fine.  However, neither kscd nor freeamp seem to be able to 
play CD audio.  Why is this?

-Brice





Re: Miscellaneous bugs

2001-07-03 Thread Brice D Ruth



In this particular respect, not much has changed since my YDL-1.2 install
... a particular function 'flush_cache' is missing, so agpgart support cannot
be compiled.  Someone on the #linuxppc channel told me that enabling 'DRI'
in your kernel is enough - though I'm not entirely sure I believe him ...
it seems that w/o choosing the card you have, it won't do you any good!

-Brice

Brice D Ruth wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">   OK -
I checked the config for Stew's 2.4.4-6.2 kernel and indeed, DRI is not enabled.
 So, you'll have to recompile to get it (and it may not recompile - I was
having issues under YDL-1.2).
  
 In any case - in theory, in the 'Character devices' section of the kernel, 
scroll all the way to the bottom and select '/dev/agpgart (AGP Support)'
  - then select 'Direct Rendering Manager (XFree86 DRI support)'
  and in its submenu, select your graphics card (hopefully its there - mine 
is, ATI Rage 128).
  
 Save your new config & compile.  Wish for the best ;)
  
 -Brice
  
 Brice D Ruth wrote:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">   I
personally am speaking entirely hypothetically, just so ya know ;)

  However - I'm pretty sure that you need to have DRI compiled for your kernel
 (which it may or may not be for Stew's 2.4.4-6.2) before XF-4.1 can access
 it.  This may be the problem.

  Regards,
  Brice Ruth

  Ian White wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Stew Benedict wrote:
  I'll check all those out and get back to the list.  We may not have GLXextensions in X, like some of those messages say, but I'll verify.  I'mheaded down to TN, so I won't be back online until tomorrow most likely.

What did you find out about GLX? I've got mine enabled and mostapplications are running.. although slowly.I've enabled it in my config, but glxinfo tells me:direct rendering: No...OpenGL vendor string: VA Linux Systems, Inc.OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX IndirectOpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.4And during the starting of X it says:(II) LoadModule: "glx"(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a(II) Module glx: vendor="The XFree86 Project"compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1(II) Loading extension GLX(II) Loading sub module "GLcore"(II) LoadModule: "GLcore"(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a(II) Module GLcore: vendor="The XFree86 Project"compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1(II) Lo!
ad!!Mo!dule: "dri"(WW) Warning, couldn't open module dri(II) UnloadModule: "dri"(EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)The release notes for 4.1.0 claim there is support for DRI under linux/ppcwith that version.Ian---Ian Whiteemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]










Re: Miscellaneous bugs

2001-07-03 Thread Brice D Ruth



OK - I checked the config for Stew's 2.4.4-6.2 kernel and indeed, DRI is
not enabled.  So, you'll have to recompile to get it (and it may not recompile
- I was having issues under YDL-1.2).

In any case - in theory, in the 'Character devices' section of the kernel,
scroll all the way to the bottom and select '/dev/agpgart (AGP Support)'
 - then select 'Direct Rendering Manager (XFree86 DRI support)'
 and in its submenu, select your graphics card (hopefully its there - mine
is, ATI Rage 128).

Save your new config & compile.  Wish for the best ;)

-Brice

Brice D Ruth wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">   I personally
am speaking entirely hypothetically, just so ya know ;)
  
 However - I'm pretty sure that you need to have DRI compiled for your kernel 
(which it may or may not be for Stew's 2.4.4-6.2) before XF-4.1 can access 
it.  This may be the problem.
  
 Regards,
 Brice Ruth
  
 Ian White wrote:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Stew Benedict wrote:
I'll check all those out and get back to the list.  We may not have GLXextensions in X, like some of those messages say, but I'll verify.  I'mheaded down to TN, so I won't be back online until tomorrow most likely.
  
  What did you find out about GLX? I've got mine enabled and mostapplications are running.. although slowly.I've enabled it in my config, but glxinfo tells me:direct rendering: No...OpenGL vendor string: VA Linux Systems, Inc.OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX IndirectOpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.4And during the starting of X it says:(II) LoadModule: "glx"(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a(II) Module glx: vendor="The XFree86 Project"compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1(II) Loading extension GLX(II) Loading sub module "GLcore"(II) LoadModule: "GLcore"(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a(II) Module GLcore: vendor="The XFree86 Project"compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1(II) Load!
!
Mo!dule: "dri"(WW) Warning, couldn't open module dri(II) UnloadModule: "dri"(EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)The release notes for 4.1.0 claim there is support for DRI under linux/ppcwith that version.Ian---Ian Whiteemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  
  
  


Re: Miscellaneous bugs

2001-07-03 Thread Brice D Ruth



I personally am speaking entirely hypothetically, just so ya know ;)

However - I'm pretty sure that you need to have DRI compiled for your kernel
(which it may or may not be for Stew's 2.4.4-6.2) before XF-4.1 can access
it.  This may be the problem.

Regards,
Brice Ruth

Ian White wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Stew Benedict wrote:
  I'll check all those out and get back to the list.  We may not have GLXextensions in X, like some of those messages say, but I'll verify.  I'mheaded down to TN, so I won't be back online until tomorrow most likely.

What did you find out about GLX? I've got mine enabled and mostapplications are running.. although slowly.I've enabled it in my config, but glxinfo tells me:direct rendering: No...OpenGL vendor string: VA Linux Systems, Inc.OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX IndirectOpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.4And during the starting of X it says:(II) LoadModule: "glx"(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a(II) Module glx: vendor="The XFree86 Project"compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1(II) Loading extension GLX(II) Loading sub module "GLcore"(II) LoadModule: "GLcore"(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a(II) Module GLcore: vendor="The XFree86 Project"compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1(II) LoadMo!
dule: "dri"(WW) Warning, couldn't open module dri(II) UnloadModule: "dri"(EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)The release notes for 4.1.0 claim there is support for DRI under linux/ppcwith that version.Ian---Ian Whiteemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: Miscellaneous bugs

2001-07-03 Thread Ian White

On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Stew Benedict wrote:

> I'll check all those out and get back to the list.  We may not have GLX
> extensions in X, like some of those messages say, but I'll verify.  I'm
> headed down to TN, so I won't be back online until tomorrow most likely.

What did you find out about GLX? I've got mine enabled and most
applications are running.. although slowly.

I've enabled it in my config, but glxinfo tells me:
direct rendering: No
...
OpenGL vendor string: VA Linux Systems, Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
OpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 3.4

And during the starting of X it says:
(II) LoadModule: "glx"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a
(II) Module glx: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1
(II) Loading extension GLX
(II) Loading sub module "GLcore"
(II) LoadModule: "GLcore"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a
(II) Module GLcore: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.0.3, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1
(II) LoadModule: "dri"
(WW) Warning, couldn't open module dri
(II) UnloadModule: "dri"
(EE) Failed to load module "dri" (module does not exist, 0)

The release notes for 4.1.0 claim there is support for DRI under linux/ppc
with that version.

Ian

---
Ian White
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







JDK for Mandrake/PPC?

2001-07-03 Thread Brice D Ruth

I'm looking to get Java running on my Mandrake install, but I can't use 
the PPC Java from blackdown.org since its compiled against libc6.1 
(Mandrake has libc6.2).  So - what's the solution?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Sincerely,
Brice Ruth