Re: Bugzilla

2003-03-02 Thread Stew Benedict

On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Robert Shade wrote:

  If you find other critical things
  you're lacking, let me know and I'll throw them on my web space.
 
 Need these as well.
 
 drakxtools-newt == 9.1-7mdk is needed by drakxtools-9.1-7mdk
 libeel2_2 = 2.2.1 is needed by nautilus-2.2.1-4mdk
 ldetect-lst = 0.1.7-3mdk is needed by drakxtools-newt-9.1-4mdk
 

http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/drakxtools-9.1-11mdk.ppc.rpm
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/drakxtools-newt-9.1-11mdk.ppc.rpm
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/libeel2_2-2.2.1-1mdk.ppc.rpm
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/ldetect-lst-0.1.7-5mdk.ppc.rpm

Stew Benedict

-- 
MandrakeSoft
PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/ppcFAQ.php3
IRC: irc.freenode.net #cooker-ppc
Archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker-ppcr=1w=2




Re: Bugzilla

2003-03-02 Thread Bob Sloots
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 03:10, Robert Shade wrote:
  If you find other critical things
  you're lacking, let me know and I'll throw them on my web space.
 
 Need these as well.
 
 drakxtools-newt == 9.1-7mdk is needed by drakxtools-9.1-7mdk
 libeel2_2 = 2.2.1 is needed by nautilus-2.2.1-4mdk
 ldetect-lst = 0.1.7-3mdk is needed by drakxtools-newt-9.1-4mdk
 
 rob
 
How about libfontconfig1-devel-2.1-7mdk.ppc.rpm?

Bob.




Re: Bugzilla

2003-03-02 Thread Robert Shade
 http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/drakxtools-9.1-11mdk.p
pc.rpm
 http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/drakxtools-newt-9.1-11
mdk.ppc.rpm
 http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/libeel2_2-2.2.1-1mdk.p
pc.rpm
 http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/ldetect-lst-0.1.7-5mdk
.ppc.rpm

Thanks.  I need one last one: libxml2-2.5.4.  The subbordinate rpms from that 
src rpm were there (-devel, -python,-utils) but not the main package.  I was 
going to build the src rpm, but it needed gtk-doc, which needed a new libslt1 
package, which needed libxml2-2.5.4. :(

rob



Re: Bugzilla

2003-03-02 Thread Stew Benedict

On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Robert Shade wrote:

 Thanks.  I need one last one: libxml2-2.5.4.  The subbordinate rpms from that 
 src rpm were there (-devel, -python,-utils) but not the main package.  I was 
 going to build the src rpm, but it needed gtk-doc, which needed a new libslt1 
 package, which needed libxml2-2.5.4. :(
 

http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/libxml2-2.5.4-1mdk.ppc.rpm

To the other person that asked for something, I accidentally deleted the
message before I could upload your request.

I just rsynced everything I have here that wasn't in Paris, so maybe the
missing stuff will start showing up.

Stew Benedict

-- 
MandrakeSoft
PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/ppcFAQ.php3
IRC: irc.freenode.net #cooker-ppc
Archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker-ppcr=1w=2




Re: Bugzilla

2003-03-01 Thread Stew Benedict

On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Robert Shade wrote:

 Speaking of package issues, the Xfree86-4.3 package is old on all of the 
 mirrors.  It has a version number of 0 and an epoch.  All the other packages 
 -libs, -server, etc. all have a version number of 1 and no epoch.  When I try 
 to update, rpm complains because it doesn't have the proper XFree86 package.
 

And the discussion comes full circle. :(

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ ls -l /RPMS/XFree86-4.3-1mdk.ppc.rpm
-rw-rw-r--1 stew stew 13012054 Feb 27 17:18
/RPMS/XFree86-4.3-1mdk.ppc.rpm

I would have uploaded that yesterday.  I do it in batches by day.
Where it goes after that, who knows? (Actually, I do know, it ends up in
rejected, but there's no way in hell when I'm uploading as many as 100
packages a day I can track down each one follow through with warly to
get them manually fixed).

Now I could do like alpha does and just keep uploading the thing forever
if it doesn't show up in the Paris repository, but that seems a little
foolish too, since if it was rejected the first time, odds are it will
continue to be rejected.

Stew Benedict

-- 
MandrakeSoft
PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/ppcFAQ.php3
IRC: irc.freenode.net #cooker-ppc
Archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker-ppcr=1w=2




Re: Bugzilla

2003-03-01 Thread Robert Shade
 And the discussion comes full circle. :(

Sorry. I wasn't reading the other thread because it seemed more 
political/philisophical then technological.

 I would have uploaded that yesterday.  I do it in batches by day.
 Where it goes after that, who knows? (Actually, I do know, it ends up in
 rejected, but there's no way in hell when I'm uploading as many as 100
 packages a day I can track down each one follow through with warly to
 get them manually fixed).

Who is rejecting them?  Why would they reject them?  I thought you were the 
mandrake ppc guy.

Whoever rejected that one obviously doesn't know what he/she is doing because 
the other packages of the build were accepted, just the main one wasn't.  
Right now cooker ppc is broken because it has wrong packages.

 Now I could do like alpha does and just keep uploading the thing forever
 if it doesn't show up in the Paris repository, but that seems a little
 foolish too, since if it was rejected the first time, odds are it will
 continue to be rejected.

Is there some in Paris I could be yelling at as a Mandrakesoft 
user/customer/club member?

If it's not too much trouble, and it's not too big, could you email me that 
package privately?  Right now it's blocking me from upgrading the drak* tools 
which are unusable at the moment.

rob



Re: Bugzilla

2003-03-01 Thread Ben Reser
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 02:59:17PM -0500, Robert Shade wrote:
 Sorry. I wasn't reading the other thread because it seemed more 
 political/philisophical then technological.

Most of us would prefer to deal with the technological issues than the
political/philisophical.  But those other issues as you see get in the
way of dealing with the technical ones.

 Who is rejecting them?  Why would they reject them?  I thought you were the 
 mandrake ppc guy.
 
 Whoever rejected that one obviously doesn't know what he/she is doing because
 the other packages of the build were accepted, just the main one wasn't.  
 Right now cooker ppc is broken because it has wrong packages.

No person is refusing them.  The bot is.  Packages are submitted to an
automated system.  There are specific rules regarding what you can do
when in a freeze and so on.  The problem is that it doesn't really
understand that Stew should set policy for what happens to PPC and keeps
dealing with the PPC packages with the policies that have been set for
i586.

 Is there some in Paris I could be yelling at as a Mandrakesoft 
 user/customer/club member?
 
 If it's not too much trouble, and it's not too big, could you email me that 
 package privately?  Right now it's blocking me from upgrading the drak* tools
 which are unusable at the moment.

We've tried time and time again.

-- 
Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ben.reser.org

America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is
the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the
champion only of her own. -- John Quincy Adams, July 4th, 1821



Re: Bugzilla

2003-03-01 Thread Stew Benedict

On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Robert Shade wrote:

 If it's not too much trouble, and it's not too big, could you email me that 
 package privately?  Right now it's blocking me from upgrading the drak* tools 
 which are unusable at the moment.
 

http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/XFree86-4.3-1mdk.ppc.rpm

I'm bailing on the rest of the discussion.  I really don't need to be
re-aggravating myself over this stuff.  If you find other critical things
you're lacking, let me know and I'll throw them on my web space.

Stew Benedict

-- 
MandrakeSoft
PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/ppcFAQ.php3
IRC: irc.freenode.net #cooker-ppc
Archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker-ppcr=1w=2




Re: Bugzilla

2003-03-01 Thread Robert Shade
 http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/XFree86-4.3-1mdk.ppc.r
pm

Thanks.

 I'm bailing on the rest of the discussion.  I really don't need to be
 re-aggravating myself over this stuff.  If you find other critical things
 you're lacking, let me know and I'll throw them on my web space.

Hey, that's understandable.  You guys work out the politics, I'll help you 
make sure it works in the end. :)

rob



Re: Bugzilla

2003-03-01 Thread Robert Shade
 If you find other critical things
 you're lacking, let me know and I'll throw them on my web space.

Need these as well.

drakxtools-newt == 9.1-7mdk is needed by drakxtools-9.1-7mdk
libeel2_2 = 2.2.1 is needed by nautilus-2.2.1-4mdk
ldetect-lst = 0.1.7-3mdk is needed by drakxtools-newt-9.1-4mdk

rob