Re: [9] RFR 8074839: Resolve disabled warnings for libunpack and the unpack200 binary

2015-03-19 Thread Kumar Srinivasan

Hi Mikael,

First of all, thank you so much for doing this!.

The changes look good.

Kumar

On 3/18/2015 4:18 PM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:


Please review the following change which fixes a number of native 
compilation warnings in the jdk.pack200 code.


Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074839
Webrev: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8074839/webrev.03/webrev/


Testing: A slightly earlier version [1] has been through a build & 
test cycle on all the OracleJDK platforms, running the core_tools 
jtreg tests as well as a number of other jtreg tests and java 
applications. There were no warnings on any of the platforms (in the 
files related to this change). I will rerun the testing, but since the 
differences from the earlier version are very small I'd like some 
reviews first.


Note that the warnings were temporarily disabled as part of 
JDK-8074096 [2] until such time they could be fixed the proper way. 
Also note that this change supersedes the earlier change [3] Dmitry 
had out for review. The bug [4] corresponding to that webrev will be 
closed as a duplicate of this bug (JDK-8074839).


Cheers,
Mikael

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8074839/webrev.02/webrev
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074096
[3] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8073584/webrev.01/
[4] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073584





Re: [9] RFR 8074839: Resolve disabled warnings for libunpack and the unpack200 binary

2015-03-18 Thread David Holmes

Hi Mikael,

This all looks okay to me.

Thanks,
David

On 19/03/2015 9:18 AM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:


Please review the following change which fixes a number of native
compilation warnings in the jdk.pack200 code.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074839
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8074839/webrev.03/webrev/

Testing: A slightly earlier version [1] has been through a build & test
cycle on all the OracleJDK platforms, running the core_tools jtreg tests
as well as a number of other jtreg tests and java applications. There
were no warnings on any of the platforms (in the files related to this
change). I will rerun the testing, but since the differences from the
earlier version are very small I'd like some reviews first.

Note that the warnings were temporarily disabled as part of JDK-8074096
[2] until such time they could be fixed the proper way. Also note that
this change supersedes the earlier change [3] Dmitry had out for review.
The bug [4] corresponding to that webrev will be closed as a duplicate
of this bug (JDK-8074839).

Cheers,
Mikael

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8074839/webrev.02/webrev
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074096
[3] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8073584/webrev.01/
[4] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073584



[9] RFR 8074839: Resolve disabled warnings for libunpack and the unpack200 binary

2015-03-18 Thread Mikael Vidstedt


Please review the following change which fixes a number of native 
compilation warnings in the jdk.pack200 code.


Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074839
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8074839/webrev.03/webrev/

Testing: A slightly earlier version [1] has been through a build & test 
cycle on all the OracleJDK platforms, running the core_tools jtreg tests 
as well as a number of other jtreg tests and java applications. There 
were no warnings on any of the platforms (in the files related to this 
change). I will rerun the testing, but since the differences from the 
earlier version are very small I'd like some reviews first.


Note that the warnings were temporarily disabled as part of JDK-8074096 
[2] until such time they could be fixed the proper way. Also note that 
this change supersedes the earlier change [3] Dmitry had out for review. 
The bug [4] corresponding to that webrev will be closed as a duplicate 
of this bug (JDK-8074839).


Cheers,
Mikael

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8074839/webrev.02/webrev
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8074096
[3] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8073584/webrev.01/
[4] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073584