Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
OK, pushed:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/6b4e4ffe01ab
Thanks for your contribution!
s'marks
On 5/4/20 1:50 AM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Yup Contributed-by as picked from my email : jayashreesk .
Will keep in mind about the complicated change-sets.
Thanks
Jay
-Stuart Marks wrote: -
To: Jayashree Sk1
From: Stuart Marks
Date: 05/01/2020 09:32AM
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for
java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
Hi Jay,
OK, welcome! I'll sponsor this changeset for you. It's pretty simple, so I'll
just paste the exported changeset below. (For complicated changesets, you'll
have to ask a sponsor to host a webrev on cr.openjdk.java.net for you.) Please
check the Contributed-by line in the changeset to make sure the attribution is
correct. I just copied the From: line from your email, but if you want it to be
different, please let me know.
I'll update the bug report with a pointer to this email thread.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D6415694=DwICaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=rA_13vli8clPM_toR46hq8FVwH3XGr8z7cUfcQoqL-k=9YMcjPnAAEf40XGqmcEU_Uiyg_xCVlOU26-U56hEb4A=ueOfMpgrTsTZc7xg22AdzVskohCya_stq_WLTREzw24=
Could I get a Reviewer to review this? Thanks.
(I noticed that the anachronistic markup is used here instead of the
preferred {@code ...} javadoc tag. However, is used all over this
package, so I didn't think that changing it in just one place would be helpful.)
I'll also note again that since this is merely an editorial wording change to
the specification, I don't think it needs a CSR request.
Thanks,
s'marks
# HG changeset patch
# User smarks
# Date 1588290431 25200
# Thu Apr 30 16:47:11 2020 -0700
# Node ID 1f5b3876d1500a2e77d6e39d079649964ba6dd26
# Parent fe6548dc92de4c875467c968ee37e7c9bbee1697
6415694: Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
Reviewed-by: XXX
Contributed-by: Jayashree Sk1
diff -r fe6548dc92de -r 1f5b3876d150
src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
--- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaThu Apr
30
15:21:15 2020 -0700
+++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaThu Apr
30
16:47:11 2020 -0700
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
/**
* An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt
- * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already
- * has an associated binding.
+ * is made to bind an object to a name that already
+ * has an associated binding in the registry.
*
* @since 1.1
* @author Ann Wollrath
On 4/29/20 10:24 PM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote:
Thanks for the review comment Stuart. Yes, I will need a sponsor, this is my
first time here in OpenJDK.
Regards!
Jay
-Stuart Marks wrote: -
To: Jayashree Sk1
From: Stuart Marks
Date: 04/30/2020 09:22AM
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for
java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
The change looks fine. Although this is in a normative portion of the
specification, the nature of the change is purely editorial, so I don't think it
needs a CSR.
Do you need a sponsor?
s'marks
On 4/29/20 2:57 AM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote:
Hi All,
Please find the below changes for the issues
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D6415694=DwICaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=rA_13vli8clPM_toR46hq8FVwH3XGr8z7cUfcQoqL-k=OXEC-w1xTWoJUyw_sRivRwIGmkHIUc3DllMsA_N3qIk=iesFFcE4NSOreLmf8vwdKzcdnFgjGE_SEERICPUFef4=
.
It is a description change, which was already approved by the reviewer.
Thanks!
diff -r 59b5bd9a7168
src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
--- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaMon Mar
16 02:16:49 2020 -0400
+++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaMon Mar
30 15:45:43 2020 +0530
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
/**
* An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt
- * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already
- * has an associated binding.
+ * is made to bind an object to a name that already
+ * has an associated binding in the registry.
*
* @since 1.1
* @author Ann Wollrath
RE: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
Hi Stuart,
Yup Contributed-by as picked from my email : jayashreesk .
Will keep in mind about the complicated change-sets.
Thanks
Jay
-Stuart Marks wrote: -
To: Jayashree Sk1
From: Stuart Marks
Date: 05/01/2020 09:32AM
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for
java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
Hi Jay,
OK, welcome! I'll sponsor this changeset for you. It's pretty simple, so I'll
just paste the exported changeset below. (For complicated changesets, you'll
have to ask a sponsor to host a webrev on cr.openjdk.java.net for you.) Please
check the Contributed-by line in the changeset to make sure the attribution is
correct. I just copied the From: line from your email, but if you want it to be
different, please let me know.
I'll update the bug report with a pointer to this email thread.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D6415694=DwICaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=rA_13vli8clPM_toR46hq8FVwH3XGr8z7cUfcQoqL-k=9YMcjPnAAEf40XGqmcEU_Uiyg_xCVlOU26-U56hEb4A=ueOfMpgrTsTZc7xg22AdzVskohCya_stq_WLTREzw24=
Could I get a Reviewer to review this? Thanks.
(I noticed that the anachronistic markup is used here instead of the
preferred {@code ...} javadoc tag. However, is used all over this
package, so I didn't think that changing it in just one place would be helpful.)
I'll also note again that since this is merely an editorial wording change to
the specification, I don't think it needs a CSR request.
Thanks,
s'marks
# HG changeset patch
# User smarks
# Date 1588290431 25200
# Thu Apr 30 16:47:11 2020 -0700
# Node ID 1f5b3876d1500a2e77d6e39d079649964ba6dd26
# Parent fe6548dc92de4c875467c968ee37e7c9bbee1697
6415694: Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
Reviewed-by: XXX
Contributed-by: Jayashree Sk1
diff -r fe6548dc92de -r 1f5b3876d150
src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
--- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaThu Apr
30
15:21:15 2020 -0700
+++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaThu Apr
30
16:47:11 2020 -0700
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
/**
* An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt
- * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already
- * has an associated binding.
+ * is made to bind an object to a name that already
+ * has an associated binding in the registry.
*
* @since 1.1
* @author Ann Wollrath
On 4/29/20 10:24 PM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote:
> Thanks for the review comment Stuart. Yes, I will need a sponsor, this is my
> first time here in OpenJDK.
>
>
> Regards!
> Jay
>
> -Stuart Marks wrote: -
> To: Jayashree Sk1
> From: Stuart Marks
> Date: 04/30/2020 09:22AM
> Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for
> java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
>
> The change looks fine. Although this is in a normative portion of the
> specification, the nature of the change is purely editorial, so I don't think
> it
> needs a CSR.
>
> Do you need a sponsor?
>
> s'marks
>
> On 4/29/20 2:57 AM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Please find the below changes for the issues
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D6415694=DwICaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=rA_13vli8clPM_toR46hq8FVwH3XGr8z7cUfcQoqL-k=OXEC-w1xTWoJUyw_sRivRwIGmkHIUc3DllMsA_N3qIk=iesFFcE4NSOreLmf8vwdKzcdnFgjGE_SEERICPUFef4=
>> .
>> It is a description change, which was already approved by the reviewer.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> diff -r 59b5bd9a7168
>> src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
>> --- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaMon
>> Mar 16 02:16:49 2020 -0400
>> +++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaMon
>> Mar 30 15:45:43 2020 +0530
>> @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
>>
>>/**
>> * An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt
>> - * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already
>> - * has an associated binding.
>> + * is made to bind an object to a name that already
>> + * has an associated binding in the registry.
>> *
>> * @since 1.1
>> * @author Ann Wollrath
>>
>
>
Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
Thanks Roger.
I figure I could have gotten away without an additional reviewer. :-) However, I
asked for a review because I wanted someone to cross-check my decision not to
file a CSR for this, despite most specification changes requiring a CSR. I also
wanted to model behavior for new community members.
s'marks
On 5/1/20 7:57 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
+1,
BTW, Stuart you are a Reviewer, no need for a 2nd.
Roger
On 5/1/20 12:02 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi Jay,
OK, welcome! I'll sponsor this changeset for you. It's pretty simple, so I'll
just paste the exported changeset below. (For complicated changesets, you'll
have to ask a sponsor to host a webrev on cr.openjdk.java.net for you.) Please
check the Contributed-by line in the changeset to make sure the attribution is
correct. I just copied the From: line from your email, but if you want it to
be different, please let me know.
I'll update the bug report with a pointer to this email thread.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6415694
Could I get a Reviewer to review this? Thanks.
(I noticed that the anachronistic markup is used here instead of the
preferred {@code ...} javadoc tag. However, is used all over this
package, so I didn't think that changing it in just one place would be helpful.)
I'll also note again that since this is merely an editorial wording change to
the specification, I don't think it needs a CSR request.
Thanks,
s'marks
# HG changeset patch
# User smarks
# Date 1588290431 25200
# Thu Apr 30 16:47:11 2020 -0700
# Node ID 1f5b3876d1500a2e77d6e39d079649964ba6dd26
# Parent fe6548dc92de4c875467c968ee37e7c9bbee1697
6415694: Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
Reviewed-by: XXX
Contributed-by: Jayashree Sk1
diff -r fe6548dc92de -r 1f5b3876d150
src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
--- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java Thu Apr
30 15:21:15 2020 -0700
+++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java Thu Apr
30 16:47:11 2020 -0700
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
/**
* An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt
- * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already
- * has an associated binding.
+ * is made to bind an object to a name that already
+ * has an associated binding in the registry.
*
* @since 1.1
* @author Ann Wollrath
On 4/29/20 10:24 PM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote:
Thanks for the review comment Stuart. Yes, I will need a sponsor, this is my
first time here in OpenJDK.
Regards!
Jay
-Stuart Marks wrote: -
To: Jayashree Sk1
From: Stuart Marks
Date: 04/30/2020 09:22AM
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for
java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
The change looks fine. Although this is in a normative portion of the
specification, the nature of the change is purely editorial, so I don't think it
needs a CSR.
Do you need a sponsor?
s'marks
On 4/29/20 2:57 AM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote:
Hi All,
Please find the below changes for the issues
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D6415694=DwICaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=rA_13vli8clPM_toR46hq8FVwH3XGr8z7cUfcQoqL-k=OXEC-w1xTWoJUyw_sRivRwIGmkHIUc3DllMsA_N3qIk=iesFFcE4NSOreLmf8vwdKzcdnFgjGE_SEERICPUFef4=
.
It is a description change, which was already approved by the reviewer.
Thanks!
diff -r 59b5bd9a7168
src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
--- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java Mon Mar
16 02:16:49 2020 -0400
+++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java Mon Mar
30 15:45:43 2020 +0530
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
/**
* An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt
- * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already
- * has an associated binding.
+ * is made to bind an object to a name that already
+ * has an associated binding in the registry.
*
* @since 1.1
* @author Ann Wollrath
Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
+1,
BTW, Stuart you are a Reviewer, no need for a 2nd.
Roger
On 5/1/20 12:02 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi Jay,
OK, welcome! I'll sponsor this changeset for you. It's pretty simple,
so I'll just paste the exported changeset below. (For complicated
changesets, you'll have to ask a sponsor to host a webrev on
cr.openjdk.java.net for you.) Please check the Contributed-by line in
the changeset to make sure the attribution is correct. I just copied
the From: line from your email, but if you want it to be different,
please let me know.
I'll update the bug report with a pointer to this email thread.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6415694
Could I get a Reviewer to review this? Thanks.
(I noticed that the anachronistic markup is used here instead
of the preferred {@code ...} javadoc tag. However, is used all
over this package, so I didn't think that changing it in just one
place would be helpful.)
I'll also note again that since this is merely an editorial wording
change to the specification, I don't think it needs a CSR request.
Thanks,
s'marks
# HG changeset patch
# User smarks
# Date 1588290431 25200
# Thu Apr 30 16:47:11 2020 -0700
# Node ID 1f5b3876d1500a2e77d6e39d079649964ba6dd26
# Parent fe6548dc92de4c875467c968ee37e7c9bbee1697
6415694: Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
Reviewed-by: XXX
Contributed-by: Jayashree Sk1
diff -r fe6548dc92de -r 1f5b3876d150
src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
--- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
Thu Apr 30 15:21:15 2020 -0700
+++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
Thu Apr 30 16:47:11 2020 -0700
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
/**
* An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt
- * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already
- * has an associated binding.
+ * is made to bind an object to a name that already
+ * has an associated binding in the registry.
*
* @since 1.1
* @author Ann Wollrath
On 4/29/20 10:24 PM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote:
Thanks for the review comment Stuart. Yes, I will need a sponsor,
this is my first time here in OpenJDK.
Regards!
Jay
-Stuart Marks wrote: -
To: Jayashree Sk1
From: Stuart Marks
Date: 04/30/2020 09:22AM
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for
java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
The change looks fine. Although this is in a normative portion of the
specification, the nature of the change is purely editorial, so I
don't think it
needs a CSR.
Do you need a sponsor?
s'marks
On 4/29/20 2:57 AM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote:
Hi All,
Please find the below changes for the issues
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D6415694=DwICaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=rA_13vli8clPM_toR46hq8FVwH3XGr8z7cUfcQoqL-k=OXEC-w1xTWoJUyw_sRivRwIGmkHIUc3DllMsA_N3qIk=iesFFcE4NSOreLmf8vwdKzcdnFgjGE_SEERICPUFef4=
.
It is a description change, which was already approved by the reviewer.
Thanks!
diff -r 59b5bd9a7168
src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
--- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
Mon Mar 16 02:16:49 2020 -0400
+++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
Mon Mar 30 15:45:43 2020 +0530
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
/**
* An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt
- * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already
- * has an associated binding.
+ * is made to bind an object to a name that already
+ * has an associated binding in the registry.
*
* @since 1.1
* @author Ann Wollrath
Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
Hi Jay,
OK, welcome! I'll sponsor this changeset for you. It's pretty simple, so I'll
just paste the exported changeset below. (For complicated changesets, you'll
have to ask a sponsor to host a webrev on cr.openjdk.java.net for you.) Please
check the Contributed-by line in the changeset to make sure the attribution is
correct. I just copied the From: line from your email, but if you want it to be
different, please let me know.
I'll update the bug report with a pointer to this email thread.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6415694
Could I get a Reviewer to review this? Thanks.
(I noticed that the anachronistic markup is used here instead of the
preferred {@code ...} javadoc tag. However, is used all over this
package, so I didn't think that changing it in just one place would be helpful.)
I'll also note again that since this is merely an editorial wording change to
the specification, I don't think it needs a CSR request.
Thanks,
s'marks
# HG changeset patch
# User smarks
# Date 1588290431 25200
# Thu Apr 30 16:47:11 2020 -0700
# Node ID 1f5b3876d1500a2e77d6e39d079649964ba6dd26
# Parent fe6548dc92de4c875467c968ee37e7c9bbee1697
6415694: Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
Reviewed-by: XXX
Contributed-by: Jayashree Sk1
diff -r fe6548dc92de -r 1f5b3876d150
src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
--- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java Thu Apr 30
15:21:15 2020 -0700
+++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java Thu Apr 30
16:47:11 2020 -0700
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
/**
* An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt
- * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already
- * has an associated binding.
+ * is made to bind an object to a name that already
+ * has an associated binding in the registry.
*
* @since 1.1
* @author Ann Wollrath
On 4/29/20 10:24 PM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote:
Thanks for the review comment Stuart. Yes, I will need a sponsor, this is my
first time here in OpenJDK.
Regards!
Jay
-Stuart Marks wrote: -
To: Jayashree Sk1
From: Stuart Marks
Date: 04/30/2020 09:22AM
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for
java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
The change looks fine. Although this is in a normative portion of the
specification, the nature of the change is purely editorial, so I don't think it
needs a CSR.
Do you need a sponsor?
s'marks
On 4/29/20 2:57 AM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote:
Hi All,
Please find the below changes for the issues
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D6415694=DwICaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=rA_13vli8clPM_toR46hq8FVwH3XGr8z7cUfcQoqL-k=OXEC-w1xTWoJUyw_sRivRwIGmkHIUc3DllMsA_N3qIk=iesFFcE4NSOreLmf8vwdKzcdnFgjGE_SEERICPUFef4=
.
It is a description change, which was already approved by the reviewer.
Thanks!
diff -r 59b5bd9a7168
src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java
--- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaMon Mar
16 02:16:49 2020 -0400
+++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaMon Mar
30 15:45:43 2020 +0530
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
/**
* An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt
- * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already
- * has an associated binding.
+ * is made to bind an object to a name that already
+ * has an associated binding in the registry.
*
* @since 1.1
* @author Ann Wollrath
RE: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
Thanks for the review comment Stuart. Yes, I will need a sponsor, this is my first time here in OpenJDK. Regards! Jay -Stuart Marks wrote: - To: Jayashree Sk1 From: Stuart Marks Date: 04/30/2020 09:22AM Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException The change looks fine. Although this is in a normative portion of the specification, the nature of the change is purely editorial, so I don't think it needs a CSR. Do you need a sponsor? s'marks On 4/29/20 2:57 AM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote: > Hi All, > Please find the below changes for the issues > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D6415694=DwICaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=rA_13vli8clPM_toR46hq8FVwH3XGr8z7cUfcQoqL-k=OXEC-w1xTWoJUyw_sRivRwIGmkHIUc3DllMsA_N3qIk=iesFFcE4NSOreLmf8vwdKzcdnFgjGE_SEERICPUFef4= > . > It is a description change, which was already approved by the reviewer. > > Thanks! > > diff -r 59b5bd9a7168 > src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java > --- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaMon > Mar 16 02:16:49 2020 -0400 > +++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaMon > Mar 30 15:45:43 2020 +0530 > @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ > > /** >* An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt > - * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already > - * has an associated binding. > + * is made to bind an object to a name that already > + * has an associated binding in the registry. >* >* @since 1.1 >* @author Ann Wollrath >
Re: RFR: 6415694 Clarification in Javadoc for java.rmi.AlreadyBoundException
The change looks fine. Although this is in a normative portion of the specification, the nature of the change is purely editorial, so I don't think it needs a CSR. Do you need a sponsor? s'marks On 4/29/20 2:57 AM, Jayashree Sk1 wrote: Hi All, Please find the below changes for the issues https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6415694. It is a description change, which was already approved by the reviewer. Thanks! diff -r 59b5bd9a7168 src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.java --- a/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaMon Mar 16 02:16:49 2020 -0400 +++ b/src/java.rmi/share/classes/java/rmi/AlreadyBoundException.javaMon Mar 30 15:45:43 2020 +0530 @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ /** * An AlreadyBoundException is thrown if an attempt - * is made to bind an object in the registry to a name that already - * has an associated binding. + * is made to bind an object to a name that already + * has an associated binding in the registry. * * @since 1.1 * @author Ann Wollrath
