Re: [coreboot] [RFC] CMOS options

2009-12-16 Thread Luc Verhaegen
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 02:30:01PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
 On 12/11/09 8:39 PM, ron minnich wrote:
  On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Andrew Goodbody
  andrew.goodb...@tadpole.com wrote:

  Luc Verhaegen wrote:
  
  We have 892 bytes to our disposal in cmos. We can reserve 128 for
  board/cmos versioning, and reserve even 256 for the bootloader, and still
  have 512bytes left for coreboot options, which is tons when bits are used
  properly and when strings are not used.

  Most boards I have used have a maximum space of 256 bytes that includes the
  RTC. Where does the extra come from?
  
  On much of my hardware, the most I can assume is 128 bytes -
  subtracting many bytes that are weirdly hardware controlled (such as
  date).
 
  Some of our hardware has 256 bytes.
 
  The io ports only support an 8-bit address I thought?

 
 The ports 0x70/0x71 even only support 7 bits... The 8th bit is used for
 NMI control.
 
 Higher CMOS bytes can be accessed by 0x72/0x73, 0x74/0x75
 
 However, if you try to access the upper 128 bytes by setting the topmost
 bit in 0x70 it will just look like the upper 128 byte are a mirror of
 the lower 128 bytes.
 
 Stefan

Ah, my bad, i guess 1024 bits is why my synapses brought up that figure.

Still, it should still be possible to segment this up nicely, and then 
we suddenly do have a lot of space for bools, sets and integers. And 
maybe a string or two to denote the board.

Luc Verhaegen

-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot


[coreboot] Problems compiling H8DMR_FAM10 because of section overlaps.

2009-12-16 Thread Knut Kujat
Hello,

I'm now trying to get coreboot working on a Supermicro H8QME-2+ board.
This board is really similar to the H8DMR/H8DMR_FAM10 boards already
supported by coreboot. Since my board is populated with 4 Opteron family
10 processors I thought of trying to compile  the H8DMR_FAM10 to get a
rom and flash it to board to see what happens. But compiling I got the
section overlaps error since its recommended to increase the
ROM_IMAGE_SIZE I added the following lines to Kconfig:

config ROM_IMAGE_SIZE
hex
default 0x15800
depends on BOARD_SUPERMICRO_H8DMR_FAM10
than a made a make distclean, make config, make and got following message:

/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
section .reset [fff0 - ] overlaps section
 .rom [5800 -
0001929f]
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
/home/knut/Documents/Supertrunk4978/build/coreboot: section .reset vma
0xfff0 overlaps previous sections

Taking a good look at the ranges I increased ROM_SIZE to 0x1 and
it worked but not at all because:

/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
section .id [0001fffeff58 - 0001fffeff7f] overlaps section
  .rom [0001fffe -
00013a9f]
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
/home/knut/Documents/Supertrunk4978/build/coreboot: section .id vma
0x1fffeff58 overlaps previous sections
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
/home/knut/Documents/Supertrunk4978/build/coreboot: section .romstrap
vma 0x1fffeffa0 overlaps previous sections

now it's .id that overlaps section .rom and not .reset :(

Now I followed the instructions on the coreboot side about section
overlaps and I did this:

00013a9f-0001fffeff58= 3b47 = 3b48

config ROM_IMAGE_SIZE
hex  
default 0x13b48
depends on BOARD_SUPERMICRO_H8DMR_FAM10
make distclean, make config, make and got


/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
section .id [00013aa0 - 00013ac7] overlaps section
  .rom [0001fffe3b48 -
000175ef]
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
/home/knut/Documents/Supertrunk4978/build/coreboot: section .id vma
0x13aa0 overlaps previous sections
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
/home/knut/Documents/Supertrunk4978/build/coreboot: section .romstrap
vma 0x13ae8 overlaps previous sections
 I can see that no only the .rom range changed but also the .id range
should it do that?? So what can I do to make it work?

A little frustrated I successfully compiled the H8DMR rom and flashed it
into the bios chip thinking that at least some debug messages should
appear since on both boards the way to the winbond chip is the same but
I only got some ·$·)?· rubbish. I of course tested the serial
before and it worked fine.

thanks,
Knut Kujat.


-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Problems compiling H8DMR_FAM10 because of section overlaps.

2009-12-16 Thread Patrick Georgi
Am 16.12.2009 15:30, schrieb Knut Kujat:
 Hello,

 I'm now trying to get coreboot working on a Supermicro H8QME-2+ board.
 This board is really similar to the H8DMR/H8DMR_FAM10 boards already
 supported by coreboot. Since my board is populated with 4 Opteron
 family 10 processors I thought of trying to compile  the H8DMR_FAM10
 to get a rom and flash it to board to see what happens. But compiling
 I got the section overlaps error since its recommended to increase the
 ROM_IMAGE_SIZE I added the following lines to Kconfig:
Fam10 is not supported with kconfig yet.


Regards,
Patrick Georgi
-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Problems compiling H8DMR_FAM10 because of section overlaps.

2009-12-16 Thread Knut Kujat
Patrick Georgi escribió:
 Am 16.12.2009 15:30, schrieb Knut Kujat:
 Hello,

 I'm now trying to get coreboot working on a Supermicro H8QME-2+
 board. This board is really similar to the H8DMR/H8DMR_FAM10 boards
 already supported by coreboot. Since my board is populated with 4
 Opteron family 10 processors I thought of trying to compile  the
 H8DMR_FAM10 to get a rom and flash it to board to see what happens.
 But compiling I got the section overlaps error since its recommended
 to increase the ROM_IMAGE_SIZE I added the following lines to Kconfig:
 Fam10 is not supported with kconfig yet.


 Regards,
 Patrick Georgi
Aham, thx for the hint. Now it worked building it with ./builtarget but
I'm only getting rubbish from the serial using standard settings 115200
8n1. Some suggestions?

thx,
Knut Kujat.
-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Problems compiling H8DMR_FAM10 because of section overlaps.

2009-12-16 Thread Peter Stuge
Knut Kujat wrote:
 I'm only getting rubbish from the serial using standard settings
 115200 8n1. Some suggestions?

Try all other speeds. It's not uncommon for a clock multiplier to be
off, causing double or half the expected speed.


//Peter

-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot


Re: [coreboot] Problems compiling H8DMR_FAM10 because of section overlaps.

2009-12-16 Thread Marc Jones
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
 Knut Kujat wrote:
 I'm only getting rubbish from the serial using standard settings
 115200 8n1. Some suggestions?

 Try all other speeds. It's not uncommon for a clock multiplier to be
 off, causing double or half the expected speed.


As Peter said, it is probably the SIO clock setting. Check the setup
in cach_as_ram_auto.c.

Marc


-- 
http://marcjonesconsulting.com

-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot


[coreboot] [commit] r4979 - trunk/targets/supermicro/h8dmr_fam10

2009-12-16 Thread svn
Author: ward
Date: 2009-12-16 20:48:45 +0100 (Wed, 16 Dec 2009)
New Revision: 4979

Modified:
   trunk/targets/supermicro/h8dmr_fam10/VERSION
Log:

Make sure that the h8dmr_fam10 has the proper version string.

This is a trivial patch.

Signed-off-by: Ward Vandewege w...@gnu.org
Acked-by: Ward Vandewege w...@gnu.org



Modified: trunk/targets/supermicro/h8dmr_fam10/VERSION
===
--- trunk/targets/supermicro/h8dmr_fam10/VERSION2009-12-14 21:52:56 UTC 
(rev 4978)
+++ trunk/targets/supermicro/h8dmr_fam10/VERSION2009-12-16 19:48:45 UTC 
(rev 4979)
@@ -1 +1 @@
-_h8dmr
+_h8dmr_fam10


-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot


Re: [coreboot] Serial Console option (was Coreboot fails to initialize on ASUS A8V-E SE)

2009-12-16 Thread Joseph Smith

On 12/15/2009 01:47 PM, ron minnich wrote:

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Myles Watsonmyle...@gmail.com  wrote:


I guess I was looking at it more like this:  All the boards that we support
have serial ports.  If we have a serial port it makes sense to enable it.
The option to disable the serial port should disappear because it can be
subsumed in the I have a serial port (CONFIG_SUPERIO_*) option.  I can see
your point, though.

So, to fix the problem of Kconfig having options that break the build, you'd
like to use #ifdefs, right?


I have no idea to tell you the truth. I trust you more than I trust me :-)

Hmm, I have been doing a little research lately on a Wyse terminal with 
a Geode that doesn't have a superio or per say an official serial port. 
I know the southbridge supports UART ports but will this throw a wrench 
into things? Especially what you are talking about above?



--
Thanks,
Joseph Smith
Set-Top-Linux
www.settoplinux.org

--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot


Re: [coreboot] Serial Console option (was Coreboot fails to initialize on ASUS A8V-E SE)

2009-12-16 Thread Myles Watson
 Hmm, I have been doing a little research lately on a Wyse terminal with
 a Geode that doesn't have a superio or per say an official serial port.
 I know the southbridge supports UART ports but will this throw a wrench
 into things? Especially what you are talking about above?

I don't think it will be a problem.  I'm not going to change anything for
now.

Thanks,
Myles


-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot


[coreboot] Asrock 939A785GMH/128M - socket 939 + AMD 785G

2009-12-16 Thread Rudolf Marek

Hello all,

Just FYI. I bought this motherboard. It has the socket 939, newest AMD 785G!
It has 1MB socketed SPI flash. The superio is W83627DHG. SB is 710.

Looking forward for the AMD code :)

The serial is on header.

Rudolf

--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot


Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] The function int15 running on the Technexion's tim5690.

2009-12-16 Thread Libra Li
Hello,

I modified int15_handler on mainboard.

The VGA BIOS is through int15 getting LCD panel's ID. Then the VBIOS
call int15.
The panel's ID is selection by switch.
This functions is reference AMD RS690 ASIC Family BIOS Developer’s
Guide.

Thanks.

Signed-off-by: Libra Li libra...@technexion.com


2009/12/16 ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com

 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Stefan Reinauer ste...@coresystems.de
 wrote:

  I think it should go to southbridge/amd/rs690, or even to the mainboard
  directory, if it's about detecting a specific LCD version.

 oops. You're right. Mainboard directory.

 Should we use the weak symbols thing for attaching handlers like this?

 So the default in yabel is a weak symbol and can be over-ridden by a
 compiled in handler?

 ron

 --
 coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
 http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Index: src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/Makefile.inc
===
--- src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/Makefile.inc	(revision 4977)
+++ src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/Makefile.inc	(working copy)
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 obj-y += tn_post_code.o
 
 obj-y += speaker.o
+obj-y += vgabios.o
 
 # This is part of the conversion to init-obj and away from included code.
 
Index: src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/cache_as_ram_auto.c
===
--- src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/cache_as_ram_auto.c	(revision 4977)
+++ src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/cache_as_ram_auto.c	(working copy)
@@ -145,20 +145,6 @@
 }
 #endif/* CONFIG_USE_FALLBACK_IMAGE == 1 */
 
-/* Early mainboard specific GPIO setup. */
-static void mb_gpio_init(void)
-{
-	/* Init Super I/O GPIOs. Done early. */
-	it8712f_enter_conf();
-	outb(IT8712F_CONFIG_REG_LDN, SIO_INDEX);
-	outb(IT8712F_GPIO, SIO_DATA);
-	outb(0x62, SIO_INDEX); // set Simple I/O Base Address 0x200
-	outb(0x02, SIO_DATA);
-	outb(0x63, SIO_INDEX);
-	outb(0x00, SIO_DATA);
-	it8712f_exit_conf();
-}
-
 void real_main(unsigned long bist, unsigned long cpu_init_detectedx);
 
 void cache_as_ram_main(unsigned long bist, unsigned long cpu_init_detectedx)
@@ -191,7 +177,6 @@
 
 	/* it8712f_enable_serial does not use its 1st parameter. */
 	it8712f_enable_serial(0, CONFIG_TTYS0_BASE);
-	mb_gpio_init();
 	it8712f_kill_watchdog();
 	uart_init();
 	console_init();
Index: src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/mainboard.c
===
--- src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/mainboard.c	(revision 4977)
+++ src/mainboard/technexion/tim5690/mainboard.c	(working copy)
@@ -26,13 +26,56 @@
 #include cpu/amd/mtrr.h
 #include device/pci_def.h
 #include ../southbridge/amd/sb600/sb600.h
+#include ../superio/ite/it8712f/it8712f.h
 #include chip.h
 #include tn_post_code.h
+#include vgabios.h
 
 #define ADT7461_ADDRESS 0x4C
 #define ARA_ADDRESS 0x0C /* Alert Response Address */
 #define SMBUS_IO_BASE 0x1000
 
+
+/* Video BIOS Function Extensions Specification
+ */
+//Callback Sub-Function 00h - Get LCD Panel ID
+#define LCD_PANEL_ID_NO 0x00	/* No LCD */
+#define LCD_PANEL_ID_01 0x01	/* 1024x768, 24 bits, 1 channel */
+#define LCD_PANEL_ID_02 0x02	/* 1280x1024, 24 bits, 2 channels */
+#define LCD_PANEL_ID_03 0x03	/* 1440x900, 24 bits, 2 channels */
+#define LCD_PANEL_ID_04 0x04	/* 1680x1050, 24 bits, 2 channels */
+#define LCD_PANEL_ID_05 0x05	/* 1920x1200, 24 bits, 2 channels */
+#define LCD_PANEL_ID_06 0x06	/* 1920x1080, 24 bits, 2 channels */
+//Callback Sub-Function 05h – Select Boot-up TV Standard
+#define TV_MODE_00	0x00	/* NTSC */
+#define TV_MODE_01	0x01	/* PAL */
+#define TV_MODE_02	0x02	/* PALM */
+#define TV_MODE_03	0x03	/* PAL60 */
+#define TV_MODE_04	0x04	/* NTSCJ */
+#define TV_MODE_05	0x05	/* PALCN */
+#define TV_MODE_06	0x06	/* PALN */
+#define TV_MODE_09	0x09	/* SCART-RGB */
+#define TV_MODE_NO	0xff	/* No TV Support */
+
+
+/* The base address is 0x2e or 0x4e, depending on config bytes. */
+#define SIO_BASE 0x2e
+#define SIO_INDEXSIO_BASE
+#define SIO_DATA SIO_BASE+1
+
+/* Global configuration registers. */
+#define IT8712F_CONFIG_REG_CC0x02 /* Configure Control (write-only). */
+#define IT8712F_CONFIG_REG_LDN   0x07 /* Logical Device Number. */
+#define IT8712F_CONFIG_REG_CONFIGSEL 0x22 /* Configuration Select. */
+#define IT8712F_CONFIG_REG_CLOCKSEL  0x23 /* Clock Selection. */
+#define IT8712F_CONFIG_REG_SWSUSP0x24 /* Software Suspend, Flash I/F. */
+#define IT8712F_CONFIG_REG_MFC   0x2a /* Multi-function control */
+#define IT8712F_CONFIG_REG_WATCHDOG  0x72 /* Watchdog control. */
+
+#define IT8712F_CONFIGURATION_PORT   0x2e /* Write-only. */
+#define IT8712F_SIMPLE_IO_BASE   0x200 /* Simple I/O base address */
+
+
 extern int do_smbus_read_byte(u32 smbus_io_base, u32 device, u32 address);
 extern int do_smbus_write_byte(u32 smbus_io_base, u32 device, u32 address,