On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 8:13 AM Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo
wrote:
>
> Hi Marshall
>
> >* amd/bettong removal, should it happen, triggers CarrizoPI (00660F01)
> >removal
> >
> >We ought to have all the backward-compatibility for CZ and the Embedded
> >variants landed in stoneyridge and amd_blobs now. I think it should be a
> >fairly easy changeover for amd/bettong from cpu/nb/sb to soc/amd
> >/stoneyridge if someone is able to spend the time on it. The older 0060F01
> >AGESA was superseded years ago by StoneyPI, and has practically no chance of
> >ever being updated again. Padmelon may be the preferred >board now but I
> >believe there are likely still Bettongs in the field.
>
> I would like to try to do the modifications to avoid bettong removal. I'll
> have some time this Xmas holidays to spend on it.
> But I'm still struggling with the minimal changes to be able to generate a
> board_status report because no commits I've done
> are merged. I don't know exactly how to proceed to avoid deprecation...
>
AMD is not valueing my work or fulfilling their part of the
agreements, so I am leaving these size 13 shoes behind for someone to
fill. From what I know, the only persons I could recommend for further
binaryPI related reviews are not being for these tasks either.
Regards,
Kyösti Mälkki
___
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org