Re: [courier-users] Courier 20030410
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:33:14 -0500 Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Download: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php Beta releases of the next major version of Courier and Courier-IMAP are available for testing. New in the next release are virtual shared folders, and access control lists. I didn't succeed to build this release on a Debian woody system: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -Wall -lcrypt -c `test -f 'imapd.c' || echo './'`imapd.c imapd.c: In function `aclstore': imapd.c:3296: parse error before `char' imapd.c:3298: `acl_rights' undeclared (first use in this function) imapd.c:3298: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once imapd.c:3298: for each function it appears in.) make[3]: *** [imapd.o] Error 1 I installed libacl1 and acl-dev packages. Bye Racke -- LinuXia Systems = http://www.linuxia.de/ Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration ICDEVGROUP = http://www.icdevgroup.org/ Interchange Development Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: Courier 20030410
Stefan Hornburg writes:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:33:14 -0500
Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Download: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php
Beta releases of the next major version of Courier and Courier-IMAP are
available for testing. New in the next release are virtual shared folders,
and access control lists.
I didn't succeed to build this release on a Debian woody system:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -Wall -lcrypt -c `test -f 'imapd.c' ||
echo './'`imapd.c
imapd.c: In function `aclstore':
imapd.c:3296: parse error before `char'
imapd.c:3298: `acl_rights' undeclared (first use in this function)
imapd.c:3298: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
imapd.c:3298: for each function it appears in.)
make[3]: *** [imapd.o] Error 1
I installed libacl1 and acl-dev packages.
You don't need to install any acl packages. This error is due to a gcc-ism.
Here's the fix.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index: imap/imapd.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/courier/courier/imap/imap/imapd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.114
diff -U3 -r1.114 imapd.c
--- imap/imapd.c11 Jan 2004 02:47:32 - 1.114
+++ imap/imapd.c11 Jan 2004 18:09:13 -
@@ -3293,6 +3293,7 @@
if (acl_settable_folder(mailboxes[i].mailbox, mi))
continue;
+ {
CHECK_RIGHTSM(mailboxes[i].mailbox,
acl_rights,
ACL_ADMINISTER);
@@ -3306,6 +3307,7 @@
mailbox_info_destroy(mi);
mailboxes[i].mailbox[0]=0;
continue;
+ }
}
if (acl_read_folder(aclt_list, mi.homedir, mi.maildir))
pgp1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[courier-users] Re: [maildropl] Invalid home directory permissions - world writable
--On Sonntag, 11. Januar 2004 19:07 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jan 11 18:43:30 tinkerbell postfix/local[20791]: DEAEA35953: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=local, delay=9686, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: /root maildrop: Invalid home directory permissions - world writable. ) You dont want to deliver mail as root, make an alias to a less privileged user instead. Roland --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Re: Courier 20030410
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:09:45 -0500 Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Hornburg writes: On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:33:14 -0500 Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Download: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php Beta releases of the next major version of Courier and Courier-IMAP are available for testing. New in the next release are virtual shared folders, and access control lists. I didn't succeed to build this release on a Debian woody system: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -Wall -lcrypt -c `test -f 'imapd.c' || echo './'`imapd.c imapd.c: In function `aclstore': imapd.c:3296: parse error before `char' imapd.c:3298: `acl_rights' undeclared (first use in this function) imapd.c:3298: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once imapd.c:3298: for each function it appears in.) make[3]: *** [imapd.o] Error 1 I installed libacl1 and acl-dev packages. You don't need to install any acl packages. This error is due to a gcc-ism. Here's the fix. Yes, that fixes the problem. Thank you very much, Sam ! Bye Racke -- LinuXia Systems = http://www.linuxia.de/ Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration ICDEVGROUP = http://www.icdevgroup.org/ Interchange Development Team --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] Re: [maildropl] lots of ifs
--On Sonntag, 11. Januar 2004 11:30 -0800 Robin Lynn Frank
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In switching over from procmail, I have what I basically want by doing:
if ( $SIZE 5 )
{
xfilter /usr/bin/spamc -f
import SENDER
import RECIPIENT
import EXTENSION
to | /usr/bin/tmda-filter
Thats 100% false positives, and offloading your job to the forged
senders and domains.
In procmail, I was able to exclude mail lists we subscribe to from
processing by spamc or tmda (to save resources) by the following:
Whats wrong with the exclamation in fron of the expression ?
You want to read the whole maildropfilter(5) and maildropex(5):
The result of the ! operator is a logical opposite of its
right hand side expression. If the right hand side expres-
sion evaluated to a logical true, the result is a logical
false. If it evaluated to a logical false, the result is a
logical true.
Roland
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
[courier-users] courier-0.44.2.20040110 imap issue
after upgrading to courier-0.44.2.20040110 the imap-ssl sessions on mozillafirebird clients hang in the opening directory state. after downgrading to 0.44.2.20031219 things are working fine again. i am running suse 8.2 - has anybody noticed a similar behavior - has anybody a solution/explanation for this issue? t.i.a. alex gretha --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Backup MX configuration
Pierre, all you need for the secondary MX server is the hostname entry in 'locals' (which must match the hostname listed in the MX record exactly, of course). When courier accepts the email and then recognises that this email address is not held locally it will consult the dns itself, see that there is another preferred MX record, and try to relay the email to that hostname. Presumably that host is temporarily unavailable, so the email will just sit in the mailq as usual until the primary MX is available again. Regards, Patrick. - Original Message - From: Pierre Ossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:47 PM Subject: [courier-users] Backup MX configuration Hi! I've been using courier for awhile now and I think it's a great piece of software. I am, however, not quite clear about how to configure it as a backup MX server. From the FAQ I can read that: Furthermore, the hostname in the MX record must be one of the hostnames in the |locals| configuration file. Is it absolutely crucial that this hostname exists in 'locals' or does it follow normal semantics and defaults to 'me' when 'locals' doesn't exist? Also, I'd prefer to not have any mail delivered to the machine acting as a backup MX. But the constraint above makes it consider any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be a local mailbox. If it is possible I'd like it to forward this mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. Setting up an alias for every user is not an option. I need some kind of catch-all. If this is not possible, then can I configure it to bounce all mail heading for [EMAIL PROTECTED]? There are user accounts on the machine but I don't want them to receive mail. I don't know if you're supposed to retain some accounts going to specific mail servers ([EMAIL PROTECTED] comes to mind). If so, I'd appreciate any pointers on what's customary to have set up. Maintaining aliases for some system critical stuff is acceptable, having to put up a new reject rule for each new user on the machine is not. Regards Pierre Ossman PS. Could you cc any replies to this address since I'm not subscribed to courier-users, thanks. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
Re: [courier-users] Backup MX configuration
When courier accepts the email and then recognises that this email address is not held locally it will consult the dns itself, see that there is another preferred MX record, and try to relay the email to that hostname. Presumably that host is temporarily unavailable, so the email will just sit in the mailq as usual until the primary MX is available again. Unfortunately, if the main MX server has bofh rules (like mine does - a lot of them), but the secondary doesn't, the administrator of the secondary server will get all of the bounced messages, rather than the original sender (which is why my friend who secondaries the rest of my services told me to stop using him as a secondary MX - he refuses to give in to spammers by imposing manual bofh rules). This is one reason why spammers prefer to direct mail towards secondary MX servers rather than primary ones. -- Chris Petersen Programmer / Web Designer Silicon Mechanics: http://www.siliconmechanics.com/ Blade Servers: http://www.siliconmechanics.com/c292/blade-server.php 1U Servers: http://www.siliconmechanics.com/c272/1u-server.php --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
