Re: Can anyone approve my email to send reports?
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Jose Luis Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I report with [EMAIL PROTECTED], and see that the tests aren't > getting through (only a couple). I've read that to get the reports reported > directly I should subscribe to the list, but I don't want to subscribe to > such a high-volume list. Can someone approve my email to send reports to the > list? (to approve the batch of tests that I hace already sent would help a > lot too ;)) I don't believe any approval is necessary anymore. But sometimes there is a delay in things getting from the email servers to NNTP, particularly since the volume of test reports is way up lately. (Oops! ;-) I scanned the last 10,000 NNTP reports. You seem to account for 60 of them. Does that sound about right? David
Re: Can anyone approve my email to send reports?
David Golden escribió: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Jose Luis Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I report with [EMAIL PROTECTED], and see that the tests aren't getting through (only a couple). I've read that to get the reports reported directly I should subscribe to the list, but I don't want to subscribe to such a high-volume list. Can someone approve my email to send reports to the list? (to approve the batch of tests that I hace already sent would help a lot too ;)) I don't believe any approval is necessary anymore. But sometimes there is a delay in things getting from the email servers to NNTP, particularly since the volume of test reports is way up lately. (Oops! ;-) I propose a documentation correction in the CPAN::Reporter pod. It says: "Because cpan-testers uses a mailing list to collect test reports, it is helpful if the email address provided is subscribed to the list. Otherwise, test reports will be held until manually reviewed and approved. Subscribing an account to the cpan-testers list is as easy as sending a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and replying to the confirmation email." I scanned the last 10,000 NNTP reports. You seem to account for 60 of them. Does that sound about right? Yes, it sounds right. I hope I can up the count a bit more... The only sour bit is that the platform under which I'm testing is slowly crawling into disuse, and I'm hand testing (don't want to install an automated tester for now...). Would testing on FreeBSD 6.2 and perl 5.8.7 contribute to the diversity of platforms or is has it already been taken? David Thanks for the tips, Jose Luis Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can anyone approve my email to send reports?
Jose Luis Martinez wrote, some time around 18/06/2008 02:04: David Golden escribió: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Jose Luis Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I report with [EMAIL PROTECTED], and see that the tests aren't getting through (only a couple). I've read that to get the reports reported directly I should subscribe to the list, but I don't want to subscribe to such a high-volume list. Can someone approve my email to send reports to the list? (to approve the batch of tests that I hace already sent would help a lot too ;)) I don't believe any approval is necessary anymore. But sometimes there is a delay in things getting from the email servers to NNTP, particularly since the volume of test reports is way up lately. (Oops! ;-) I propose a documentation correction in the CPAN::Reporter pod. It says: "Because cpan-testers uses a mailing list to collect test reports, it is helpful if the email address provided is subscribed to the list. Otherwise, test reports will be held until manually reviewed and approved. Subscribing an account to the cpan-testers list is as easy as sending a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and replying to the confirmation email." I scanned the last 10,000 NNTP reports. You seem to account for 60 of them. Does that sound about right? Yes, it sounds right. I hope I can up the count a bit more... The only sour bit is that the platform under which I'm testing is slowly crawling into disuse, and I'm hand testing (don't want to install an automated tester for now...). Would testing on FreeBSD 6.2 and perl 5.8.7 contribute to the diversity of platforms or is has it already been taken? Go for it. Although 5.8.7 is a bit oldish. If you can put a 5.8.8 and a 5.10.0 along side that would doubleplusgood. David -- stubborn tiny lights vs. clustering darkness forever ok?
Re: Can anyone approve my email to send reports?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:10:57PM +0200, David Landgren wrote: > Jose Luis Martinez wrote, some time around 18/06/2008 02:04: > >Would testing on FreeBSD 6.2 and perl 5.8.7 contribute to the diversity > >of platforms or is has it already been taken? > Go for it. Although 5.8.7 is a bit oldish. If you can put a 5.8.8 and a > 5.10.0 along side that would doubleplusgood. I'm already testing with 5.10.0 on FBSD 6.2. -- David Cantrell | Hero of the Information Age You don't need to spam good porn
Re: Can anyone approve my email to send reports?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 08:26:00PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:10:57PM +0200, David Landgren wrote: > > Jose Luis Martinez wrote, some time around 18/06/2008 02:04: > > >Would testing on FreeBSD 6.2 and perl 5.8.7 contribute to the diversity > > >of platforms or is has it already been taken? > > Go for it. Although 5.8.7 is a bit oldish. If you can put a 5.8.8 and a > > 5.10.0 along side that would doubleplusgood. > > I'm already testing with 5.10.0 on FBSD 6.2. > Same here, but the more the merrier if only to counter the linux supremacy >:) -- Chris Williams aka BinGOs PGP ID 0x4658671F http://www.gumbynet.org.uk == pgpRdVp3fc4Ur.pgp Description: PGP signature
