[CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Louis Desjardins
Hi all,

I am asked by PSF if we have a Code of Conduct?

I am sure that at some point in time that question was raised among us but
I can’t recall if we reached a consensus and if so where would that text be?

PSF could consider funding us but we’d need a published Code of Conduct.

A quick follow-up will be appreciated.

Thanks!

Louis
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Andrew Chadwick
It was mentioned a while back [0]. I'm distinctly at the edge of
organization myself, but I want to see LGM2014 publish a good one
before I attend.

Do the PSF have a sample one? If not, simplest to start with the CC0
one on GeekFeminism[1] suitably tailored, just like PyCon. A published
incident handling procedure like [2] would be a good idea too.

PyCon’s Code of Conduct is structured after one created by The
Ada Initiative and others, available under the Creative Commons Zero
license at [...][1]. [3]

And add it to the Ada Initiative's list[4] when it's done to get the word out ☺

[0] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/create/2012-December/004500.html
[1] http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy
[2] https://us.pycon.org/2013/about/code-of-conduct/harassment-incidents/
[3] 
http://pyfound.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/psf-moves-to-require-code-of-conduct.html
[4] http://adainitiative.org/what-we-do/conference-policies/

On 14 January 2014 19:15, Louis Desjardins louis.desjard...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 I am asked by PSF if we have a Code of Conduct?

 I am sure that at some point in time that question was raised among us but I
 can’t recall if we reached a consensus and if so where would that text be?

 PSF could consider funding us but we’d need a published Code of Conduct.

 A quick follow-up will be appreciated.

 Thanks!

 Louis

 ___
 CREATE mailing list
 CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create




-- 
Andrew Chadwick
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 19:45 +, Andrew Chadwick wrote:
 It was mentioned a while back [0]. I'm distinctly at the edge of
 organization myself, but I want to see LGM2014 publish a good one
 before I attend.

It's often easier to change an organization from within... maybe there
are people who are able to go to the event who can champion this?

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml

___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Dienstag, 14. Januar 2014, 14:15:34 schrieb Louis Desjardins:
 Hi all,

Hi,

I guess you are talking about LGM? Just in case I added the corresponding list 
to the recipients, too.

 I am asked by PSF if we have a Code of Conduct?

Not that I am aware of. But I might be wrong here.

 I am sure that at some point in time that question was raised among us but
 I can’t recall if we reached a consensus and if so where would that text be?
 
 PSF could consider funding us but we’d need a published Code of Conduct.

I don't think we should have something like that. LGM has always been an event 
that was meant to be fun for everyone. No formal rules, no pressure, just nice 
people that know how to behave and use common sense. That applies both how to 
act but also how to react to actions of others. Formalizing that into any sort 
of event law is both unnecessary and in my eyes even hurting the free and 
open approach of LGM.

If we really need something written down I would propose this:

§1 Behave
§2 Use common sense when dealing with others
§3 Learn from the reactions of others

Just my two cents.

 A quick follow-up will be appreciated.
 
 Thanks!
 
 Louis

Tobias

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Jon Nordby
I support having a code of conduct. I had a read through the one at
http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy
and found it to be very sane, both the statement and the practical
guideline on how organization should deal with matters.

Having a policy does pledge organizers and volunteers to enforce it,
if need be. So if we decide to adopt one, all staff should explicity
state that they have read and accepted the policy.
It must also be sent out to presenters and attendees.

On 14 January 2014 20:45, Andrew Chadwick a.t.chadw...@gmail.com wrote:
 It was mentioned a while back [0]. I'm distinctly at the edge of
 organization myself, but I want to see LGM2014 publish a good one
 before I attend.

 Do the PSF have a sample one? If not, simplest to start with the CC0
 one on GeekFeminism[1] suitably tailored, just like PyCon. A published
 incident handling procedure like [2] would be a good idea too.

 PyCon’s Code of Conduct is structured after one created by The
 Ada Initiative and others, available under the Creative Commons Zero
 license at [...][1]. [3]

 And add it to the Ada Initiative's list[4] when it's done to get the word out 
 ☺

 [0] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/create/2012-December/004500.html
 [1] http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy
 [2] https://us.pycon.org/2013/about/code-of-conduct/harassment-incidents/
 [3] 
 http://pyfound.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/psf-moves-to-require-code-of-conduct.html
 [4] http://adainitiative.org/what-we-do/conference-policies/

 On 14 January 2014 19:15, Louis Desjardins louis.desjard...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 I am asked by PSF if we have a Code of Conduct?

 I am sure that at some point in time that question was raised among us but I
 can’t recall if we reached a consensus and if so where would that text be?

 PSF could consider funding us but we’d need a published Code of Conduct.

 A quick follow-up will be appreciated.

 Thanks!

 Louis

 ___
 CREATE mailing list
 CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create




 --
 Andrew Chadwick
 ___
 CREATE mailing list
 CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create



-- 
Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Gregory Pittman
On 01/14/2014 03:20 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
 I support having a code of conduct. I had a read through the one at
 http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy
 and found it to be very sane, both the statement and the practical
 guideline on how organization should deal with matters.
 
 Having a policy does pledge organizers and volunteers to enforce it,
 if need be. So if we decide to adopt one, all staff should explicity
 state that they have read and accepted the policy.
 It must also be sent out to presenters and attendees.
 

Personally, I would rather see language that talks of respect (a
positive term) rather than anti-harrassment (a negative term).

Thus, we can be on the lookout for behavior or materials as far as how
they respect others, perhaps making some positive suggestions, as
opposed to searching for harrassment as if it were some kind of
witch-hunt (meaning no disrespect to witches of course).

Greg

___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Michael Natterer
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 14:15 -0500, Louis Desjardins wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I am asked by PSF if we have a Code of Conduct?
 
 I am sure that at some point in time that question was raised among us but
 I can’t recall if we reached a consensus and if so where would that text be?
 
 PSF could consider funding us but we’d need a published Code of Conduct.

If they want to impose their rules in order to fund, then I'd suggest
not to take their money.

About a code of conduct, what about

use your brain, failure to do so will get you kicked out after one
warning, or immediately for serious misbehavior

If that's not enough we're pretty much doomed.

--Mitch


___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Hin-Tak Leung

Hmm, I rather think some of the geekfeminism content material is rather extreme 
and make me uncomfortable. 

The way I see these matters on equality and etc is this: does the paragraphs 
make sense if you replace every instance of the word female by black 
person, Chinese, dwarf, Obama or Geek, or Your grandmother? or 
another specific group of people? 

Granted, chinese isn't strictly speaking a 'minority', but you don't know how 
many 'slitty eye' jokes I have heard in my life. (Well, females aren't 
minority either... If you want to argue that attendences of females are rare, 
I can also say that attendences of chinese and blacks or Obama are rare too)

geeks are minority among the general population, too. It is worth remembering. 
Perhaps there should only be one guideline - treat others like how you would 
like to be treated. 
--
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 22:01 GMT Gregory Pittman wrote:

On 01/14/2014 03:20 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
 I support having a code of conduct. I had a read through the one at
 http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy
 and found it to be very sane, both the statement and the practical
 guideline on how organization should deal with matters.
 
 Having a policy does pledge organizers and volunteers to enforce it,
 if need be. So if we decide to adopt one, all staff should explicity
 state that they have read and accepted the policy.
 It must also be sent out to presenters and attendees.
 

Personally, I would rather see language that talks of respect (a
positive term) rather than anti-harrassment (a negative term).

Thus, we can be on the lookout for behavior or materials as far as how
they respect others, perhaps making some positive suggestions, as
opposed to searching for harrassment as if it were some kind of
witch-hunt (meaning no disrespect to witches of course).

Greg

___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create

___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Dienstag, 14. Januar 2014, 22:40:51 schrieb Andrew Chadwick:

[...]

 Codes of conduct are mostly just don't be obnoxious; listen, respect,
 learn written out in long form with some specifics about what's not
 to be tolerated. Granted, they say what shouldn't need to be said and
 are always written in the hope they don't have to be invoked; but they
 also publicly state that the organizers care about what happens to
 people at the conference and how welcome they feel.

I don't know about you, but when I approach a group of people that have given 
themselves rules like that my first thought would be OMFG, do I really want to 
get in touch with them? Terrible things must have happened there.

[...]

Tobias

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Dave Crossland
RTA this time

 On 14 Jan 2014 16:09, Tobias Ellinghaus h...@gmx.de wrote:
 
  Am Dienstag, 14. Januar 2014, 22:40:51 schrieb Andrew Chadwick:
 
  [...]
 
   Codes of conduct are mostly just don't be obnoxious; listen, respect,
   learn written out in long form with some specifics about what's not
   to be tolerated. Granted, they say what shouldn't need to be said and
   are always written in the hope they don't have to be invoked; but they
   also publicly state that the organizers care about what happens to
   people at the conference and how welcome they feel.
 
  I don't know about you, but when I approach a group of people that have
given
  themselves rules like that my first thought would be OMFG, do I really
want to
  get in touch with them? Terrible things must have happened there.

That attitude is a fine example of white male privilege.

I'm a white male, and I want to welcome people who are not like me. If they
want a coc, we should give them one. If PSF wants one to give us money to
find their travel to join us, all the better.

I think a coc also helps mitigate the tyranny of structurelessness.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tyranny_of_Structurelessness
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Dave Crossland
On 14 Jan 2014 15:51, Hin-Tak Leung hin...@ghostscript.com wrote:


 Hmm, I rather think some of the geekfeminism content material is rather
extreme and make me uncomfortable.

The whole site has a lot of stuff. Are you referring specifically to the
coc template that is written to have bits you don't want elided?

 The way I see these matters on equality and etc is this: does the
paragraphs make sense if you replace every instance of the word female by
black person, Chinese, dwarf, Obama or Geek, or Your
grandmother? or another specific group of people?

 Granted, chinese isn't strictly speaking a 'minority', but you don't know
how many 'slitty eye' jokes I have heard in my life. (Well, females aren't
minority either... If you want to argue that attendences of females are
rare, I can also say that attendences of chinese and blacks or Obama are
rare too)

 geeks are minority among the general population, too. It is worth
remembering. Perhaps there should only be one guideline - treat others like
how you would like to be treated.
 --
 On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 22:01 GMT Gregory Pittman wrote:

 On 01/14/2014 03:20 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
  I support having a code of conduct. I had a read through the one at
  http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy
  and found it to be very sane, both the statement and the practical
  guideline on how organization should deal with matters.
 
  Having a policy does pledge organizers and volunteers to enforce it,
  if need be. So if we decide to adopt one, all staff should explicity
  state that they have read and accepted the policy.
  It must also be sent out to presenters and attendees.
 
 
 Personally, I would rather see language that talks of respect (a
 positive term) rather than anti-harrassment (a negative term).
 
 Thus, we can be on the lookout for behavior or materials as far as how
 they respect others, perhaps making some positive suggestions, as
 opposed to searching for harrassment as if it were some kind of
 witch-hunt (meaning no disrespect to witches of course).
 
 Greg
 
 ___
 CREATE mailing list
 CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create

 ___
 CREATE mailing list
 CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] CREATE Digest, Vol 102, Issue 7

2014-01-14 Thread Susan Spencer
Can LGM adopt the PSF policy
as a temporary measure?
http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy

Then at LGM we can hold a BOF meeting
where results are posted
with additional paper for comments.

Results will be put forward to an
all-hands vote with amendments
welcomed from the floor.

- Susan
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Susan Spencer
Can LGM adopt the PSF policy
as a temporary measure?
http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy

Then at LGM we can hold a BOF meeting
where results are posted
with additional paper for comments.

Results will be put forward to an
all-hands vote with amendments
welcomed from the floor.

- Susan
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
I just clicked on the geekfeminism url in the previous e-mail. I apologize
for making quick judgements, but OTOH, if a code of conduct statement
is indeed made, and a newcomer is in the position of evaluating whether to
come to a conference based on that statement, that's probably the same amount
of time it would take to persuade/dissuade him/her to come.

Human virtues are good, I am all for fairness and equality, and patriotism, etc.
So my thoughts are simple: does it make sense if you replace the word 'female'
with 'black person', 'Chinese', 'dwarfs', 'your grandmother', or 'Obama'?
At what point does 'fighting for quality' becomes an excuse for demanding
special treatments?

The love of one's country is also a very good virtue, but when you hear news
(this is a real event which happened as recent as just over a year ago) - of a
Chinese smashing the car windows and beating another Chinese passer-by
to the point of comma and possible brain-damage, just for being behind
the wheel of a *Japanese brand* car. The love of animals is a good virtue,
but you also hear people getting hurt and going to hospitals from car bombs,
for working in research places which keep some animals for experiments.

As one other commenter said, the statement is also a reflection of the
atmosphere expected, etc. I'd rather suggest one stay away from special
treatments, over-compensations, and sexual/racial/political extremisms.

You can't pull the 'white male privilege' card on me :-).


On Wed, 15/1/14, Dave Crossland d...@lab6.com wrote:

 On 14 Jan 2014 15:51, Hin-Tak Leung hin...@ghostscript.com
 wrote:
 
  Hmm, I rather think some of the geekfeminism content
 material is rather extreme and make me uncomfortable.
 
 
 The whole site has a lot of stuff. Are you
 referring specifically to the coc template that is written
 to have bits you don't want elided?
 
 
  The way I see these matters on equality
 and etc is this: does the paragraphs make sense if you
 replace every instance of the word female by
 black person, Chinese,
 dwarf, Obama or Geek, or
 Your grandmother? or another specific group of
 people?
 
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Gregory Pittman

On 01/14/2014 09:14 PM, Susan Spencer wrote:


Can LGM adopt the PSF policy
as a temporary measure?
http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy
Then at LGM we can hold a BOF meeting
where results are posted
with additional paper for comments.

Results will be put forward to an
all-hands vote with amendments
welcomed from the floor.



What I see on this page is a not A policy, but a number of versions of 
policies, some short some verbose. We can hardly adopt all these versions.


How about:

The Libre Graphics Meeting was established as and continues to be a 
conference open to all those who share an interest in FOSS 
graphics-related software. A facet of this openness is that we expect 
attendees and especially presenters to show the utmost respect for all 
others who attend and to avoid defamatory or derogatory remarks or 
actions against others strictly related to their views, their lifestyle 
choices, where they are from, or who they are.


The organizers invite anyone to inform the LGM organizers of any such 
disrespectful language or behavior they have experienced or witnessed, 
so that appropriate steps can be taken.


Please edit as desired.

Greg
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Dave Crossland
On 14 Jan 2014 15:39, Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org wrote:

 On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 14:15 -0500, Louis Desjardins wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  I am asked by PSF if we have a Code of Conduct?
 
  I am sure that at some point in time that question was raised among us
but
  I can’t recall if we reached a consensus and if so where would that
text be?
 
  PSF could consider funding us but we’d need a published Code of Conduct.

 If they want to impose their rules in order to fund, then I'd suggest
 not to take their money.

 About a code of conduct, what about

 use your brain, failure to do so will get you kicked out after one
 warning, or immediately for serious misbehavior

 If that's not enough we're pretty much doomed.

I suggest we ask the people who are minorities at the event if it or any
other proposal is enough. You and I, as the white male majority, can't tell.

For dudes claiming this is unneccessary, do you know what it's like to have
a public profile online, like you and I do, but as a female?

 In 2006, researchers from the University of Maryland set up a bunch of
fake online accounts and then dispatched them into chat rooms. Accounts
with feminine usernames incurred an average of 100 sexually explicit or
threatening messages a day. Masculine names received 3.7.

http://www.psmag.com/navigation/health-and-behavior/women-arent-welcome-internet-72170/

 --Mitch


 ___
 CREATE mailing list
 CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] Code of Conduct

2014-01-14 Thread Susan Spencer
It seems this discussion is taking place
around three definition sets of heinous behaviors.

The 1st set contains injustices against groups
as described by Hin-tak  (Hi Hin-tak! :D)

The 2nd set of heinous behaviors is contained
within the 1st set. It is the set of
injustices committed against women.

The 3rd set is within the 2nd, and is the set of injustices
which are committed against women
in the working place and in professional settings.

LGM is a professional setting.
Open source conferences historically have been places
where women are ostracized, insulted
and humiliated. Many, many women have gone
to open source conferences only to find that
they have wasted their time, money and effort.
These conferences should be events where their
career gains momentum, not where their career
is ruined.

The only reason that LGM is being asked
to have a CoC is to help erradicate behaviors
which have been shoving women to the back of the
professional line.

There are always people who constantly must
put others down in order to feel good about themselves.
A Code of Conduct is usually implemented to indicate that
insults and injuries should be dispensed *equally* against
women and men, such that there isn't a larger proportion
being aimed at women's ability to program, their intelligence,
their personalities, their fillintheblank, and that
lewd wisecracks aren't made which by definition
render women excluded from the group who laugh
at the 'joke'.

So when someone posts on this thread, it would
help me to know which set of heinous behaviors they
are addressing.

PSF is clearly concerned about the third smallest set,
which is the most critical in affecting the number
of women in the open source community.

LGM attendees have always followed the rules of polite society
so well that there has been no need to mention the rules.
But LGM is growing...

We can't eradicate stupid ridiculous behavior,
but we can at least join the effort to keep it from sweeping
the XXs out of the IT gene pool.


Solidarność,

Susan
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create


Re: [CREATE] CREATE Digest, Vol 102, Issue 7

2014-01-14 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
15 янв. 2014 г. 6:13 пользователь Susan Spencer susan.spen...@gmail.com
написал:


 Can LGM adopt the PSF policy
 as a temporary measure?
 http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Policy

It says among other things:

 [Exhibitors in the expo hall, sponsor or vendor booths, or similar
activities are also subject to the anti-harassment policy. In particular,
exhibitors should not use sexualized images, activities, or other material.
Booth staff (including volunteers) should not use sexualized
clothing/uniforms/costumes, or otherwise create a sexualized environment.]

Now, I've been at events where companies slightly overdo sexualized
clothing of female participants up to the point where it begins to look
(disgustingly) slutty. But guess what -- it's just my opinion. I have my
own standards and don't expect everybody else to comply, although I reserve
the right to grumble :)

Making the event comfortable for extreme feminists increases the
possibility of hysterical behavior at the event, and the last thing I want
LGM to become famous for is some overreacting feminist (of any sex) in
boring colorless unisex clothes getting riled up because of someone else
having a V-neck not complying with the feminist's internal standards.

In a nutshell, if you are going to adopt this, please use common sense and
drop the parts of CoC that increase the possibility of someone being a
self-righteous jerk.

If we can't joke about the tight pants of LGM2010 anymore, we might as well
focus on reaching singularity and drop all bodily hints when we talk.

Alexandre
___
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create