Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] core.jobs dependency on Java 8

2015-12-09 Thread Ralf Sternberg
Just for your information, in today's RAP meeting we agreed to

- keep RAP 3.1 in the Neon simultaneous release despite the
core.databinding dependencies on Java 8
- keep the RAP 3.1 bundles Java 7 compatible
- provide an alternative target platform based on Eclipse Mars for Java 7 users.

With this policy, the core.jobs BREE would not be an issue for RAP anymore.

Thanks to all for your feedback and cooperation.

Regards,
Ralf


On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Daniel Megert <daniel_meg...@ch.ibm.com> wrote:
> In our PMC call today [1] we decided to move 'org.eclipse.core.jobs' back to
> JavaSE-1.7.
>
> [1] https://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/PMC#Meeting_Minutes
>
> Dani
>
>
>
> From:Ralf Sternberg <rsternb...@eclipsesource.com>
> To:Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
> Date:08.12.2015 00:21
> Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] core.jobs dependency on Java
> 8
> Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> 
>
>
>
> Hi John,
>
> thanks for your support.
>
>> One question for you Ralf, is whether this is the only bundle RAP requires
>> that is blocking you in this way? I thought there were a number of other
>> platform bundles already requiring Java 8 as well.
>
> Unfortunately, as Ivan reported already, there are three more
> eclipse.core.databinding bundles now requiring Java 8 that I was not
> aware of. All other dependencies of RAP (equinox, eclipse.core,
> javax.servlet, javax.xml, icu) are still on <= 1.7.
>
> As Lars pointed out in bug 483803, the planned support for the new
> Date and Time API would require Java 8, so the core.databinding
> bundles should remain on Java 8. I'd think that the databinding
> bundles are less critical for us as databinding is an optional feature
> and the bundles could probably easily be replaced by their Mars
> versions in a Java 7 deployment.
>
> Also thanks to Thomas and Konstantin for the pointers to Application
> Servers and Java 8. We'll discuss again if moving to Java 8 could
> already be an option for RAP 3.1.
>
> Regards,
> Ralf
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orTherefore
g
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
>
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


[cross-project-issues-dev] core.jobs dependency on Java 8

2015-12-07 Thread Ralf Sternberg
Hi,

while we all want to use the new features in Java 8, some users of the
RAP project still can't switch to Java 8 because they have to deploy
on application servers that run on a (bundled) non-Java-8 VM. For
example, looking at the IBM WebSphere JDK support list [1], it seems
that for the server side, it's still a bit too early to require Java
8.

Since one of the bundles RAP depends on (core.jobs) has recently been
updated to Java 8, we find ourselves faced with the choice of either
locking out those users or shipping RAP 3.1 with an older version of
the platform. The latter would probably mean to abstain from the Neon
simultaneous release.

I wonder if there is a general consensus that the Eclipse platform
(not the IDE) does not support Java 7 anymore. If this is the case, we
have to live with it, however, I'd appreciate to keep at least the
core Java-7-compatible for one more year. Looking at the respective
change in core.jobs [2], it looks like a refactoring, not an API
change that would require Java 8. Also on the Neon release plan [3],
it's still marked as 1.7. Is there a chance to revert this change or
are more of those going to come?

Regards,
Ralf

[1] http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=180=swg27005002
[2] 
http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.runtime.git/commit/bundles/org.eclipse.core.jobs?id=e0c1dc5111c5200d39f4611082b34110d735ac29
[3] 
https://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?planurl=http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/development/plans/eclipse_project_plan_4_6.xml#appendix

--
Ralf Sternberg
Project Lead, Remote Application Platform (RAP)
EclipseSource

Tel: +49 721 66 47 33-0

Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH
Lammstraße 21, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
General Manager: Jochen Krause
Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] core.jobs dependency on Java 8

2015-12-07 Thread Ralf Sternberg
Hi John,

thanks for your support.

> One question for you Ralf, is whether this is the only bundle RAP requires
> that is blocking you in this way? I thought there were a number of other
> platform bundles already requiring Java 8 as well.

Unfortunately, as Ivan reported already, there are three more
eclipse.core.databinding bundles now requiring Java 8 that I was not
aware of. All other dependencies of RAP (equinox, eclipse.core,
javax.servlet, javax.xml, icu) are still on <= 1.7.

As Lars pointed out in bug 483803, the planned support for the new
Date and Time API would require Java 8, so the core.databinding
bundles should remain on Java 8. I'd think that the databinding
bundles are less critical for us as databinding is an optional feature
and the bundles could probably easily be replaced by their Mars
versions in a Java 7 deployment.

Also thanks to Thomas and Konstantin for the pointers to Application
Servers and Java 8. We'll discuss again if moving to Java 8 could
already be an option for RAP 3.1.

Regards,
Ralf
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Automatic Bugzilla updates (Gerrit and Commit references) from Gerrit

2015-02-09 Thread Ralf Sternberg
I somehow expected this answer but I thought it was worth a try ;-) Nevermind.

Ralf

-- 
Ralf Sternberg
Project Lead, Remote Application Platform (RAP)
EclipseSource

Tel: +49 721 66 47 33-0

Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH
Lammstraße 21, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
General Manager: Jochen Krause
Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883


On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org wrote:
 Clearly, my next area of focus is to write a tool that will create Bugzillas
 from cross-project email, extract me too replies and cc them all  =)




 On 02/09/2015 12:09 PM, Eike Stepper wrote:

 Am 09.02.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Ed Willink:

 Hi

 We have a standard. EMF, which many of us seek to emulate, has been
 using [x] since March 2004.

 commit 04fe0d2e8262351927bdb3cc6b1cad88ffcdd033
 Author: emerks emerks 2004-03-08 20:13:40
 Committer: emerks emerks 2004-03-08 20:13:40

 [54077]  Changes to handle the new look CTabFolder

 We use the same [nnn] format in CDO and Oomph, too. Plus some additional
 tools such as release note generators that expect that format. I could
 change those tools, too, but it would be nice to be able to keep that
 format.

 Cheers
 /Eike

 
 http://www.esc-net.de
 http://thegordian.blogspot.com
 http://twitter.com/eikestepper




 Regards

 Ed Willink

 On 09/02/2015 16:08, Denis Roy wrote:

 The question that comes to my mind is: why not simply adopt Bug:
 XX as the standard?

 458123 could be a bug number, a reference to a Gerrit change number,
 a mailing list post or anything.

 At some point we have to choose a format.

 In any case, if you feel strongly about supporting other formats,
 please file a bug and gather community support for it. We need to
 make sure additional formats are supported in Gerrit, in the Gerrit
 plugin and in the cGit code browser.

 Denis


 On 02/09/2015 10:52 AM, LETAVERNIER Camille wrote:

 Hi all,

 Same comments for me: it is really useful, and additional formats
 would be even more useful!

 Especially, the default format when copy/pasting from the
 Mylyn/Bugzilla task list looks like this:

 459454: [CSS] Support position  size with CSS
 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=459454

 It doesn't contain the 'Bug' prefix, and is not recognized by the
 synchronization tool

 Thank you for this tool, it really helps! :)
 Camille

 -Message d'origine-
 De : cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
 [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] De la part de
 Ujhelyi Zoltán
 Envoyé : lundi 9 février 2015 16:33
 À : Cross project issues
 Objet : Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Automatic Bugzilla updates
 (Gerrit and Commit references) from Gerrit

 Hi all,

 first of all, thanks for this feature, it seems really useful.
 However, is it possible to support other reference types in addition
 to Bug: XX? For example all projects (GEF, EMF) I am actively
 following uses a different reference scheme: the bugzilla bug number
 is written at the start of the commit comment inside square
 brackets, like [xx].

 We at the EMF-IncQuery and VIATRA project use this scheme as well,
 but we would be interested in having this feature working for us. Is
 it possible to either configure the scheme somewhere, or support it
 generally?

 Thank you,
 Zoltán
 -- Zoltán Ujhelyi
 https://www.inf.mit.bme.hu/en/members/ujhelyiz

 Fault Tolerant Systems Research Group
 Budapest University of Technology and Economics

 On 2015. febr. 9., at 15:36, Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org wrote:


 On 02/08/2015 07:17 AM, Lars Vogel wrote:

 AFAIK the plug-in is active by default for everybody...


 That is correct.  If a Gerrit change contains Bug: XX it will
 be linked to Bugzilla automatically.

 Denis




 Best regards, Lars

 On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Eike Stepper step...@esc-net.de
 mailto:step...@esc-net.de wrote:

 Hi Lars,

 Thanks for the hint. The bug has so many comments - is there a
 short
 description on how to opt-in (if needed at all)?

 Cheers
 /Eike

 
 http://www.esc-net.de
 http://thegordian.blogspot.com
 http://twitter.com/eikestepper


 Am 08.02.2015 tel:08.02.2015 um 11:29 schrieb Lars Vogel:

 FYI - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/__show_bug.cgi?id=434811


 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=434811 got fixed
 by Denis. Gerrit now updates automatically Bugzilla with
 relevant changes in Gerrit.

 Please see the bug for details. A big thanks for Denis for
 this
 great piece of work to make the committer life easier.

 Best regards, Lars

 --
 Eclipse Platform UI Co-Lead
 Geschäftsführer vogella GmbH

 Haindaalwisch 17a, 22395 Hamburg
 Amtsgericht Hamburg: HRB 127058
 Geschäftsführer: Lars Vogel, Jennifer Nerlich de Vogel
 USt-IdNr.: DE284122352
 Fax (032) 221739404 tel:%28032%29%20221739404

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Gerrit down?

2014-09-09 Thread Ralf Sternberg
No, it works fine from my site.

Regards, Ralf
Ralf Sternberg
Project Lead, Remote Application Platform (RAP)
EclipseSource

Tel: +49 721 66 47 33-0

Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH
Lammstraße 21, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
General Manager: Jochen Krause
Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883


On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Lars Vogel lars.vo...@gmail.com wrote:
 If I go to https://git.eclipse.org/r/ I get Gerrit loading but it never
 finishes. Is this the same for everyone?

 Best regards, Lars

 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
 this list, visit
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

[cross-project-issues-dev] Luna SR schedule

2013-12-12 Thread Ralf Sternberg
Are the SR dates for Luna already settled? It seems that the wiki page [1]
simply copied the dates from Kepler, and still needs to be adjusted.

Ralf


[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Luna/Simultaneous_Release_Plan#Service_Releases
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Bugzilla hanging?

2013-07-30 Thread Ralf Sternberg
I can't connect to bugzilla - connection timeout.

Ralf


On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Daniel Megert daniel_meg...@ch.ibm.comwrote:

 Works fine so far from Zurich this morning.

 Dani


 From:Tom Schindl tom.schi...@bestsolution.at
 To:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 Date:30.07.2013 10:03
 Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Bugzilla hanging?
 Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
 --



 for bugzilla is hanging as well.

 Tom

 On 30.07.13 09:08, Eike Stepper wrote:
  I didn't have any problems with Bugzilla today.
 
  Cheers
  /Eike
 
  
  http://www.esc-net.de
  http://thegordian.blogspot.com
  http://twitter.com/eikestepper
 
 
 
  Am 30.07.2013 08:47, schrieb Henrik:
  Bugzilla seems to be unresponsive for a while this morning (Git and
  Hudson seem to work).
  Is anybody else experiencing this?
 
  -Henrik
 
 
 
  ___
  cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
  cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
 
 
  ___
  cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
  cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler's final staging repository is complete

2013-06-13 Thread Ralf Sternberg
I'm hesitating to bring it up, but ... in case a respin is done, it
would be good if this build could eliminate the outdated rap.rwt
bundle that was accidentally contributed by Gyrex [1]. This version of
the rap.rwt bundle contains a critical bug [2] that is fixed in RAP's
final RC4 contribution.

This bug causes IE browsers to fire requests permanently for certain
RAP applications and put the server under extreme load. Even though
RAP is not affected by this duplicate (AFAIK), I would feel better if
this bundle was not in the Kepler repository. I'm sorry that this bug
made it even into RC3, this problem is almost invisible at development
time and could not be discovered by any of our unit tests, browser
tests or integration tests.

Regards,
Ralf

[1] Bug 409457: Contributing old RAP 2.1 bundles to Kepler
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=409457

[2] Bug 410157: [ServerPush] ServerPush requests always return immediately in IE
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=410157
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Missing release information for some Kepler projects

2013-06-11 Thread Ralf Sternberg
I don't know about the SRs but I remember that EGit updated from 1.3
to 2.0 in Juno RC2 or RC3. For me this feels like a pretty risky
change for an RC. I don't mean to point the finger at EGit, I just
think we should agree that RC1 should really be a release candidate,
i.e. almost the thing that is going to be released except for some
minor fixes. The code should cool down after that point. At least
major versions should not change anymore.

Ralf
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] simrel.kepler.runaggregator is failling

2013-05-28 Thread Ralf Sternberg
The build started to fail after the RAP contribution. But I can't
locate the problem as well. I've successfully validated the
aggregation locally before I pushed the change.

Any ideas?

Regards,
Ralf


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Grégoire Dupé gd...@mia-software.com wrote:
 Hello,

 I can see the following error message:

Build failed! Exception was org.eclipse.core.runtime.CoreException: 
 Not all artifacts could be mirrored, see log for details 

 But I do not found the line explaining which update site is causing the 
 failure. Does any body can explain me where or what to search ?

 Regards,
 Grégoire
 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] simrel.kepler.runaggregator is failling

2013-05-28 Thread Ralf Sternberg
Searching the (raw) log [1] for error I found:

Message content: The following errors occured when building Kepler:
 [exec]
 [exec] Artifact org.eclipse.b3.p2.impl.ArtifactKeyImpl@96044202
(classifier: osgi.bundle, id: org.eclipse.egf.application, version:
1.0.0.v20130520-1044) could not be found in the artifact repository
(file:///home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/egf/updates/kepler/official)
 [exec]


So it seems to be related to the EGF project.

Regards,
Ralf

[1] 
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/simrel.kepler.runaggregator/494/consoleText
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Request for comment: Provide standard update site locations

2013-03-15 Thread Ralf Sternberg
Great idea! Not only are p2 repositories not search-engine friendly,
the fact that links to p2 repositories often lead to a 404 due to a
missing index.html lets some users assume that there is nothing.
While it's possible to create index files manually, some kind of a
uniform appearance would help users to recognize a p2 repository
immediately. Ideally, I think an index.html should be generated
together with the metadata files that is both search-engine and human
readable.

Ralf
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Is hudson-slave1 down?

2012-06-13 Thread Ralf Sternberg
Same here, all our builds fail immediately with:
Building remotely on Fastlane
hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed:
/opt/users/hudsonbuild/workspace/rap-2.0-tools at
hudson.remoting.Channel@237c8a9c:Fastlane
at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:754)
at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:740)
at hudson.FilePath.mkdirs(FilePath.java:806)
at hudson.model.AbstractProject.checkout(AbstractProject.java:1227)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.checkout(AbstractBuild.java:507)
at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.run(AbstractBuild.java:424)
at hudson.model.Run.run(Run.java:1367)
at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:46)
at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:88)
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:145)
Caused by: ch.ethz.ssh2.channel.ChannelClosedException: SSH channel is
closed. (Close requested by remote)
at ch.ethz.ssh2.channel.ChannelManager.sendData(ChannelManager.java:405)
at 
ch.ethz.ssh2.channel.ChannelOutputStream.write(ChannelOutputStream.java:71)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream$BlockDataOutputStream.drain(ObjectOutputStream.java:1838)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream$BlockDataOutputStream.writeByte(ObjectOutputStream.java:1876)
at 
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeFatalException(ObjectOutputStream.java:1537)
at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:329)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.send(Channel.java:490)
at hudson.remoting.Request.call(Request.java:111)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:650)
at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:747)
... 9 more

Ralf


On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Ed Willink e...@willink.me.uk wrote:
 Hi

 slave1 seems ok but fastlane has gone uncommunicative
 (https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/buckminster-mdt-ocl-branch-tests/194/)

    Regards

        Ed Willink


 On 13/06/2012 02:46, Denis Roy wrote:

 I have restarted the slave agent on slave1.  Let me know if this does not
 solve the issue.

 Sent from mobile device


 Michael Golubevgolu...@montages.com  wrote:

 Hello,

 Last half a hour I am getting seemingly endless stream of builds, all
 failing like the one at [1] with:

 hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed:
 /opt/users/hudsonbuild/workspace/tycho-gmp.gmf.tooling at
 hudson.remoting.Channel@18931e52:hudson-slave1

 Is it just me or some known problem?

 [1]
 https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/tycho-gmp.gmf.tooling/265/console

 Regards
 --

 *Michael Borlander Golubev
 *Eclipse Committer (GMF, UML2Tools)
 at Montages Think Tank, Prague, Czech Republic
 1165/1 Dvorecka, 14700, Prague-4 Podoli

 tek: +420 602 483 463

 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


 -
 No virus found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2433/5064 - Release Date: 06/12/12



 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Is hudson-slave1 down?

2012-06-13 Thread Ralf Sternberg
Yes, it works again now.

Thanks!


On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org wrote:

 I believe Denis got this restarted. Please let us know if you're still having 
 problems.



 Mike Milinkovich
 mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org
 +1.613.220.3223

 -Original Message-
 From: Ed Willink e...@willink.me.uk
 Sender: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:43:43
 To: Cross project issuescross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 Reply-To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Is hudson-slave1 down?

 Hi

 slave1 seems ok but fastlane has gone uncommunicative
 (https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/buckminster-mdt-ocl-branch-tests/194/)

     Regards

         Ed Willink

 On 13/06/2012 02:46, Denis Roy wrote:
 I have restarted the slave agent on slave1.  Let me know if this does not 
 solve the issue.

 Sent from mobile device


 Michael Golubevgolu...@montages.com  wrote:

 Hello,

 Last half a hour I am getting seemingly endless stream of builds, all
 failing like the one at [1] with:

 hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed:
 /opt/users/hudsonbuild/workspace/tycho-gmp.gmf.tooling at
 hudson.remoting.Channel@18931e52:hudson-slave1

 Is it just me or some known problem?

 [1] https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/tycho-gmp.gmf.tooling/265/console

 Regards
 --

 *Michael Borlander Golubev
 *Eclipse Committer (GMF, UML2Tools)
 at Montages Think Tank, Prague, Czech Republic
 1165/1 Dvorecka, 14700, Prague-4 Podoli

 tek: +420 602 483 463

 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


 -
 No virus found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2433/5064 - Release Date: 06/12/12



 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and Outlook for Juno!

2012-06-13 Thread Ralf Sternberg
For the duplicate org.eclipse.rap.* bundles, 1.5.0.20120612-1458 our
RC4 contribution, 20120605-1606 is RC3. I guess someone depending on
the rap runtime has not picked up the RC4 yet, could that be EMF?

The duplicate org.eclipse.jetty.xml bundles come from the rap tools.
For some reason, they contain the RC3 version of these bundles. I will
re-build the rap tools and contribute them to the aggregator. But
since no one depends on them, this should not affect any other
project.

Thanks for pointing out these problems!

Ralf


On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, John Arthorne john_artho...@ca.ibm.com wrote:
 David Williams wrote on 06/12/2012 05:15:26 PM:

 I appreciate everyone keeping the build green and making progress
 on the sim rel reports [1], though there are a few serious issues
 left there.

 [1] http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/

 I looked through these, and at this point I think most of them are not
 blocking the release. Just to save people some time digging through them,
 these are the remaining issues that I believe are important for Juno (see
 above report for details):

 1) 10 bundles with missing about.html. Six bundles from emf.query2, four
 from Gemini.

 2) 10 features with no license (in particular their license is the string
 %license). 1 from Virgo, 9 from Gemini. The most common cause of this is
 missing key in feature.properties file, or the feature.properties file
 itself is not included in the bin.includes list in the feature's
 build.properties file.

 3) Multiple copies of bundles from eclipse.org projects. These might not be
 a problem if they are known or understood, but it might mean another project
 is including old, unreleased versions of another project's bundles. The
 core.commands dependency seems to be coming from Sapphire, and the remaining
 dependencies look like they come from RAP.

 org.eclipse.jetty.xml
         8.1.3.v20120522
         8.1.3.v20120416
 org.eclipse.core.commands
         3.6.1.v20120521-2332
         3.6.1.v20120521-2329
 org.eclipse.rap.jface
         1.5.0.20120612-1458
         1.5.0.20120605-1606
 org.eclipse.jetty.webapp
         8.1.3.v20120522
         8.1.3.v20120416
 org.eclipse.rap.rwt.osgi
         1.5.0.20120612-1458
         1.5.0.20120605-1606
 org.eclipse.rap.rwt
         1.5.0.20120612-1458
         1.5.0.20120605-1606

 John
 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


[cross-project-issues-dev] Recent Hudson problem accessing /tmp

2012-05-23 Thread Ralf Sternberg
Hi,

Since yesterday night a number of unit tests in the the rap runtime
jobs [1] fail when trying to delete files from /tmp. I've never seen
such failures before and there hasn't been any change in the code, so
I assume that some change in the environment may have triggered it?
It's always the method File#delete() that returns false, so I can't
tell whether it's because of permissions or because of the file to
delete has vanished.

Has any one else seen similar problems or has some idea what could
have caused this?

Thanks,
Ralf

[1] Examples:
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/rap-1.5-runtime/655/
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/rap-2.0-runtime/4/
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Recent Hudson problem accessing /tmp

2012-05-23 Thread Ralf Sternberg
It turned out that the problem was on our side [1], sorry for
suspecting the server!

We had two similar builds scheduled at the same time and both were
accessing the same temp dir, one deleting the other's files - how
stupid :-/

Thank you anyway,
Ralf

[1] 380420: Build failures on Eclipse Hudson with delete files from /tmp
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=380420

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Webmaster(Matt Ward)
webmas...@eclipse.org wrote:
 The only recent change to Hudson that I am aware of is the addition of 2
 extra build slots on Slave1 to help relieve the build load.

 -Matt.


 --

 Eclipse WebMaster - webmas...@eclipse.org

 Questions? Consult the WebMaster FAQ at
 http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Webmaster_FAQ
 View my status at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/WebMaster

 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Disk usage report for Hudson/Build

2012-02-28 Thread Ralf Sternberg
Hi,

   1.1G rap-runtime

I keep getting the very same result here even though I already reduced
the number of builds to keep some time ago. A `du -hs
/shared/jobs/rap-runtime/` gives me 682M. Can anyone explain this
difference?

Regards, Ralf
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev