Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Jetty conversion

2012-03-05 Thread Markus Knauer
I've got two new problems today... :(

One is the web interface. It's painful slow today and/or I am getting our
'Bad Gateway' error. The same problems are shown when I try to update any
of my job configurations. Maybe it's a bandwidth problem, maybe a problem
with Hudson. Are others having the same problem?

The next problem is the file system access. Is /shared/technology available
or what's the status there? I thought it should be accessible but every
attempt to create/add/modify anything there ends up with error messages
like this

Cleaning the workspace because project is configured to clean the
workspace before each build.
java.io.IOException: Failed to mkdirs: /shared/technology/epp/epp_repo/juno


Regards,
Markus



On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 08:52, Laurent Goubet laurent.gou...@obeo.fr wrote:

 We were seeing a steady increase in the time taken by our builds to
 complete, eventually reaching the time out we had set at 30 minutes, then
 reaching the time out we had raised to 40 minutes in order to have a
 build... since Winston started working on this and switching to jetty, all
 the builds we launched went back to a rough 13 minutes each.

 So yeah, seen from our side, we have a winner :p. Thanks for all the work
 you've done on this!

 Laurent Goubet
 Obeo


 On 29/02/2012 22:33, Denis Roy wrote:

 I was kidding yesterday, but after 24 hours, I'll echo other people's
 comments here ...  Hudson on Jetty, seems like we have a winner.

 Many thanks to Winston and Jesse for helping out.



 On 02/28/2012 04:28 PM, Denis Roy wrote:

 Yeah, nice try, buddy.

 Man, is it just me, or has Hudson been soo slw for the last
 6 minutes?

 :-D

 __**_
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@**eclipse.orgcross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/cross-**project-issues-devhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Jetty conversion

2012-03-05 Thread Jesse McConnell
I am able click around quickly right now..

jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com



On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 08:08, Markus Knauer mkna...@eclipsesource.com wrote:
 I've got two new problems today... :(

 One is the web interface. It's painful slow today and/or I am getting our
 'Bad Gateway' error. The same problems are shown when I try to update any of
 my job configurations. Maybe it's a bandwidth problem, maybe a problem with
 Hudson. Are others having the same problem?

 The next problem is the file system access. Is /shared/technology available
 or what's the status there? I thought it should be accessible but every
 attempt to create/add/modify anything there ends up with error messages like
 this

 Cleaning the workspace because project is configured to clean the workspace
 before each build.
 java.io.IOException: Failed to mkdirs: /shared/technology/epp/epp_repo/juno


 Regards,
 Markus




 On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 08:52, Laurent Goubet laurent.gou...@obeo.fr wrote:

 We were seeing a steady increase in the time taken by our builds to
 complete, eventually reaching the time out we had set at 30 minutes, then
 reaching the time out we had raised to 40 minutes in order to have a
 build... since Winston started working on this and switching to jetty, all
 the builds we launched went back to a rough 13 minutes each.

 So yeah, seen from our side, we have a winner :p. Thanks for all the work
 you've done on this!

 Laurent Goubet
 Obeo


 On 29/02/2012 22:33, Denis Roy wrote:

 I was kidding yesterday, but after 24 hours, I'll echo other people's
 comments here ...  Hudson on Jetty, seems like we have a winner.

 Many thanks to Winston and Jesse for helping out.



 On 02/28/2012 04:28 PM, Denis Roy wrote:

 Yeah, nice try, buddy.

 Man, is it just me, or has Hudson been soo slw for the last
 6 minutes?

 :-D

 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Jetty conversion

2012-03-05 Thread Denis Roy
/shared isn't explicitly read-only.  I think Matt was referring to the 
fact that the hudsonbuild user does not have write access to 
/shared/technology.  I'm re-running some ACL scripts -- please let me 
know if this is still broken for you in a few hours from now.


Denis





On 03/05/2012 10:20 AM, Markus Knauer wrote:
Thanks for that info... is the read-only access to /shared permanent, 
or will it be changed in the (near) future to its old state? My 
understanding was that this is the place where we could store and work 
with possibly large build artifacts.


Sorry if this has been asked somewhere else, but there are so many 
discussions around Hudson that I may have missed one.


Thanks,
Markus


On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 16:05, Webmaster(Matt Ward) 
webmas...@eclipse.org mailto:webmas...@eclipse.org wrote:



One is the web interface. It's painful slow today and/or I am
getting our 'Bad Gateway' error. The same problems are shown
when I try to update any of my job configurations. Maybe it's
a bandwidth problem, maybe a problem with Hudson. Are others
having the same problem?

The interface seems responsive from here.  In the past the gateway
error has implied that Winstone(no longer used) was running out of
resources to serve content.  But I also see a 'flood' of requests
today from:

Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique 904
SAP AG, Walldorf   842

So it may just be bandwidth/load.

The next problem is the file system access. Is
/shared/technology available or what's the status there? I
thought it should be accessible but every attempt to
create/add/modify anything there ends up with error messages
like this

It's mounted, but the Hudson user/group has no access(ownership)
on that dir so it can only read.


-Matt.
-- 


Eclipse WebMaster - webmas...@eclipse.org
mailto:webmas...@eclipse.org

Questions? Consult the WebMaster FAQ at
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Webmaster_FAQ
View my status at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/WebMaster

EclipseCon 2012 http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev





___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Jetty conversion

2012-03-05 Thread Markus Knauer
It's still broken. I've added *Bug
373325*https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=373325-
/shared/technology
read-only for EPP Hudson build jobs in order to track this.

Thanks,
Markus

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 22:29, Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org wrote:

  /shared isn't explicitly read-only.  I think Matt was referring to the
 fact that the hudsonbuild user does not have write access to
 /shared/technology.  I'm re-running some ACL scripts -- please let me know
 if this is still broken for you in a few hours from now.

 Denis






 On 03/05/2012 10:20 AM, Markus Knauer wrote:

 Thanks for that info... is the read-only access to /shared permanent, or
 will it be changed in the (near) future to its old state? My understanding
 was that this is the place where we could store and work with possibly
 large build artifacts.

 Sorry if this has been asked somewhere else, but there are so many
 discussions around Hudson that I may have missed one.

 Thanks,
 Markus


 On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 16:05, Webmaster(Matt Ward) 
 webmas...@eclipse.orgwrote:


  One is the web interface. It's painful slow today and/or I am getting
 our 'Bad Gateway' error. The same problems are shown when I try to update
 any of my job configurations. Maybe it's a bandwidth problem, maybe a
 problem with Hudson. Are others having the same problem?

  The interface seems responsive from here.  In the past the gateway error
 has implied that Winstone(no longer used) was running out of resources to
 serve content.  But I also see a 'flood' of requests today from:

 Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique 904
 SAP AG, Walldorf   842

 So it may just be bandwidth/load.

  The next problem is the file system access. Is /shared/technology
 available or what's the status there? I thought it should be accessible but
 every attempt to create/add/modify anything there ends up with error
 messages like this

  It's mounted, but the Hudson user/group has no access(ownership) on that
 dir so it can only read.


 -Matt.
 --

 Eclipse WebMaster - webmas...@eclipse.org

 Questions? Consult the WebMaster FAQ at
 http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Webmaster_FAQ
 View my status at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/WebMaster

 EclipseCon 2012 http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012
   ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev





 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing 
 listcross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orghttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Jetty conversion

2012-02-28 Thread Winston Prakash



On 2/28/12 11:42 AM, Webmaster(Matt Ward) wrote:

Hi Folks,

 I know it's short notice but as it's quiet for Hudson this week I'm 
going to move us off the Winstone servlet and onto Jetty.  I've got 
everything ready to go so at 4pm I'll shut Hudson down and then 
startup the Jetty instance.  I expect we'll be offline for about 10 
minutes.


Nice. Good news is, for Hudson 3.0.0 we don't have to do this, because 
we replaced Winstone with Jetty as a bundled server.


I'm interested to know, from Jetty folks, if there is a difference 
between Jetty bundled server and Standlone server in terms of performance.


- Winston



-Matt.



___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Jetty conversion

2012-02-28 Thread Jesse McConnell
not sure what is meant by 'bundled' vs 'standalone' really

maybe osgi vs normal distribution? or embedded vs normal distribution?

in those cases there shouldn't be any real default difference, osgi
has its natural bit of classloader muckity muck muck but in terms of
processing of a request from start to finish...not that I know of.

more info on what is meant by 'bundled' vs 'standalone' would help
clarify that though

cheers,
jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com



On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 14:08, Winston Prakash
winston.prak...@gmail.com wrote:


 On 2/28/12 11:42 AM, Webmaster(Matt Ward) wrote:

 Hi Folks,

  I know it's short notice but as it's quiet for Hudson this week I'm going
 to move us off the Winstone servlet and onto Jetty.  I've got everything
 ready to go so at 4pm I'll shut Hudson down and then startup the Jetty
 instance.  I expect we'll be offline for about 10 minutes.


 Nice. Good news is, for Hudson 3.0.0 we don't have to do this, because we
 replaced Winstone with Jetty as a bundled server.

 I'm interested to know, from Jetty folks, if there is a difference between
 Jetty bundled server and Standlone server in terms of performance.

 - Winston


 -Matt.


 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Jetty conversion

2012-02-28 Thread Jesse McConnell
ok...for the record...

if there are issues with hudson from here on out it is _NOT_
immediately jetty's fault.

thank you for listening :)

cheers,
jesse


--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com



On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 15:17, Webmaster(Matt Ward)
webmas...@eclipse.org wrote:
 Hi Folks,

  Ok, the move is complete.


 -Matt.

 --

 Eclipse WebMaster - webmas...@eclipse.org

 Questions? Consult the WebMaster FAQ at
 http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Webmaster_FAQ
 View my status at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/WebMaster

 EclipseCon 2012 http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012
 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Jetty conversion

2012-02-28 Thread Denis Roy
Yeah, nice try, buddy.

Man, is it just me, or has Hudson been soo slw for the last
6 minutes?

:-D

On 02/28/2012 04:25 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
 ok...for the record...

 if there are issues with hudson from here on out it is _NOT_
 immediately jetty's fault.

 thank you for listening :)

 cheers,
 jesse


 --
 jesse mcconnell
 jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com



 On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 15:17, Webmaster(Matt Ward)
 webmas...@eclipse.org wrote:
 Hi Folks,

  Ok, the move is complete.


 -Matt.

 --

 Eclipse WebMaster - webmas...@eclipse.org

 Questions? Consult the WebMaster FAQ at
 http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Webmaster_FAQ
 View my status at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/WebMaster

 EclipseCon 2012 http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Jetty conversion

2012-02-28 Thread Matthias Sohn
feels pretty snappy at the moment
looks like this was a good move :-)

--
Matthias

2012/2/28 Denis Roy denis@eclipse.org

 Yeah, nice try, buddy.

 Man, is it just me, or has Hudson been soo slw for the last
 6 minutes?

 :-D

 On 02/28/2012 04:25 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
  ok...for the record...
 
  if there are issues with hudson from here on out it is _NOT_
  immediately jetty's fault.
 
  thank you for listening :)
 
  cheers,
  jesse
 
 
  --
  jesse mcconnell
  jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
 
 
 
  On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 15:17, Webmaster(Matt Ward)
  webmas...@eclipse.org wrote:
  Hi Folks,
 
   Ok, the move is complete.
 
 
  -Matt.
 
  --
 
  Eclipse WebMaster - webmas...@eclipse.org
 
  Questions? Consult the WebMaster FAQ at
  http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Webmaster_FAQ
  View my status at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/WebMaster
 
  EclipseCon 2012 http://www.eclipsecon.org/2012

 ___
 cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
 cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev