Re: [css-d] Don't miss a space

[Crest Christopher]

Should I use "srcset", "" or "picturefill" for images.  I've 
read if you use "picturefill" as an alternative you can use  ?


Christopher


Tom Livingston 
Saturday, November 22, 2014 7:50 PM
This will be handled by the min-width MQs, as mentioned before. Base 
styles for small screens like iPhone. Then, for example, the next MQ 
at 480 for landscape iPhone. The gap between base and 480 will take 
care of the different width phones.

Crest Christopher 
Saturday, November 22, 2014 7:46 PM
How do you accommodate most, if not all screen sizes.  For example 
iPhone 3,4,5 are all 320px width, but iPhone6 is 375, then most other 
smart phones fall in-between, I did not include Phablets, and 
tablets.  I suppose using SASS, although I don't have experience using 
SASS you could do a condition whereas one MQ could somehow fill in the 
pixel gaps between an iPhone5 and a Nexus 4, or no ?


Christopher

__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

[css-d] matrix3D

[Crest Christopher]

Is a CSS 3D-Matrix Transform equal to defining X,Y,Z translation values 
? I think it would be simpler to do CSS 3D transforms using; 
matrix3d(n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n) instead of 
translate(x),(y),(z) less code :-)


Christopher


__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] validating CSS when?

[Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh]

Are there any good lists--populated by serious developers, like this
one--wear "on topic" includes all the trades real developers use, like
server side scripting, databases, javascript AND CSS?  There are many such
forums.  But forums tend to be populated by beginners while lists tend to
be populated by real coding soldiers.

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Philip Taylor  wrote:

>
>
> Barney Carroll wrote:
>
>  That's an interesting approach. Any particular reason(s) not to use HTML5
>> at all times?
>>
>
> Yes, but this is not the place to discuss it/them !
> Philip Taylor
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>



-- 
/*  Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh  >--oO0> */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] validating CSS when?

[MiB]

nov 25 2014 17:49 Barney Carroll :

> A task runner like Gulp would be useful for this kind of thing. This guy 
> wrote an excellent introduction (and starter kit) [0] that covers automated 
> SASS & Browserify code compilation and filesystem-browser synchronisation.
> 
> I've used Gulp for my last 2 major project for all my development and build 
> needs. When a *.js file changes, it reads over my code and warns me (in the 
> console) of any code style deviations or syntax errors, compiles it, tells 
> the browser to reload it, and runs my unit tests, notifying me of any errors. 
> When a *.scss file changes, it runs compass, concatenates, minifies, writes 
> source maps, then tells the connected browsers to reload that particular 
> resource.
> 
> Using a system like this you could easily chuck in a CSS validation report on 
> each change after the SCSS compilation but before the browser-prefixing. 
> There's a plugin that reports back from the W3C service [1] which has been 
> adapted to Gulp [2]. So much more convenient than asking a technical question 
> on CSS-D and waiting for the reply back with the link to 
> http://validator.w3.org/! ;)
> 

That’s very interesting as I installed Gulp in a more complex framework the 
other day. I haven’t looked it over yet, as I was mostly interested in the 
server-side things there. I’ll make sure I check out gulp more thoroughly. 
Thanks.

__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/