[css-d] [ADMIN - OFF TOPIC - STOP THIS THREAD] Re: ASP.NET and http://validator.w3.org/

[Alex Robinson]

At 13:40 -0800 6/2/08, Big Moxy wrote:
The w3 validator clearly is not compatible with Microsoft ASP.NET code.
Here is an example - http://www.cargovango.com/start.aspx. All of the
code that it flags is generated at run time. It's nothing that a
developer adds.

It's annoying because I can never say that the code is Valid XHTML 1.0
Transitional.

Has anyone else encountered this or similar situations?



Whether or not ASP.NET produces output that validates has absolutely 
zero to do with CSS.

CSS exists independently of scripting languages / frameworks and 
therefore css-discuss is therefore NEVER the right place to discuss 
anything that is related to your scripting language of choice.

So this thread stops now.


Alex
css-d moderator

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] [ADMIN - OFF TOPIC - STOP THIS THREAD] Re: ASP.NET and http://validator.w3.org/

[dg]

 At 13:40 -0800 6/2/08, Big Moxy wrote:
 The w3 validator clearly is not compatible with Microsoft ASP.NET  
 code.
 Here is an example - http://www.cargovango.com/start.aspx. All of the
 code that it flags is generated at run time. It's nothing that a
 developer adds.

Too bad their couldn't be doctypes just for MS stuff as they seem to  
live in their own world.  Might make a lot of things easier.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/