Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-30 Thread John Lockerbie
I forgot to say, I've still got the problem with what I think is the
IE double margin problem which I can't seem to solve. It shows itself
in Win IE 5.1,5.5 and 6, but not 7. See Browsershots:
http://browsershots.org/website/http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html

Does anybody know what I've done wrong?

Regards
JL

On 29/07/07, John Lockerbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 29/07/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  John Lockerbie wrote:
   David,
  
   Thank you for the comments. I should have said it seems to be fine on
   Mac/Opera, as it does on Safari and Firefox, it's the Windows
   environments I've no access to.
  
   I'd not spotted the font size problem as I'm new to coding. This is my
   third attempt to redesign my site - see the problem in
   http://catnaps.org/islamic/islaurb.html - in order to reduce page
   lengths.
  
  
   JL
  
 
 
  The comments I made regarding Opera are when I veiwed it on a mac:
  Version
  9.21
  Build
  3678
  Platform
  MacOS X
  System
  10.4.9
 
  If page height is an issue could you split the pages or use js to open
  and close division sections.
 
  With regard to fonts, I am referring more to IE's inability to scale
  fonts when set in pixels, /regardless of page height,/ unless the user
  goes through the drill of putting the browser in accessiblity mode
  with the ignore font-sizes specified box checked.
 
  One way to avoid this is to set percent at user default (100%) on the
  body, and then use percent on individual selectors throughout the style
  sheet as needed (line-height is best specified as a raw number).
  For example:
  body {font: 100%/1.4 arial, helvetica, sans-serif;}
  h1 {font-size: 180%;}
  #footer p {font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.2;}
 
  Best,
 
  ~d
 
 
 
  --
  http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
 
 

 David,

 I looked at the page on Opera
 Version:  9.22
 Build:  3687
 MacOS X
 System: 10.4.10

 I work on Safari Version 2.0.4 (419.3) and check on Firefox 2.0.0.5. I
 don't have access to a Windows environment except at my local library
 where they've got the screens in the most bizarre arrangements you've
 ever seen and don't know how to change them.

 What I'm attempting to do is split the pages into a number of smaller
 pages, these being set out in the top and bottom menus - 'Menu for
 al-Salata...' - and it's that which is causing me the problems. I like
 the idea of using js to open divisions, but thought that might give
 visitors problems.

 50% of my visitors use WinIE6, 25% WinIE7, 15% Firefox and the rest a
 variety, so I'm really concerned to get the IE6 sorted out.

 I take your point about the font scaling issues and spent some time
 researching Zeldman et al to find a consensus. There isn't one. But I
 do worry about accessibility and will see what I can do about the
 fonts. I may sit in a darkened room and try to think the paging
 problem through again and see if I can find a simpler system.

 Anyhow, a lot to think about,

 With kind regards
 John

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-30 Thread John Lockerbie
On 30/07/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 John Lockerbie wrote:
  I forgot to say, I've still got the problem with what I think is the
  IE double margin problem which I can't seem to solve. It shows itself
  in Win IE 5.1,5.5 and 6, but not 7. See Browsershots:
  http://browsershots.org/website/http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html
 
  Does anybody know what I've done wrong?
 
  Regards
  JL
 


 This is a mystery. You did not provide a url with this re-post. Using
 the url you provided yesterday [1] shows the page (s) rendering
 properly in IE7 through 5.01 (on XP) with no signs of the float drop
 seen in your screen capture. The page is rendering (from your question
 yesterday) as intended in win/Opera but not mac/Opera. Note that you
 have a series of markup validation errors  within a list around line 1482.


 [1]

 http://catnaps.org/islamic/islaurb.html

 Best,

 ~dL

 PS Fwiw, top-posting is making it impossible for anyone to follow this
 thread-- write below (rather than above) those you reply to on the list





Apologies for the top posting.

I'll check out the listing error.

The address for the problem float drop which occurs on Win IE 5.1,5.5
and 6 but not 7, is: http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html with css
file: http://catnaps.org/latest/latest.css

With kind regards
JL
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-30 Thread David Laakso
John Lockerbie wrote:
 On 30/07/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 John Lockerbie wrote:
 
 I forgot to say, I've still got the problem with what I think is the
 IE double margin problem which I can't seem to solve. It shows itself
 in Win IE 5.1,5.5 and 6, but not 7. See Browsershots:
 http://browsershots.org/website/http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html

 Does anybody know what I've done wrong?

 Regards
 JL

   

 The address for the problem float drop which occurs on Win IE 5.1,5.5
 and 6 but not 7, is: http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html with css
 file: http://catnaps.org/latest/latest.css

 With kind regards
 JL

   


John,


If you can cope with not having cross-browser pixel perfection, the 
correction on a local file (without hacking) is to change the margin in 
#sidebar to read:
margin: 10px 0 10px 5px;

Others on the list may offer a better alternative.

Best,

~dL










-- 
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-30 Thread John Lockerbie
On 30/07/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 John Lockerbie wrote:
  On 30/07/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  John Lockerbie wrote:
 
  I forgot to say, I've still got the problem with what I think is the
  IE double margin problem which I can't seem to solve. It shows itself
  in Win IE 5.1,5.5 and 6, but not 7. See Browsershots:
  http://browsershots.org/website/http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html
 
  Does anybody know what I've done wrong?
 
  Regards
  JL
 
 
 
  The address for the problem float drop which occurs on Win IE 5.1,5.5
  and 6 but not 7, is: http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html with css
  file: http://catnaps.org/latest/latest.css
 
  With kind regards
  JL
 
 


 John,


 If you can cope with not having cross-browser pixel perfection, the
 correction on a local file (without hacking) is to change the margin in
 #sidebar to read:
 margin: 10px 0 10px 5px;

 Others on the list may offer a better alternative.

 Best,

 ~dL
 --
 http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

David,

I'll have a look at that suggestion though I would prefer to get a
more symmetrically arrangement if at all possible.

With kind regards
JL
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-30 Thread Rick Faircloth
I prefer top-posting as well... scrolling down constantly is a pain...

Rick

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 7:32 AM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

John Lockerbie wrote:

 PS Fwiw, top-posting is making it impossible for anyone to follow 
 this thread-- write below (rather than above) those you reply to 
 on the list

That fad is your personal preference. Many of us dislike scrolling down
through long quotes to see whether the current posting has any content or is
of interest. Many of us prefer so-called top-posting or interleaved posting.

But I wouldn't presume to force either upon you.

Bruce


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-30 Thread David Laakso
John Lockerbie wrote:
 On 30/07/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 John Lockerbie wrote:
 
 On 30/07/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 John Lockerbie wrote:

 
 I forgot to say, I've still got the problem with what I think is the
 IE double margin problem which I can't seem to solve. It shows itself
 in Win IE 5.1,5.5 and 6, but not 7. See Browsershots:
 http://browsershots.org/website/http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html

 Does anybody know what I've done wrong?

 Regards
 JL


   
 The address for the problem float drop which occurs on Win IE 5.1,5.5
 and 6 but not 7, is: http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html with css
 file: http://catnaps.org/latest/latest.css

 With kind regards
 JL


   
 John,


 If you can cope with not having cross-browser pixel perfection, the
 correction on a local file (without hacking) is to change the margin in
 #sidebar to read:
 margin: 10px 0 10px 5px;

 Others on the list may offer a better alternative.

 Best,

 ~dL
 --
 http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
 

 David,

 I'll have a look at that suggestion though I would prefer to get a
 more symmetrically arrangement if at all possible.

 With kind regards
 JL
   



John,

I experimented a little and have it closer in compliant browsers as well 
as IE7 through IE5.01 (did not check mac/ie5.2). It may not pass a 
micrometer test for cross browser pixel perfection but it is far better 
than it was.

Note that the file is now in quirks for IE6 and down, and that in 5,5 
and 5.01 the page is now centered. You'll want to validate. And I don't 
remember all that I changed. You'll need compare my styles with yours.

The uri is:
http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/arch.html

Best,
~dL

















-- 
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-30 Thread David Laakso


 
 David,

 Thank you very much for your time and effort. I'll take a close look
 at what you've done and see if I can then amend my site to suit.
 Incidentally, the site was always supposed to be centred.

 I've been trying to re-rationalise what I'm doing and simplify it but
 seem to be getting lost with all the different methods I'm trying.
 Isn't css fun...?

 With kind regards
 JL

   




John,

You are welcome and I hope it works out.

And, yes CSS is fun (particularly when you can find answers in the list 
archives that have not been messed up by folks who top post).

Best,

~dL








-- 
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-30 Thread Jim Nannery
Morning Bruce

You wrote

 John Lockerbie wrote:

 PS Fwiw, top-posting is making it impossible for anyone to follow
 this thread-- write below (rather than above) those you reply to
 on the list

 That fad is your personal preference. Many of us dislike scrolling down 
 through long quotes to see whether the current posting has any content or 
 is of interest. Many of us prefer so-called top-posting or interleaved 
 posting.

 But I wouldn't presume to force either upon you.

 Bruce



Not a fad and not someone's personal preference.

The following is from the list policies [1] Please note the second 
point.

a.. Trim your replies. If you have more quotation than original text, think 
about cutting down on the quoted stuff. The list members can look at the 
message to which you responded, or check the archive. Prune that quoted text 
with ruthless abandon. Everyone else will thank you for it, especially the 
list admin(s). Don't forget, thankful list admins are less hasty with the 
unsubscribe button.
a.. The list admin(s) will scowl heavily in the direction of any 
Jeopardy-style quotations-- ** that is, putting your answer before the 
quoted question to which you're responding ** -- but won't actually 
unsubscribe you for doing it. Unless you keep doing it without trimming down 
your quoted text (see above).  (emphasis added)

[1] http://www.css-discuss.org/policies.html

It might be worthwhile for list members to review them. After all, when 
we joined the list, we *all* agreed to abide by them..

Best to all

Jim Nannery
www.redfernenterprises.com




__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-29 Thread John Lockerbie
Dear Listers,

I think my test site - http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html with
http://catnaps.org/latest/latest.css - works on most popular sites,
including WinIE7. However WinIE5.1, WinIE5.5 and WinIE6 appear to have
what I assume is the double margin bug but which I can't resolve.
WinIE5.5 also has a problem with the top  menu bar.

On the Mac browsers all is mostly as it should be, though I don't know
how it behaves on Opera.

Please could somebody suggest how to to resolve the 5.1/5.5/6 problem
- and could they have a look at it on Opera?
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-29 Thread David Laakso
John Lockerbie wrote:
 Dear Listers,

 I think my test site - http://catnaps.org/latest/saturday.html with
 http://catnaps.org/latest/latest.css - works on most popular sites,
 including WinIE7. However WinIE5.1, WinIE5.5 and WinIE6 appear to have
 what I assume is the double margin bug but which I can't resolve.
 WinIE5.5 also has a problem with the top  menu bar.

 On the Mac browsers all is mostly as it should be, though I don't know
 how it behaves on Opera.

 Please could somebody suggest how to to resolve the 5.1/5.5/6 problem
 - and could they have a look at it on Opera?

   


Interesting. It looks fine in ie/mc5.2 (bless it's loving little heart). 
I am not running a pc right now so can't check 6  7.
IYou'll want to install Opera: she is not containing the top and bottom 
divisions Menu for al-Salata al-jadida pages.
On a local file, deleting the /height/ and adding float:left; to 
selector #menucontainer1, #menucontainer2, seemed to help (but not sure 
how it will play out cross-browser).
Also Opera (at least on a mac) is not honoring the font-specification 
for the top and bottom h-nav's and did not look into the reason but 
deleting the letter-spacing may at least put it on one-line.

Trivial pursuits: Not nice (in my opinion) to feed all that tiny content 
type to win/ie in pixels forcing most of the world's users to jump 
through hoops to ignore your font sizes in order to read it.

Best,
~dL


 


-- 
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-29 Thread John Lockerbie
David,

Thank you for the comments. I should have said it seems to be fine on
Mac/Opera, as it does on Safari and Firefox, it's the Windows
environments I've no access to.

I'd not spotted the font size problem as I'm new to coding. This is my
third attempt to redesign my site - see the problem in
http://catnaps.org/islamic/islaurb.html - in order to reduce page
lengths.

I'll have another go at it. You may see me again...

With kind regards
JL
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-29 Thread John Lockerbie
On 29/07/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 John Lockerbie wrote:
  David,
 
  Thank you for the comments. I should have said it seems to be fine on
  Mac/Opera, as it does on Safari and Firefox, it's the Windows
  environments I've no access to.
 
  I'd not spotted the font size problem as I'm new to coding. This is my
  third attempt to redesign my site - see the problem in
  http://catnaps.org/islamic/islaurb.html - in order to reduce page
  lengths.
 
 
  JL
 


 The comments I made regarding Opera are when I veiwed it on a mac:
 Version
 9.21
 Build
 3678
 Platform
 MacOS X
 System
 10.4.9

 If page height is an issue could you split the pages or use js to open
 and close division sections.

 With regard to fonts, I am referring more to IE's inability to scale
 fonts when set in pixels, /regardless of page height,/ unless the user
 goes through the drill of putting the browser in accessiblity mode
 with the ignore font-sizes specified box checked.

 One way to avoid this is to set percent at user default (100%) on the
 body, and then use percent on individual selectors throughout the style
 sheet as needed (line-height is best specified as a raw number).
 For example:
 body {font: 100%/1.4 arial, helvetica, sans-serif;}
 h1 {font-size: 180%;}
 #footer p {font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.2;}

 Best,

 ~d



 --
 http://chelseacreekstudio.com/



David,

I looked at the page on Opera
Version:  9.22
Build:  3687
MacOS X
System: 10.4.10

I work on Safari Version 2.0.4 (419.3) and check on Firefox 2.0.0.5. I
don't have access to a Windows environment except at my local library
where they've got the screens in the most bizarre arrangements you've
ever seen and don't know how to change them.

What I'm attempting to do is split the pages into a number of smaller
pages, these being set out in the top and bottom menus - 'Menu for
al-Salata...' - and it's that which is causing me the problems. I like
the idea of using js to open divisions, but thought that might give
visitors problems.

50% of my visitors use WinIE6, 25% WinIE7, 15% Firefox and the rest a
variety, so I'm really concerned to get the IE6 sorted out.

I take your point about the font scaling issues and spent some time
researching Zeldman et al to find a consensus. There isn't one. But I
do worry about accessibility and will see what I can do about the
fonts. I may sit in a darkened room and try to think the paging
problem through again and see if I can find a simpler system.

Anyhow, a lot to think about,

With kind regards
John
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] I've got the IE blues...

2007-07-29 Thread David Laakso
John Lockerbie wrote:
 David,

 Thank you for the comments. I should have said it seems to be fine on
 Mac/Opera, as it does on Safari and Firefox, it's the Windows
 environments I've no access to.

 I'd not spotted the font size problem as I'm new to coding. This is my
 third attempt to redesign my site - see the problem in
 http://catnaps.org/islamic/islaurb.html - in order to reduce page
 lengths.


 JL
   


The comments I made regarding Opera are when I veiwed it on a mac:
Version
9.21
Build
3678
Platform
MacOS X
System
10.4.9

If page height is an issue could you split the pages or use js to open 
and close division sections.

With regard to fonts, I am referring more to IE's inability to scale 
fonts when set in pixels, /regardless of page height,/ unless the user 
goes through the drill of putting the browser in accessiblity mode 
with the ignore font-sizes specified box checked.

One way to avoid this is to set percent at user default (100%) on the 
body, and then use percent on individual selectors throughout the style 
sheet as needed (line-height is best specified as a raw number).
For example:
body {font: 100%/1.4 arial, helvetica, sans-serif;}
h1 {font-size: 180%;}
#footer p {font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.2;}

Best,

~d



-- 
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/