Re: [css-d] Revisit our navigation layout semantic.

2007-12-20 Thread James Leslie
Firstly, I feel that the attack on David is wholly unjustified, and the
general tone of the mail is unlikely to endear your views to the
mindless majority (of which I appear to be one), however I do not wish
to be in any way involved in a flaming war, and do have a couple of
questions about your post :-)

Can you clarify why exactly list items are parasites?
Which browsers stumble with the selector parasites of 'div ul', or
similar?
Also... You say Apart from a garbling war between M and A to show off
the best proprietary fit, there is a much easier and non-confrontational
way to code css navigation. That method replaces OL, UL and DT with
DIV.

I can't see this method alluded to anywhere Could you expand on
this?

Cordially,

James

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Revisit our navigation layout semantic.

2007-12-20 Thread David Hucklesby
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:33:59 -0800, Mark wrote:
 Recently, David Hucklesby offered us a problem with fitting list based 
 navigation to
 design intentions. His article was titled, Spreading list items across total 
 width.


I'm sure I didn't.

Cordially,
David
--

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/