Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
15 nov 2013 kl. 15.51 skrev Jon Reece: > Not really an illustration app, but Macaw's tagline is "Stop writing code. > Start drawing it." > > http://macaw.co/ Ahhh, and you tell us now. This really looks like the real [whatveryourcurrentdevelopmentapp]-killer. At least all of those dreadful "WYSIWYH"-tools. I'm just hoping it's not another Flux kiddie development app. Very nice, thank you! __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
On Nov 13, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Tim Arnold wrote: > It's possible that graphics apps will eventually have an option to > export something like this, but I lean toward "probably not." More > likely (particularly since it's already happening with Adobe) is that > illustrations will export to . Illustrator can already export > to SVG which will probably fill in where does not. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:59 AM, COM wrote: > I can get on board with a draw app that converts my creative work into > useable CSS. Not really an illustration app, but Macaw's tagline is "Stop writing code. Start drawing it." http://macaw.co/ -- Jon Reece jon.re...@gmail.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Philip Taylor wrote: >>> http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? > > Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from Github while he > seeks legal permission to reproduce the Simpsons characters > > Translation : the suits and bean-counters have threatened litigation for > infringement of copyright. makes perfect sense…you don't replicate one of the hottest properties on earth without inviting a little C&D action… thanks for the alternate link. J __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
Philip Taylor wrote: > Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from Github while he > seeks legal permission to reproduce the Simpsons characters > > Translation : the suits and bean-counters have threatened litigation for > infringement of copyright. A variant can still be found here : http://cssdeck.com/labs/homer-simpson-rendered-in-css3 Philip Taylor __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
Theresa Jennings wrote: > Yeah, it came up as a 404 for me, and I'm the one who started this thread. > Oh, well. It was cool. > > > On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Greg Gamble wrote: > >> http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? Update: Pattle has temporarily removed his project from Github while he seeks legal permission to reproduce the Simpsons characters Translation : the suits and bean-counters have threatened litigation for infringement of copyright. Philip Taylor __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? -Original Message- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of COM Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:08 AM To: CSS-Discuss Subject: Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS ..it also just dawned on me that illustration converted to code can be dynamically changed... some dizzying implications to that, eh? John __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
Yeah, it came up as a 404 for me, and I'm the one who started this thread. Oh, well. It was cool. On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Greg Gamble wrote: > http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ is 404? > __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
..it also just dawned on me that illustration converted to code can be dynamically changed… some dizzying implications to that, eh? John __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
On Nov 13, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Tim Arnold wrote: > It's possible that graphics apps will eventually have an option to > export something like this, but I lean toward "probably not." More > likely (particularly since it's already happening with Adobe) is that > illustrations will export to . Illustrator can already export > to SVG which will probably fill in where does not. Sketch for OS X, a vector draw app, does some level of this, tho the actual success of the exported code could use some work, but I've gotten it to spit out lean code for a box with border radius and both inside and outside shadows, and IIRC, web kit moz kit, etc. I can get on board with a draw app that converts my creative work into useable CSS. I can't get on board with drawing by sticking my hands into a set of rubber gloves attached to tongs attached to tweezers way at the other end. ..which is how I personally view "drawing with CSS" as being..the thought of tapping out the code for bart's noggin…where's the Maaloxx?? John __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:15 AM, MiB wrote: > > nov 13 2013 06.30 Theresa Jennings: > >> I think they're more proof of concept than anything else. > > Of course, but what about in three years? Someone will always be going there > first. It's possible that graphics apps will eventually have an option to export something like this, but I lean toward "probably not." More likely (particularly since it's already happening with Adobe) is that illustrations will export to . Illustrator can already export to SVG which will probably fill in where does not. I could totally be wrong, but I think that those two are better for that. I love the CSS in the example, but am really not a fan of the hundreds of empty divs with unique classes needed to accomplish it. -- tim.arn...@gmail.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
nov 13 2013 06.30 Theresa Jennings: > I think they're more proof of concept than anything else. Of course, but what about in three years? Someone will always be going there first. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
I think they're more proof of concept than anything else. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
At first glance I think these animations are totally cool. And then I start to think they're a bit like text on steriods. A changing line in the sixth place means "real world caution is advised" On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > On 13/11/2013 5:14 AM, COM wrote: > >> This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an >> illustration tool? >> Am I missing a concept here? >> >> I am very impressed by the samples shown… >> >> John >> > > I have used CSS to demonstrate how CSS works or may work. > > > This demos show how 'transform-origin' can be used. Imagine Bart tumbling > over and over or cartwheeling. :-) > > http://css-class.com/test/css/3/2d-animation/box-turning-on-egde2.htm > > > This demo shows how gradients could be theoretically be animated (only > possible by using element() which only works in Firefox~Gecko). > > http://css-class.com/test/css/3/image/element-gradient- > rotate-animation1.htm > > > This demo shows how element() could be used (only works in Firefox~Gecko). > > http://css-class.com/test/css/3/image/element-water- > background-movement1.htm > > > > > > > > -- > Alan Gresley > http://css-3d.org/ > http://css-class.com/ > > __ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > -- /* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh >--oO0> */ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
On 13/11/2013 5:14 AM, COM wrote: This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? I am very impressed by the samples shown… John I have used CSS to demonstrate how CSS works or may work. This demos show how 'transform-origin' can be used. Imagine Bart tumbling over and over or cartwheeling. :-) http://css-class.com/test/css/3/2d-animation/box-turning-on-egde2.htm This demo shows how gradients could be theoretically be animated (only possible by using element() which only works in Firefox~Gecko). http://css-class.com/test/css/3/image/element-gradient-rotate-animation1.htm This demo shows how element() could be used (only works in Firefox~Gecko). http://css-class.com/test/css/3/image/element-water-background-movement1.htm -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
12 nov 2013 kl. 22.39 skrev Tim Arnold: > > I think impressing was the main goal. That, and to an an exercise in "what > if?" So how difficult would it be to implement CSS in a graphics app you think? I'd say it's doable. If it's an attractive feature today I'm not sure. But it could of course become one. How many designers thought we'd be doing simple animation with CSS just a few years ago? The menu choice "Export graphic to CSS" in an app real soon? Or never? What do you think? It's probably more realistic to construct with CSS of course. Logos in CSS do seem like an attractive feature. Or perhaps there is an even better vector graphics format there already? __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 12, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > > >> On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, MiB wrote: >> >> >> nov 12 19.14 COM: >> >>> This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration >>> tool? >>> Am I missing a concept here? >> If it's possible someone will make it a part of an illustration software >> tool. My guess would be not Adobe. >> >>> >>> I am very impressed by the samples shown… >> >> >> But is it responsible? :P > > Well, what is the load time as opposed to say an svg? > Might be some benefit there, but you take all that time saved and add it to > production I am thinking. > > I did notice it loaded extremely fast for me... __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:14 PM, COM wrote: > This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration > tool? > Am I missing a concept here? > > I am very impressed by the samples shown… > I think impressing was the main goal. That, and to an an exercise in "what if?" Tim -- tim.arn...@gmail.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, MiB wrote: nov 12 19.14 COM: This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? If it's possible someone will make it a part of an illustration software tool. My guess would be not Adobe. I am very impressed by the samples shown… But is it responsible? :P Well, what is the load time as opposed to say an svg? Might be some benefit there, but you take all that time saved and add it to production I am thinking. Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
nov 12 19.14 COM: > This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration > tool? > Am I missing a concept here? If it's possible someone will make it a part of an illustration software tool. My guess would be not Adobe. > > I am very impressed by the samples shown… But is it responsible? :P __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
This is cool and all, but…seriously, is CSS being touted as an illustration tool? Am I missing a concept here? I am very impressed by the samples shown… John __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
On 11/11/2013 12:33 PM, Theresa Jennings wrote: Deconstruct at your leisure. http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ I had no idea CSS could do this. I need to get out more. someone has WAY too much time on his/her hands. But, it is a masterful display of CSS bill __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
Sent from losPhone > On Nov 11, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > Another one: Apple mouse through history — in CSS: > > http://codepen.io/joshbader/full/fKjra > > >> I need to get out more. > > Hmm, it is bloody cold outside - I’ll stay by the stove :-(, maybe do a > little coding. > > > Philippe > -- > Philippe Wittenbergh > http://l-c-n.com > Learned a little something new today. Lisa mouse. :) Best, Karl __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
Le 12 nov. 2013 à 02:33, Theresa Jennings a écrit : > Deconstruct at your leisure. > > http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ > > I had no idea CSS could do this. Another one: Apple mouse through history — in CSS: http://codepen.io/joshbader/full/fKjra > I need to get out more. Hmm, it is bloody cold outside - I’ll stay by the stove :-(, maybe do a little coding. Philippe -- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
On Nov 11, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Theresa Jennings wrote: Deconstruct at your leisure. http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ I had no idea CSS could do this. I need to get out more. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ That's pretty cool. Thanks for sharing. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] The Simpsons in CSS
Deconstruct at your leisure. http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/ I had no idea CSS could do this. I need to get out more. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
