[CTRL] Fwd: Who Created Condi Rice?

2005-06-24 Thread Robert Millegan
-Caveat Lector-
Begin forwarded message:From: "Linda Minor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: June 24, 2005 6:59:55 AM PDTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Who "Created" Condi Rice? http://www.sandersresearch.com/Sanders/NewsManager/ShowNewsGen.aspx?NewsID=978Inside TrackJune 16, 2004Can We Handle the Truth? Part two:  Who “Created” Condi Rice?By Linda Minor 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Fwd: Who Created Condi Rice?

2005-06-24 Thread Robert Millegan
-Caveat Lector-
Begin forwarded message:From: "Linda Minor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: June 24, 2005 6:59:55 AM PDTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Who "Created" Condi Rice? http://www.sandersresearch.com/Sanders/NewsManager/ShowNewsGen.aspx?NewsID=978Inside TrackJune 16, 2004Can We Handle the Truth? Part two:  Who “Created” Condi Rice?By Linda Minor 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Fwd: News Release

2005-06-24 Thread Robert Millegan
-Caveat Lector-
Begin forwarded message:From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: June 1, 2005 10:10:07 PM PDTCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: News Release Mysteries Magazine Movie Reviews [Conspiracy Films]  "For conspiracy theory buffs, Government Guinea Pig is a must-see."  —Richard Mackenzie, issue #7 Mysteries Magazine   Government Guinea Pig: When Uncle Sam Wants You ISBN: 0-9746672-1-8 $11.95, Guinea Pig, 2002  Thousands of people every year report encounters with seemingly unexplainable phenomena, but many more who experience strange happenings never come forward because of fear of public ridicule. Some encounters may involve supernatural entities or ghosts; others contact with beings from another world. But what if the explanation for many of these events were closer to home and far more sinister that anyone had ever expected? What if the blame for these occurrences lay, not in outer space or the spirit world, but on the shoulders of certain covert branches of the American government? Government Guinea Pig: When Uncle Sam Wants You is a rare and disturbing glimpse into how the government may be using secret technology to profoundly affect and control the lives of its citizens.     It is a well-documented fact that the U.S. government has, on many occasions, conducted harmful research on its citizens without their knowledge or consent. Especially vulnerable to these abuses were prisoners, the impoverished, and members of ethnic minorities: in other words, those considered least credible and least able to voice objections to these atrocities. From extensive testing in the 1940s and 1950s of the effects of radiation on both soldiers and civilians to experiments in the 1960s involving LSD and other hallucinogens on students, military personnel, and others, to the refusal of medical treatment to African-American men afflicted with syphilis from the 1930s to the 1970s in order “to see the disease’s natural progression” in Tuskegee, AL, the list of these abuses is long and ugly. And if the creators of Government Guinea Pig are right, even more horrifying and sinister experiments are taking place today. Using the story of one family’s bizarre ordeal as a framework, they weave a tale of how ordinary citizens are being used as subjects in experiments ranging from mind control to directed energy weaponry.    Many of these experiences take the form of an event that seems similar to reports of paranormal or UFO activity, from semi-transparent ghost-like objects that are actually projected holograms intended to confuse and terrify, to the emission of noxious chemicals that, combined with lasers, create floating orbs and moving trails of light, to infrared lights that only appear on film. Directed microwave energy can cause symptoms virtually identical to a panic attack but leave no physical trace, including heart palpitations, dizziness, disorientation, and hyperventilation. In fact, the filmmakers imply that the millions of cases of panic attacks and agoraphobia experienced by people around the country may actually be triggered not by natural or psychosomatic causes but by these experiments.     Government Guinea Pig also discusses how these technologies have terrifying implications in the private sector as well, involving mind and social control through religious organizations, social groups, video games, and even so-called “self-help” instructional tapes. For instance, they suggest that the audio frequency-based technology used to produce subliminal self-help messages that aid in quitting smoking, losing weight, focus and concentration, and other activities could just as easily be used to trigger certain responses in the brain from violent impulses (or their suppression) to manipulating emotions, implanting memories, or at its most extreme, death.     The DVD’s production values, although low-budget, are clean and do nothing to detract from the compelling story they have to tell. For conspiracy theory buffs, Government Guinea Pig is a must-see. For anyone who wonders about—or has actually experienced the peculiar phenomena associated with UFOs or the supernatural—this DVD will provide more than a few chilling moments. —Richard Mackenzie, issue #7 Mysteries Magazine   
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

[CTRL] Fwd: When K-Mart Comes to Your Neighborhood, It'll Bulldoze Your Home

2005-06-24 Thread Robert Millegan
-Caveat Lector-
Begin forwarded message:From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: June 23, 2005 10:06:22 PM PDTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: When K-Mart Comes to Your Neighborhood, It'll Bulldoze Your Home   Homes may be 'taken' for private projects Justices: Local governments can give OK if it's for public good The Associated Press June 23, 2005 WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that local governments may seize people’s homes and businesses — even against their will — for private economic development.It was a decision fraught with huge implications for a country with many areas, particularly the rapidly growing urban and suburban areas, facing countervailing pressures of development and property ownership rights.As a result, cities now have wide power to bulldoze residences for projects such as shopping malls and hotel complexes in order to generate tax revenue.The 5-4 ruling — assailed by dissenting Justice Sandra Day O’Connor as handing “disproportionate influence and power” to the well-heeled — represented a defeat for some Connecticut residents whose homes are slated for destruction to make room for an office complex. Those residents argued that cities have no right to take their land except for projects with a clear public use, such as roads or schools, or to revitalize blighted areas.Under the ruling, residents still will be entitled to “just compensation” for their homes as provided under the Fifth Amendment. But residents involved in the lawsuit expressed dismay and pledged to keep fighting. “It’s a little shocking to believe you can lose your home in this country,” said resident Bill Von Winkle, who said he would refuse to leave his home, even if bulldozers showed up. “I won’t be going anywhere. Not my house. This is definitely not the last word.” Jobs, tax revenue citedWriting for the court’s majority in Thursday’s ruling, Justice John Paul Stevens said local officials, not federal judges, know best in deciding whether a development project will benefit the community. States are within their rights to pass additional laws restricting condemnations if residents are overly burdened, he said.“The city has carefully formulated an economic development that it believes will provide appreciable benefits to the community, including — but by no means limited to — new jobs and increased tax revenue,” Stevens wrote.He was joined by Justice Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer.O’Connor, who has been a key swing vote on many cases before the court, issued a stinging dissent. She argued that cities should not have unlimited authority to uproot families, even if they are provided compensation, simply to accommodate wealthy developers.“Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but the fallout from this decision will not be random,” O’Connor wrote. “The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms.” She was joined in her opinion by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, as well as Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. Thomas filed a separate opinion to argue that seizing homes for private development, even with “just compensation,” is unconstitutional.“The consequences of today’s decision are not difficult to predict, and promise to be harmful,” Thomas wrote. “So-called ’urban renewal’ programs provide some compensation for the properties they take, but no compensation is possible for the subjective value of these lands to the individuals displaced and the indignity inflicted.”Homeowners refused to budgeThe case involves Susette Kelo and several other homeowners in a working-class neighborhood in New London, Conn., who filed a lawsuit after city officials announced plans to raze their homes to clear the way for a riverfront hotel, health club and offices. The residents had refused to budge, arguing it was an unjustified taking of their property. “I’m not willing to give up what I have just because someone else can generate more taxes here,” said homeowner Matthew Dery, whose family has lived in the neighborhood known as Fort Trumbull for more than 100 years.New London contends the condemnations are proper because the development plans serving a “public purpose” — such as boosting economic growth — are valid “public use” projects that outweigh the property rights of the homeowners.The Connecticut Supreme Court agreed with New London, ruling 4-3 in March 2004 that the mere promise of additional tax revenue justified the condemnation.Issue across the countryNationwide, more than 10,000 properties were threatened or condemned between 1998 and 2002, according to the Institute for Justice, a Washington public interest law firm representing the New London homeowners.In many cases, according to the group, cities are pushing the limits of their power to accommodate wealthy 

[CTRL] Fwd: [cia-drugs] US acknowleges for first time torture at Gitmo, in Afghanistan and Iraq

2005-06-24 Thread Robert Millegan
-Caveat Lector-
Begin forwarded message:From: MA PA [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: June 24, 2005 9:52:50 AM PDTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [cia-drugs] US acknowleges for first time torture at Gitmo, in Afghanistan and IraqReply-To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.comUS acknowledges torture at Guantanamo and Iraq, AfghanistanUS acknowledges torture at Guantanamo and Iraq, Afghanistan: UN sourceFri Jun 24, 9:23 AM ET  Washington has for the first time acknowledged to the United Nations that prisoners have been tortured at US detention centres in Guantanamo Bay, as well as Afghanistan and Iraq, a UN source said.The acknowledgement was made in a report submitted to the UN Committee against Torture, said a member of the ten-person panel, speaking on on condition of anonymity."They are no longer trying to duck this, and have respected their obligation to inform the UN," the Committee member told AFP."They they will have to explain themselves (to the Committee). Nothing should be kept in the dark."UN sources said it was the first time the world body has received such a frank statement on torture from US authorities.The Committee, which monitors respect for the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, is gathering information from the US ahead of hearings in May 2006.Signatories of the convention are expected to submit to scrutiny of their implementation of the 1984 convention and to provide information to the Committee.The document from Washington will not be formally made public until the hearings."They haven't avoided anything in their answers, whether concerning prisoners in Iraq, in Afghanistan or Guantanamo, and other accusations of mistreatment and of torture," the Committee member said.Continued: http://www.livejournal.com/users/mparent/380412.htmlMARC PARENT  CRIMES AND CORRUPTIONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS http://www.livejournal.com/~mparent/ For today's news overview scroll to bottom and work up :  http://www.livejournal.com/users/mparent/2005/06/      __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com   Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/  Please let us stay on topic and be civil.   OM  Yahoo! Groups Links  To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Fwd: The Secret World of Jack Abramoff

2005-06-24 Thread Robert Millegan
-Caveat Lector-
Begin forwarded message:From: "Daniel Hopsicker" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: June 20, 2005 11:49:22 AM PDTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: The Secret World of Jack AbramoffReply-To: "Daniel Hopsicker" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terrorist, Torpedos,  Republican 'Muscle' now up at TheMadCowMorningNewswww.madcowprod.com The MadCowMorningNews recently learned exclusive new details about the gangland-style murder in Florida which figures so prominently in Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff’s rise to power.  The 'secret world' of Jack Abramoff being probed by investigators today has definite connections and unmistakable links to the one inhabited during their final year in the U.S.by Mohamed Atta and the other hijackers. So as the scandal embroiling House Major Domo Tom Delay and Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff grows hotter, there may be new revelations about the 9.11 attack. Less than a week before the 9.11 attack, for example, Atta and several other hijackers made a still-unexplained visit onboard one of Abramoff’s casino boats. What does a scandal involving Indian casinos, gambling boat “cruises to nowhere”  pay-for-play government officials have to do with the story of 19 hijackers planning a mass murder in supposed isolation in Florida?  Read the whole story at: TheMadCowMorningNewswww.madcowprod.com "When Matt  Katie aren’t enough.” 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Repressed memory case, Aljazeera Guantanamo inmate 'abused'

2005-06-24 Thread Smart News
-Caveat Lector-







scroll

High Court to Review Privacy Rights - Panel will rule in repressed memory case in which a UC Irvine scholar revealed information about the subject of a study. By Maura Dolan, L A Times Staff Writer San Francisco "Stepping into the debate over repressed memory, the California Supreme Court decided Wednesday to review whether a famed memory scholar can be found liable for defaming and invading the privacy of the subject of a psychological case study. The court voted without dissent in a closed session to accept an appeal by UC Irvine psychology professor Elizabeth F. Loftus, who was sued after publishing what she called an "expose" of a case study in which a 17-year-old purportedly recalled a memory of her mother sexually molesting her 11 years earlier. Two lower courts had ruled that the lawsuit could go to trialLoftus said Wednesday that she was "extremely gratified" that the court had decided to review the case. "I also am exceedingly grateful to the scientists, clinical researchers and scholars who wrote to the court … and joined me in my concerns about a frivolous lawsuit that carries the potential to stifle the free exchange of information," Loftus said. But Joyanna Silberg, executive vice president of the Leadership Council on Child Abuse  Interpersonal Violence, said Loftus behaved unethically in probing the life of the woman identified in the study as "Jane Doe." "Science is in jeopardy if the public is not protected by ethics and standards," said Silberg, a clinical psychologist who specializes in child abuse. "There is no individual who is above the law, whether they be a very well-respected scientist or the president or a garbage collector." http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-memory23jun23,1,2960655.story

What Psychologists Better Know About Recovered Memories: Research, Lawsuits, and the Pivotal Experiment - Kenneth S. Pope http://kspope.com/memory/lofrev3.php  

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/15AACD99-DF1A-4E68-A9A6-DFEECF597F3E.htm
Aljazeera Guantanamo inmate 'abused' 
By Roshan Muhammed Salih
Wednesday 22 June 2005, 21:55 Makka Time, 18:55 GMT   
An Aljazeera cameraman who has been incarcerated in Guantanamo Bay since 2001 has suffered extreme physical, sexual and religious abuse, his lawyer says.
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Fwd: [smashthestate] Who Is Running This Choo-Choo Train?

2005-06-24 Thread Kris Millegan
-Caveat Lector-
 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
---BeginMessage---
-Caveat Lector-

Who Is Running This Choo-Choo Train?
Children At The Helm
By Fred Reed

http://www.fredoneverything.net/WhatPrice.shtml

June 18, 2005

The crumbling has begun, methinks. Congressmen, a few only now, speak of 
withdrawal from Iraq. A small thing, but for the White House a worrisome 
step toward vertebracy in that body of polyps. The numbers of the 
dissenting will grow as they see that they do not get hurt. Military 
recruiting is way down, and will stay down: The gullibility of the young 
cannot forever be relied upon. The House has summoned the courage to vote 
against parts of the Patriot Act. The president’s polls drop and drop.

The crumbling has begun, methinks.

Is this surprising? If I may risk repeating myself tiresomely, the way to 
defeat the American military is to avoiding giving it clear targets, keep 
the body bags flowing into Dover or Travis, and wait. It is that simple. 
The insurgents know this. They are doing it, and it is working. Five 
Marines today, three tomorrow, twelve GIs one week, nine another. On and 
on. So far we have killed 1700 of our soldiers, closing in on 2000. Sooner 
or later, even Middle America will notice.

Is victory still possible, if it ever were? The military can’t stop the 
bleeding, or it would have. Short of a miracle, of perhaps a serious attack 
within the United States, actually or apparently by terrorists, the 
casualties will continue. The public will weary of the war, and it will all 
be over. No?

Wars are marketed as involving moral principles or geo-strategic necessity, 
but they can become grudge matches, contests of vanity grown stubborn. A 
president who has led his country into a war has his ego on the line. He 
cannot easily say, “In the light of events, the adventure appears to have 
failed, and so we will return home.” The world would regard him as a fool 
and a knave. Further, humble men do not become presidents. Such a man will 
struggle on desperately, unwisely, with no real purpose any longer than to 
avoid the personal ignominy of defeat. When his pride has been engaged he 
can’t stop. For this men die.

One sees a similar approach in the gambler who, having lost his car, bets 
his house in hopes of redeeming himself.

As the news worsens the lying, begun long ago, increases. Democracies of 
course have to be lied into aggressive wars, since no one really cares 
about the form of government in an obscure and remote nation. Thus as 
losses mount, the enemy’s successes are described as defeats, as the last 
throes of a failing force. (I would not be surprised to find that Tokyo 
described the bombing of Hiroshima as a sign of American desperation.) The 
government forbids reporters to photograph the coffins, punishes soldiers 
who talk to the press. The horribly wounded are discreetly hidden. Generals 
who are not upbeat are fired. Dissidents become labeled as traitors. War 
crimes become isolated incidents: Only those which are discovered have 
occurred. Etc.

Historians tend to see wars as consequent to abstract currents of history. 
They speak of the balance of power, the clash of civilizations, of economic 
rivalry, and it all sounds dispassionate, reasoned, and occasionally 
majestic. It might be more accurate to say that wars are the hobbies of 
half-informed children who have somehow come into possession of the levers 
of power. Can anyone possible believe that Mr. Bush knew anything about the 
Arab world when he set out to conquer it? That Hitler understood the 
Russians, or the Japanese Army, America?

Getting into wars is so often easier than getting out. In terms of national 
and presidential vanity, the prospects of Iraq, short always of a miracle, 
vary between bad and ghastly. If the United States pulls out, in a sort of 
exploitus reservatus, the One Remaining