-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Franklin Wayne Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BCPolitics] Re: Chemtrail Conspiracy.
David: This is where my limits are (first year college chemistry
only). You however were aspiring to be a vet before becoming a tv
celebrity so you may know this one. I thought the idea of the aluminum
oxide was to reflect the sun back into space and reduce global warming.
If that is so, cities shouldn't be targeted. OTOH, cities produce more
heat so infrared is the problem there. I guess you could say that our
benign masters are doing this for our own good...even the biowar
tests. After all we (they) have to know how to deal with this contingency
if an enemy were to attack. That was the reasoning way back in the
Cole/Cranston reporting on spraying large Canada-US populations with
microbes in the 60's/70's.
The additional consideration is that the "democratic
society" guaranteed and in those words by the Canadian Constitution is
trashed by the senior politicians of this country. Diane Francis, Bill
VanderZalm and others have said, THIS IS NOT A DEMOCRACY, on public tv.
Why don't you invite them on with that as a topic?
You see, it doesn't matter much what us peasant masses say on this
topic or any other as long as Chretien, Manning and their ilk are running
the political show.
FWP.
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Will Thomas wrote:
> Yes Franklin,
>
> Your points are well taken. If the "screen" is also meant to cut down on
> dangerous levels of UV, "they" would spray over cities. But spraying
> pathogens has nothing to do with weather/atmospheric modification. The
> implications are disturbing and ominous.
>
> Best,
> WILL
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Franklin Wayne Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Will Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 12:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Chemtrail Conspiracy.
>
>
> > Thanks for the compliment William. Your excellent work here has drawn a
> > lot of attention on the Internet. I'm not big on David Ingram's
> > "conspiracy theory" guests, like Horowitz though I think he should present
> > their messages for the public to decide. I still get my flu shots every
> > year! But I think you have a hold on something real and scientifically
> > verifiable by the chemical-lab tests. And it is BIG...HUGE. The question I
> > wanted to ask you is whether you can demonstrate if those "gassing" North
> > America are flying over cities more than non-cities. If they just want to
> > reflect light back into space they don't need to target cities. But the
> > microbes you find in the samples suggests a repeat of "Clouds of
> > Secrecy" (Cole/Cranston) which means there is an anti-personnel purpose to
> > this. That is bloody well chilling.
> > FWP.
> > On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Will Thomas wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you Franklin,
> > >
> > > Your comments re. journalistic ethics and the responsibility of
> > > journalists to cover news is well said.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > William Thomas
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: Franklin Wayne Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: Barry Rueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2000 1:50 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Chemtrail Conspiracy.
> > >
> > >
> > > > What about calling journalists to task for a BREACH OF JOURNALISTIC
> > > > ETHICS? You have a duty to the public when it comes to protecting the
> > > > democracy of this country. That is what I was taught by Professor
> Dawson
> > > > in my Canadian Government course and it is sound to-day.
> > > > FWP.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Barry Rueger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > CAJ guidelines - Rule Number One:
> > > > >
> > > > > "1. CAJ-L is not to be used as a tip sheet or a means to lobby
> > > > > journalists to cover certain events or issues. Nor is it a
> discussion
> > > > > list for general public policy or political issues. Postings should
> be
> > > > > directly relevant to its main purposes (see above)."
> > > > >
> > > > > OK?
> > > > >
> > > > > B.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 8 Apr 2000, at 13:06, Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Date sent: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 13:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > > From: Franklin Wayne Poley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject:Chemtrail Conspiracy.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Anybody on Canadian Association of Journalists List come across
> the
> > > > > > "Chemtrail Conspiracy"? See http://www.islandnet.com/wilco .
> "Project
> > > > > > Censored" rated it as one of its top contenders last year.
> > > > > > Investigator William
