Re: [CTRL] The OKC Bombing Chronology You're NOT Supposed To Know
-Caveat Lector- Steve , do you believe this info? If so, do you think McVeigh should have been executed? On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:52:00 -0700 Steve Wingate [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -Caveat Lector- The OKC Bombing Chronology You're NOT Supposed To Know From Brasscheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6-14-1 Sgt. McVeigh was an outstanding soldier. He did what he was told, anticipated what had to be done (and) took pride in his work, - Capt. Jesus Angel Rodriguez, McVeigh's commanding officer during the Gulf War, testifying at his sentencing hearing It's called a Reichstag Fire The OKC Chronology you're not supposed to know 1. A second bomb found inside the building SUSANNE SEALY, Correspondent: Yes, LEA [sp], I can. The Oklahoma City police and the FBI have confirmed there is another bomb in the Federal Building. It's in the east side of the building. They've moved everybody back several blocks. CNN SHOW: NEWS 11:27 am ET - LIVE April 19, 1995 Transcript # 920-19 2. Forget the people, get those papers OKLAHOMA CITY -- Hours after a bomb ripped apart the federal building, some rescue workers were stopped from searching for survivors while federal officials removed boxes of documents. You'd think they would have let their evidence and files sit at least until the last survivor was pulled out, one angry rescue worker told The News. The worker and a firefighter said that 10 to 12 hours after the 9 a.m. blast April 19, federal officials began limiting the number of rescue workers in the building to a dozen, confining them largely to the lower right side of the battered structure. Source: New York Daily News 3. FBI quietly drops pursuit of John Doe No. 2 Denver, Colo. -- An internal FBI memo indicates FBI agents suspended their search for the elusive Oklahoma City bomb suspect John Doe No. 2 in the critical weeks soon after the April 1995 blast, belying assurances by federal officials at the time that the search was continuing. The memo, the existence of which is publicly disclosed for the first time here, undercuts the government contention that federal agents have done everything they can to find the mystery suspect... In the memo, San Francisco-based FBI agent Thomas Ravenelle writes that he's discontinuing efforts to investigate a lead relating to attempts to find and identify John Doe No. 2 in view of the fact that the Oklahoma City Command Post has directed all offices to hold (John Doe No. 2) leads in abeyance. Source: 1997 Digital City Denver 4. McVeigh's first confession faked by newspaper The document containing a purported confession by alleged Oklahoma City bomber Timothy J. McVeigh, published by the Dallas Morning News, was fabricated by an investigator for the defense team, a friend of the investigator said yesterday. The Washington Post 03/05/97 By Lois Romano and Tom Kenworthy, Washington Post Staff Writers 5. DOJ report calls FBI's OJC bomb blast conclusions: incomplete... inappropriate... scientifically insupportable Williams' report contains several serious flaws. His opinion as to the VOD of the main charge was unjustifiable; his statement of the VOD of ANFO
[CTRL] The OKC Bombing Chronology You're NOT Supposed To Know
-Caveat Lector- The OKC Bombing Chronology You're NOT Supposed To Know From Brasscheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6-14-1 Sgt. McVeigh was an outstanding soldier. He did what he was told, anticipated what had to be done (and) took pride in his work, - Capt. Jesus Angel Rodriguez, McVeigh's commanding officer during the Gulf War, testifying at his sentencing hearing It's called a Reichstag Fire The OKC Chronology you're not supposed to know 1. A second bomb found inside the building SUSANNE SEALY, Correspondent: Yes, LEA [sp], I can. The Oklahoma City police and the FBI have confirmed there is another bomb in the Federal Building. It's in the east side of the building. They've moved everybody back several blocks. CNN SHOW: NEWS 11:27 am ET - LIVE April 19, 1995 Transcript # 920-19 2. Forget the people, get those papers OKLAHOMA CITY -- Hours after a bomb ripped apart the federal building, some rescue workers were stopped from searching for survivors while federal officials removed boxes of documents. You'd think they would have let their evidence and files sit at least until the last survivor was pulled out, one angry rescue worker told The News. The worker and a firefighter said that 10 to 12 hours after the 9 a.m. blast April 19, federal officials began limiting the number of rescue workers in the building to a dozen, confining them largely to the lower right side of the battered structure. Source: New York Daily News 3. FBI quietly drops pursuit of John Doe No. 2 Denver, Colo. -- An internal FBI memo indicates FBI agents suspended their search for the elusive Oklahoma City bomb suspect John Doe No. 2 in the critical weeks soon after the April 1995 blast, belying assurances by federal officials at the time that the search was continuing. The memo, the existence of which is publicly disclosed for the first time here, undercuts the government contention that federal agents have done everything they can to find the mystery suspect... In the memo, San Francisco-based FBI agent Thomas Ravenelle writes that he's discontinuing efforts to investigate a lead relating to attempts to find and identify John Doe No. 2 in view of the fact that the Oklahoma City Command Post has directed all offices to hold (John Doe No. 2) leads in abeyance. Source: 1997 Digital City Denver 4. McVeigh's first confession faked by newspaper The document containing a purported confession by alleged Oklahoma City bomber Timothy J. McVeigh, published by the Dallas Morning News, was fabricated by an investigator for the defense team, a friend of the investigator said yesterday. The Washington Post 03/05/97 By Lois Romano and Tom Kenworthy, Washington Post Staff Writers 5. DOJ report calls FBI's OJC bomb blast conclusions: incomplete... inappropriate... scientifically insupportable Williams' report contains several serious flaws. His opinion as to the VOD of the main charge was unjustifiable; his statement of the VOD of ANFO was incomplete; his categorical identification of the main charge as ANFO was inappropriate; his estimate of the weight of the main charge was too specific and based in part on improper
