[CTRL] WHAT'S IT ALL ABOUT, ARI?
-Caveat Lector- http://www.antiwar.com/justin/justincol.html March 14, 2003 WHAT'S IT ALL ABOUT, ARI? A foreign intelligence service forged phony 'evidence' of Iraqi nukes – guess which one ... In the midst of a furious debate over the key role of pro-Israel ideologues in pushing us into war, the FBI has announced it is looking into the possibility that "a foreign government is using a deception campaign to foster support for military action against Iraq." Remember the forged "evidence" the U.S. submitted to the UN to support their contention that Iraq sought fissionable materials? We now learn that, according to the Washington Post: "Officials are trying to determine whether the documents were forged to try to influence U.S. policy, or whether they may have been created as part of a disinformation campaign directed by a foreign intelligence service. … [The forged documents] came to British and U.S. intelligence officials from a third country. The identity of the third country could not be learned yesterday." Unless it's the African nation of Niger – where Iraq was supposedly trying to buy uranium to develop nukes – that is desperately trying to drag us into war, for obscure reasons of its own, the identity of this mysterious "third country" is no mystery. "By way of deception, thou shalt do war" – the Mossad, Israel's legendary intelligence agency, have more than lived up to their motto in the past, and, in this instance, seem to have surpassed themselves. To feed the U.S. such a crude forgery – the fake letters were rife with fairly obvious and easily checkable errors – and have Colin Powell take it to the UN as "proof" of Iraqi perfidy was a calculated insult, and soon had the desired result. Attitudes hardened on the Security Council, and prospects faded for a compromise that would give the Iraqis at least some small hope that war could be avoided. As the loose cannon known as Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld rolled around on the American ship of state, alienating even the British, the likelihood increased that the President would lose patience and jumpstart the stalled war drive, even if that meant going it alone. Alone, that is, but for Israel. The FBI, which may or may not have jurisdiction over the investigation into the forged "evidence," is not exactly hot on the trail of the forgers and their possible connection to a "third country," as their spokesman made all too clear: "We're looking at it from a preliminary stage as to what it's all about." What's it all about, Ari? That's a key question the President ought to ask the next time he gets on the horn to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. What it's all about is this: as Pat Buchanan points out in the latest issue of The American Conservative, a cabal of pro-Israeli lobbyists and high administration officials planned this war from start to bloody finish. They have been gunning for Iraq – and Iran, and Syria, and Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan – since long before 9/11. When the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were attacked, the neoconservative branch of the War Party came to the President with "a pre-cooked meal," as Pat put it on MSNBC yesterday [Wednesday]. In a debate with a spokesman for the American Jewish Committee, publisher of the stridently pro-war Commentary magazine, Pat quoted Commentary editor Norman Podhoretz calling for "World War IV" – regime change not just in Iraq, but in a whole slew of Middle Eastern countries, including even Egypt (the second-biggest recipient of U.S. aid, after Israel). "In whose interest," thundered Pat, "is such a policy being pushed? Why not 'liberate' Cuba?" The AJC spokesman, reduced to stuttering evasion, said he didn't "necessarily" agree with Podhoretz's polemics. But he didn't say he disagreed with the editor of his own publication, either. Buchanan is right. The tragic irony of this war is that it is being fought to secure an empire: not our own, but Ariel Sharon's. As Arnaud de Borchgrave pointed out in the Washington Times, the "Bush-Sharon Doctrine" was formulated by Israel's staunch supporters within the Bush regime. The documentary trail leads straight back to a number of high administration officials, including Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser and Elliot Abrams, who have relentlessly pursued Israeli rather than American interests. This fifth column has been backed up by a phalanx of well-connected neoconservative think-tankers organized around Bill Kristol and the Project for a New American Century, which is heavily involved in the war propaganda apparatus on the home front. If you want to know why we are headed toward a bloody and disastrous war in Iraq, you have merely to peruse the pages of a 1996 study, "A Clean Break," co-authored by Wolfowitz, Perle, and Wurmser, and prepared for then-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in which regime-change in Iraq is cited as the path to security for Israel. Syria, the authors aver, is the main danger to I
[CTRL] What's It All About?
-Caveat Lector- >From http://www.komiti.com/default.asp?page_id=4 >>>Note: there are linques at bottom that will take the reader to other sites that have numerous other linques to other sites. This and other sites have nifty charts, maps and other graphics. A<>E<>R<<< >>}Begin What it is all about ? Komiti.Com 24 March, 2001 Like everything else in life It is all about money and oil. We live in a time when the energy resources of the planet are being depleted. There are few new forms of energy sources but none of them can replace oil. Almost every form of transport uses oil in its internal combustion engines (fuel and lubrication). Can you imagine your life without the current transport system? The whole world economy will come to a stand still. Lets not forget that all forms of plastics and most chemicals are derived from oil as well. Oil is the single most important substance on the planet. Oil is what makes the world go around. As the world oil resources decrease, whoever controls these will be the master of the world. Currently 85% of the oil comes from the Arab countries. We have seen how OPEC by just slightly reducing the oil output has managed to double the oil price. NATO did not invade Iraq to protect human rights. NATO countries (US, Great Britain) want to secure the oil fields for themselves. They have more or less succeeded in this, by exerting their military might over the Arab countries. But what would happen if large oil reserves (bigger or equal to all of the current ones put together) were discovered in Russias backyard (The Caspian)? Well, it has happened and a great geo-strategic game is unfolding. The Russians and the NATO countries are competing for these oil reserves. Whoever brings this oil to Europe will control it. To bring the oil from the Caspian Sea to Europe a pipeline is needed. Both the Russians and the NATO countries are building pipelines and strangely both of them go through Macedonia. The policy of the Macedonian government has been to be neutral on this issue. Having both pipelines built can only mean greater benefits for Macedonia itself. The US-British proposal for the Bulgaria Macedonia Albania pipeline is underway, but it is running late due to the difficulty of the mountainous terrain. The pipeline section between Macedonia and Greece (Russian pipeline) has already been built, and the OKTA refinery has been sold to Greek interests. The Macedonia Serbia section of the Russian pipeline is not ready yet due to the fighting between Albanian terrorists in Southern Serbia and North Macedonia. The NATO alliance is using the Albanians as proxies to fight their dirty war in stopping the Russian pipeline being built. If you look at the map nearly all of the fighting has been in areas where the pipeline is suppose to be built. Albanians live in other parts of Macedonia as well, why are they quiet there? A further proof of Russian interests in Macedonia is the Russian will to send military force to Macedonia. It took 78 days of NATO bombing for Russia to send its troops to Kosovo, yet only a week of fighting was needed for Russia to make an offer of it sending troops to Macedonia. The Greeks have already sent troops and large military aid to Macedonia. It is hard to believe that Macedonias enemy No 1 Greece is willing to help if it had no interests in Macedonia. Whether the current crisis is designed by NATO to slowdown or completely stop the Greece Macedonia Serbia section of the Russian pipeline we are not sure. What we know is that NATO is sweet talking Macedonia (expressing verbal support against Albanian extremists) while conducting a media war (CNN and BBC) as well as allowing CIA sponsored Albanian terrorists infiltrate Macedonia form Kosovo. The current behavior of NATO is destabilising Macedonia and threatens vital Macedonian national interests. It also questions Macedonian neutrality if the crisis escalates. Lets not forget that the Russians use the Macedonian alphabet (Cyrillic - Cyrill was Macedonian), that Russians were christianized by Macedonian missionaries and that all church services in Russia are still held in ancient Macedonian language. As Macedonian president Boris Tajkovski said : We will not be very selective of allies! Below are usefull links related to the Geo-politics of Caspian Oil http://www.aliyev.com/aliyev/fact_07.htm http://www.zoran.net/afp/text/submitted/wagons_east.htm http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3793a582649e.htm http://www.bisnis.doc.gov/bisnis/country/000818rspipetrans.htm http://www.soz.uni-hannover.de/isoz/Kosovo/pipel.htm http://www.worldwidewamm.org/caspian.html http://128.121.216.19/justin/j031401.html Background to an aggression Key stories Who are the rebels? Rebel aims Nato's role Inject the war In depth What it's all about The invisible war Nazi connection Ethnic make up Macedonian Democracy Macedonian Constitution Editorial Crisis Solution NATO in Kosovo Greece's policy change Sorcerers apprent
