Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Kerry and Bush, but Ralph Nader too? by Chuck Zlatkin

2004-10-18 Thread Total Information
-Caveat Lector-

Looks like April 16 - there's a link to the audio here:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/280904archived.htm

but you may have to be a subscriber to www.prisonplanet.tv to listen.


On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:21:13 EDT, Kris Millegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks, Do you know the date? I will put that in my database. I have Etra
 working with Nader 71-73. Nader had also spoken on George Noory but by
 writing my criticism in a paper of record I was trying to call attention
 to the lack of scrutiny and connections within the major players and the
 mainstream. Ralph Nader has access to the major media. If he was asked by
 Alex Jones, that shows again that the alternative media is both more
 brazen and generally better informed than mainstream, but also the fact
 that Nader had not used the Bones fact in any sort of mainstream or even
 continued attack. He must have known about Bones, etc. If Nader really was
 running for President and or even trying to influence the outcome/ make a
 statement/etc. why wouldn't one use the fact that your two major opponents
 are members of this secret club? If one was running against the corporation
 controlled state wouldn't you talk about Bones?  Especially since neither
 candidates nor their Democrats or Republicans supporters really want to talk
 about it? Seems kind of like something that could get you publicity and
 support? What makes Ralph run? Its not like he is William Jennings Bryan or
 Eugene Debs. Or is it?

 I find it interesting that Bones gets mentioned in the news now but very
 little on the reality and undercurrents. And really no discussion of what it
 means. Russert asked and that was the end of public questioning.

 They still try and play by old-time rules can the unveil in the changing
 paradigm or will the waves of time and change do them in?

 Co-ed and many more members from overseas and ethnicity must be having an
 effect on Bones.


 Peace,
 Om
 K
--
www.total411.info
www.libertythink.com
www.total911.info

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Kerry and Bush, but Ralph Nader too? by Chuck Zlatkin

2004-10-18 Thread Kris Millegan
-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 10/18/04 7:49:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


-Caveat Lector-

Looks like April 16 - there's a link to the audio here:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/280904archived.htm

but you may have to be a subscriber to www.prisonplanet.tv to listen.



Thanks, 
Peace, 
Om
K

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
2">

Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Kerry and Bush, but Ralph Nader too? by Chuck Zlatkin

2004-10-16 Thread Kris Millegan
-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 10/16/04 2:24:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


-Caveat Lector-

When Nader was on Alex Jones' show a few months ago, he said he hadn't
had any dealings with Etra since the early 70s.




Thanks, Do you know the date? I will put that in my database. I have Etra working with Nader 71-73. Nader had also spoken on George Noory but by writing my criticism in a "paper of record" I was trying to call attention to the lack of scrutiny and connections within the major players and the "mainstream." Ralph Nader has access to the major media. If he was asked by Alex Jones, that shows again that the "alternative" media is both more brazen and generally better informed than "mainstream," but also the fact that Nader had not used the Bones fact in any sort of mainstream or even continued "attack." He must have known about Bones, etc. If Nader really was running for President and or even trying to "influence the outcome"/ "make a statement"/etc. why wouldn't one use the fact that your two major opponents are members of this secret club? If one was running against the corporation controlled state wouldn't you talk about Bones?  Especially since neither candidates nor their Democrats or Republicans supporters really want to talk about it? Seems kind of like something that could get you publicity and support? What makes Ralph run? Its not like he is William Jennings Bryan or Eugene Debs. Or is it?

I find it interesting that Bones gets mentioned in the news now but very little on the reality and undercurrents. And really no discussion of what it means. Russert asked and that was the end of "public questioning."

"They" still try and play by old-time rules can the unveil in the changing paradigm or will the "waves of time and change" do "them" in? 

Co-ed and many more members from overseas and ethnicity must be having an effect on Bones.


Peace, 
Om
K

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om
2">