Re: Soap version
Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification. I submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which specify MTOM at least do not presently work in CXF--you need to rely on a config file for MTOM instead. Glen Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies: Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2 for JAX-WS services?
RE: Soap version
OK, but you're probably going to have to read page 130 anyway. javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_BINDING javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP12HTTP_BINDING Glen Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:31 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies: Glen, Could you please have pity on me and 'name that snail' so that I don't have to go wade through the 130 page monster just now? --benson -Original Message- From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:27 PM To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Soap version Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification. I submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which specify MTOM at least do not presently work in CXF--you need to rely on a config file for MTOM instead. Glen Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies: Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2 for JAX-WS services?
RE: Soap version
Oops, that's not the snail. It's called @BindingType. Look here: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20071102#NWSstep6 @BindingType(value=javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_MTOM_BINDING) Glen Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:45 -0500 schrieb Glen Mazza: OK, but you're probably going to have to read page 130 anyway. javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_BINDING javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP12HTTP_BINDING Glen Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:31 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies: Glen, Could you please have pity on me and 'name that snail' so that I don't have to go wade through the 130 page monster just now? --benson -Original Message- From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:27 PM To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Soap version Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification. I submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which specify MTOM at least do not presently work in CXF--you need to rely on a config file for MTOM instead. Glen Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies: Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2 for JAX-WS services?
RE: Soap version
Thganks. -Original Message- From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:48 PM To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Soap version Oops, that's not the snail. It's called @BindingType. Look here: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20071102#NWSstep6 @BindingType(value=javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_MT OM_BINDING) Glen Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:45 -0500 schrieb Glen Mazza: OK, but you're probably going to have to read page 130 anyway. javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_BINDING javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP12HTTP_BINDING Glen Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:31 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies: Glen, Could you please have pity on me and 'name that snail' so that I don't have to go wade through the 130 page monster just now? --benson -Original Message- From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:27 PM To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Soap version Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification. I submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which specify MTOM at least do not presently work in CXF--you need to rely on a config file for MTOM instead. Glen Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies: Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2 for JAX-WS services?
