CS: Target-.308/7.62

2000-08-02 Thread E.J. Totty

From:   "E.J. Totty", [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The "Hornady Handbook of Cartridge Reloading",
Vol. 1, Fourth ED., page 322, begs to differ.
It seems that Hornady equates the above cartridges
as equal for the purposes of reloading and for ballistics.
That being the case, perhaps your "M G FARNAN"
wouldn't mind providing the data which points unequivocally
to another source?

Hornady says:
"The 308 was originally designated the 7.62mm NATO."
--and--
"More recently, NATO switched to the 5.56mm cartridge,
commonly known as the .223 Remmington."

Do note that the decimal point for the .308 in the above
was also missing from the text from which I quote.

ET
--
There are (very) small differences between the SAAMI spec and the
NATO spec, don't ask me why, perhaps through the conversion
from metric.  As a small note of esoterica, Imperial and US
measurements are slightly different, but it is a microscopic
difference.

My personal view is that it is more to do with minor differences
between manufacturers, e.g. Winchester .308 brass vs. RG military
brass (or INDEP) than any physical difference in the case
dimension specifications.  In your average M60 or FAL it doesn't
make much difference but in a match chamber for a TR it can.  I
bet if you check the maximum and minimum tolerances for brass
in US measurements then in metric the tolerances will be
slightly different, as people like to round off numbers.

I am sure Winchester military 7.62 brass is identical to their
commercial .308 brass, but we don't use Winchester military
ammo.

SAAMI is always coming up with daft specifications, I can't
see why they don't use the military specifications for
military calibre ammunition.  Note for example that 9x23mm
Winchester has a higher pressure specification by SAAMI
than .38 Super, although 9x23 is just a rimless .38 Super.
There are lots of other examples, 9x19mm is the classic one.

Does anyone have any personal experience of the problem of
using 7.62 NATO in a .308?

I've always wondered why cases from different makers have
different case capacities, in fact Winchester Match brass
(rare stuff) has a higher case capacity than their regular
brass.  Surely if they're all following the SAAMI or NATO
specification the case capacities should all be the same?

When you push the limits of shooting technology I find
you eventually come up against these sorts of things.

Steve.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Misc-help with Borchardt

2000-08-02 Thread HW

From:   "HW", [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dear Sirs:
  I am the owner of a Borchardt Pistol N¦ 1700
and I am looking for a collectionist to get more information
about the gun. If you know of anybody please let me know.
Thank you, kind regards.

Roberto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Misc-FHM Magazine

2000-08-02 Thread Dave

From:   Dave Reay, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>or the average American, strolling into the bedroom to find 
>little hank staring down the barrel of a loaded revolver, which 
>he found in "pops, draw under the dirty magazines", is as 
>common as obesity"
That should have read "In Pops dirty draws, under the magazine" seems
odd that Jonathon missed the obvious, everybody knows that the Americans
keep a spare magazine with their loaded revolvers! The rich folk suffer
from "Anorexia Nervosa", the common folk suffer from "obesity" simple
"Typo" nothing to get unhinged about! After all "Young Hank" would not
have gotten past the "Dirty Magazines" and would be more into "pump
action" type stuff than looking down the barrel of anything except maybe
his python!   

-- 
Dave Reay


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Target-Parker Hale bust?

2000-08-02 Thread Peter

From:   Peter H Jackson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I heard a rumour that P-H called in the receivers today. They
were not answering the phone. Don't know if it is true, but if
you do business with them it would seem prudent to check.

If true, well done Mr Major and Mr Blair! Your 1997 Firearms Acts
have destroyed yet another great British business.

Peter.

www.jacksonrifles.com
--
There's a bit more to it than that (if true).  Parker-Hale
fired their gunsmiths which was a mistake.  One of the guys
they got in to do some of the work had a most interesting
comment to make about a Browning Hi-Power:

"That gun was used by the Parachute Regiment."
"How do you know?"
"It says 9 PARA on it."

I kid you not.

The .22 AR-15s have a reputation of dubious reliability
although I have been told repeatedly that the early
problems were fixed.

One of the ex-directors has been saying nasty things about
PH but it is hard to tell if it was just sour grapes or not.

They would seem worth buying out though if only because
of their test range.  Plus they are still the S&W
distributors for the UK, for what that's worth (not much).

Inpower recently lost the distribution rights for Glock
as well.  Glocks now cost a bit more but delivery is
more reliable.

While I'm in "slagging off" mode, I can't help but mention
Beechwood Equipment.  Am I the only one who has been kept
waiting over a year (no kidding) for delivery?  I also tried
buying some ammo off them last year, in the end I imported
the stuff myself from Switzerland.

In fact if you're a copper things are beginning to look
a bit tight.  H&K they can get, Glock they can get,
SIG perhaps if they order enough of them, but that's
about it.

Steve.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Misc-RIP Bill

2000-08-02 Thread Alan

From:   Alan Phillips, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<>

Rather good letter in today's (2/8/00) Times on this subject 

Sir, If Tony Blair wants to read my emails, courtesy of the Regulation
of Investigatory Powers Bill, why shouldn't I read his memos?

Yours faithfully
Alan Phillips
--
Okay, enough about things that are unrelated to guns!

Steve.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Misc-RIP Bill

2000-08-02 Thread Bippygee

From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anyone worried about the RIP bill should sign up with
America on Line (AOL). Much better than other servers
I've tried--and it all goes through Waterford 
in the Republic--ie, outside UK jurisdiction.

Barry Woodward.
--
The quickest and easiest method is to use something
like supanet or freeserve, and then create a mail
account on hotmail or altavista or something
similar.

If your too lazy Dell net and others are based
in Ireland.

Steve.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Target-.308/7.62

2000-08-02 Thread Alex Hamilton

From:   "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Steve,

I asked Martin Farnan about the warnings in the Bible about
7.62NATO/308Win and .223/5.56 and here is his reply.

Alex

- Original Message -
From: Martin G Farnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Dear Alex,
>
> No, we merely draw firers attention to the fact that
the two cartridges may (in the case of .308/7.62) or
are (in the case of .223/5.56) not be the same.  To go
any further, e.g. to say that "this" rifle was suitable
for "that" cartridge, would be exceedingly foolish on
our part.

Yours sincerely

M G FARNAN
Shooting Manager


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Pol-US buyback nets court officer guns

2000-08-02 Thread SSAA

From:   SSAA, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"It gets the gun off the street instead of leaving it in a closet where
children or a burglar could find them,"

Street closets?

From: News and Views
Friday, July 28, 2000
http://www.nydailynews.com/2000-07-28/News_and_Views/City_Beat/a-74714.asp

Gun Buy-Back Backfires When Officers Cash In

By MIKE CLAFFEY
Daily News Staff Writer

Gun buy-back program to get illegal weapons off the
streets had to be altered yesterday after a stampede
of court officers tried to cash in.

Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes ordered changes
in the initiative when he found out that court officers
ù some of them in uniform ù were handing in their old
.38-caliber service revolvers.

Because the program had pulled in only about 200 guns
since the one-month window began July 1, Hynes upped
the reward on Monday from $100 to $250 per gun.

"We had a surge last night of about 100 guns and they
all seem to be .38 service revolvers," said a source
in the prosecutor's office.

One court officer collected $1,500 by turning in six guns.

This is a program with good intentions to get illegal
guns off the street and shouldn't be bastardized by
people looking for a quick buck," said Hynes' spokesman,
Kevin Davitt.

"We're going to be contacting those people who abused
the program and ask for our money back," Davitt said.

But a spokesman for the court system, David Bookstaver,
said it is not clear that the officers can be forced
to do that.

"District Attorney Hynes has indicated that this is
really not in the spirit of what the program was
designed for," Bookstaver said.

But he added that court officials "have no authority"
to tell the officers to give the money back.

He said, however, that word was going out yesterday
that court officers can no longer participate.

Some court officers in Brooklyn were upset that
Hynes had forbidden them from participating in the
buy-back offer. The officers were allowed to keep
their revolvers after they were issued 9-mm semiautomatics
last year.

"I have the flyer right here and it says, 'Any
working handgun, sawed-off shotgun or assault rifle. No
questions asked.'" said Bob Patelli a Senior Court
Officers Association delegate at Brooklyn Supreme Court.

"If the DA sees fit to discontinue the program, fine.
But he's bound legally to pay for the guns he's already
taken."

Patelli added that the program was achieving its goal
of getting extra guns out of circulation.

"It gets the gun off the street instead of leaving
it in a closet where children or a burglar could find
them," he said. Last year, 659 firearms were turned in
for $100 each. The money comes from drug forfeiture
funds, Davitt said. "We thought that perhaps $100 was
not meeting the value that some people place on these
weapons," he said.

 To be turned in, guns must be wrapped in brown paper
and can be taken to any Brooklyn precinct house. If the
gun is deemed operable, the desk officer is supposed to
give the person a pink voucher that can be redeemed at
the district attorney's office at 350 Jay St.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Pol-JAMA study url and author details

2000-08-02 Thread SSAA

From:   SSAA, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v284n5/abs/joc91749.html
will take you to the report on homicide and the effect of the Brady
Bill.

http://www.georgetown.edu/ludwig/
will take you Jens Ludwig's homepage - Georgetown University



Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Pol-JAMA says Brady law ineffective

2000-08-02 Thread SSAA

From:   SSAA, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Study Disputes Gun Control Law's Impact
 By Guy Gugliotta
 Washington Post Staff Writer
 Tuesday, August 1, 2000; 4:22 PM

In a finding that casts doubt on one of the pillars of the gun control
movement, a new study published today concludes that the Brady law had
no effect on firearm homicide and suicide rates in states that
previously had no handgun controls.

Gun control advocates criticized the study, but also said it reaffirmed
the Brady Law's effectiveness in reducing gun crimes nationwide and
emphasized the need for further regulation of handgun sales.

The study in the Journal of the American Medical Association analyzed
national homicide and suicide data between 1985 and 1997, dividing the
states into two groups: 32 that installed the Brady Law handgun purchase
controls in 1994, and 19 (18 states plus the District) that already had
Brady-style restrictions.

While the study confirmed a well-documented reduction in firearms deaths
across the United States beginning in 1993-94, the data showed no
difference in the overall rate of decline between the two sets of
states.

There was, however, a sharp drop in gun suicides among adults 55 and
older in the "Brady states."

Still, "there's no real convincing way to show how much of the reduction
can be attributed to Brady," said Georgetown University public policy
specialist Jens Ludwig, co-author of the study, along with Philip J.
Cook of Duke University.

The study provided a volatile new addition to the national gun control
debate, and the National Rifle Association hastened to take note.

"We don't always agree with the American Medical Association, but in
this case common sense has prevailed," said James Jay Baker, the NRA's
executive director for Legislative Action. "Schemes like the Brady
waiting period have nothing to do with reducing criminal behavior."

The 1994 Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act requires that federally
licensed firearms dealers impose a waiting period on the purchase of
handguns while they conduct a background check on the purchaser.

The law was enacted 13 years after former presidential press Secretary
James Brady was disabled in the 1981 shooting that gravely wounded
President Reagan. The gun control movement regards it as one of the most
important pieces of firearms legislation ever passed.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Misc-RIP Bill

2000-08-02 Thread Brian Toller

From:   "Brian Toller", [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The following is culled from the Computer Buyer website and may be of
interest as this bill has been mentioned before on the list. The interesting
part is at the end as it appears reasonably easy to avoid the snoops if you
really need to.


 "Inept" RIP Bill Passed

27 July - DN Wire -- The controversial Regulation of Investigatory Powers
(RIP) Bill has been passed by Parliament, despite being described as
"technically inept" in a new report.
The Bill, which gives the police extensive powers to install "black box"
interception devices on the networks of Internet service providers (ISPs)
and demand keys to encrypted data, has received fierce criticism from
opposition parties and independent watchdog organisations. Although several
important amendments were made to the Bill by the House of Lords last week,
including the allocation of ú20m to cover black box installation costs and
the formation of a statutory advisory committee to oversee its
implementation, concerns persist over the Bill's wording.

The breadth of powers conferred by the legislation raise questions about its
compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights, and RIP will
make Britain the only G8 country with government access to keys (GAK)
powers.

After the Lords debate, Casper Bowden, director of the Foundation for
Information Policy Research (FIPR), said, "it's zombie legislation. Although
clinically dead with macabre wounds, it still lumbers on menacing both
individual privacy and commercial confidence."

Now his fears have been confirmed in a report by two security experts, Ian
Brown and Brian Gladman. The report states that "the envisaged powers for
interception and for seizure of encryption keys are technically inept," and
details four "trivially easy" methods for circumventing the Bill's e-mail
snooping methods.

Although the Bill has been passed by Parliament, it still requires Royal
Assent before it enters the statute book. Unless the Queen has been keeping
her active interest in IT very well hidden, RIP should be in force before
the summer recess.


How to avoid being RIPped off...

None of the methods suggested in the report require particular technical
expertise.

The first is to connect to the Internet with a smaller ISP - since the
government intends to install the black boxes at a small number of large
ISPs, those using smaller providers are less at risk. The cost of installing
the interception devices at every ISP in the country will almost certainly
be prohibitive.

The second approach is to use an e-mail server located outside the UK. Since
the machines themselves will be located outside this jurisdiction,
enforcement agencies will be unable to access data stored on them. As for
traffic between e-mail client and server, Brown and Gladman recommend using
the Diffie-Hellman technique, which generates unique keys for the session
and are destroyed after use.

Thirdly, permanent Internet connections such as ADSL enable e-mail to be
delivered directly to the user's PC, without the need for a separate e-mail
server. As ADSL falls in price and becomes more popular (BT, take note),
black box devices will become increasingly redundant. Currently BT
subscribers will not be able to use this loophole for technical reasons.

The final method takes advantage of IPv6, a new Internet Protocol currently
being introduced. In addition to providing a vastly increased number of IP
addresses, all data sent using IPv6 is automatically encrypted. As before,
this will circumvent interception devices and render several of the Bill's
provisions worthless.

Joel Harrison


Brian T
--
I wouldn't call going to ADSL or IPv6 "trivially easy" solutions, myself.
IPv6 isn't even a commercial proposition at the moment and you have
to build the installation file yourself using the software from the
Microsoft development website.  ADSL for home use won't be available
until the end of this month and it is available only in limited areas
and costs L40 a month.  (Plus BTopenworld still uses an email server
at the moment anyway).  Going to a smaller ISP is no guarantee because
it may be a big ISP next week.  Using a mail server outside the UK
is the easiest and surest method.

Steve.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Misc-Cybershooters award

2000-08-02 Thread Howell-Jones & Partners - Kingston Office

From:   "Howell-Jones & Partners - Kingston Office"

I have now received the award which I thank you for.

I will treasure it always.

DAVID STEED.
--

And of course, anyone can be the recipient of our
outstandingly tasteful Cybershooters plaque awarded
every year, you just need to make a big enough effort!

(And if that won't motivate you all I don't know what
will - should I throw in a trip to the local strip
club.)

Steve.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Misc-Johnny Gurkha etc

2000-08-02 Thread Norman

From:   Norman Bassett, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anyone looking for out-of-print books should check out
http://www.abebooks.com
http://www.powells.com 
which I've found very helpful. Try using a keyword
search for general topics.

A lot of people have a bit of our common history in
their heads, or in grandad's effects. 

I notice the UK government is more interested in
putting up museum buildings than getting our history
out of the files and into the public domain on the
internet. The government also exhibits an obsessive
desire NOT to publicise some parts of our past - which
probably accounts for it.

I think that the business of putting a part of our
common history into a private venture like a book in
fact tends towards censoring of history for one bad
reason or another and I think that web publishing of
history is the better way forward.

Regards
Norman Bassett
drakenfels.org


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Misc-SAGBNI job opening

2000-08-02 Thread Norman

From:   Norman Bassett, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SAGBNI tell me they're currently considering offering
Full (voting) Membership without liability insurance
at a reduced rate - which, as previously discussed
here, would be a more sensible use of their money for
people who are already members of other shooting
associations with insurance schemes. 

SAGBNI seem to think that this would involve
transferring their DOS-based database to a
Windows-based one and seem to be looking for a "data
input professional" to do the job cheap. They're
currently in Preston, Lancs.

SAGBNI tel: 01772 200 801

Regards
Norman Bassett
drakenfels.org


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Legal-Police shooting inquest

2000-08-02 Thread Pete Ansbro

From:   "Pete Ansbro", [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"A former soldier was shot and killed by police marksmen
after he had aimed an airgun at six officers"

I know that circumstances may not always be accommodating
but I sometimes wonder if police armed response units
shouldn't be trained to use binoculars
before bullets.
Though this report doesn't mention whether the airgun
was a rifle or a handgun, one assumes that if police
shooters are trained to assess a situation, that might
go so far as identifying the level of risk involved.
Of course if police shooters were trained to kill first
and question later, that'd be the death of anyone with
a chair leg in a carrier bag.

Pete
--
I think in this particular situation they were justified
in shooting him, he was armed with an air rifle and for
all they knew it could have been an 80 ft/lb air rifle.

If you point a rifle at an armed police officer, expect
to get shot.

Steve.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics