CS: Field-Cats the worst killers - odd twist
From: Pete Ansbro, [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've been carrying this information for many years and now seems as good a time as any to roll it out. Road kill dogs are the responsibility of the Highway Authority, whereas road kill cats are the responsibility of the Environmental Health Authority for the area. If this has changed since I ceased to work for a highways authority about 12 years ago, perhaps someone will let me know then I can forget all about it. Pete -- Fascinating! Steve. Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Misc-gundealer.net
From: "Charlie", [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve and all Cybershooters Great news for me and hopefully for you, too. After four months offline, Gundealer.net (www.gundealer.net) and Countrymans Weekly Online (www.countrymansweekly.co.uk) are back in business. Many apologies to anyone who tried to look at them. The owners of Gundealer.net had some financial problems, which they have worked out. Gundealer.net started life as the National Gundealers' Directory, which was a supplement I put together for Shooting Times magazine in 1997. It provides a free and comprehensive list of UK gunshops. I put it on the web in March 1999, added free gun classified advertisements to the site (you pay if you sell your gun through the site), and sold it to an American company in February last year. That company has now resurrected the site. It also means that those who entered the draw for the popular Gundealer.net baseball caps, which bear the legend "They fly they die" will get them, as I can now afford the postage. Countrymans Weekly Online is a fieldsports news service. It is the Internet presence of The Countryman's Weekly, which is an excellent paper based in Devon - and has nothing to do with the owner of Gundealer.net. All the best Charlie Jacoby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Pol-PETA
From: nick royall, [EMAIL PROTECTED] PETA are the loonies that want the continuance of the feeding of pigeons in Trafalgar square because they think they will starve to death otherwise. Obviously these pigeons are too stupid to fly off to Green Park and therefore disprove Darwin's theory unless human intervention counts as proof God exists in the form of nutty spokespersons. Confused? Well, ask yourself this. How do these people not starve themselves since they obviously dont believe in walking to the shops to feed themselves. Nick Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Pol-The march in March
From: "Brian Toller", [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is anyone aware of any coaches going to the march from the Merseyside area? Brian T -- Phone them on their "hotline". I think that's one of the reasons for it! www.march-info.org Steve. Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Pol-Gunter on Guns
From: "Lorne Gunter", [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lots of new licenses; few background checks Geez, what happened at the Canadian Firearms Centre between Friday, February 9 and Monday the 12th? On Friday , Liberal MP John Maloney, who serves as Justice Minister Anne McLellan's parliamentary secretary, told the House of Commons the costs for registering all gun owners and guns in Canada over the past five years "are roughly $227 million." But by Monday, McLellan herself was telling Canadian Press that over the same period the costs were $489 million. Must have been some party to have ran up a tab of $262 million in just three days. One of the managers probably shouted "Free hot tubs and mai tais for everyone!" And then bedlam broke out. Before it was all over, the 1,700 police officers and bureaucrats who work for the registry must have also decided if addictions counsellors at a native drug treatment facility in Manitoba could cruise the Caribbean with their spouses at taxpayer expense, surely they were entitled to the same. By the time they'd booked their staterooms and finalized plans for personal spas in each of their homes...Poof! -- $262 million. Of course, none of that happened. It's all a fiction, just like the government's cost estimates. The reason Maloney could give the Commons a total of $227 million and then have his minister give CP a total of $489 million three days later is that the Liberals are making the cost figures up as they go alone. Alliance MP Garry Brietkreuz estimates the real total -- based on access to information requests and Department of Justice sources -- is closer to $585 million. The total for the current budget year alone is supposedly $260 million. Whatever the true number, it's in the half-a-billion range, a far cry from the $120 million the government assured us would be the upper-end when it started down this path in 1995. Still, McLellan insists all this spending is worth it. "I think it's a bargain," she said on Monday. The registry has cost just $3 per person in the past five years, she calculates. She feels that's a small price to pay for increased public safety and saved lives. (By contrast, the Liberals have spent less than $1 a head combating organized crime and biker gangs during the same time.) However, it's unlikely the Canadian Firearms Centre is trying any longer to increase or even maintain public safety. In an effort to make the registry look successful, it appears CFC staff have given up conducting meaningful background checks on applicants for gun licences, and are now merely firing permits to buy guns out the door as fast as they are able. McLellan and her PR flaks have long loved to announce how many more licences have been refused or revoked under the new registry than under the stringent gun controls that existed before the current scheme. Okay. They provided the rope. It would be discourteous not to hang them with it. At the end of last October, the CFC reported that it had issued 418,000 gun licences in its first 23 months of operation, and that in that time it had refused or revoked 2,238 licences; in its own words an impressive "21 times more revocations" than the total for the five years before the new law took effect. No doubt most of these revocations could have been accomplished under the old laws, and what was responsible for the increase was a change in enforcement, not a change in law. But, for a minute, let's grant the government its gloat. The rate to the end of October was one refusal or revocation for every 190 applications. Then came the last-minute rush in applications. In the last four months before the December 31, 2000 deadline for applying for a gun owner's licence more than a million came in. Suddenly a system that had groaned out just 418,000 applications in two years was faced with two-and-a-half times more. It wasn't up to the task. Since the end of October, the CFC has issued 162,000 more full licences, but it has also hurried through 595,000 temporary licenses. That's 757,000 licenses in a little more than three months. However, during that same time, it has refused or revoked just 402 additional licenses, an insignificant rate of only one in every 1,883 -- 10 times fewer refusals or revocations than before this face-saving rush. You can almost hear the Liberal staffers saying, "Public safety be damned. Let's save the minister's butt!" Applications that were taking a full day each to process, are (as Ezra Levant pointed out in a brilliant editorial in the National Post on January 19) "blazing through...in 10 minutes flat." Applications without references, applications with known criminals are references, applications with major personal information left blank are all zipping through the system, as the CFC switches from concern for public safety to concern for Liberal political fortunes. Wh
CS: Legal-marine accused of making recruit suck on gun
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FORMER MARINE `MADE RECRUIT SUCK ON GUN MUZZLE' 131716 FEB 10 By Chris Court, PA News A former Royal Marine NCO accused of making a teenage recruit suck the muzzle of a 9mm pistol told a court today that the allegation was a "kick in the teeth." David Everall, 33, who left the corps as a sergeant after 12 years with an "exemplary" character, told Exeter Crown Court he was "totally flabbergasted" at the allegation. The incident was alleged to have happened when Everall was a 23-year-old Cpl at the Commando Training Centre at Lympstone, near Exeter, Devon. Everall, from Gothic Close, Basford, Nottingham, said he had no recollection of either putting a gun near someone's face or actually them making them take the gun in their mouth. He told the court he had worked for the prison serving since leaving the Corps, but had been suspended for the last year pending the outcome of the case. Everall has pleaded not guilty to causing actual bodily harm to Brian Bannister at the CTC in 1991, and not guilty to an alternative charge of affray, using or threatening violence towards him. Mr Bannister, 27, has told the court that Everall called his 618 troop on to the accommodation block landing at the CTC, put the Browning 9mm into his mouth and told him "suck it." Everall, who was a platoon weapons instructor at the time of the alleged incident, said today no gun, loaded or unloaded, should be pointed at anyone. He told the court he found "very strange and suspicious" that someone should make allegations after all this time about something which did not happen. Cross-examined by prosecutor Richard Crabb, he said he had never heard of anyone putting a gun into someone's mouth as a joke. Earlier today, two former Royal Marines today told the court they saw Everall put a 9mm pistol into Mr Bannister's mouth and told him toid him to suck on it. Mr Bannister, who served two tours in Bosnia, said yesterday he began to get flashbacks and "chronic nightmares" about the incident after a car crash in October, 1998. He said he was medically discharged from the Marines last year after developing post traumatic stress disorder. Mr Bannister said the incident happened when he and his 618 troop returned to Lympstone from a week's weapons course at Portsmouth seven or eight weeks into their training. Former Royal Marine Mark Smith, who was in Mr Bannister's troop at the CTC, said today: "Everall was shouting at Bannister, and I saw a pistol in his hand pointing towards Bannister's mouth. "The Corporal was shouting abuse, and I heard him say something along the lines of 'suck on this' and pointing the pistol towards Bannister's face," said the witness. "Bannister was very upset, he was crying," said Mr Smith, who added: "Everall saw it as a joke I suppose, because of his usual big grin all over his face." Fellow 618 troop member Jason Sanders, who left the Marines three years ago, said he was about six feet away when he heard Everall ask Mr Bannister for the weapon. "It was a Browning 9mm, and he told Bannister to open his mouth and put the weapon in his mouth. The muzzle was in there for five or 10 seconds," he said. Mr Bannister said yesterday that Everall unlocked an ammunition box and took out a 9mm Browning pistol, in which there was a magazine, and pulled back the slide. "Smiling, he put it in my face and stood there grinning at me. By this time I was in tears," said Mr Bannister, who said Everall had his finger on the trigger. Everall, he said, told him: "Suck it Bannister, and nudged the gun forward and made me put my lips over the barrel. "I was crying my eyes out and pleading to stop. He just smiled," said Mr Bannister, adding: "I just cannot get rid of that face. It was like he was enjoying it." In the car accident he hit his head but was not detained in hospital. But later he went back to hospital after getting "more vivid" flashbacks involving Everall and the pistol, and was diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder. Mr Bannister told defence counsel Michael Brabin he believed the pistol was loaded, adding: "I believed he was going to kill me." The trial was adjourned until tomorrow. Kenneth Pantling Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Legal-Lufthansa refuse to carry replica musket
From: George Barnard, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just saw this letter from Dr. Alastair Bantock in the current issue of Orders of the Daye, the Journal of the Sealed Knot, Website: "http://www.sealedknot.org/ Air Transport Of Historic Weapons For Re-Enactments In August while travelling to the Wallenstein Fest in Memmingen, Germany I experienced a problem with the transportation of my replica dog-lock muzzle-loading musket, the carrier being Lufthansa. The musket was checked by the Stansted police and accepted by the baggage handlers, but then failed to arrive at Munich. 24 hours later we learned that the transportation of this musket had been refused by the Lufthansa pilot and was still at Stansted. They had not even informed Munich of this action. I have received a letter of apology from Lufthansa, but feel that you should be made aware of their policy. I quote from their letter of 14 November 2000: The Lufthansa policy on the transportation of firearms states that passengers may carry hunting or sporting arms as exclusively checked baggage which is loaded in the aircraft cargo compartment and which must be unloaded and contained in a breakproof container, e.g. a marked gun case... The transportation of such items IS AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CAPTAIN. As this policy would appear to differ from all other carriers I have previously used I feel it is important that this statement by Lufthansa should be brought to the attention of members. It may be of interest that the Royal Ulster Constabulary regard these as theatrical props since the weapons referred to are being used as part of a theatrical performance, a firearm certificate is not required (letter 10 May 1996). There would have been about 40 muskets in Memmingen for this event by Sealed Knot members, all of which had travelled from UK. -- All carriers have this policy, it is part of international law, if I recall correctly. My suggestion is to wait at check-in and talk to the Captain when he comes in to make sure if you are worried. Steve. Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Pol-changes will be made to hunting bill
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MINISTERS `HINTING AT HUNT BILL U-TURNS' 131830 FEB 10 By Amanda Brown, Environment Correspondent, PA News The Government is expected to bring in changes to the highly controversial Hunting Bill after protests that it would, as drafted, ban deer stalking. MPs have overwhelmingly voted for a foxhunting ban, but the Bill was never intended to crack down on stalking and flushing deer. Opponents of the Bill said it went too far and would restrict land managers from carrying out important culling and managerial tasks - a point conceded by Home Office Minister Mike O'Brien in a letter to Conservative MP David Lidington (Aylesbury). Simon Hart, Director of the Campaign for Hunting said: "In the short time the Government has allotted to the Committee stage of this Bill, we have seen Ministers hint at some major U-turns. "Firstly, there was doubt as to whether rabbits should or should not be included in the list of prohibited species. "Then we were assured by the Junior Minister Jane Kennedy that the gun packs of Wales would be excluded from any ban and now we are told that the stalking and flushing of deer, which was originally intended to be outlawed, will now probably not be. "All of this confirms that despite years of time and millions of pounds of resources, hunting's opponents have failed to draft a Bill that actually achieves their objectives. "The Bill as it stands would impact on a much wider rural community than either the House of Commons or the public have been led to believe it will." Mr Hart added: "The Minister has a duty to ensure that there are no grey areas, no ambiguities and no assumptions. "If they haven't managed that by now, it is unlikely that they ever will." Kenneth Pantling Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Pol-The march in March
From: "Andrew Chastney", [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's what I think, anyway. I could be wrong (it does happen occasionally), but I have to do what I think is right, even if everyone else seems to disagree(including people who I respect). If anyone would like to post any counter-arguments I'll read them, though I can't guarantee a reply, for the reasons already stated - though I can guarantee to consider any sensible argument. But unless you can persuade me I'm wrong, the position at the moment is that I'll be spending 18th March in Manchester, same as usual. Stuart Heal Quiet loner with an arsenal of weapons. http://olympia.fortunecity.com/naseem/170/ -- You state that "the chase itself has to be extremely stressful". You also say that you've never ridden to hounds and don't think you'd learn anything by doing so. If you've never experienced it for yourself, on what basis are you drawing your conclusion that the chase has to be stressful? I can only assume that in your opinion you _think_ it must be stressful. If you had been hunting you would have seen for yourself that both foxes and hares will act completely nonchalantly even when the hounds are as close as a minute behind. Among other things they will stop to groom themselves, they will stop to drink, hares are frequently seen to stop and begin feeding, and have even been seen mating while hounds are hunting their line. None of these things suggest an animal under extreme duress. Let's not forget that for a wild animal to run away from danger is the most natural thing in the world. It seems extremely unlikely that a hare or a fox makes much distinction between different types of danger. Consider two fox control scenarios - a) A group of farmers beating with dogs to flush foxes from cover to waiting guns b) A huntsman using foxhounds to flush foxes from cover to be hunted Does the fox in a) feel any less stress than the one in b) at the moment at which it decides to make a run for it? I doubt it very much. Or what about the fox that you meet wandering along a hedgerow when you're out for a walk with your dog? I maintain that in each of those situations the fox just thinks 'Hell, time to get out of here'. As soon as it has got what it perceives to be a safe distance from its persuer it will stop running. That is precisely what happens during the course of a hunt. The hunted hare or fox runs till it thinks it's safe, then pulls up and just gets on with its normal business.The hounds have either lost it or they're still on its line. If the latter, as soon as they get too close for comfort off goes the quarry again till once more it feels safe and pulls up. (I say this with certainty as I have been hunting many times and seen it with my own eyes.) This stop/start affair keeps up for most of the hunt. I would argue that at no point during this process is the quarry under any stress at all. It is simply doing what every single wild bird or animal does every day in order to survive - running from danger. It is only in the very last stages of a hunt when the hounds close in that there is any possibility of stress. But I would argue that even at that point it is still completely natural. Watch just about any natural history programme and you will see countless examples of insects, birds or animals chasing and killing other insects, birds, or animals. You might find it disagreeable but the unescapeable reality is that nature is indeed 'red in tooth and claw'. The _real_ reason that hunting is under threat has nothing to do with animal welfare. (The Govt's own enquiry, the Burns Report, has found nothing to suggest that hunting is any more cruel than any of the other legal methods of control.) It's because some people are revolted by the fact that other people go hunting for enjoyment, and also because it's still perceived to be the sole preserve of the idle rich and it's a good way of indulging in a bit of toff bashing. Andrew Chastney Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Target-.50
From: "VinceB", [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think perhaps the .50 shooters could help themselves out by inviting along some TR shooters for a look-see though. Steve. Ooh, yes please - count me in for that day out! Cheers Vince Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Target-High capacity Ruger .44 magazines?
From: "John Hurst.", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CS: Crime-"the fashion for firearms"
From: "James McNair", [EMAIL PROTECTED] Had a slight bit of double counting on my earlier figure of firearm deaths. I make it 77 killed by firearms in the year 2000 , unfortunately the police and the media don't always let on what type of gun was involved so its difficult to pin down exactly how many were handgun related killings. Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Field-Cats the worst killers
From: nick royall, [EMAIL PROTECTED] A dog, like a horse is a domestic animal. A cat is a wild animal so you cannot do anything about next door's cat shi--ing in your garden wheras if the next door's dog does the same they are culpable. Nick Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Legal-Hungerford "suicide by cop"
From: "tony whiting", [EMAIL PROTECTED] i lived in hungerford at the time, and everyone there believed he hade been shot, look at the old pictures, their seem to be two hole in the windows one a smash and one that could be a gun shot -- Presumably a bullet hole in the window could be from shooting himself, as the bullet would have kept on going. I'll have to check, I can't remember if he kept on firing once he was inside the school. Steve. Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Crime-"the fashion for firearms"
From: "James McNair", [EMAIL PROTECTED] I too would question the figures of fatalities caused by firearms in the year 2000. Perhaps the figure of 42 relates to ONLY those caused by handguns, however, by my calculations around 81 deaths were caused by guns in the year 2000.This figure does include those killed by the police. -- The official figure is 62 homicides, although I assume that is illegal homicides. Steve. Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Pol-Proliferation of Small Arms
From: "Mike Burns", [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mullin, a junior international development minister, said: "We all have a collective responsibility to combat small arms proliferation." 1: We have a teacher shortage 2: We have a nurse and doctor crisis 3: We have pensioners freezing to death in winter 4: We have students being taxed out of higher education 5: We have middle earners being taxed out of existence We have all these crises and the govt wants to spend umpteen million on THIS? It'll be almost as effective as the Firearms Acts 1968-1997 and probably cost more. Money well spent, that's what I say... mike Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Pol-Cook on small arms control
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] World Forum on the Future of Sport Shooting - Mailing list _ Britain seeks curbs on world's small arms trade By Dominic Evans LONDON (Reuters) - Britain sought international support Tuesday for plans to curb the enormous global trade in small arms, offering development aid to countries which set aside and destroyed weapons stockpiles. Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told a conference in London that Britain was proposing an International Arms Surrender Fund to help replace the "click of the safety catch" in conflict zones with the "click of the computer mouse." Cook said Britain also wanted tougher regulation of the legal arms market and a clampdown on illicit sales. We will all gain from the successful removal of weaponry from strife-torn societies, and the substitution of productive and meaningful economic activity," he said. Arms trade campaigners say Britain must take steps at home before it could assume a leading international role. The United Nations, increasingly worried at the impact of small arms -- particularly in internal conflicts -- has called an international conference in July on the illicit arms trade. Britain has spearheaded demands for action to cut the estimated 500 million pistols, rifles and semi-automatic rifles in circulation worldwide, many of them recycled from one conflict to another. "In the past 10 years alone, conflicts fought only with small arms and light weapons have killed over three million people, most of them unarmed civilians," Cook said. "The self-loading rifle is today's real weapon of mass destruction." Cook said Britain would provide funds over the next three years to help with weapons collection and destruction projects, but initiatives by individual countries could not match the impact of concerted international action. BRITAIN "MUST PUT OWN HOUSE IN ORDER" Prime Minister Tony Blair's government, which pledged four years ago to inject an "ethical dimension" into foreign policy, has promised tight controls on arms exports. But they are unlikely to come into force before elections expected in May. Speaking before Wednesday's fifth anniversary of a damning report into British arms sales to Iraq in the 1980s, arms trade campaigners chastised ministers for failing to take quicker action. "Small arms brokered from Britain will continue to cause suffering around the world," Justin Forsyth, director of policy at Oxfam said in a statement. "The government should be ashamed of its failure to introduce tough new arms laws." Human rights group Amnesty International said Britain "desperately needs to get its own house in order so as to exert the kind of leadership we need to stop the suffering and human rights abuses caused by inappropriate arms exports." Blair's government says it has already opened up the murky world of arms trading to public scrutiny and prevented sales of weapons for use in internal repression and external aggression. In December it unveiled a draft bill which would introduce controls on trafficking and brokering in weapons, including light weapons and small arms. The bill stands no chance of being approved before May, when Blair is expected to announce elections, and would have to be reintroduced in a later parliamentary session. -- Ah yes, the SLR, a weapon of "mass destruction", that the Government thoughtfully gave away in large quantities to those responsible people in Sierra Leone... These people from Oxfam have no clue what they're twittering on about, they actually suggested to the Foreign Office that Guernsey was a major centre for international arms trafficking, because of all the ammunition shipments there. If they actually bothered to check, they would have discovered this is because private possession of Section 1 ammunition is banned in Guernsey, hence no handloading, hence large shipments of ammunition to gun clubs. Steve. Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
CS: Field-Cats...and Pheasants..
From: "Richard Loweth", [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you "steal" a pheasant when it is alive...it is poaching. When it is dead...it is theft. One cannot have "property" in game as it is wild. So what then of pet pheasants kept in an enclosed aviary? Theft or poaching? Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
