Re: Suggestion: /etc/hosts
Robert Collins wrote: > > This does not belong in setup. It belongs in a postinstall script for a > package. One possible package is the one John Morrison put together that > I'll be uploading realsoonnow. Another is cygwin itself. I just wrote such a patch. See the patches-l. Further discussion of style issues (which package gets the patch, etc.) probably belongs in that thread.
apache-php problem
Hi, I have problems with cygwin apache php. The htdocs are well accessed. But when I try: /var/www/htdocs/test.php It runs only one time, and then the server is dead. The test.php page is well displayed until the "APACHE_INCLUDE" title. I get this error: /var/log/apache/error_log [Tue Sep 10 10:00:44 2002] [notice] Apache/1.3.24 (Cygwin) PHP/4.2.0 configured -- resuming normal operations [Tue Sep 10 10:00:45 2002] [notice] Accept mutex: pthread (Default: pthread) [Tue Sep 10 10:01:21 2002] [notice] child pid 653 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) I just installed cygwin. I use WinNT 4.0 Server, SP 6a, McAfee NetShield is enabled. The apache and mod_php4 packages are from the original binary distro. $ cygcheck -c apache 1.3.24-5 mod_php44.2.0-1 I rebased the dlls: Administrator@MYHOST /lib/apache/new $ rebase.exe -d -b 0x6800 -o 0x1 /lib/apache/*.dll /bin/cygbz21.0.dll / bin/cygcrypto.dll /bin/cygintl-1.dll /bin/pq.dll /bin/cygxml2-2.dll /bin/cygz.d ll I added the folllowing lines : [...] LoadModule php4_module lib/apache/libphp4.dll [...] AddModule mod_php4.c [...] AddType application/x-httpd-php .php to /etc/apache/httpd.conf file. I run apache from the command line, logged as Administrator. Are the cygwin-patches included in the binary distro or do I have to rebuid the DLL for cygwin mod_php4? Do I need to create a /usr/local/lib/php.ini file ? Where can I get this file ? (I tried php.ini-dist from php-4.2.2-Win32.zip I downloaded from www.php.net, but it is useless, I always got Segmentation fault error) Thank you for any help. E. __ Lèche-vitrine ou lèche-écran ? magasinage.yahoo.ca
a vote for procps...
I just checked out procps that Chris January ported. At least "top", "uptime" and "watch" work, so you have my vote for including this in Cygwin. Joe Buehler
Astyle review
I can see only minor ploblems: - setup.hint: I always seen people suggest to put new packages that can do no real damane directly in current, and not test branch. but again this could be better this way. - binary package: - docs are installed in /usr/doc/astyle_1.15.3/ instead of the more usual /usr/doc/astyle-1.15.3/, ditto for the usr/doc/Cygwin/astyle_1.15.3..README file. this is a very *little* bug, I guess we can live with it (I'll mark it a "non-stopping marked-for-the-next-release bug") - executable works (no big testing done) - source package - it extracts in the directory astyle_1.15.3, instead of astyle-1.15.3 - patch: last line contains an unuseful "Binary files .. and ... differ" - patch: compares files in /home/rsato/software/astyle/astyle_1.15.3/ with files in astyle_1.15.3/ (patch asks for file to change) - README: doesn't say how to remove patch from archive and if it is already applied (it seems to be already applied, BTW) Keep in my that this is my first "complete review", be gente 0=) -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
RE: FW: top and other /proc utilities available for Cygwin
> [snip] > > > If the values you are seeing in the procps utilities don't look like the > > ones on your Linux box, this is probably an indication of a bug and > > should be reported to the cygwin-apps mailing list. > > Chris, I've reported this to the cygwin-apps list but got no response at > all. Take a look below - the SIZE colum seems wrong, while the RSS is > reported exactly as it is reported by Task Manager. First of all, just to point out, this is a bug/issue with the /proc fhandler, not a problem with the procps package. I took a look at this and, yes, the SIZE value doesn't tally with the VM Size value in Task Manager. The SIZE value you see in top is actually derived from the VirtualSize member of the VM_COUNTERS structure returned by NtQueryInformationProcess (..., ProcessVmCounters, ...). The VM Size value in Task Manager would appear to come from elsewhere. According to the top manpage, the SIZE value is "The size of the task's code plus data plus stack space". So the present value is clearly not correct, the problem is finding out where to read the correct value from. Chris
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:19:00AM -0400, Robb, Sam wrote: > > ...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever > > get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares? > > ...and... > > > Please note, *all* maintainers are welcome to give his/her voice for > > a new package. > > What about non-maintainers? I'd be perfectly happy to try out packages > (I've used doxygen before, and ELFIO just looks neat.) I've not done > so in the past because I didn't think that my vote would be considered, > and I'm not really sure what I would need to do in order to give a > worthwhile evaluation (just install the binary package & run? Check > on install locations? Look for missing files? Run a test suite? Try > to build from source?) > > If you are willing to count votes from non-maintainers, then some > guidelines for how to do an evaluation would be useful. A fairly > simple and straightforward checklist to follow would probably be > enough for most folks to work off of. I don't think it's that big a deal. Just have a look on http://cygwin.com/setup.html. This page contains the guidelines to create a package. Now *just* turn around and look from the evaluators side. So, if you think the package follows the guidelines and, that's obviously even better, you also tried the package and it works fine, then your voice is as good as anybody elses voice. And, if you find a useful package, who knows? Perhaps you are willing to become Cygwin package maintainer, too... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
Morrison, John wrote: >>From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Update: >> >>procps (reviewed, 5 votes, John, Lapo, Nicholas, Robert and me, >> discussion needed) >>doxygen (reviewed, 3 votes, Lapo and Robert, package >>cleanup needed(?)) >>astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo, package >>cleanup needed)) >> >>Btw., I'm under the impression that bookkeeping as above >>could be useful. >> >>Shall I try keep that going? If so, does anybody volunteer >>to continue >>that while I'm on vacation in October? > > > Would it be a good idea to setup something like Bugzilla where > a [ITP] subject could be voted on? That would keed track of > yay's and nays :) Just a thought... Well since RedHat already has bugzilla server setup, I think this is an excellent idea!!! In addition to the voting deal, we could finally have a centralized source for bug-reporting that queries reporterss for relevant information. I think it would also be quite useful to keep track of pending patches so they don't slip between the cracks. Cheers, Nicholas
RE: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
> ...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever > get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares? ...and... > Please note, *all* maintainers are welcome to give his/her voice for > a new package. What about non-maintainers? I'd be perfectly happy to try out packages (I've used doxygen before, and ELFIO just looks neat.) I've not done so in the past because I didn't think that my vote would be considered, and I'm not really sure what I would need to do in order to give a worthwhile evaluation (just install the binary package & run? Check on install locations? Look for missing files? Run a test suite? Try to build from source?) If you are willing to count votes from non-maintainers, then some guidelines for how to do an evaluation would be useful. A fairly simple and straightforward checklist to follow would probably be enough for most folks to work off of. -Samrobb
Re: Suggestion: /etc/hosts
> Hi,
>
> > >>/etc/hosts -> ${SYSTEMROOT}/system32/drivers/etc/hosts
> >
> > So, like all great ideas, all that it needs is an actual patch to make
> > it happen.
>
Uhh - what about just /windows/hosts (for those that are non NT based) ?
> Ok, I will have a go at this. As it involves mods to the setup program,
I'm
> going to move the discussion to cygwin-apps.
>
> Paul
>
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:12:00PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo, package cleanup needed)) > > I also vote for astyle - i forgot to mention it in the previous post. > > > Btw., I'm under the impression that bookkeeping as above could be useful. > > I like the idea and you have my vote for it. > > > Shall I try keep that going? If so, does anybody volunteer to continue > > that while I'm on vacation in October? > > I'll do that. Jippeeeh! Ok, latest update: procps (reviewed, 5 votes, John, Lapo, Nicholas, Robert and me, discussion needed) doxygen (reviewed, 4 votes, Joshua, Lapo, Nicholas and Robert, package cleanup needed(?)) astyle (reviewed, 3 votes, Gareth, Lapo and Pavel, package cleanup needed) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo, package cleanup needed)) I also vote for astyle - i forgot to mention it in the previous post. > Btw., I'm under the impression that bookkeeping as above could be useful. I like the idea and you have my vote for it. > Shall I try keep that going? If so, does anybody volunteer to continue > that while I'm on vacation in October? I'll do that.
RE: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Update: > > procps (reviewed, 5 votes, John, Lapo, Nicholas, Robert and me, > discussion needed) > doxygen (reviewed, 3 votes, Lapo and Robert, package > cleanup needed(?)) > astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo, package > cleanup needed)) > > Btw., I'm under the impression that bookkeeping as above > could be useful. > > Shall I try keep that going? If so, does anybody volunteer > to continue > that while I'm on vacation in October? Would it be a good idea to setup something like Bugzilla where a [ITP] subject could be voted on? That would keed track of yay's and nays :) Just a thought... J. === Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed to any third party without our permission. There is no intention to create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use of this email. Experian Limited (registration number 653331). Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 06:56:59AM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > > --- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) > > I actually voted for this as well as checked it out. I saw your review but you didn't vote for it (hey, I'm German, I'm the perfect prig ;-)) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
Update: procps (reviewed, 5 votes, John, Lapo, Nicholas, Robert and me, discussion needed) doxygen (reviewed, 3 votes, Lapo and Robert, package cleanup needed(?)) astyle (reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo, package cleanup needed)) Btw., I'm under the impression that bookkeeping as above could be useful. Shall I try keep that going? If so, does anybody volunteer to continue that while I'm on vacation in October? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:24:54AM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > > > >procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me) > > I voted for this one, after reviewing it. Ok, didn't see that. > >ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas) > >doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) > > Again, I voted for it, but with the conditions that it be > cleaned up a bit. Where? I don't see any mail from you voting for it. Only a mail "Arrgh! Geocities strikes again!!!" Did you review the package after Ryunosuke offered the fixed package? I take your vote now but I take a package issue, too, for now. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
--- Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) I actually voted for this as well as checked it out. __ Yahoo! - We Remember 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 08:55:12AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: > > The Cygwin net distro isn't sort of a one man show, it's a community > > effort. It's not Chris and me who are the responsible people for > > reviewing a package and we are not the only people with the right > > to upload packages. > > This is one of the reasons I think that it might be better to: > > 1) Maintainers only approve the setup.hint file. > 2) Upload the new package as test or new and let the Cygwin community as > a whole have a say in the package configuration. >a) Use cygwin.com for voting for the package with comments area and > the form is mailed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >b) The package maintainer has two weeks to work the issues discussed > on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] page. Counting from when? The occurence of the first bug report or the first wild complain? Who will check if it's one or the other? And who plays the keeper of the rules? >c) If the issues aren't fixed the package is pulled. > 3) Once x count votes of approval the setup.hint can be adjusted to > remove the test/new classification. >a) base x on some percentage of the cygwin community population > count. >b) or base x on some flat number. Since already on cygwin-apps (assumed to be the most "active" part of the community) only a few people actually care, how do you think that will work on cygwin? 99.999% of the people will not even get that there is some sort of voting scheme. They will tell you that the new foobaz package doesn't work on their B20, though... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > astyle (NOT reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo)
One more thing - this time it is not a package issue.
According to 'astyle --help' the program searches for .astylerc in three
places:
1) environment
2) $HOME/.astylerc
3) $HOMEPATH/.astylerc
Imo 3 is wrong - it should be ${HOMEDRIVE}${HOMEPATH}/.astylerc and the
path should be converted. I don't know if 3 will ever happen on Cygwin
having in mind that HOME is set automagically, but... :)
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > astyle (NOT reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo) I did a review of the package itself, not of its feature. astyle contains a lot of options and since I haven't used it in the past its not easy to tell if specific options behaves as expected. Ok, here is what I've found: 1) the names of the source and binary packages, the doc directory and the source directories are not correct: astyle_1.15.3-src.tar.bz2 => astyle-1.15.3-1-src.tar.bz2 astyle_1.15.3.tar.bz2 => astyle-1.15.3-1.tar.bz2 /usr/doc/astyle_1.15.3 => /usr/doc/astyle-1.15.3 /usr/doc/Cygwin/astyle_1.15.3.README => /usr/doc/Cygwin/astyle-1.15.3.README /usr/src/astyle_1.15.3 => /usr/src/astyle-1.15.3-1 CYGWIN-PATCHES/astyle_1.15.3.README CYGWIN-PATCHES/astyle-1.15.3.README CYGWIN-PATCHES/astyle_1.15.3.patch CYGWIN-PATCHES/astyle-1.15.3-1.patch When fixing this the maintainer should also change the build receipt in /usr/doc/Cygwin/astyle-1.15.3.README. 2) the source package includes astyle.exe 3) setup.hint contains a test entry (test: 1.2.17), but i don't recall having this package as test in the Cygwin net distro, or am I wrong ? 4) the source package contains the patch in CYGWIN-PATCHES instead of the root of the archive. 5) The patch was generated with CYGWIN-PATCHES containing the patch.
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
> The Cygwin net distro isn't sort of a one man show, it's a community > effort. It's not Chris and me who are the responsible people for > reviewing a package and we are not the only people with the right > to upload packages. This is one of the reasons I think that it might be better to: 1) Maintainers only approve the setup.hint file. 2) Upload the new package as test or new and let the Cygwin community as a whole have a say in the package configuration. a) Use cygwin.com for voting for the package with comments area and the form is mailed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] b) The package maintainer has two weeks to work the issues discussed on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] page. c) If the issues aren't fixed the package is pulled. 3) Once x count votes of approval the setup.hint can be adjusted to remove the test/new classification. a) base x on some percentage of the cygwin community population count. b) or base x on some flat number. Earnie.
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:40:53AM +, Gareth Pearce wrote: > >>Hmmm I was under the impression that for a package to be accepted it needed >>a) - someone to check it for packaging. >>b) - at least 3 votes saying that it is desired to be seen in the >>distribution. >> >>which so long as person in a) is competant - seems fine to me. > > > Ok, that's no. 2 and other packages are still missing the pro votes. > I could step in and be no. 3 but... I still think we should keep it at 2, unless more activity is seen. > ...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever > get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares? I always > see the same names if it comes to vote for a package and I see > always the same (less) names if it comes to reviewing a package. > > The Cygwin net distro isn't sort of a one man show, it's a community > effort. It's not Chris and me who are the responsible people for > reviewing a package and we are not the only people with the right > to upload packages. AMEN! > Please note, *all* maintainers are welcome to give his/her voice for > a new package. I was getting worried that people thought I was always voting yes for a package, so I tried cut back a little :-(. > And by all means I think a positive vote should be combined with at > least *some* reviewing of a package. Agreed, but I hope that more then just the usual people are expected to do this... > I failed to check this in the past sometimes but I will not upload > a package with less than three positive votes in future. Please, this is rediculous. It's hard enough to get people interested enough to give 2 votes. > > Outstanding packages: > > procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me) I voted for this one, after reviewing it. > ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas) > doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) Again, I voted for it, but with the conditions that it be cleaned up a bit. > astyle (NOT reviewed, 1 vote, Gareth) Haven't had a chance to check it out. I'd like to echo Corinna's point in that the apathy for new packages is disgraceful. If someone has taken the time to put a package together, the least you can do is check it out. Even if you don't, then just say so, but IMHO, silent vetos are unacceptable. Cheers, Nicholas
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 11:37:45AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Ok, so the state is now: Update: procps (reviewed, 4 votes, John, Lapo, Robert and me,s discussion needed) doxygen (reviewed, 2 vote, Lapo and Robert) astyle (NOT reviewed, 2 votes, Gareth and Lapo) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
Re: ELFIO 1.0.0
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:55:20AM +0300, Serge Lamikhov-Center wrote: > Updated packages located at the same place: > http://elfio.sourceforge.net/ELFIO-1.0.0-1.tar.bz2 > http://elfio.sourceforge.net/ELFIO-1.0.0-1-src.tar.bz2 > > Please review and vote! > Thank you. > > Changes: > 1. tutorial.cpp located near tutorial.pdf now. > 2. Appropriate record added to /usr/doc/ELFIO-1.0.0/README file. > 3. New setup.hint file: > > # ELFIO library > category: Devel Libs > requires: cygwin > sdesc: "ELF file reader and producer implemented as a C++ library" > ldesc: "ELFIO is a C++ library for reading and generating files in the > ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binary format. This library is > unique and not based on any other product. It is also platform > independent. The library uses standard ANSI C++ constructions and runs > on a wide variety of architectures." > > Serge Uploaded. Please prepare an announcement according to http://cygwin.com/setup.html#submitting, section 9 and send it in a few hours (give mirrors a chance). Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:18:16PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > Insanely busy at the moment. This is a general problem I assume. I'm doing the same as you, working just voluntarily on Cygwin. It's not a revenue generating project. > > least *some* reviewing of a package. > > I think that the two steps are very distinct. Obviously more review is > good, but requiring review is not good IMO. *some*. If you're interested in a package, you're probably also interested in that this package happens to fit well into the distro and that it doesn't destroy your installation or some such, isn't it? > > procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me) > > I think this is an excellent thing to include. Yes. So that's no. 3. However, a questin is still if we really want to include it right now. AFAI understood it, the /proc implementation is (just slightly) buggy in that it contains a wrong uid in /proc/PID/status. As a result, procps prints the wrong user name as owner of the process. This raises two questions: - Is a patch to /proc in sight? - Shouldn't we wait until that patch is in and the next Cygwin version has been released? Chris (J)? > > ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas) > > Looks neat. Yes. Ok. Uploaded. > > doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) > > This is quite a popular documentation system. I don't use it myself, but > I know folk who do. Also, libxml and libxslt are documented via it, and > they are in the distro. Yes. > > > astyle (NOT reviewed, 1 vote, Gareth) > > I'm still looking for a good C++ prettier. I'll try to check this out in > the next week or so. Ok, so the state is now: procps (reviewed, 3 votes, John, Robert and me, discussion needed) doxygen (reviewed, 1 vote, Robert) astyle (NOT reviewed, 1 vote, Gareth) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
> > > procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me) > That's a yes from me. > ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas) > doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) > Ths is indeed useful, pro. > astyle (NOT reviewed, 1 vote, Gareth) > > Abuot ELFIO and astyle I know not what they are... let's try a little Google... astyle: I used the version in jEdit and it's really useful ineed, that's a pro vote from me. ELFIO: I don't think I really understand its usefulness in a cygwin environment... the website is a little scarce in informations, too.. -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
n Wed, 2002-09-11 at 19:06, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > ...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever > get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares? I always > see the same names if it comes to vote for a package and I see > always the same (less) names if it comes to reviewing a package. Insanely busy at the moment. I try to keep up to date, and comment where I have an opinion > And by all means I think a positive vote should be combined with at > least *some* reviewing of a package. I think that the two steps are very distinct. Obviously more review is good, but requiring review is not good IMO. > Outstanding packages: > > procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me) I think this is an excellent thing to include. Yes. > ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas) Looks neat. Yes. > doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) This is quite a popular documentation system. I don't use it myself, but I know folk who do. Also, libxml and libxslt are documented via it, and they are in the distro. Yes. > astyle (NOT reviewed, 1 vote, Gareth) I'm still looking for a good C++ prettier. I'll try to check this out in the next week or so. Rob signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:40:53AM +, Gareth Pearce wrote: > Hmmm I was under the impression that for a package to be accepted it needed > a) - someone to check it for packaging. > b) - at least 3 votes saying that it is desired to be seen in the > distribution. > > which so long as person in a) is competant - seems fine to me. Ok, that's no. 2 and other packages are still missing the pro votes. I could step in and be no. 3 but... ...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares? I always see the same names if it comes to vote for a package and I see always the same (less) names if it comes to reviewing a package. The Cygwin net distro isn't sort of a one man show, it's a community effort. It's not Chris and me who are the responsible people for reviewing a package and we are not the only people with the right to upload packages. Please note, *all* maintainers are welcome to give his/her voice for a new package. And by all means I think a positive vote should be combined with at least *some* reviewing of a package. I failed to check this in the past sometimes but I will not upload a package with less than three positive votes in future. Outstanding packages: procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me) ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas) doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) astyle (NOT reviewed, 1 vote, Gareth) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
