Re: [Attn. Maintainers] prepare your packages for release of perl-5.32

2021-02-10 Thread Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps

On 09.02.2021 13:00, marco atzeri wrote:

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 7:12 PM Marco Atzeri wrote:


On 06.02.2021 20:07, Marco Atzeri wrote:

On 06.02.2021 17:13, Achim Gratz wrote:

Achim Gratz writes:

These are the source packages that touch the previous Perl installations
(some of these weren't updated for perl-5.30, so I checked perl-5.26
also) and need updating for perl-5.32:



   5 built

GraphicsMagick   Marco Atzeri
ImageMagick  Marco Atzeri
irssiMarco Atzeri
postgresql   Marco Atzeri
gdal Marco Atzeri


I am looking at it

graphviz Yaakov Selkowitz




there is some issue with swig python interface of

subversion   Marco Atzeri

I am looking at the version 1.14.1 to see if that has been
solved upstream and in the meantime I also updated swig

but I see no reason to delay the upgrade for it

regards
Marco


Re: [Attn. Maintainers] prepare your packages for release of perl-5.32

2021-02-10 Thread Achim Gratz
Jon Turney writes:
> I'm not quite sure why grepmail is on this list since it seems to just
> contain a perl script

Then it's probably good as it is.

> I think hexchat should also be on this list, as it provides a perl
> scripting plugin.

I haven't gone through all mails from the previous upgrades, it may well
have been in there somewhere.

>> irssi
>> postgresql
>> rxvt
>
> I think this should be 'rxvt-unicode'.  I'll take care of updating
> that, as I did for the last perl update.

OK.

>> texinfo
>> weechat
>> znc

> Not quite sure that git* and texinfo should be on this list. They seem
> to contain perl scripts and perl modules which are installed elsewhere 
> than vendor_perl.

For Git it is just a packaging error, really.  As I said, that has the
interesting side-effect that it survives the update, but that really is
unintended.

Ken has already confirmed that texinfo is a false positive.


Thanks for checking.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptation for Waldorf microQ V2.22R2:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada


Re: [Attn. Maintainers] prepare your packages for release of perl-5.32

2021-02-10 Thread Jon Turney

On 06/02/2021 16:13, Achim Gratz wrote:

Achim Gratz writes:

Please prepare your packages for the release of perl-5.32 and report on
this list about their status.  The one package that I intend to wait for
the release is subversion-perl, everything else either is under my
maintenance already or can be updated slightly later without too much
disturbance based on the last two updates of Perl.



[...]


Please note that I can't easily figure out if a package uses an embedded
Perl interpreter or sets up its own installation paths for Perl modules.
These packages have previously been determined to fall under that
category (some may have dropped that dependency in the meantime, but the
maintainer would hopefully know):

gdal
git
git-svn
grepmail


I'm not quite sure why grepmail is on this list since it seems to just 
contain a perl script


I think hexchat should also be on this list, as it provides a perl 
scripting plugin.



irssi
postgresql
rxvt


I think this should be 'rxvt-unicode'.  I'll take care of updating that, 
as I did for the last perl update.



texinfo
weechat
znc


Not quite sure that git* and texinfo should be on this list. They seem 
to contain perl scripts and perl modules which are installed elsewhere 
than vendor_perl.


Re: [ITA] asciidoc 9.0.5

2021-02-10 Thread Adam Dinwoodie
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 09:20, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> On 10.02.2021 09:40, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> > Asciidoc is currently both orphaned and bugged, per my email to the
> > main list. I've got the latest upstream release building, confirmed it
> > resolves my Python versioning issues with the Git builds, and can
> > upload as soon as I get the GTG.
> >
> > New packaging source: https://github.com/me-and/Cygwin-AsciiDoc/tree/next
> >
> > Build log: https://github.com/me-and/Cygwin-AsciiDoc/actions/runs/552677569
> >
> > Full build output:
> > https://github.com/me-and/Cygwin-AsciiDoc/suites/2005247005/artifacts/40091144
> >
> > Packages and hint files: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AhKYM5BNTYlAhaFH5xlHfnOZLWik1g
> >
>
> forgot to pack something ?
>
> $ cygport asciidoc.cygport all
> /pub/tmp/asciidoc-9.0.5-1.src/asciidoc.cygport: line 17:
> build-requires.txt: No such file or directory

Ah crud, good catch, thank you!


Re: [ITA] asciidoc 9.0.5

2021-02-10 Thread Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps

On 10.02.2021 10:20, Marco Atzeri wrote:

On 10.02.2021 09:40, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:

Asciidoc is currently both orphaned and bugged, per my email to the
main list. I've got the latest upstream release building, confirmed it
resolves my Python versioning issues with the Git builds, and can
upload as soon as I get the GTG.



Packages and hint files: 
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AhKYM5BNTYlAhaFH5xlHfnOZLWik1g


forgot to pack something ?

$ cygport asciidoc.cygport all
/pub/tmp/asciidoc-9.0.5-1.src/asciidoc.cygport: line 17: 
build-requires.txt: No such file or directory


Regards
Marco


except that issue and that
lilypond used for testing need to move to python3 :-(

it looks fine.

I changed maintainership to you

Thanks
Marco


Re: [ITA] asciidoc 9.0.5

2021-02-10 Thread Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps

On 10.02.2021 09:40, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:

Asciidoc is currently both orphaned and bugged, per my email to the
main list. I've got the latest upstream release building, confirmed it
resolves my Python versioning issues with the Git builds, and can
upload as soon as I get the GTG.

New packaging source: https://github.com/me-and/Cygwin-AsciiDoc/tree/next

Build log: https://github.com/me-and/Cygwin-AsciiDoc/actions/runs/552677569

Full build output:
https://github.com/me-and/Cygwin-AsciiDoc/suites/2005247005/artifacts/40091144

Packages and hint files: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AhKYM5BNTYlAhaFH5xlHfnOZLWik1g



forgot to pack something ?

$ cygport asciidoc.cygport all
/pub/tmp/asciidoc-9.0.5-1.src/asciidoc.cygport: line 17: 
build-requires.txt: No such file or directory


Regards
Marco


[ITA] asciidoc 9.0.5

2021-02-10 Thread Adam Dinwoodie
Asciidoc is currently both orphaned and bugged, per my email to the
main list. I've got the latest upstream release building, confirmed it
resolves my Python versioning issues with the Git builds, and can
upload as soon as I get the GTG.

New packaging source: https://github.com/me-and/Cygwin-AsciiDoc/tree/next

Build log: https://github.com/me-and/Cygwin-AsciiDoc/actions/runs/552677569

Full build output:
https://github.com/me-and/Cygwin-AsciiDoc/suites/2005247005/artifacts/40091144

Packages and hint files: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AhKYM5BNTYlAhaFH5xlHfnOZLWik1g