Good bye, Cygwinners
Hi all. I am no longer working with Windows, so I have no free resources (including time) to maintain my Cygwin packages. The list (I hope that it is complete) of my packages follows: docbook-xml412 docbook-xml42 docbook-xml43 docbook-xml44 docbook-xsl hexedit ioperm stunnel xmlto If there is anyone willing to adopt these package, (s)he is welcome. If there are any questions about some of my old packages or packaging, just ask me. Please use my private e-mail because I will unsubscribe from Cygwin mailing lists shortly. Maybe, the things could change in the near or far future, but now I must say: Good bye, Cygwinners. Cygwin was really a 'must have' software for me during working with Windows. Thank you everybody for your work on Cygwin. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Please upload: stunnel-4.14-2
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 10:54:20PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 4 22:41, Marcel Telka wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Please upload new stunnel-4.14-2 files: > > > > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint > > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.14-2-src.tar.bz2 > > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.14-2.tar.bz2 > > > > ac352c244df85feb3e130fe7e60011d6 setup.hint > > 4d18d2d3bed4241748cf503074665507 stunnel-4.14-2-src.tar.bz2 > > 0c79a434eedeff1b8789178f2d0e3533 stunnel-4.14-2.tar.bz2 > > > > and remove old 4.14-1 files. > > Really? 4.14-1? Not perhaps 4.12-1? Really. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: stunnel-4.14-2
Hi. Please upload new stunnel-4.14-2 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.14-2-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.14-2.tar.bz2 ac352c244df85feb3e130fe7e60011d6 setup.hint 4d18d2d3bed4241748cf503074665507 stunnel-4.14-2-src.tar.bz2 0c79a434eedeff1b8789178f2d0e3533 stunnel-4.14-2.tar.bz2 and remove old 4.14-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: stunnel-4.14-1
Hi. Please upload new stunnel-4.14-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.14-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.14-1.tar.bz2 f6fa62bffaf8752177a2611e92d98c92 stunnel-4.14-1-src.tar.bz2 8c667cdd96e70477c10d6b2160effd7f stunnel-4.14-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 4.11-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: stunnel-4.12-1
Hi. Please upload new stunnel-4.12-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.12-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.12-1.tar.bz2 7cf69948f3fcd3d1890fa6bf0cc9c17b stunnel-4.12-1-src.tar.bz2 6ce2b884bd0105f6c782e4530c9afa79 stunnel-4.12-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 4.04-3 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: [HEADSUP] ALL Maintainers, please reply.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > So, ALL maintainers of Cygwin packages, > > please reply to this mail within the next six weeks, > > including a list of ALL packages you maintain. docbook-xml412 docbook-xml42 docbook-xml43 docbook-xml44 docbook-xsl hexedit ioperm stunnel xmlto -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
New packages: docbook-xml412, docbook-xml44
Hi. I've packed DocBook XML DTD 4.1.2 and DocBook XML DTD 4.4 for Cygwin. The internal packages structure is same as for DocBook XML DTD 4.2 and DocBook XML DTD 4.3 (packages docbook-xml42 ad docbook-xml43). http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml412/docbook-xml412-4.1.2-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml412/docbook-xml412-4.1.2-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml412/setup.hint ec675eb70a0ebb6b9f8405584cac21ae docbook-xml412-4.1.2-1-src.tar.bz2 44a84a515969add98df6df7aa53126ff docbook-xml412-4.1.2-1.tar.bz2 5b9fdff31adcd44c491abbeeafd0ce60 setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml44/docbook-xml44-4.4-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml44/docbook-xml44-4.4-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml44/setup.hint e670e6d2cf2f836d173688ee653f7a2a docbook-xml44-4.4-1-src.tar.bz2 82fb34295ca4aac2925ebde0745a7547 docbook-xml44-4.4-1.tar.bz2 4f41ca26aeaf33934ec916f15f07 setup.hint Please upload the new packages. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Error in g-b-s (line 408: almostall: command not found)
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:10:05AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Eric Blake wrote: > > This patch fixes that (and a few other things)... > > > > 2005-08-13 Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > * templates/generic-build-script (build): Variables must be > > set after make to override Makefile's setting. > > (test_rule): Default to check, since FSF coding standards and > > automake prefer that. > > (install_docs): Add USAGE. > > (list): Sort the list. > > (LC_ALL): Set, to ensure sane behavior with sort and others. > > (src_orig_pkg_name): Improve error message. > > (all): Fix broken usage of almostall. > > Thanks, I'll review and apply this later today. Looks like this subsumes ping > your 8/1 patch (<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2005-08/msg2.html>). -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.69.1-1
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.69.1-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.69.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.69.1-1.tar.bz2 648b5c9be733178ecc17958ad200f726 docbook-xsl-1.69.1-1-src.tar.bz2 0feb617545b7c9f67220eb310b4705c1 docbook-xsl-1.69.1-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 1.68.1-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Error in g-b-s (line 408: almostall: command not found)
Hi. There is an error in the latest generic-build-script (1.34). Parameter all doesn't work. Steps to reproduce the problem: $ cp generic-build-script a-1-1.sh $ touch a-1.tar.bz2 $ ./a-1-1.sh all ./a-1-1.sh: line 408: almostall: command not found $ Regards. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: newer version of stunnel in cygwin?
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:18:49PM -0500, Steve Sether wrote: > I've noticed the current version of stunnel is rather old, a little more > than 2 years old. Since then there's been numerous bug fixes and some > enhancements to stunnel. Are there any plans to compile a new version > of stunnel for use with cygwin? The windows binary version on stunnel.org > works with different libraries, and more important to me doesn't work with > pidof. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2005-08/msg00087.html -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: stunnel-4.11-1
Hi. Please upload new stunnel-4.11-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.11-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.11-1.tar.bz2 3e59f5eed326ddc974251b52496c9c4f stunnel-4.11-1-src.tar.bz2 29c74e06fc9a53e7d7cd41ebca48c8e5 stunnel-4.11-1.tar.bz2 Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.69.0-1
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.69.0-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.69.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.69.0-1.tar.bz2 03d256929375aa6ab552de5bd8d62d17 docbook-xsl-1.69.0-1-src.tar.bz2 ffbf62cebf823d5e925a5577ae24f624 docbook-xsl-1.69.0-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 1.68.0-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
New package: docbook-xml43
Hi. I've packed DocBook XML DTD 4.3 for Cygwin. The internal package structure is same as for DocBook XML DTD 4.2 (package docbook-xml42). http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml43/docbook-xml43-4.3-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml43/docbook-xml43-4.3-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml43/setup.hint 301dea743ecc9fe466b00d30d448018c docbook-xml43-4.3-1-src.tar.bz2 0eb620b1ce1c1d38a12c1bf9546e0921 docbook-xml43-4.3-1.tar.bz2 036f25cf95fb47511c3a12e1b1240141 setup.hint Please upload the new package. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.68.1-1
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.68.1-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.68.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.68.1-1.tar.bz2 101251c3ac6e657fd479d93d8ad1bcd0 docbook-xsl-1.68.1-1-src.tar.bz2 d686e7071d3fcfc8014c18daf8bc4ca3 docbook-xsl-1.68.1-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 1.67.2-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.68.0-1
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:31:44PM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.68.0-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.68.0-1.tar.bz2 4699ca45283e4b00a44f4f1aae84ad70 docbook-xsl-1.68.0-1-src.tar.bz2 657d3ee373327a660aa1b37b75d0065c docbook-xsl-1.68.0-1.tar.bz2 -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: corrupted files: docbook, lintntl1
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 01:49:41PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Could the package maintainers for the packages in the subject provide a > URL where I can fix this problem? Apparently I wasn't paying attention > when I downloaded docbook-xsl and only part of the src file was > transferred. > > - Forwarded message from Keith Moore - > > docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1-src.tar.bz2 and http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1-src.tar.bz2 MD5: 8c58328fb16c909dcf29874679b2e332 -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.68.0-1
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.68.0-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.68.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.68.0-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 1.67.0-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: what about a "Security" category?
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:19:25PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Personally I'd choose any program that uses cryptography directly (e.g. > I wound't include autossh as it is "simply" an openssh frontend) and/or > is useful to secure a system (an antivirus). > But of course the difference is subtle, progabnly autossh and stunnel > could be in too. > > autossh ? > ccrypt > clamav ? > crypt > cyrus-sasl ? > gnome-keyring ? > gnupg > keychain ? > libgcrypt > libmcrypt > libsasl ? > mhash > netrcat ? > openssl > openssh > splint ? splint has nothing with security IMHO. > stunnel ? > > Probably I missed something... -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: setup.exe sucks
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:48:17PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:37:36PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>I believe that it was always Robert's intention to work towards the use > >>of a true package manager someday. That time is now. I can't take it > >>anymore. > > > >Perhaps it's time to begin work on a native port of rpm.exe -- but to > >avoid any "where exactly IS /var/lib/rpm before cygwin is even > >installed" problems, maybe winrpm.exe should store ALL of its stuff in > >HKCU somewhere. /usr/lib/rpm/* and all. > > I don't think you need a native version of rpm any more than you need a > MS_DOS version of rpm when you're installing linux. You do have to have > something early on that bootstraps what you need, like setup.exe does > now, but it could always install the cygwin first before it does > anything. ... or you could use statically linked rpm. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 05:58:17PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 11:02:16PM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > >On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 04:11:52PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:23:05AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> >On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 04:58:59PM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > >> >>Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1 files: > >> >> > >> >>http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1-src.tar.bz2 > >> >>http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1.tar.bz2 > >> >> > >> >>and remove buggy 1.67.1-1 files. > >> > > >> >Done. > >> > >> Actually, I spoke too soon. I started downloads for both of these and > >> they are now both hung in the background 24+ hours later. > >> > >> Could you put these back up on your server so that I can attempt to > >> re-download them, Marcel? > > > >Both are back. > > Here are the file sizes. Do they seem right now? > > -rw-rw-r--1 cyguser cygwin 692330 Dec 5 22:16 > docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1.tar.bz2 > -rw-rw-r--1 cyguser cygwin1057500 Dec 4 14:04 > docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1-src.tar.bz2 Yes, but timestamp for bin looks bad (it's not a real problem, of course :-): [EMAIL PROTECTED] docbook-xsl]$ ls -l total 1724 -rw-r--r-- 1 marcel marcel 1057500 Dec 4 15:04 docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1-src.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 marcel marcel 692330 Dec 4 15:04 docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1.tar.bz2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] docbook-xsl]$ md5sum * 8c58328fb16c909dcf29874679b2e332 docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1-src.tar.bz2 1ec0dbef1b1a6f58ab7622cb52f70701 docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1.tar.bz2 Regards. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 04:11:52PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:23:05AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 04:58:59PM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > >>Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1 files: > >> > >>http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1-src.tar.bz2 > >>http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1.tar.bz2 > >> > >>and remove buggy 1.67.1-1 files. > > > >Done. > > Actually, I spoke too soon. I started downloads for both of these and > they are now both hung in the background 24+ hours later. > > Could you put these back up on your server so that I can attempt to > re-download them, Marcel? Both are back. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.2-1.tar.bz2 and remove buggy 1.67.1-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.67.1-1
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.67.1-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.1-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 1.66.1-2 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: ITP: hexedit
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 12:22:34PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > No ldesc: > $ cat setup.hint > sdesc: "hexadecimal file viewer and editor" > category: Editors > requires: cygwin libncurses8 ldesc is not mandatory AFAIK. > > Besides this, it is GTG. Thanks. > > I have uploaded this package. Thank you. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
ITP: hexedit
Hi. I've prepared hexedit package for Cygwin. It is available here: http://telka.sk/cygwin/hexedit/hexedit-1.2.10-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/hexedit/hexedit-1.2.10-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/hexedit/setup.hint setup.hint -- sdesc: "hexadecimal file viewer and editor" category: Editors requires: cygwin libncurses8 The hexedit package is available in Debian and Fedora Core. Reviews and comments are welcome. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: docbook-xml42-4.2-3-src.tar.bz2 : md5sum failure
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 07:38:50AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ~> grep "xml42.*3.*src" setup.ini > release/docbook-xml42/docbook-xml42-4.2-3-src.tar.bz2 119001 > 04459ac59c6b258d1cb812bbcc59c6eb > > ~> find release/ -name "*xml42*3*src*" | xargs md5sum > c443933657226aacfd8c05082db86f0f > *release/docbook-xml42/docbook-xml42-4.2-3-src.tar.bz2 MD5 sum in setup.ini is bad. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.67.0-1
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.67.0-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.67.0-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 1.66.1-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Missing DocBook XML DTD
Hi. On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 01:29:14PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Jani Tiainen wrote: > >Actually in my installation I have no /usr/share/xml/docbook-4.1.2, > >instead I have usr/share docbook-xml42, and under /usr/share/xml is > >_only_ libglade subdir... > > > >Wondered that while looking those one of scripts... > > > >Are packages installed improperly in wrong directory? > > Hmmm, the cygwin docbook packages are there because the maintainer > decided to put them there. Make symlinks or mount the according paths > or change the script to your needs. You may also start a discussion > with the docbook-x* maintainer to use paths like recommended by the FHS: > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHARESGMLSGMLANDXMLDATA > or like debian or fedora or whatever you think is better. DTDs are now[1] in /usr/share/xml/docbook/4.2 directory. It should be compliant with FHS 2.3 now... [1] in new docbook-xml42-4.2-3 package Regards. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xml42-4.2-3
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xml42-4.2-3 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml42/docbook-xml42-4.2-3-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml42/docbook-xml42-4.2-3.tar.bz2 and remove old 4.2-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.66.1-2
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.66.1-2 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.66.1-2-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.66.1-2.tar.bz2 and remove old 1.65.1-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.66.1-1
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.66.1-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.66.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.66.1-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 1.64.1-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: docbook-dsssl wanted
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 11:52:25AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hi Marcel, > > are you interested to provide also a package for the DocBook DSSSL > Stylesheets: http://docbook.sourceforge.net/projects/dsssl/ ? I've no free time to maintain that package. So, my answer is no. Sorry. Regards. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
gbs patch (install/preremove)
Hi.
Attached is a patch for preremove.sh support.
ChangeLog entry:
2004-03-28 Marcel Telka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* templates/generic-build-script (install): Add support for preremove
script.
--
+---+
| Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
|jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+---+
Index: generic-build-script
===
RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/packaging/templates/generic-build-script,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -p -r1.20 generic-build-script
--- generic-build-script18 Mar 2004 23:00:35 - 1.20
+++ generic-build-script28 Mar 2004 08:30:29 -
@@ -214,6 +214,13 @@ install() {
fi && \
/usr/bin/install -m 755 ${srcdir}/CYGWIN-PATCHES/postinstall.sh \
${instdir}${sysconfdir}/postinstall/${PKG}.sh ; \
+ fi && \
+ if [ -f ${srcdir}/CYGWIN-PATCHES/preremove.sh ] ; then \
+if [ ! -d ${instdir}${sysconfdir}/preremove ]; then \
+ mkdir -p ${instdir}${sysconfdir}/preremove ; \
+fi && \
+/usr/bin/install -m 755 ${srcdir}/CYGWIN-PATCHES/preremove.sh \
+ ${instdir}${sysconfdir}/preremove/${PKG}.sh ; \
fi )
}
strip() {
Re: gbs patch (prep/patch)
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:08:37PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote: > On 2004-03-27T21:02+0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > ) * templates/generic-build-script (prep): Apply patch only if it is > ) available. > > I believe the .patch is required, even if it is empty. (I am distributing a > 0-byte .patch with naim, at least.) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00248.html Regards. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
gbs patch (prep/patch)
Hi.
Attached is a small patch for gbs' prep command.
ChangeLog entry:
2004-03-27 Marcel Telka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* templates/generic-build-script (prep): Apply patch only if it is
available.
--
+---+
| Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
|jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+---+
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/packaging/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.14 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 18 Mar 2004 23:00:35 - 1.14
+++ ChangeLog 27 Mar 2004 19:58:20 -
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2004-03-27 Marcel Telka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * templates/generic-build-script (prep): Apply patch only if it is
+ available.
+
2004-03-18 Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* templates/generic-build-script (install_docs): Fix sort to work
Index: templates/generic-build-script
===
RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/packaging/templates/generic-build-script,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.20 generic-build-script
--- templates/generic-build-script 18 Mar 2004 23:00:35 - 1.20
+++ templates/generic-build-script 27 Mar 2004 19:58:40 -
@@ -131,7 +131,9 @@
(cd ${topdir} && \
unpack ${src_orig_pkg} && \
cd ${topdir} && \
- patch -Z -p0 < ${src_patch} && \
+ if [ -f ${src_patch} ] ; then \
+patch -Z -p0 < ${src_patch} ;\
+ fi && \
mkdirs )
}
conf() {
ITP: ac-archive
Hi. setup.hint sdesc: "The Autoconf Macro Archive" ldesc: "The Autoconf Macro Archive provides documented and tested macros that are useful to many software writers using the autoconf tool, but too specific to be included into autoconf itself." category: Devel requires: perl http://telka.sk/cygwin/ac-archive/ac-archive-0.5.57-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/ac-archive/ac-archive-0.5.57-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/ac-archive/setup.hint setup.ini/setup.bz2 is available from: http://telka.sk/cygwin/ Regards. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.65.1-1
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.65.1-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.65.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.65.1-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 1.62.4-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: xmlto-0.0.18-1
Please upload new xmlto-0.0.18-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/xmlto/xmlto-0.0.18-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/xmlto/xmlto-0.0.18-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 0.0.16-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl 1.64.1-1
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.64.1-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.64.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.64.1-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 1.62.3-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: xmlto-0.0.17-1
Hi. Please upload new xmlto-0.0.17-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/xmlto/xmlto-0.0.17-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/xmlto/xmlto-0.0.17-1.tar.bz2 and remove old xmlto-0.0.15-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: xmlto-0.0.16-1
Hi. Please upload new xmlto-0.0.16-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/xmlto/setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/xmlto/xmlto-0.0.16-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/xmlto/xmlto-0.0.16-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 0.0.14-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xml42-4.2-2
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xml42-4.2-2 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml42/docbook-xml42-4.2-2-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xml42/docbook-xml42-4.2-2.tar.bz2 Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Maintainers/Packages List, 2003-11-01
Hi. On 01.11.2003 17:00, Daniel Reed wrote: cvs Charles Wilson !!! stale version (freshmeat lists 1.11.9; we only have 1.11.6) http://www.cvshome.org/ lists 1.12.2 Regards. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: xmlto-0.0.15-1
Hi. Please upload new files for xmlto-0.0.15-1: http://telka.sk/cygwin/xmlto/xmlto-0.0.15-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/xmlto/xmlto-0.0.15-1.tar.bz2 ... and remove old 0.0.12-1 files. Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Patch to generic-build-script for listing package files
On 25.10.2003 20:17, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
+list() {
+ (cd ${instdir} && \
+ find . -name "*" ! -type d | sed 's/\.\/\(.*\)/\1/' )
What about "find ! -type d | cut -c 2-" instead of
"find . -name "*" ! -type d | sed 's/\.\/\(.*\)/\1/'"?
Differences:
- less characters :-)
- filenames started with "." are listed too
+}
Regards.
--
+---+
| Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
|jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+---+
Re: Pending Packages List, 2003-10-08
On 08.10.2003 20:56, Daniel Reed wrote: === Pending Packages List === Waiting for review: tcm ploticus sgrep libsigsegv suite3270 distcc Waiting for vote[s]: ploticus sgrep libsigsegv suite3270 check d distcc (graphviz) (subversion) (GAP) distcc has my vote. Regards. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: [ITP] antiword-0.34
On 04.10.2003 11:46, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hallo, How about including Antiword in the netrelease? Home -> http://www.antiword.org/ # antiword sdesc: "A free MS Word reader" ldesc: "Antiword converts the binary files from Word 2, 6, 7, 97, 2000 and 2002 to plain text and to PostScript TM." requires: cygwin It has my vote. Regards. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.62.4-1
Hello. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.62.4-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.62.4-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.62.4-1.tar.bz2 and remove old docbook-xsl-1.62.0-1 files. Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.62.3-1
Hello. Please upload new docbook-xsl-1.62.3-1 files: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.62.3-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.62.3-1.tar.bz2 and remove old docbook-xsl-1.61.3-2 files. Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.62.0-1
I've created new docbook-xsl packages: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.62.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.62.0-1.tar.bz2 setup.hint is unchanged. Please remove old 1.61.2-1 files. Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Missing source package for tin-1.6.1-1
Hi. There is no source package for tin-1.6.1-1.tar.bz2 on the cygwin mirrors. The source package is not listed in the setup.ini file too. Is it a bug or feature? Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: micro-patch to generic-readme
On 2003.08.04 16:51, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: This is just nitpicking, mostly, but there's a slight type-o in the generic readme.. --- generic-readme~ 2003-08-04 16:19:27.313059200 +0200 +++ generic-readme 2003-08-04 16:27:25.190212800 +0200 @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ http://... Canonical download: - ftp://... + ftp://... I've reported the typo too some months ago here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00166.html -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.61.3-2
Hi. Please upload updated docbook-xsl packages: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.61.3-2-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.61.3-2.tar.bz2 and remove obsolete 1.61.2-1 files. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: [ITP] wtf
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:17:11PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > As per John Morrison's suggestion, I would like to contribute and maintain > wtf (http://cronus.comp.utas.edu.au/~thsutton/computing/wtf.html). > > wtf(6) is a utility provided by some UNIX and UNIX-like systems including > Slackware Linux and NetBSD. It translates acronyms and filename suffixes > by looking up the definition of a term in various databases. > > I've added the OLOCA to the database directory (named %OLOCA to place it > first in search order). There's also a perl script that can update that > file from the web version of the OLOCA (also requires wget), but since > this rule is totally optional (and won't be invoked in the default build), > I didn't put perl and wget as prerequisites for building wtf. This is > mentioned in wtf.README as well. > > http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/wtf/wtf-0.0.3-1.tar.bz2 > http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/wtf/wtf-0.0.3-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/wtf/setup.hint (also inline below) > > sdesc: "translates acronyms and filename suffixes for you" > ldesc: "wtf translates acronyms and filename suffixes for you. > > The wtf program looks-up the definition of a term. It supports a > number of definition sources. In this version they are an acronyms > database and qa filename suffixes database." > requires: cygwin > category: Text Doc This has my vote. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: 1.5.0 Test packages status (issue 2)
On 2003.07.17 09:16, Charles Wilson wrote: 1) already recompiled for 1.5.0 2) non-binary 3) binary, but not for new use (e.g. could be recompiled, but why?) 4) empty compatibility packages (newlib-man, texmf?) 5) need to be recompiled 1.5.0 NEED TO BE RECOMPILED FOR 1.5.0 --- [...] docbook-xml42 docbook-xsl Please move both docbook-xml42 and docbook-xsl to #2. They are not compiled... Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Maintainers (of mod_php4,docbook-xml42,xmlto) - Please take note
On 2003.07.01 14:38, Elfyn McBratney wrote: I have split up the libxml2 package into four seperate packages libxml2_2 Runtime libxml2-doc Documentation/Manual pages libxml2-devel Developement binaries, libraries and headers libxml2-python Python Bindings and added a new package libxml2-perlBundled XML::LibXML perl module(s). Please remember when you are updating your setup.hint files to change the `requires' line (s/libxml2/libxml2_2/). Once uploaded (ETA ~20 minutes) I'll edit your setup.hint files. Ok. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Proposal: stunnel
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Marcel Telka wrote:
> > I've updated proposed stunnel packages:
> > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint
> > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2-src.tar.bz2
> > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2.tar.bz2
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sorry I didn't spot this before, but:
>
> if [ ! -d ${instdir}${prefix}/var/run/stunnel ]; then \
> mkdir -p ${instdir}${prefix}/var/run/stunnel ; \
> fi && \
>
> is incorrect. (Remove ${prefix}).
>
> Also, there are some bugs in stunnel.conf-sample.in and stunnel.init.in -
> they are using @prefix@/foo where they should be using @localstatedir@ or
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED] This causes the paths to be incorrect. (You may wish to submit
> these changes upstream.)
Thanks.
Updated packages are available at:
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-3-src.tar.bz2
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-3.tar.bz2
--
+---+
| Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
|jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+---+
Re: Proposal: stunnel
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:19:14PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: > Marcel Telka wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I've created stunnel packages for cygwin: > > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint > > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 > > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 > > > > setup.hint: > > sdesc: "Universal SSL Wrapper" > > category: Admin > > requires: cygwin openssl initscripts > > > > setup.ini is available at: > > http://telka.sk/cygwin/setup.ini > > > > Testing, comments and votes are welcome. > > A few comments: > > The overwhelming majority of Cygwin packages use /usr/doc, not > /usr/share/doc. > (The only exceptions being dpkg, groff, libxml2, libxslt - should they > change to fit the pattern?) > > I don't think "requires: initscripts" is right - presumably, you could run > stunnel from cygrunsrv? > > I don't think "category: Admin" is right. "Net" seems more appropriate to me > personally. Thank you for your comments. I've updated proposed stunnel packages: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-2.tar.bz2 setup.hint: sdesc: "Universal SSL Wrapper" category: Net requires: cygwin openssl setup.ini is available at: http://telka.sk/cygwin/setup.ini Changes since 4.04-1: Moved documentation files from /usr/share/doc/stunnel to /usr/doc/stunnel-4.04 Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Proposal: stunnel
Hi Gerrit. On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:20:36PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Hi Marcel, > > > Build instructions: > > unpack stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 > > if you use setup to install this src package, it will be > > unpacked under /usr/src automatically > > cd /usr/src > > ./stunnel-4.04-1.sh all > > > This will create: > > /usr/src/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 > > /usr/src/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 > > > > Hope this helps. > > As I wrote, I found a native windows executable in the dist which make Ah. Yes. > building a new one in the source directory impossible without deleting > the old one, maybe that this is not a problem when building out of the > source directory, though. Cygwin packages are built by default outside the source tree. So, there is no problem. I've created a patch to successful build outside the tree. If you want to build stunnel in the source tree, then there are some additional tweaks required. stunnel.exe deletion is an example. I've never tested this type of the build... Regards. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Proposal: stunnel
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:45:54AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Marcel schrieb: > > > Hi. > > > I've created stunnel packages for cygwin: > > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint > > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 > > http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 > > > setup.hint: > > sdesc: "Universal SSL Wrapper" > > category: Admin > > requires: cygwin openssl initscripts > > > setup.ini is available at: > > http://telka.sk/cygwin/setup.ini > > > Testing, comments and votes are welcome. > > I vote pro. Thanks. > > Though I had some problems to build it since the 'source' package > includes precompiled windows binaries and more windowish thingies. Have > you wrote s.th. about the build-process? Can you post the README if so, > please? README is included in stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2, here is an excerpt: Build requirements: cygwin-1.3.10 or newer openssl-devel Build instructions: unpack stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 if you use setup to install this src package, it will be unpacked under /usr/src automatically cd /usr/src ./stunnel-4.04-1.sh all This will create: /usr/src/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 /usr/src/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 Hope this helps. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Proposal: stunnel
Hi. I've created stunnel packages for cygwin: http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/setup.hint http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.04-1.tar.bz2 setup.hint: sdesc: "Universal SSL Wrapper" category: Admin requires: cygwin openssl initscripts setup.ini is available at: http://telka.sk/cygwin/setup.ini Testing, comments and votes are welcome. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: xmlto-0.0.14-1
Hi. Please upload new xmlto packages: http://tortuga.etc.sk/cygwin/xmlto-0.0.14-1-src.tar.bz2 http://tortuga.etc.sk/cygwin/xmlto-0.0.14-1.tar.bz2 Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Please upload: docbook-xsl-1.61.3-1
Hi. Please upload new docbook-xsl packages: http://tortuga.etc.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl-1.61.3-1-src.tar.bz2 http://tortuga.etc.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl-1.61.3-1.tar.bz2 and remove old 1.60.1-1. Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Updated: docbook-xsl-1.61.2-1
Hello. Please upload: http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.61.2-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/cygwin/docbook-xsl/docbook-xsl-1.61.2-1.tar.bz2 Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Ok to upload docbook-* and xmlto? (was Re: Pending package status (11 June 2003))
On 2003.06.13 08:28, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Marcel Telka wrote: > > On 2003.06.12 22:04, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > > > > > > 4. docbook-xml42 > > > > > > > > I vote pro. > > > > > > > > > 5. docbook-xsl > > > > > > > > I vote pro. > > > > > > > > > 6. xmlto > > > > > > > > I vote pro. > > > > > > > > Where is the rest of the docbook toolchain, is it already > > included? > > > > > > This is all that's been contributed thus far. > > > > They now have enough votes to go in. Time to upload? > > It would be great :-). Thank you. Uploaded. Please send an announcement in a couple of hours. Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Ok to upload docbook-* and xmlto? (was Re: Pending package status (11 June 2003))
On 2003.06.12 22:04, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > > 4. docbook-xml42 > > > > I vote pro. > > > > > 5. docbook-xsl > > > > I vote pro. > > > > > 6. xmlto > > > > I vote pro. > > > > Where is the rest of the docbook toolchain, is it already included? > > This is all that's been contributed thus far. They now have enough votes to go in. Time to upload? It would be great :-). Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Proposal: Remove autotool-generated files from setup CVS
Napísané dňa 2003.03.06 13:08, (autor: Max Bowsher): > Marcel Telka wrote: > > Napísané dňa 2003.03.05 22:36, (autor: Max Bowsher): > >> Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:10:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >>>> On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 07:05, Max Bowsher wrote: > >>>>> I propose removing autotool-generated files from setup CVS. > >>>> > >>>> I am ok with this. I'm not going to participate in a flamefest > like > >>>> that occuring when I introduced libgetopt++ w/o generated files. > >>> > >>> I don't have any objections as long as there is an easy way to > >>> regenerate the files. > >> > >> There is already a bootstrap.sh script which does this. > >> > >> Robert: Does the order of invocation of automake and autoconf > matter? > > > > $0.02: > > What about one `autoreconf` call instead of twiddling with > > autoconf/automake/autoheader/auto... call order? > > I don't know. I'm new to the autotools. I've heard it said that > autoreconf > used to be unreliable. It seems ok to me, except for one *big* flaw: > There > is no way to tell it not to recurse, and we do *not* want to > autoreconf all > the subdirectories. Yes. It recurses to AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS directories automatically. If you do not want to descend to libgetopt++, then autoreconf is unusable for you. IMHO this is not a good idea (no flame please). I'm not watching whole thread about libgetopt++ bootstrapping... If the decision is no, then no :-). Have a nice day. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Proposal: Remove autotool-generated files from setup CVS
Napísané dňa 2003.03.05 22:36, (autor: Max Bowsher): > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:10:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >> On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 07:05, Max Bowsher wrote: > >>> I propose removing autotool-generated files from setup CVS. > >> > >> I am ok with this. I'm not going to participate in a flamefest like > >> that occuring when I introduced libgetopt++ w/o generated files. > > > > I don't have any objections as long as there is an easy way to > > regenerate the files. > > There is already a bootstrap.sh script which does this. > > Robert: Does the order of invocation of automake and autoconf matter? $0.02: What about one `autoreconf` call instead of twiddling with autoconf/automake/autoheader/auto... call order? Regards. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Pending packages status
Napísané dňa 2003.02.20 16:12, (autor: Nicholas Wourms): > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Napísané dňa 2003.02.20 11:32, (autor: Pavel Tsekov): > > > >>1. grace > >>2. nfs-server > >>3. LPRng > >>4. ifhp > >>5. TCM > >>6. par > >>7. pdksh > > > > > > There are missing my DocBook XML packages :-(. > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00148.html > > > > Not that I object, but as someone who is well aware of the > frustration that sgml/xml processing systems cause on linux, > shouldn't we have a complete roadmap for the potential > cygwin system before we start checking in stylesheet Why this roadmap is required? I don't understand... We need working DocBook XML toolchain on cygwin (or at least I need :-). So I started packaging some software which are required to satisfy my needs. > packages? I don't know of anyone who wouldn't agree that > getting a working docbook system is a royal PITA. Are we > going to have some sort of style-sheet management > infrastructure at some point? Although I realize that xmlto xmlto is used in RH Linux too. I've no experience with jade and I'm unable to see any relation between xmlto and jade... > is stand-alone from jade, I think we should plan for a fully > working docbook rendering system at some point. I really > don't have a good solution for this, but I feel it was at > least worth noting the possible complications that may arise > in the future from an improperly planned stylesheet > installation. We should decide now on the type of layout > that we want and what sort of management infrastructure we > are going to use (RedHat, Mandrake, Suse, Debian, or our > own?). You know, an ounce of prevention... My infrastructure is inspired by RH Linux. Any suggestions to improve this infrastructure are welcome. Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Pending packages status
Napísané dňa 2003.02.20 11:32, (autor: Pavel Tsekov): > 1. grace > 2. nfs-server > 3. LPRng > 4. ifhp > 5. TCM > 6. par > 7. pdksh There are missing my DocBook XML packages :-(. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00148.html Regards. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
please upload: ioperm-0.4-1
Hi. New ioperm files are available: http://telka.sk/ioperm/setup.hint http://telka.sk/ioperm/ioperm-0.4-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/ioperm/ioperm-0.4-1.tar.bz2 Please upload. Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
proposal: DocBook XML packages
Hi. I've created some packages which are useful for working with DocBook XML. The collection contains three separate packages: docbook-xml42 (DocBook XML DTD 4.2) docbook-xsl (XSL stylesheets for the DocBook XML DTD) xmlto (front-end to the DocBook XML toolchain) The packages are available for evaluation, testing, feedback, voting,comments, ... here: http://telka.sk/docbook/ (add this address as yor new mirror to setup.exe) - + docbook-xml42 + - http://telka.sk/docbook/xml42/docbook-xml42-4.2-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/docbook/xml42/docbook-xml42-4.2-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/docbook/xml42/setup.hint sdesc: "DocBook XML DTD 4.2" category: Doc Text requires: libxml2 --- + docbook-xsl + --- http://telka.sk/docbook/xsl/docbook-xsl-1.60.1-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/docbook/xsl/docbook-xsl-1.60.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/docbook/xsl/setup.hint sdesc: "XSL stylesheets for the DocBook XML DTD" category: Doc Text requires: libxml2 - + xmlto + - http://telka.sk/docbook/xmlto/xmlto-0.0.12-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/docbook/xmlto/xmlto-0.0.12-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/docbook/xmlto/setup.hint sdesc: "front-end to the DocBook XML toolchain" category: Doc Text requires: cygwin bash libxslt docbook-xsl Enjoy! -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: ioperm: ok to upload ?
Napísané dňa 2003.02.06 19:24, (autor: Pavel Tsekov): On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:20:33AM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > >Hello, > > > >Does anyone have any objections ? > > > > Nope. Ok, I have uploaded it. I haven't removed the 'test' directive from the setup.hint file. Marcel, please send an announcement in a couple of hours. Thanks! :) Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: ioperm proposal: Updated packages (final 0.3 released)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:09:00PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > Marcel Telka wrote: > > I've released final 0.3 version of the ioperm today. > > > > Here are updated (proposed) files: > > http://telka.sk/ioperm/ioperm-0.3-1-src.tar.bz2 > > http://telka.sk/ioperm/ioperm-0.3-1.tar.bz2 > > http://telka.sk/ioperm/setup.hint > > > > setup.ini (for testing with setup.exe) is here: > > http://telka.sk/ioperm/setup.ini > > Packaging looks good. > > Can't comment on functionality, since I don't have any software that would > use ioperm. There is a spkrtest program (in test directory in source package). It's not included in the binary package. Simply unpack ioperm sources and build spkrtest by hand. Thank you. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
ioperm proposal: Updated packages (final 0.3 released)
Hi. I've released final 0.3 version of the ioperm today. Here are updated (proposed) files: http://telka.sk/ioperm/ioperm-0.3-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/ioperm/ioperm-0.3-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/ioperm/setup.hint setup.ini (for testing with setup.exe) is here: http://telka.sk/ioperm/setup.ini Regards. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: proposal: ioperm support for cygwin
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:20:15PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:08:53AM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > > > >Nap??san?? d??a 2003.01.24 14:54, (autor: Nicholas Wourms): > >> > >>I don't think this has come up before, but is there any reason why > >>this couldn't be added to the Cygwin dll [either now or at some later > > > >It depends on cygwin1.dll maintainer. :-) > > When I suggested that you make this a cygwin package, I really did > intend that it should be a cygwin package and not some more code in the > cygwin dll. > > If there is a hue and cry about how difficult it is to use because it > requires separate installation and a separate library then possibly > it would make sense to include this in cygwin. Until then, let's stick > with the separate library. Ok. I agree. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: proposal: ioperm support for Cygwin
Napísané dňa 2003.01.24 14:54, (autor: Nicholas Wourms): I don't think this has come up before, but is there any reason why this couldn't be added to the Cygwin dll [either now or at some later It depends on cygwin1.dll maintainer. :-) date]? The framework appears to be somewhat similar to how we are going about implimenting SysV IPC's. The only issue might be how to deal with the driver [arguably a very touchy subject]. I would argue that our touching the registry alone is much worse then installing a system driver. As long as it is not orphaned, it shouldn't be a big deal. In any event, the interface could be purely optional in the same way that cygserver will be. One could possibly even break the driver and binary out into a seperate package. Any thoughts? The only reason I bring this up is the fact that ioperm() is a part of linux's glibc, so most applications which would use it expect it to This is a solution (it's not ideal, but works :-): AC_SEARCH_LIBS([ioperm], [ioperm]) be available via the system's libc. In any event, it just seems it might be easier to do it this way. However, this, of course, depends on the wishes of the author concerning licensing agreements. Just a thought, though... Only library/ioperm.c file is one which should be included in main cygwin1.dll. If there is a problem with license I could change the license of this file to BSD-like (if this helps). Other two files (include/sys/io.h and include/sys/perm.h) in ioperm package required to include in cygwin dll distribution are copied from glibc sources... Regards. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: proposal: ioperm support for Cygwin
Napísané d??a 2003.01.23 13:44, (autor: Max Bowsher): Marcel Telka wrote: > No patch is required. Is empty patch file a problem? It's potentially confusing. I see you have the build script running echo "patch -p0 < patchfile". I.e. - echoing a command that it does not run. Fixed. That's also confusing. Simply don't include a patchfile. Removed empty patch file. > There is probably missing ioperm.sys in /usr/bin directory. Full > installation is required. Either using `make install` or by full > unpacking of the ioperm-0.3-1.tar.bz2 package in /. At this stage, it is best to start using Cygwin setup to test installation. Created setup.ini file. Current URL for Cygwin setup is http://telka.sk/ioperm/2003-01-23.1/ Also, it would be nice to add a preremove script that runs ioperm -u before Added. the package is removed. To support this better, it would also be nice for ioperm -u to distinguish between 'Uninstallation failed' and 'ioperm was not installed'. Fixed. Thank you, Max! New reincarnation of the ioperm proposal is at: http://telka.sk/ioperm/2003-01-23.1/ioperm-0.3-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/ioperm/2003-01-23.1/ioperm-0.3-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/ioperm/2003-01-23.1/setup.hint URL for Cygwin setup: http://telka.sk/ioperm/2003-01-23.1/ = # $Id: setup.hint,v 1.3 2003/01/23 08:46:19 telka Exp $ sdesc: "ioperm support for Cygwin" ldesc: "This package adds support for ioperm()/iopl() functions to Cygwin. This support includes sys/io.h and sys/perm.h header files together with development and runtime libraries." category: Devel Libs System requires: cygwin libpopt0 test: 0.3-1 ========= -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: proposal: ioperm support for Cygwin
Napísané d??a 2003.01.22 21:27, (autor: "Robb, Sam"): Marcel, - In the source package, ioperm-0.3-1.patch is an empty file. No patch is required. Is empty patch file a problem? - Trying to install using ioperm.exe, I get: $ ./ioperm -i -v Installing ioperm.sys... OpenSCManager ok CreateService ok StartServicefailed Installation ok. There is probably missing ioperm.sys in /usr/bin directory. Full installation is required. Either using `make install` or by full unpacking of the ioperm-0.3-1.tar.bz2 package in /. - Trying to build, I get an error while building in tests: i686-pc-cygwin-gcc -O2 -g -Wall -o spkrtest.exe spkrtest.o -L/tmp/src/ioperm-0.3/library -lioperm /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.2/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld: cannot find -lioperm collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [spkrtest.exe] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/src/ioperm-0.3/.build/tests' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Thanks. This error is fixed now. The updated files are available from: http://telka.sk/ioperm/2003-01-23/ioperm-0.3-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/ioperm/2003-01-23/ioperm-0.3-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/ioperm/2003-01-23/setup.hint === # $Id: setup.hint,v 1.3 2003/01/23 08:46:19 telka Exp $ sdesc: "ioperm support for Cygwin" ldesc: "This package adds support for ioperm()/iopl() functions to Cygwin. This support includes sys/io.h and sys/perm.h header files together with development and runtime libraries." category: Devel Libs System requires: cygwin libpopt0 test: 0.3-1 === Regards. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: proposal: ioperm support for cygwin
Napísané d??a 2003.01.22 23:26, (autor: Christopher Faylor): On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 07:10:24PM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: >=== ># $Id: setup.hint,v 1.2 2003/01/22 17:48:06 telka Exp $ > >sdesc: "ioperm support for Cygwin" >ldesc: "This package adds support for ioperm()/iopl() functions to Cygwin. >This support includes sys/io.h and sys/perm.h header files together >with development and runtime libraries." >category: Base Devel Libs System >requires: cygwin libpopt0 >test: 0.3-1 >=== This doesn't belong in Base. Please remove that part from the category. Removed. Thanks. Please see updated package proposal. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
proposal: ioperm support for Cygwin
Hi. I've created ioperm packages from upcoming 0.3 release of the ioperm support for Cygwin. Note: ioperm-0.3 is not yet officialy released. These packages are only pre-release, but no significant changes are expected in the release. The files are available from: http://telka.sk/ioperm/2003-01-22/ioperm-0.3-1-src.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/ioperm/2003-01-22/ioperm-0.3-1.tar.bz2 http://telka.sk/ioperm/2003-01-22/setup.hint Here is setup.hint file: === # $Id: setup.hint,v 1.2 2003/01/22 17:48:06 telka Exp $ sdesc: "ioperm support for Cygwin" ldesc: "This package adds support for ioperm()/iopl() functions to Cygwin. This support includes sys/io.h and sys/perm.h header files together with development and runtime libraries." category: Base Devel Libs System requires: cygwin libpopt0 test: 0.3-1 === Thank you for your comments. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Invalid setup.hint file for bash
Hi. The sdesc and ldesc fields are both mandatory as stated at http://cygwin.com/setup.html, but bash/setup.hint file violates this rule. :-) -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Announce: ioperm-0.2.1 for cygwin released
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:05:43AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:57:35PM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote: > >This software adds support for ioperm() function to Cygwin. This support > >includes sys/io.h and sys/perm.h header files (not included in Cygwin by > >default) together with development and runtime libraries. > > > >News in this release: > > * Windows DDK is optional for compilation now > > * --prefix=/usr parameter for ./configure script is not mandatory now > > > >Homepage: http://openwince.sourceforge.net/ioperm/ > > Is there some reason you're not proposing this as a standard cygwin package? There are at least two reasons: 1. A device driver (ioperm.sys) is required for running ioperm with NT/2000/XP 2. Windows DDK is required for the driver compilation. If these drawbacks are acceptable for a standard cygwin package I could start ioperm integration with mainstream cygwin net distribution. Any votes? :-) CC'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have a nice day -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Typo in generic-readme
Hi. # cat CVS/Root :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps # cat CVS/Repository packaging/templates # grep -n diito generic-readme 19: ftp://... it should be "ditto" IMHO. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Setup.exe: misbehaviour with non-standard DPI (aka no scroll bar)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 02:12:46PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > >> Comparison point: Mozilla 1.2.1's configuration dialogs exhibit this > >> too. > > Marcel Telka wrote: > > No problem with "Preferences" dialog box in Mozilla 1.2.1 here. > > > My friend tested setup.exe with XP at 144 DPI and he is able > > to reproduce tis bug (WinXP w/o SP1 and w/o any updates). > > "Tablet PC Edition" seems to be the remaining difference. > It vaguely makes sense that certain GUI systems might have been overhauled > for the Tablet PC Edition. > > Could we compare md5sums and versions of comctl32.dll ? > > Mine (XP Pro SP1): > md5sum: 0b5d337119929505ee72d4e4a41ed1fd */c/WINDOWS/system32/comctl32.dll > File Version (top of properties page): 5.82.2800.1106 > File Version (listbox at bottom): 5.82 (xpsp1.020828-1920) > Product Version (listbox): 6.00.2800.1106 Mine: 0b5d337119929505ee72d4e4a41ed1fd *comctl32.dll $ ls -l comctl32.dll -rwxr-xr-x1 marcel None 557056 Aug 29 13:00 comctl32.dll Version numbers are same. The files are identical... Hm -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Setup.exe: misbehaviour with non-standard DPI (aka no scroll bar)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:17:11PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > Marcel Telka wrote: > >>> Hm. Tested with 144 dpi: no problem. > >>> > >>> Notes: My XP installation is fresh (only two days old) with all > >>> relevant updates (from windowsupdate) installed. Installation was > >>> made from CD marked: "Windows XP Tablet PC Edition, Disc 1" (MSDN > >>> Disc 1847). No, my PC is not > >>> a Tablet PC :-). This installation CD comes with the SP1 built in > >>> and > >>> it looks like a standard XP (and it is a XP Professional Edition > >>> :-). > >> > >> How odd. On my PC, the package chooser and the view name (where is > >> says Category/Full/Partial) are clipped off at the right hand side > >> of the window. > >> I'm running Windows XP, with slipstreamed SP1, and all > >> WindowsUpdates. Maybe they fixed something in the Tablet PC edition. > > > > Strange. Is here someone else who is able to reproduce this buggy > > behaviour? > > There has been a trickle of bug reports for as long as I remember, but I > don't know if any of those people are on this list. Hm. > > Comparison point: Mozilla 1.2.1's configuration dialogs exhibit this too. No problem with "Preferences" dialog box in Mozilla 1.2.1 here. Here is System information string from "System Properties" dialog box: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Version 2002 Service Pack 1 Here is a complete list of my installed WinXP hotfixes: Q329048 Q329115 Q329390 Q329834 Q322011 Q327979 Q328310 Q810565 Updates for IE6: SP1; Q324929 I'm confused: I remember that immediately after XP installation I had problems with dialog boxes in Exodus (a Jabber client) - with 120 DPI. Now I'm using 103 DPI and Exodus looks ok. My friend tested setup.exe with XP at 144 DPI and he is able to reproduce tis bug (WinXP w/o SP1 and w/o any updates). -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Setup.exe: misbehaviour with non-standard DPI (aka no scroll bar)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:58:56PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > Marcel Telka wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:33:49PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > >> Marcel Telka wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:36:06AM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: > >>>> Marcel Telka wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:18:36AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > >>>>>> I've been having a look at this, and am rather puzzled. I'm > >>>>>> beginning to suspect that this might be a bug in MS's dialog > >>>>>> routines... after all, all sizes in setup are specified in dialog > >>>>>> units, yet somehow they come out mangled at high DPI. > >>>>> > > > > Hm. Tested with 144 dpi: no problem. > > > > Notes: My XP installation is fresh (only two days old) with all > > relevant updates (from windowsupdate) installed. Installation was > > made from CD marked: "Windows XP Tablet PC Edition, Disc 1" (MSDN > > Disc 1847). No, my PC is not > > a Tablet PC :-). This installation CD comes with the SP1 built in and > > it looks like a standard XP (and it is a XP Professional Edition :-). > > How odd. On my PC, the package chooser and the view name (where is says > Category/Full/Partial) are clipped off at the right hand side of the window. Strange. Is here someone else who is able to reproduce this buggy behaviour? > I'm running Windows XP, with slipstreamed SP1, and all WindowsUpdates. Maybe > they fixed something in the Tablet PC edition. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Setup.exe: misbehaviour with non-standard DPI (aka no scroll bar)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:33:49PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > Marcel Telka wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:36:06AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > >> Marcel Telka wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:18:36AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > >>>> I've been having a look at this, and am rather puzzled. I'm > >>>> beginning to suspect that this might be a bug in MS's dialog > >>>> routines... after all, all sizes in setup are specified in dialog > >>>> units, yet somehow they come out mangled at high DPI. > >>> > >>> I'm using setup 2.249.2.5 with non-standard DPI (120) on my > >>> WinXP+SP1 > >>> box and I unable to see any problems with scroll bars... > >> > >> I should have explained better. Both the "Normal (96DPI)" and "Large > >> (120DPI)" settings work OK. However, try "Custom" with, sat, 144DPI, > >> and setup is all stretched out of proportion and unusable. > > > > I'm now running with 103 DPI and all works ok. > > > >> > >> I've now done a bit more research, and I'm convinced that this is a > >> bug in Microsofts Dialog and/or PropertySheet implementation. Which > >> leaves us a bit stuck - since there is no easy fix that I can think > >> of. > > > > This bug looks fixed in WinXP+SP1. > > No, I'm running that as well. I can definitely reproduce this at 144DPI. Hm. Tested with 144 dpi: no problem. Notes: My XP installation is fresh (only two days old) with all relevant updates (from windowsupdate) installed. Installation was made from CD marked: "Windows XP Tablet PC Edition, Disc 1" (MSDN Disc 1847). No, my PC is not a Tablet PC :-). This installation CD comes with the SP1 built in and it looks like a standard XP (and it is a XP Professional Edition :-). -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Setup.exe: misbehaviour with non-standard DPI (aka no scroll bar)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:36:06AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > Marcel Telka wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:18:36AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > >> I've been having a look at this, and am rather puzzled. I'm > >> beginning to suspect that this might be a bug in MS's dialog > >> routines... after all, all sizes in setup are specified in dialog > >> units, yet somehow they come out mangled at high DPI. > > > > I'm using setup 2.249.2.5 with non-standard DPI (120) on my WinXP+SP1 > > box and I unable to see any problems with scroll bars... > > I should have explained better. Both the "Normal (96DPI)" and "Large > (120DPI)" settings work OK. However, try "Custom" with, sat, 144DPI, and > setup is all stretched out of proportion and unusable. I'm now running with 103 DPI and all works ok. > > I've now done a bit more research, and I'm convinced that this is a bug in > Microsofts Dialog and/or PropertySheet implementation. Which leaves us a bit > stuck - since there is no easy fix that I can think of. This bug looks fixed in WinXP+SP1. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: Setup.exe: misbehaviour with non-standard DPI (aka no scroll bar)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:18:36AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > I've been having a look at this, and am rather puzzled. I'm beginning to > suspect that this might be a bug in MS's dialog routines... after all, all > sizes in setup are specified in dialog units, yet somehow they come out > mangled at high DPI. I'm using setup 2.249.2.5 with non-standard DPI (120) on my WinXP+SP1 box and I unable to see any problems with scroll bars... Which scroll bar is not visible? Regards. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: [Patch] Whitespace tidyup in setup/README
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:04:31PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: > This is purely a tidy-up of the currently somewhat haphazard indentation. OK > to apply? Do I bother with changelog for whitespace changes to a > documentation file? Cite from http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_43.html#SEC43 : There's no need to make change log entries for documentation files. This is because documentation is not susceptible to bugs that are hard to fix. Documentation does not consist of parts that must interact in a precisely engineered fashion. To correct an error, you need not know the history of the erroneous passage; it is enough to compare what the documentation says with the way the program actually works. Regards. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: setup now ready for a release?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:01:52AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:58, Marcel Telka wrote: > > > > > Sorry, but your commit is different from my patch and probably will break > > FTP support in setup.exe. > > > > Your: > > - sscanf (paren + 1, "%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d", &i1, &i2, &i3, &i4, &p1, &p2); > > + sscanf (digit + 1, "%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d", &i1, &i2, &i3, &i4, &p1, &p2); > > > > My: > > - sscanf (paren + 1, "%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d", &i1, &i2, &i3, &i4, &p1, &p2); > > + sscanf (digit, "%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d", &i1, &i2, &i3, &i4, &p1, &p2); > > > > > > Please fix it before setup release. Thanks. > > Urggle, yes, of course. Thank you. Now it looks ok. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: setup now ready for a release?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:50:22AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 08:34, Marcel Telka wrote: > > > Please add my FTP related patch. Thanks. > > Done, and thanks. Sorry, but your commit is different from my patch and probably will break FTP support in setup.exe. Your: - sscanf (paren + 1, "%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d", &i1, &i2, &i3, &i4, &p1, &p2); + sscanf (digit + 1, "%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d", &i1, &i2, &i3, &i4, &p1, &p2); My: - sscanf (paren + 1, "%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d", &i1, &i2, &i3, &i4, &p1, &p2); + sscanf (digit, "%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d", &i1, &i2, &i3, &i4, &p1, &p2); Please fix it before setup release. Thanks. -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: setup now ready for a release?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:19:02AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > I've fixed the sort bug and uploaded a snapshot. Max, what letter is > free for the antivirus to use as a shortcut? > > Other than that, does anyone (Pavel? Gary? Max? ...) have any specific > enhancements or bugfixes to be included. If not, once that letter is Please add my FTP related patch. Thanks. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-07/msg00190.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-07/msg00203.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-07/msg00317.html Have a nice day. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
Re: [PATCH] setup.exe - problem with FTP
ping
Napísané dňa 2002.07.10 09:10, (autor: Robert Collins):
This will go in but not immediately, I've a couple of pending things
in my
sandbox to sort out first.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: "Marcel Telka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] setup.exe - problem with FTP
>
> Napísané dňa 08.07.2002 15:27:30 +0200, (autor: Marcel Telka):
> > Hi.
> >
> > I've found little problem in the cygwin setup program:
> >
> > There is no possibility to download files from some FTP servers
(like
> > djb's publicfile ftpd http://cr.yp.to/publicfile/ftpd.html)
because
> > the setup scans for '(' in a PASV FTP reply (code 227).
> >
> > djb's ftpd uses this format for a PASV reply:
> >
> > 227 =h1,h2,h3,h4,p1,p2
> >
> >
> > RFC 1123 (in section 4.1.2.6) says:
> >
> >
> > The format of the 227 reply to a PASV command is not well
standardized.
> > In particular, an FTP client cannot assume that the parentheses
shown
> > on page 40 of RFC-959 will be present (and in fact, Figure 3 on
page 43
> > omits them). Therefore, a User-FTP program that interprets the
PASV
reply
> > must scan the reply for the first digit of the host and port
numbers.
> >
> >
> > I've considered this as a bug in the setup and created patch for
> > nio-ftp.cc
> > file (see attachment). Please apply this patch to the CVS tree.
Thanks.
>
> Please.
>
> --
> +---+
> | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> |homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
> |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> +---+
>
--
+---+
| Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
|jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+---+
Re: [PATCH] setup.exe - problem with FTP
Napísané dňa 08.07.2002 15:27:30 +0200, (autor: Marcel Telka):
> Hi.
>
> I've found little problem in the cygwin setup program:
>
> There is no possibility to download files from some FTP servers (like
> djb's publicfile ftpd http://cr.yp.to/publicfile/ftpd.html) because
> the setup scans for '(' in a PASV FTP reply (code 227).
>
> djb's ftpd uses this format for a PASV reply:
>
> 227 =h1,h2,h3,h4,p1,p2
>
>
> RFC 1123 (in section 4.1.2.6) says:
>
>
> The format of the 227 reply to a PASV command is not well standardized.
> In particular, an FTP client cannot assume that the parentheses shown
> on page 40 of RFC-959 will be present (and in fact, Figure 3 on page 43
> omits them). Therefore, a User-FTP program that interprets the PASV reply
> must scan the reply for the first digit of the host and port numbers.
>
>
> I've considered this as a bug in the setup and created patch for
> nio-ftp.cc
> file (see attachment). Please apply this patch to the CVS tree. Thanks.
Please.
--
+---+
| Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
|jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+---+
Re: [PATCH] setup.exe - problem with FTP
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:27:30PM +0200, Marcel Telka wrote: > ChangeLog entry: > > > 2002-07-08 Marcel Telka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * nio_ftp.cc (NetIO_FTP::NetIO_FTP): Fixed decoding of the FTP reply (code 227) ^ Aaargh. Here | should be '-' instead of '_'. Sorry. > to the PASV command. -- +-------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
[PATCH] setup.exe - problem with FTP
Hi.
I've found little problem in the cygwin setup program:
There is no possibility to download files from some FTP servers (like
djb's publicfile ftpd http://cr.yp.to/publicfile/ftpd.html) because
the setup scans for '(' in a PASV FTP reply (code 227).
djb's ftpd uses this format for a PASV reply:
227 =h1,h2,h3,h4,p1,p2
RFC 1123 (in section 4.1.2.6) says:
The format of the 227 reply to a PASV command is not well standardized.
In particular, an FTP client cannot assume that the parentheses shown
on page 40 of RFC-959 will be present (and in fact, Figure 3 on page 43
omits them). Therefore, a User-FTP program that interprets the PASV reply
must scan the reply for the first digit of the host and port numbers.
I've considered this as a bug in the setup and created patch for nio-ftp.cc
file (see attachment). Please apply this patch to the CVS tree. Thanks.
ChangeLog entry:
====
2002-07-08 Marcel Telka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* nio_ftp.cc (NetIO_FTP::NetIO_FTP): Fixed decoding of the FTP reply (code 227)
to the PASV command.
Regards.
--
+-------+
| Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
|jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+---+
diff -urNp setup-0.orig/nio-ftp.cc setup-0/nio-ftp.cc
--- setup-0.orig/nio-ftp.cc 2002-02-18 14:53:06.0 +0100
+++ setup-0/nio-ftp.cc 2002-06-12 19:56:01.0 +0200
@@ -125,13 +125,13 @@ NetIO_FTP::NetIO_FTP (char const *Purl,
return;
char *
-paren = strchr (last_line, '(');
- if (!paren)
+digit = strpbrk (last_line + 3, "0123456789");
+ if (!digit)
return;
int
i1, i2, i3, i4, p1, p2;
- sscanf (paren + 1, "%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d", &i1, &i2, &i3, &i4, &p1, &p2);
+ sscanf (digit, "%d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d", &i1, &i2, &i3, &i4, &p1, &p2);
char
tmp[20];
sprintf (tmp, "%d.%d.%d.%d", i1, i2, i3, i4);
Re: CVSWeb interface to installer sources ?
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:33:29AM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > Is this possible ? Or maybe its already available, but I can't find > the proper link ? http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/setup/?cvsroot=cygwin-apps -- +---+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |homepage: http://telka.sk/ | |jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---+
