Update: lftp 2.6.10-2
I have updated the lftp package to 2.6.10-2. Please upload at your earliest convenience. [CHANGEME: A partial list of what was wrong with the earlier submission.] lftp-2.6.10-2 is available from: BIN http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-2.tar.bz2 SRC http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-2-src.tar.bz2 HINT http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/setup.hint MD5SUM d5c9a94cadf3944bf5253ed027563d9b *lftp-2.6.6-2-src.tar.bz2 42cb1a647fae2dfc1d001ad7f18a62ec *lftp-2.6.6-2.tar.bz2 Thanks.
Re: Update: lftp 2.6.10-2
Sorry, I forgot to review that message before I hit send. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have updated the lftp package to 2.6.10-2. Please upload at your earliest convenience. [CHANGEME: A partial list of what was wrong with the earlier submission.] Previous submission wasn't compiled with SSL support. lftp-2.6.10-2 is available from: BIN http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-2.tar.bz2 SRC http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-2-src.tar.bz2 HINT http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/setup.hint MD5SUM d5c9a94cadf3944bf5253ed027563d9b *lftp-2.6.6-2-src.tar.bz2 42cb1a647fae2dfc1d001ad7f18a62ec *lftp-2.6.6-2.tar.bz2 Thanks. Thanks. Mark Blackburn
Re: Update: lftp 2.6.10-2
On 2004-02-27T22:50-, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ) I have updated the lftp package to 2.6.10-2. Please upload at your earliest ) convenience. ) http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-2.tar.bz2 ) http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-2-src.tar.bz2 ) HINT http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/setup.hint Uploaded, and I removed 2.6.10-1, leaving 2.6.8-3 as prev. -- Daniel Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://naim-users.org/nmlorg/ http://naim.n.ml.org/ I don't believe in making something user friendly just for the sake of being user friendly, though; if you're decreasing the users' available power, you're not really being all that friendly to them.
Update: lftp 2.6.10
I have updated the lftp package to the new vendor version 2.6.10. Please upload at your earliest convenience. lftp-2.6.10-1 is available from: BIN http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-1.tar.bz2 SRC http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-1-src.tar.bz2 HINT http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/setup.hint md5sums: 8cbc96a1a0935088cc47df6907e9e17b *lftp-2.6.10-1-src.tar.bz2 03ee084236db911187ee1212666e9ac3 *lftp-2.6.10-1.tar.bz2 2c657285185cd5ecb5801cc187040b12 *setup.hint Changes: -Update to newer upstream version (2.6.9) which contains a security fix. Thanks. Mark Blackburn
Re: Update: lftp 2.6.10
On 2003-12-15T14:59-0500, Mark Blackburn wrote: ) I have updated the lftp package to the new vendor version 2.6.10. Please ) upload at your earliest convenience. ... ) http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-1.tar.bz2 ) http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-1-src.tar.bz2 ) HINT http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/setup.hint Uploaded. Should I leave 2.6.9-1 as prev, or should 2.6.8-3 receive that honor since 2.6.9-1 is barely 24 hours old? I might recommend 2.6.8-3 as prev unless 2.6.9-1 included some critical fixes itself. -- Daniel Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://naim-users.org/nmlorg/ http://naim.n.ml.org/ There are people who do things and people who take the credit, and the trick is to be in the first group; there is a lot less competition. -- Dwight Morrow, American Diplomat
Re: Update: lftp 2.6.10
Daniel Reed wrote: On 2003-12-15T14:59-0500, Mark Blackburn wrote: ) I have updated the lftp package to the new vendor version 2.6.10. Please ) upload at your earliest convenience. ... ) http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-1.tar.bz2 ) http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-1-src.tar.bz2 ) HINT http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/setup.hint Uploaded. Should I leave 2.6.9-1 as prev, or should 2.6.8-3 receive that honor since 2.6.9-1 is barely 24 hours old? I might recommend 2.6.8-3 as prev unless 2.6.9-1 included some critical fixes itself. No 2.6.9-1 didn't include any critical fixes, 2.6.8-3 can be prev.
